Nutrition and health

Objectives:
Does mushroom dietary intake reduce risk of cancer at any site?

Study design:
This review article included 11 case-control studies and 6 cohort studies.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found higher mushroom consumption significantly reduced total cancer with 34% [pooled RR for the highest compared with the lowest consumption groups = 0.66, 95% CI = 0.55 to 0.78, n = 17].

The investigators found higher mushroom consumption significantly reduced breast cancer with 35% [pooled RR for the highest compared with the lowest consumption groups = 0.65, 95% CI = 0.52 to 0.81, n = 10].

The investigators found higher mushroom consumption significantly reduced nonbreast cancer with 20% [pooled RR for the highest compared with the lowest consumption groups = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.66 to 0.97, n = 13].

The investigators found there was evidence of a significant nonlinear dose-response association between mushroom consumption and the risk of total cancer [p-nonlinearity = 0.001, n = 7].

The investigators concluded higher mushroom consumption reduces risk of cancer, particularly breast cancer.

Original title:
Higher Mushroom Consumption Is Associated with Lower Risk of Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies by Ba DM, Ssentongo P, […], Richie JP.

Link:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33724299/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on vegetables consumption and breast cancer right here.

Objectives:
Magnesium supplementation is often purported to improve sleep; however, as both an over-the-counter sleep aid and a complementary and alternative medicine, there is limited evidence to support this assertion. Therefore, this review article (meta-analysis) has been conducted.

Does magnesium supplementation improve sleep in older adults with insomnia?

Study design:
This review article included 3 randomized control trials (RCTs), comparing oral magnesium to placebo in 151 older adults in 3 countries.

All 3 RCTs were at moderate-to-high risk of bias and outcomes were supported by low to very low quality of evidence.

Daily elemental magnesium intake ranged from 320 mg to 729 mg taken 2 to 3 times per day using 2 formulations (magnesium oxide and magnesium citrate tablets).
Duration of follow-up for outcome assessment ranged from 20 days to 8 weeks.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found pooled analysis showed that post-intervention sleep onset latency time was significantly 17.36 min less [95% CI = -27.27 to -7.44, p = 0.0006] after magnesium supplementation compared to placebo.
Significantly because the calculated p-value of = 0.0006 was less than the p-value of 0.05.

The investigators found pooled analysis showed that total sleep time improved by 16.06 min in the magnesium supplementation group but was statistically insignificant [95% CI = - 5.99 to 38.12, p = 0.15].
Insignificant because the calculated p-value of 0.15 was larger than the p-value of 0.05.

The investigators concluded that RCT evidence may support oral magnesium supplements (less than 1 g quantities given up to 3 times a day) for insomnia symptoms in older adults. May support because all 3 RCTs are at moderate-to-high risk of bias and outcomes are supported by low to very low quality of evidence.

Original title:
Oral magnesium supplementation for insomnia in older adults: a Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis by Mah J and Pitre T.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8053283/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on magnesium consumption and elderly right here.

Magnesium oxide contains 60% elemental magnesium and magnesium citrate contains 16% elemental magnesium.
So if you want to get 320 mg elemental magnesium from magnesium supplements, you have to take 534 mg magnesium oxide supplements or 2000 mg magnesium citrate.

Objectives:
Controversial results of the association between green tea consumption and risk for esophageal cancer (EC) were reported by previous meta-analysis. Therefore, this review article (meta-analysis) has been conducted.

Does green tea consumption reduce esophageal cancer risk?

Study design:
This review article included 14 studies with a total of 5,057 esophageal cancer cases among 493,332 participants.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found in the dose-response analysis, no association for a 1 cup/d increase in green tea and esophageal cancer risk [the summary OR = 1.00, 95% CI = 0.95 to 1.04, I2 = 77%].

The investigators found no nonlinearity association was observed between tea consumption and risk for esophageal cancer [p = 0.71 for nonlinearity].

The investigators found in the subgroup analysis of sex, a significantly reduced risk of 21% for esophageal cancer among women for a 1 cup/d increase in green tea [summary OR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.68 to 0.91, I2 = 0%].
However, this reduced risk was not found for men [summary OR for a 1 cup/d increase in green tea = 1.03, 95% CI = 0.95 to 1.11, I2 = 67%].
Significant because OR of 1 was not found in the 95% CI of 0.68 to 0.91. OR of 1 means no risk/association.

The investigators concluded that a 1 cup/d increase in green tea consumption reduces esophageal cancer among women. Notably, these findings might be influenced by limited studies and potential bias, such as dose of green tea assessment and select bias of case-control studies. Further larger number, prospective and well-designed larger-scale studies are needed to provide more precise evidence, especially in women and more regions (United States and Europe).

Original title:
Green tea consumption and risk for esophageal cancer: A systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis by Zhao H, Mei K, […], Lixia Xie L.

