Nutritional advice

Objectives:
There is an ongoing debate on the involvement of systemic copper (Cu) dysfunctions in Alzheimer's disease (AD) and clinical studies comparing Cu levels in serum, plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of AD patients with those of healthy controls have delivered non-univocal and often conflicting results. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Does blood level of copper increase in Alzheimer’s disease?

Study design:
This review article included 26 studies including a pooled total of 761 AD subjects and 664 controls for serum Cu studies, 205 AD subjects and 167 controls for plasma Cu and of 116 AD subjects and 129 controls for CSF Cu.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found Alzheimer's disease patients have higher levels of serum copper than healthy controls. Plasma data did not allow conclusions, due to their high heterogeneity, but the meta-analysis of the combined serum and plasma studies confirmed higher copper levels in Alzheimer's disease patients. 

The investigators found the analysis of CSF data revealed no difference between Alzheimer's disease patients and controls.

The investigators concluded Alzheimer's disease patients have higher levels of serum and plasma copper than healthy controls.

Original title:
Copper in Alzheimer's disease: a meta-analysis of serum, plasma, and cerebrospinal fluid studies by Bucossi S, Ventriglia M, […], Squitti R.

Link:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21187586

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on copper and dementia right here.

Objectives:
The aim of this review article was to assess the relation between the level of habitual potassium intake and the incidence of cardiovascular disease (CVD).

Study design:
This review article included 15 cohort studies involving a total of 247510 male and female participants, 7,066 strokes, 3,058 coronary heart disease (CHD) events and 2,497 total CVD events.
The weighted average follow-up time was 12.2 years (range 5 to 19 years).
There was significant heterogeneity among studies in terms of sample size, duration of observation, number of events and difference in dietary potassium intake between the groups being compared. This heterogeneity led to a reduced statistical power in detecting a possible association between dietary potassium and coronary heart disease and cardiovascular disease.

There was no evidence of publication bias by the Egger test.

Potassium intake was assessed by 24-h dietary recall (n = 2), food frequency questionnaire (n = 6) or 24-h urinary excretion (n = 3).

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found in a pooled analysis, a dietary intake of 1.64g (42 mmol) potassium per day was significantly associated with a 21% lower risk of stroke [RR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.68 to 0.90, p = 0.0007]. Significant means it can be said with a 95% confidence that a daily intake of 1.64g potassium really decreased the risk of having a stroke.

The investigators found a trend toward an inverse association between higher potassium intake (average weighted difference = 1.38g or 35.3 mmol/day) and risk of coronary heart disease [RR = 0.92, 95% CI = 0.81 to 1.04], which was not statistically significant [p = 0.18].
Not significant means it cannot be said with a 95% confidence that a daily intake of 1.38g potassium really decreased the risk of coronary heart disease with 8%. 

The investigators found a trend toward an inverse relationship between higher potassium intake (average weighted difference = 1.30g or 33.4 mmol/day) and cardiovascular disease risk [RR = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.62 to 1.16], which was not statistically significant [p = 0.31].

The investigators found a trend toward lower risk of CHD [RR = 0.93, 95% CI = 0.87 to 0.99, p = 0.03] and total CVD [RR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.60 to 0.91, p = 0.0037] that attained statistical significance after the exclusion of a single cohort, based on sensitivity analysis.

The results of meta-regression analyses indicated that potassium intake difference, length of follow-up, quality score, recruitment year and population potassium intake at baseline were not significant sources of heterogeneity in the relationship of the potassium intake effect on the risk of CHD.

The results of meta-regression analyses indicated that the length of follow-up (coefficient: -0.064, 95% CI = -0.112 to -0.015, p = 0.01) and quality score (coefficient: -0.165, 95% CI = -0.287 to -0.043, p = 0.01) were significant sources of heterogeneity.

The investigators concluded that 1.64g dietary potassium per day decreases the risk of having a stroke and might also reduce the risk of coronary heart disease and total cardiovascular disease. This result applies to the general population, not only to specific subgroups at higher risk.
The favorable effects of dietary potassium were documented at least to some extent independently of other factors.
The results of this meta-analysis support recommendations for higher consumption of potassium-rich foods to prevent vascular diseases.

Original title:
Potassium Intake, Stroke, and Cardiovascular Disease : A Meta-Analysis of Prospective Studies by D'Elia L, Barba G, [...], Strazzullo P.

Link:
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0735109710049764

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on potassium right here.
The protective effect of potassium against the risk of stroke may conceivably relate to its blood pressure lowering effect.

Objectives:
There is no published systematic review and meta-analysis regarding the effect of olive oil consumption on cancer occurrence. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Does olive oil consumption reduce cancer risk?

Study design:
This review article included 19 case-control studies (13800 cancer patients and 23340 controls).

Random effects meta-analysis was applied in order to evaluate the research hypothesis.
Heterogeneity of the effect-size measures was observed in studies performed in the Mediterranean region (n = 15, p = 0.0002), whereas no heterogeneity was observed in non-Mediterranean studies (n = 4, p = 0.12).

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found when comparing with the lowest, the highest category of olive oil consumption was significantly associated with lower odds of having any type of cancer [log odds ratio = -0.41, 95% CI = -0.53 to -0.29, Cohran's Q = 47.52, p = 0.0002, I2 = 62%].

The investigators found both Mediterranean and non-Mediterranean people reported olive oil intake were less likely to have developed any type of cancer.

The investigators found olive oil consumption was significantly associated with lower odds of developing breast cancer [logOR = -0.4,  95% CI = -0.78 to -0.12] and a cancer of the digestive system [logOR = -0.36, 95% CI = -0.50 to -0.21] compared with the lowest intake.

The investigators concluded olive oil consumption probably reduces risk of any type of cancer, especially breast cancer and cancer of the digestive system. Probably, because this review article only included case-control studies and there was heterogeneity.
The reduced risk is similar to studies performed in Mediterranean as well as non-Mediterranean countries. However, it is still unclear whether olive oil's monounsaturated fatty acid content or its antioxidant components are responsible for its beneficial effects.

Original title:
Olive oil intake is inversely related to cancer prevalence: a systematic review and a meta-analysis of 13800 patients and 23340 controls in 19 observational studies by Psaltopoulou T, Kosti RI, […], Panagiotakos DB.

Link:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3199852/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more studies on olive oil consumption and fat.