Nutrition and health

Objectives:
Systematic reviews of case-control studies evaluating the relationship between dietary salt intake and gastric cancer showed a positive association, however a quantitative analysis of longitudinal cohort studies is lacking. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Does a high salt intake increase gastric cancer risk?

Study design:
This review article contained 10 cohort studies with 268,718 participants, of which 1,474 gastric cancer events and a follow-up of 6-15 years.

Meta-regression analyses did not detect specific sources of heterogeneity.

There was no evidence of publication bias.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found for high vs low salt intake a significantly increased risk of 68% for gastric cancer [RR = 1.68, 95% CI = 1.17 to 2.41, p = 0.005].

The investigators found for moderate vs low salt intake a significant increased risk of 41% for gastric cancer [RR = 1.41, 95% CI = 1.03 to 1.93, p = 0.032].

The investigators found the association was stronger in the Japanese population and higher consumption of selected salt-rich foods was also associated with greater risk.

The investigators concluded high salt intake is directly associated with an increased risk of gastric cancer in prospective population studies, with progressively increasing risk across consumption levels.

Original title:
Habitual salt intake and risk of gastric cancer: A meta-analysis of prospective studies by D’Elia L, Rossi G, […], Strazzullo P.

Link:
http://www.clinicalnutritionjournal.com/article/S0261-5614%2812%2900005-2/abstract

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find here more studies/information on sodium/salt and  cancer right here.

According to WHO, a high salt intake is a salt intake of more than 5 grams salt per day.

A diet with more than 5 grams salt per day is a diet with mainly products/meals with more than 0.25 grams salt per 100 kcal. Check here which products contain maximum 5 grams salt per 100 kcal.
Use the 7-points nutritional profile app to see whether your daily diet contains maximum 5 grams salt per 100 kcal.
 

Objectives:
Is there a relationship between serum 25(OH)D (vitamin D blood level) and mortality risk in the general population?

Study design:
This review article included 14 prospective cohort studies that involved 5562 deaths out of 62548 individuals.
In the parametric model, which is based on 11 studies and 59231 individuals, the lowest quantile as the reference category has been used.

Evidence of heterogeneity for the RR was apparent when highest were compared with lowest categories [p = 0.008, I2 = 58%].

There was no evidence of publication bias.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found for “highest compared with lowest” categories of 25(OH)D, a significant reduced risk of 29% for mortality [RR = 0.71, 95% CI = 0.50-0.91].

The investigators found in the parametric model, the estimated summary RRs of mortality were 0.86 [95% CI = 0.82-0.91], 0.77 [95% CI = 0.70-0.84] and 0.69 [95% CI = 0.60-0.78] for individuals with an increase of 12.5, 25 and 50 nmol 25(OH)D serum values/L, respectively, from a median reference category of ∼27.5 nmol/L.
However, no significant decrease in mortality was found above ∼87.5 nmol/L.

The investigators concluded there is a nonlinear decrease in mortality risk as circulating 25(OH)D increases, with optimal concentrations ∼75-87.5 nmol/L. Because many adults do not achieve these 25(OH)D values, large prospective randomized trials are urgently needed to investigate whether vitamin D supplementation is able to reduce mortality risk in the general population.

Original title:
Vitamin D deficiency and mortality risk in the general population: a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies by Zittermann A, Iodice S, [...], Gandini S.

Link:
http://ajcn.nutrition.org/content/95/1/91.full

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on vitamin D right here. 

Objectives:
Does soy isoflavone reduce the frequency and severity of hot flashes?

Study design:
This review article included 19 trials (13 included hot flash frequency, of which 10 for severity and 3 for composite scores).
17 trials were selected for meta-analyses to clarify the effect of soybean isoflavones on hot flash frequency (13 trials) and severity (9 trials).

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found intake of soy isoflavones (median = 54 mg aglycone equivalents) for 6 weeks to 12 months significantly reduced the frequency (combined fixed-effect and random effects model) of hot flashes by 20.6% [95% CI = -28.38 to -12.86, p 0.00001] compared with placebo [p heterogeneity = 0.0003, I2 = 67% for random effects model].

The investigators also found isoflavones significantly reduced hot flash severity by 26.2% [95% CI = -42.23 to -10.15, p = 0.001] compared with placebo [p heterogeneity 0.00001, I2 = 86% for random effects model].

The investigators found isoflavone supplements providing more than 18.8 mg of genistein (the median for all studies) were more than twice as potent at reducing hot flash frequency than lower genistein supplements.

The investigators concluded soy isoflavone supplements (54 mg per day for 6 weeks to 12 months), derived by extraction or chemical synthesis, are significantly more effective than placebo in reducing the frequency and severity of hot flashes. Additional studies are needed to further address the complex array of factors that may affect efficacy, such as dose, isoflavone form, baseline hot flash frequency and treatment duration.

Original title:
Extracted or synthesized soybean isoflavones reduce menopausal hot flash frequency and severity: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials by Taku K, Melby MK, […], Messina M.

Link:
http://journals.lww.com/menopausejournal/Abstract/2012/07000/Extracted_or_synthesized_soybean_isoflavones.11.aspx

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more studies/information on elderly and isoflavones right here.
 

Objectives:
In view of the vital role of oxidative stress in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease (AD), the potential of antioxidant supplements to prevent AD have gained much interest, while there are conflicting results on this topic in recent years. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Does dietary intake of vitamin C and E and β-carotene decrease risk of Alzheimer's disease?

Study design:
This review article included 7 articles (dietary intake, but no supplements).

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found a significant decreased risk for Alzheimer disease of 24% [pooled relative risk = 0.76 95% CI = 0.67-0.84] for dietary intake of vitamin E and of 17% [pooled relative risk = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.72-0.94] for dietary intake of vitamin C.

However, the investigators found a non-significant decreased risk of 12% [pooled relative risk = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.73-1.03] for dietary intake of β-carotene.

The investigators concluded dietary intakes of vitamin C and E lower the risk of Alzheimer's disease, with vitamin E exhibiting the most pronounced protective effects. The findings will be of significance to the prevention and interventional treatment of Alzheimer's disease.

Original title:
Dietary intakes of vitamin E, vitamin C, and β-carotene and risk of Alzheimer's disease: a meta-analysis by Li FJ, Shen L and Ji HF.

Link:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22543848

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on vitamin C and E and carotenoids right here. 

Objectives:
Quantification of the association between the intake of fruit and vegetables and risk of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is controversial even though several studies have explored this association. Therefore, this review article (meta-analysis) has been conducted.

Does a high intake of vegetables and fruit decrease risk of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma?

Study design:
This review article included a total of 32 observational studies involving 10037 cases of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

There was no evidence of publication bias.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found highest vs. lowest vegetable intake, significantly reduced risk of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma with 44% [SRR = 0.56, 95% CI = 0.45-0.69, p-heterogeneity 0.001]. Significant means there is an association with a 95% confidence.

The investigators found highest vs. lowest fruit intake, significantly reduced risk of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma with 47% [SRR = 0.53, 95% CI = 0.44-0.64, p-heterogeneity 0.001].

The investigators found similar results in a linear dose-response analysis and there was evidence of non-linear associations for intakes of fruit [p non-linearity 0.001] and vegetables [p non-linearity = 0.041].

The investigators concluded that intakes of vegetables and fruit reduce risk of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Further investigation with prospective designs, validated questionnaires and good control of important confounders is warranted.

Original title:
Intake of fruit and vegetables and risk of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A meta-analysis of observational studies by Liu J, Wang J, […], Lv C.

Link:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23319052

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on review, 95% CI and heterogeneity, vegetables and fruits and cancer right here.