Link:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33744644/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on green tea consumption and cancer right here.

Objectives:
Lifestyle interventions are an important and viable approach for preventing cognitive deficits. However, the results of studies on alcohol, coffee and tea consumption in relation to cognitive decline have been divergent, likely due to confounds from dose-response effects. Therefore, this review article (meta-analysis) has been conducted.

Does alcohol, coffee or tea consumption reduce the risk of cognitive deficits (such as dementia or Alzheimer's disease)?

Study design:
This review article included 29 prospective cohort studies from America, Japan, China and some European countries (131,777 participants for alcohol, 333,843 participants for coffee and 20,411 participants for tea).

The NOS score was 8.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found dose-response relationships showed that compared to non-drinkers, low consumption (11 g/day) of alcohol significantly reduced the risk of cognitive deficits or only dementias, but there was no significant effect of heavier drinking (>11 g/day).

The investigators found dose-response relationships showed that compared to non-drinkers, low consumption of coffee significantly reduced the risk of any cognitive deficit (2.8 cups/day) or dementia (2.3 cups/day).
However, coffee drinking was not a significant protective factor for cognitive deficits in groups of average age 60 years.

The investigators found dose-response relationships showed that compared to non-drinkers, every cup of green tea per day significantly reduced risk of cognitive deficits with 6% [relative risk = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.92 to 0.97].  

The investigators concluded that light consumption of alcohol (11 g/day) and coffee (2.8 cups/day) reduces risk of cognitive deficits. Cognitive benefits of green tea consumption increases with the daily consumption.

Original title:
Alcohol, coffee and tea intake and the risk of cognitive deficits: a dose-response meta-analysis by Ran LS, Liu WH, […], Wang W.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8061189/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on alcohol, coffee and tea consumption and dementia right here.

Objectives:
The etiology of cancer type may vary significantly due to anatomy, embryology and physiology of the cancer site. Although the association between potato consumption and colorectal cancer (CRC) was summarized in a 2018 meta-analysis of 5 cohort studies, however, no meta-analysis has evaluated potato consumption in relation to multiple cancer sites in adults. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Do potato intakes increase multiple cancer sites risk?

Study design:
This review article included 20 prospective cohort studies (with a total of 785,348 participants, of which 19,882 incident cases (persons with cancer)) and 36 case-control studies ( with a total of 21,822 cases (persons with cancer) and 66,502 controls (persons without cancer)).

Certainty of the evidence was low for total cancer, colorectal cancer, colon, rectal, renal, pancreatic, breast, prostate and lung cancer and very low for gastric and bladder cancer.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found among cohort studies, no association between high versus low intake of total potato (white and yellow) consumption and overall cancers [RR = 1.04, 95% CI = 0.96 to 1.11, tau2 = 0.005, n = 18].

The investigators found no relation between total potato consumption (high compared with low intake) and risk of colorectal, pancreatic, colon, gastric, breast, prostate, kidney, lung or bladder cancer in cohort or case-control studies.

The investigators found no association between high versus low consumption of potato preparations (boiled/fried/mashed/roasted/baked) and risk of gastrointestinal-, sex-hormone-, or urinary-related cancers in cohort or case-control studies.

The investigators concluded that potato intakes or potato preparations are not associated with multiple cancer sites when comparing high and low intake categories. This finding is consistent with the findings from the 2018 meta-analysis regarding potato intake and risk of colorectal cancer.

Original title:
Potato Consumption and Risk of Site-Specific Cancers in Adults: A Systematic Review and Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies by Mofrad MD, Mozaffari H, […], Azadbakht L.

Link:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33861304/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on potato consumption and cancer right here.

Objectives:
Do magnesium intakes reduce risk of all-cause, cancer and cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality?

Study design:
This review article included 19 prospective cohort studies with a total of 1,168,756 participants (52,378 deaths from all causes (all-cause mortality), 23,478 from cardiovascular disease (CVD) and 11,408 from cancer).
The follow-up period was 3.5 to 32 years.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found dietary magnesium intake was significantly associated with a lower risk of 13% for all-cause mortality [pooled effect size (ES) = 0.87, 95% CI = 0.79 to 0.97, p = 0.009, I2 = 70.7%, p 0.001].

The investigators found dietary magnesium intake was significantly associated with a lower risk of 20% for cancer mortality [pooled ES = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.67 to 0.97, p = 0.023, I2 = 55.7%, p = 0.027].

The investigators found for supplemental and total magnesium intakes, no significant associations with risks of all-cause, cardiovascular disease and cancer mortality.

The investigators found, however, linear dose-response meta-analysis indicated that each additional intake of 100 mg/d of dietary magnesium was significantly associated with a 6% and 5% reduced risk of all-cause and cancer mortality, respectively.

The investigators concluded that higher intake of dietary magnesium (at least 100 mg/d of dietary magnesium) is associated with a reduced risk of all-cause and cancer mortality, but not cardiovascular disease mortality. Supplemental and total magnesium intakes are not associated with the risk of all-cause, cardiovascular disease and cancer mortality. These findings indicate that consumption of magnesium from dietary sources may be beneficial in reducing all-cause and cancer mortality and thus have practical importance for public health.  

Original title:
Total, Dietary, and Supplemental Magnesium Intakes and Risk of All-Cause, Cardiovascular, and Cancer Mortality: A Systematic Review and Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies by Bagheri A, Naghshi S, […], Esmaillzadeh A.

Link:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33684200/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on magnesium consumption, cardiovascular disease and cancer right here.

Objectives:
Previous population studies on the associations between dietary fatty acids (FAs), plasma FAs levels and the risk of age-related macular degeneration (AMD) have yielded inconclusive results. Therefore, this review article (meta-analysis) has been conducted.

Do higher dietary fatty acids (EPA and DHA) intakes or higher plasma fatty acids levels reduce risk of age-related macular degeneration?

Study design:
This review article included 11 prospective cohort studies with 167,581 participants. During the follow-up periods (ranging from 3 to 28 years), 6,318 cases of age-related macular degeneration were recorded.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found that each 1 g/day increment of dietary intake of docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) and eicosatetraenoic acid (EPA) combined significantly reduced risk of early age-related macular degeneration with 33% [RR = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.51 to 0.88].
Significantly means that there is an association with a 95% confidence.

The investigators found that each 1 g/day increment of dietary intake of docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) significantly reduced risk of early age-related macular degeneration with 50% [RR = 0.50, 95% CI = 0.32 to 0.78].
Significantly means it can be said with a 95% confidence that each 1 g/day increment of dietary intake of docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) really reduces risk of early age-related macular degeneration with 50%.

The investigators found that each 1 g/day increment of dietary intake of eicosatetraenoic acid (EPA) significantly reduced risk of early age-related macular degeneration with 60% [RR = 0.40, 95% CI = 0.18 to 0.87].
Significantly because RR of 1 was not found in the 95% CI of 0.18 to 0.87. RR of 1 means no risk/association.

The investigators found that higher plasma docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) levels significantly reduced risk of advanced age-related macular degeneration with 28% [RR = 0.72, 95% CI = 0.55 to 0.95].

The investigators found that higher plasma eicosatetraenoic acid (EPA) levels significantly reduced risk of advanced age-related macular degeneration with 43% [RR = 0.57, 95% CI = 0.40 to 0.81].

The investigators concluded that 1 g/day of dietary intake DHA and 1 g/day of dietary intake EPA and higher plasma DHA and EPA levels are associated with a reduced risk of age-related macular degeneration.

Original title:
Dietary fatty acid intake, plasma fatty acid levels, and the risk of age-related macular degeneration (AMD): a dose-response meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies by Zhong Y, Wang K, [...], Yao K.

Link:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33469697/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on EPA en DHA and elderly right here.

A high plasma EPA and DHA content can be obtained by eating a lot of oily fish and/or by taking EPA and DHA supplements (fish oil supplements).
Oily fish contains more EPA and DHA than non-oily fish.

Early age-related macular degeneration: most people do not experience adverse symptoms or vision loss in the early stage of age-related macular degeneration, but night vision problems are often reported. Though no pigmentary abnormalities are apparent upon examination, medium-sized drusen (>63 μm and ≤125 μm) are present.

Objectives:
Previous studies on the association between alcohol intake and risk of fracture have reached conflicting findings. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Does alcohol consumption increase risk of fractures?

Study design:
This review article included 38 prospective cohort studies with a total sample size of 5,053,117 participants and 169,560 cases of fracture.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found in a random-effects meta-analysis, that alcohol consumption significantly increased risk of total fractures with 35% [RR = 1.35, 95% CI = 1.01 to 1.81] and any fractures with 24% [RR= 1.24, 95% CI = 1.11 to 1.38].
Significant because RR of 1 was not found in the 95% CI of 1.01 to 1.81. RR of 1 means no risk/association.

The investigators found, however, no significant association between alcohol intake and risk of hip fractures [RR = 1.19, 95% CI = 0.96 to 1.48], osteoporotic fractures [RR = 2.01, 95% CI = 0.76 to 5.34], vertebral fractures [RR = 0.98, 95% CI = 0.68 to 1.40] and wrist fractures [RR = 0.99, 95% CI = 0.85 to 1.16].
No significant because RR of 1 was found in the 95% CI of 0.85 to 1.06. RR of 1 means no risk/association.

The investigators concluded that alcohol consumption is positively associated with risk of total fractures and any fractures.

Original title:
A systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies on the association between alcohol intake and risk of fracture by Asoudeh F, Salari-Moghaddam A, […], Esmaillzadeh A.

Link:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33596741/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on alcohol and osteoporosis right here.
 

Objectives:
Recent evidence suggests that diet can modify the risk of future cognitive impairment and dementia. A biologically plausible rationale and initial clinical data indicate that the antioxidant activities of dietary carotenoids may assist the preservation of cognitive function. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Does carotenoid supplementation improve cognitive performance among healthy adults?

Study design:
This review article included 9 RCTs, involving 2,228 subjects in the treated group (group with carotenoid supplementation) and 2,174 subjects in control group (group without carotenoid supplementation).
The age of all participants varied from 45 to 78 years.
The majority of clinical trials assessed the effect of xanthophylls such as lutein, zeaxanthin, and astaxanthin, whereas only 1 study determined the effects of β-carotene.
The duration of carotenoid supplementation ranged from 2 weeks to 12 months.
The dosage of carotenoids administered in the studies ranged from 0.5 mg/d to 50 mg/d.
There was no evidence of publication bias.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found results of the pooled meta-analysis showed a significant effect of carotenoid intervention on cognitive outcomes [Hedge's g = 0.14, 95% CI = 0.08 to 0.20, p 0.0001, I2 = 0.00%].
The sensitivity analysis did not change the overall findings obtained from the primary analysis.

The investigators concluded that these results highlight the potential role of carotenoids (0.5 mg/d to 50 mg/d) in the protection of mental functions even in subjects (healthy participants aged 45-78 years) without cognitive impairment. This is particularly important because the population is aging and preservation of cognitive function is crucial for individual autonomy and quality of life, even in non-demented subjects. Further well-powered and long-term trials are required to determine treatment duration, type of carotenoid and optimal dosage.

Original title:
Carotenoids and Cognitive Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Intervention Trials by Davinelli S, Ali S, […], Corbi G.

Link:
https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3921/10/2/223/htm

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on carotenoids and dementia right here.
 

Objectives:
Does citrus dietary intake reduce the risk of lung cancer?

Study design:
This review article included 21 observational studies.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found pooled analyses showed that those with the highest citrus fruit dietary intake compared to the lowest intake had a 9% reduction in lung cancer risk [OR = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.84 to 0.98].

The investigators found a nonlinear association between citrus dietary intake and lung cancer risk in the dose-response analysis [p = 0.0054] and that the risk reached the minimum [OR = 0.91] around 60 g/d.
However, no obvious dose-response association was observed with intakes above 80 g/d.

The investigators concluded that citrus fruit dietary intake is negatively associated with the risk of lung cancer. Besides, there is a nonlinear dose-response relationship between citrus fruit dietary intake and lung cancer risk within a certain range (60-80g per day).

Original title:
Citrus fruit intake and lung cancer risk: A meta-analysis of observational studies by Wang J, Gao J, [...], Qian BY.

Link:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33529754/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on fruit consumption and cancer right here.

Citrus fruits include oranges, lemons, limes and grapefruits.

Objectives:
Increasing macular pigment optical density (MPOD) as a result of increased macular concentration of lutein and zeaxanthin may reduce the risk of age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Have daily egg consumption beneficial effects on macular pigment optical density and serum lutein levels?

Study design:
This review article included 5 RCTs with a total of 296 participants.
There was no heterogeneity between studies.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found that egg consumption significantly increased macular pigment optical density [WMD = +0.037, 95% CI = 0.004 to 0.069, p = 0.027] and serum lutein levels [WMD = +0.150 μmol/L, 95% CI = 0.037 to 0.263, p = 0.009].

The investigators found subgroup analyses showed that egg consumption had a larger effect on macular pigment optical density in studies with a parallel design and increased serum lutein levels to a greater extent in a healthy population.

The investigators concluded daily egg consumption have beneficial effects on macular pigment optical density and serum lutein level is inversely associated with reduced age-related macular degeneration progression. Further clinical trials are required to confirm the results of this review article.

Original title:
A positive effect of egg consumption on macular pigment and healthy vision: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials by Sikaroudi MK, Saraf-Bank S, […], Soltani S.

Link:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33491232/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find here more information/studies about review article/significant, egg consumption and elderly diseases.
 

Objetivos:
¿Aumenta un nivel bajo de selenio en los tejidos humanos el riesgo de cáncer de mama?

Diseño del estudio:
Este artículo de revisión incluyó 18 estudios de casos y controles con 3,374 mujeres diagnosticadas con cáncer de mama (grupo de casos) y 3,582 controles sanos (mujeres sin cáncer de mama).

Resultados y conclusiones:
Los investigadores encontraron que el nivel de selenio de grupo de casos (grupo con mujeres diagnosticadas con cáncer de mama) fue significativamente menor que grupo de control (grupo con mujeres sin cáncer de mama) [-0.53 μg/L, 95% IC = -0.72 a -0.34, p 0.001].

Los investigadores encontraron en el análisis de subgrupos que el nivel de selenio sérico de grupo de casos fue significativamente más bajo que grupo de control [-1.14 μg/L, 95% IC = -1.70 a -0.58, p 0.001].

Los investigadores encontraron en el análisis de subgrupos que el nivel de selenio en plasma de grupo de casos fue significativamente más bajo que grupo de control [-0.21 μg/L, 95% IC = -0.37 a -0.04, p 0.014].

Los investigadores encontraron en el análisis de subgrupos que el nivel de selenio de la uña del pie de grupo de casos fue significativamente más bajo que grupo de control [-0.21 μg/L, 95% IC = -0.38 a -0.03, p 0.021].

Los investigadores concluyeron que un nivel bajo de selenio en los tejidos humanos aumenta el riesgo de cáncer de mama, lo que puede mejorar la comprensión de los efectos del selenio en la salud humana.

Título original:
Relationship Between Selenium in Human Tissues and Breast Cancer: a Meta-analysis Based on Case-Control Studies by Zhu X, Pan D, […], Sun G.

Enlace:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33420696/

Información adicional de El Mondo:
Encontrar aquí más información/estudios sobre el consumon de selenio y el cáncer.

Objectives:
Does a low selenium level in human tissues increase the risk of breast cancer?

Study design:
This review article included 18 case-control studies with 3,374 women diagnosed with breast cancer (case group) and 3,582 healthy controls (women without breast cancer).

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found selenium level of the case group (group with women diagnosed with breast cancer) was significantly lower than the control group (group with women without breast cancer) [-0.53 μg/L, 95% CI = -0.72 to -0.34, p 0.001].

The investigators found in subgroup analysis that serum selenium level of the case group was significantly lower than the control group [-1.14 μg/L, 95% CI = -1.70 to -0.58, p 0.001].

The investigators found in subgroup analysis that plasma selenium level of the case group was significantly lower than the control group [-0.21 μg/L, 95% CI = -0.37 to -0.04, p 0.014].

The investigators found in subgroup analysis that selenium level of toenail of the case group was significantly lower than the control group [-0.21 μg/L, 95% CI = -0.38 to -0.03, p 0.021].

The investigators concluded that a low selenium level in human tissues increases the risk of breast cancer, which may improve the understanding of the effects of selenium on human health.

Original title:
Relationship Between Selenium in Human Tissues and Breast Cancer: a Meta-analysis Based on Case-Control Studies by Zhu X, Pan D, […], Sun G.

Link:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33420696/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on selenium and breast cancer right here.

Objectives:
Does a high dietary intake of β-cryptoxanthin reduce the risk of osteoporosis and hip fracture?

Study design:
This review article included 7 cohort studies, 4 case-control studies and 4 cross-sectional studies with a total of 100,496 individuals.
The methodological qualities of all studies were rated as “fair” to “good”.
The number of populations in each study ranged from 59 to 25,566.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found that a high dietary intake of β-cryptoxanthin significantly reduced risk of osteoporosis with 24% [OR = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.66 to 0.88, p = 0.0002, I2 = 36%, p = 0.11].

The investigators found in subgroup analysis that a high dietary intake of β-cryptoxanthin significantly reduced risk of osteoporosis with 28% [OR = 0.72, 95% CI = 0.58 to 0.91, p = 0.005, I2 = 59%] among women.

The investigators found in subgroup analysis that a high dietary intake of β-cryptoxanthin significantly reduced risk of osteoporosis with 20% [OR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.65 to 1.00, p = 0.005, I2 = 11%] among men.

The investigators found that a high dietary intake of β-cryptoxanthin significantly reduced risk of hip fracture with 28% [OR = 0.72, 95% CI = 0.60 to 0.87, p = 0.0008, I2 = 55%].

The investigators found in subgroup analysis that a high dietary intake of β-cryptoxanthin significantly reduced risk of hip fracture with 29% [OR = 0.71, 95% CI = 0.54 to 0.94, p = 0.02, I2 = 71%] among women. 

The investigators concluded that a high dietary intake of β-cryptoxanthin reduces the risk of osteoporosis and hip fracture. Further longitudinal studies are needed to validate the causality of current findings.

Original title:
Effects of β-Cryptoxanthin on Improvement in Osteoporosis Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies by Kim SJ, Anh NH, […], Kwon SW.

Link:
https://www.mdpi.com/2304-8158/10/2/296/htm

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on β-cryptoxanthin and osteoporosis right here.
 

Objectives:
Although several epidemiological studies have investigated associations between poultry and fish consumption and pancreatic cancer (PC) risk, these findings have been inconsistent. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Do high dietary poultry or fish intakes increase risk of pancreatic cancer?

Study design:
This review article included 25 studies (cohort studies and case-control studies).

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found for the highest vs. lowest poultry intake category a significantly increased risk of 14% for pancreatic cancer [pooled RR = 1.14, 95% CI = 1.02 to 1.26] in cohort studies.
Significant because RR of 1 was not found in the 95% CI of 1.02 to 1.26. RR of 1 means no risk/association.

The investigators found there was no association between fish intake and pancreatic cancer risk [RR = 1.00, 95% CI = 0.93 to 1.07].
No association because RR of 1 was found in the 95% CI of 0.93 to 1.07. RR of 1 means no risk/association.

The investigators concluded that large amount of poultry intake increases pancreatic cancer risk, while fish intake is unlikely to be linked to pancreatic cancer risk. These findings require further investigation, particularly between poultry and pancreatic cancer.

Original title:
Poultry and Fish Intake and Pancreatic Cancer Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis by Gao Y, Ma Y, […], Wang X.

Link:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33432844/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on poultry and fish consumption and cancer right here.

Objectives:
Does dietary acrylamide intake increase risk of breast, endometrial and ovarian cancer?

Study design:
This review article included 14 prospective cohort studies.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found no significant association between dietary acrylamide intake and the risk of breast [RR = 0.95, 95% CI = 0.90 to 1.01], endometrial [RR = 1.03, 95% CI = 0.89 to 1.19] and ovarian cancers [RR = 1.02, 95% CI = 0.84 to 1.24].
In addition, no significant association between dietary acrylamide intake and the risk of breast, endometrial and ovarian cancers in different subgroup analyses by smoking status, menopausal status, BMI status and different types of breast cancer.

The investigators concluded there is no significant association between dietary acrylamide intake and the risk of breast, endometrial and ovarian cancers.

Original title:
Dietary acrylamide intake and risk of women's cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies by Benisi-Kohansal S, Salari-Moghaddam A, […], Esmaillzadeh A.

Link:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33413725/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on breast cancer right here.

Acrylamide is a chemical that naturally forms in starchy food products during high-temperature cooking processes, such as frying, roasting and baking. Acrylamide in food forms from sugars and an amino acid that are naturally present in food.
 

Objetivos:
¿Reduce el consumo de frutas y verduras el riesgo de cáncer del conducto biliar?

Diseño del estudio:
Este artículo de revisión incluyó 14 estudios.

No hubo sesgo de publicación entre los estudios [p Begg = 0.53, p Egger = 0.84 para hortalizas y p Begg = 0.95, p Egger = 0.64 para frutas].

Resultados y conclusiones:
Los investigadores encontraron para el consumo más alto en comparación con más bajo, un riesgo significativamente reducido del 52% para el cáncer del conducto biliar [RR resumido = 0.48, 95% IC = 0.22 a 0.74, I2 = 86.8%, p 0.001, n = 10] para el consumo de verduras.

Los investigadores encontraron para el consumo más alto en comparación con más bajo, un riesgo significativamente reducido del 53% para el cáncer del conducto biliar [RR resumido = 0.47, 95% IC = 0.32 a 0.61, I2 = 63.3%, p = 0.001, n = 13] para el consumo de fruta.

Los investigadores encontraron por cada incremento de 100 gramos/día de consumo de verduras, un riesgo significativamente reducido del 69% para el cáncer del conducto biliar [RR = 0.31, 95% IC = 0.20 a 0.47, I2 = 63.3, n = 8].

Los investigadores concluyeron que el consumo de frutas y verduras reduce el riesgo de cáncer del conducto biliar. Se necesitan más estudios prospectivos bien diseñados para confirmar estos hallazgos.

Título original:
Vegetable, Fruit Consumption and Risk of Biliary Cancer: Evidence from a Meta-Analysis by Huai J and Xiaohua Ye X.

Enlace:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32731775/

Información adicional de El Mondo:
Encontrar aquí más información/estudios sobre significativamente/estudios de cohorte, el consumo de frutas y verduras y el cáncer.

Objectives:
Data on the association of nut intake with risk of cancer and its mortality are conflicting. Although previous meta-analyses summarized available findings in this regard, some limitations may distort their findings. Moreover, none of these meta-analyses examined the dose-response associations of total nut intake with the risk of specific cancers as well as associations between specific types of nuts and cancer mortality. Therefore, this review article (meta-analysis) has been conducted.

Do higher nut dietary intakes reduce risk of cancer incidence and mortality?

Study design:
This review article included in total 43 articles (observational studies) on cancer risk and 9 articles (observational studies) on cancer mortality.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found when comparing the highest with lowest intakes of total nuts, the highest intakes of total nuts (tree nuts and peanuts), significantly reduced risk of cancer with 16% [summary effect size = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.81 to 0.92, p 0.001, I2 = 58.1%, p 0.01].

The investigators found when comparing the highest with lowest intakes of tree nuts, the highest intakes of tree nuts significantly reduced risk of cancer with 13% [pooled effect size = 0.87, 95% CI = 0.78 to 0.96, p 0.01, I2 = 15.8%, p = 0.28].

The investigators found based on the dose-response analysis, a 5-g/d increase in total nut intake was associated with 3%, 6% and 25% lower risks of overall, pancreatic and colon cancers, respectively.  

The investigators found in terms of cancer mortality, 13%, 18% and 8% risk reductions with higher intakes of total nuts, tree nuts and peanuts, respectively.

The investigators found, in addition, a 5-g/d increase in total nut intake was associated with a 4% lower risk of cancer mortality.

The investigators concluded there is a protective association between total nut and tree nut intake and the risk of cancer and its mortality.

Original title:
Association of Total Nut, Tree Nut, Peanut, and Peanut Butter Consumption with Cancer Incidence and Mortality: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies by Naghshi S, Sadeghian M, […], Sadeghi O.

Link:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33307550/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on significant/cohort studies, nuts consumption and cancer right here.

Tree nuts in this review article are walnuts, pistachios, macadamia nuts, pecans, cashews, almonds, hazelnuts and Brazil nuts.

Objectives:
Do omega-3 fatty acid supplements (EPA and DHA) improve sarcopenia-related performances among the elderly?

Study design:
This review article included 10 RCTs with 552 participants.
The number of study participants ranged from 24 to 126 and the durations of the interventions spanned 10 to 24 weeks.
The doses ranged from 0.16 to 2.6 g/day of EPA and from 0 to 1.8 g/day of DHA.
The mean ages of the participants across the RCTs ranged from 63 to 75 years old.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found in subgroup analyses that omega-3 fatty acid supplements (EPA and DHA) at more than 2 g/day significantly increased muscle mass among the elderly [SMD = 0.67 kg, 95% CI = 0.16 to 1.18, p 0.05].

The investigators found in subgroup analyses that omega-3 fatty acid supplements (EPA and DHA) during more than 6 months significantly improved walking speed among the elderly [SMD = 1.78 m/sec, 95% CI = 1.38 to 2.17, p 0.05].

The investigators concluded that taking at least 2 grams of omega-3 supplements (EPA and DHA) per day increases muscle mass among the elderly, while taking omega-3 supplements for at least 6 months increases walking speed among the elderly.

Original title:
Effects of Omega-3 Fatty Acids on Muscle Mass, Muscle Strength and Muscle Performance among the Elderly: A Meta-Analysis by Huang YH, Chiu WC, […], Wang YH.

Link:
https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/12/12/3739/htm

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on EPA and DHA consumption and elderly right here.
EPA and DHA are present in fish.
 

Objectives:
Does calcium combined with vitamin D supplementation reduce risk of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women?

Study design:
This review article included 10 RCTs.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found calcium combined with vitamin D supplementation significantly increased total bone mineral density [SMD = 0.537, 95% CI = 0.227 to 0.847] in postmenopausal women.

The investigators found calcium combined with vitamin D supplementation significantly increased lumbar spine bone mineral density [SMD = 0.233, 95% CI = 0.073 to 0.392, p 0.001] in postmenopausal women.

The investigators found calcium combined with vitamin D supplementation significantly increased arms bone mineral density [SMD = 0.464, 95% CI = 0.186 to 0.741] in postmenopausal women.

The investigators found calcium combined with vitamin D supplementation significantly increased femoral neck bone mineral density [SMD = 0.187, 95% CI = 0.010 to 0.364] in postmenopausal women.

The investigators found calcium combined with vitamin D supplementation significantly reduced risk of hip fracture with 13.6% [RR = 0.864, 95% CI = 0.763 to 0.979] in postmenopausal women.

The investigators found in subgroup analysis that calcium combined with 400 IU/d (10 mcg/d) vitamin D supplementation significantly increased femoral neck bone mineral density [SMD = 0.335, 95% CI = 0.113 to 0.558] in postmenopausal women.

The investigators found in subgroup analysis that dairy products fortified with calcium and vitamin D significantly increased total bone mineral density [SMD = 0.784, 95% CI = 0.322 to 1.247] in postmenopausal women.

The investigators found in subgroup analysis that dairy products fortified with calcium and vitamin D significantly increased lumbar spine bone mineral density [SMD = 0.320, 95% CI = 0.146 to 0.494] in postmenopausal women.

The investigators concluded that dairy products fortified with calcium and vitamin D have a favourable effect on bone mineral density. Furthermore, calcium combined with vitamin D supplementation could prevent osteoporosis hip fracture in postmenopausal women.

Original title:
Effects of combined calcium and vitamin D supplementation on osteoporosis in postmenopausal women: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials by Liu C, Kuang X […], Li D.

Link:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33237064/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on dairy products consumption, calcium and vitamin D right here.

Objectives:
Epidemiological studies showing the correlation between folate (folic acid) and the breast cancer risk have revealed inconsistent results. Therefore, this review article (meta-analysis) has been conducted.

Do higher folate dietary intakes or plasma folate levels reduce risk of breast cancer?

Study design:
This review article included 39 studies on folate dietary intake (19 were prospective cohort studies, which included 37,917 cases (persons with breast cancer) and 20 were case-control studies, which included 13,074 cases and 17,497 controls (persons without breast cancer)) and 12 studies on plasma folate level (10 were case-control studies, consisting of 7,850 cases and 8,898 controls and 2 cohort studies, consisting of 815 incident cases).

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found when compared to the lowest folate dietary intake, the highest folate dietary intake significantly reduced risk of breast cancer with 15% [combined OR = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.79 to 0.92, I2 = 75.2%, p 0.001].
This reduced risk was not significant for cohort studies [OR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.91 to 1.03, I2 = 53.3%, p = 0.316].

The investigators found for every 100-μg/day increase in folate dieatary intake, a significantly reduced risk of 2% for breast cancer [combined OR = 0.98, 95% CI = 0.97 to 0.99, I2 = 72.8%, p = 0.002].
This reduced risk was also significantly in cohort studies [summary OR = 0.99, 95% CI = 0.98 to 1.00]. 
Significant means that there is an association with a 95% confidence.

The investigators found stratification by menopausal status showed that a higher folate dietary intake significantly reduced risk of breast cancer in premenopausal women with 20% [OR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.66 to 0.97, p = 0.022] but not in postmenopausal women [OR = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.83 to 1.06, p = 0.320].
Significant because OR of 1 was not found in the 95% CI of 0.66 to 0.97. OR of 1 means no risk.

The investigators found the highest versus lowest plasma folate levels had no correlation with the risk of breast cancer [combined OR = 0.98, 95% CI = 0.82 to 1.17, I2 = 63.0%, p = 0.822].

The investigators concluded there is a negative correlation between folate dieatary intake, at least 100-μg/day and the risk of breast cancer. However, plasma folate levels have no correlation with the risk of breast cancer. Therefore, whether folate dietary intake has practical clinical significance requires further study and the use of additional folate supplements should be carefully considered.

Original title:
Association of folate intake and plasma folate level with the risk of breast cancer: a dose-response meta-analysis of observational studies by Ren X, Xu P, [...], Dai Z.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7695428/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on significant/cohot studies, folate (folic acid) consumption and breast cancer right here.

The plasma folate level can be increased by taking folate-rich foods and/or folate supplements.

Objectives:
The association between vitamin C intake and breast cancer is unclear. Therefore, this review article (meta-analysis) has been conducted.

Does a higher vitamin C intake reduce risk of breast cancer incidence, mortality and recurrence?

Study design:
This review article included 24 cohort studies and 30 case-control studies.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found pooled results suggested that the highest versus lowest vitamin C intake was significantly associated with a 14% lower risk of breast cancer incidence [relative risk = 0.86, 95% = 0.81 to 0.92, I2 = 78.7%, p 0.00].
Sensitivity analysis indicated that the overall results remained consistent even after excluding studies individually.

The investigators found the use of random-effects model indicated that a 100-mg/day increment in vitamin C intake had no significant effect on breast cancer risk.

The investigators found stratification by study design showed a 26% lower risk of breast cancer incidence for vitamin C intake in case-control studies [RR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.65 to 0.84, p 0.001]. However, a non-significant inverse association was found in cohort studies [RR = 0.96, 95% CI = 0.89 to 1.04, p = 0.295].

The investigators found when the studies were stratified by the source of vitamin C, a 11% lower risk of breast cancer incidence with dietary intake [RR = 0.89, 95% CI = 0.82 to 0.96, p = 0.004] but not with supplements [RR = 1.02, 95% CI = 0.94 to 1.10, p = 0.678].

The investigators found that the highest versus lowest vitamin C intake was significantly associated with a 22% lower risk of breast cancer mortality [HR = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.69 to 0.88, I2 = 2.6%].

The investigators found that the highest versus lowest vitamin C intake was significantly associated with a 19% lower risk of breast cancer recurrence [HR = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.67 to 0.99, p = 0.043, I2 = 0.0%].

The investigators concluded that higher vitamin C dietary intake is significantly associated with a reduced risk of breast cancer incidence, mortality and recurrence.

Original title:
Association of vitamin C intake with breast cancer risk and mortality: a meta-analysis of observational studies by Zhang D, Xu P, [...], Dai Z.

Link:
https://www.aging-us.com/article/103769/text

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on significant/cohot studies, vitamin C consumption and cancer right here.
 

Objectives:
Heated debates have been on-going about tea consumption and the incidence of cancer, especially in head and neck cancer types. Therefore, this review article (meta-analysis) has been conducted.

Does habitual tea consumption reduce risk of nasopharyngeal cancer?

Study design:
This review article included 6 articles.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found that habitual tea consumption significantly reduced risk of nasopharyngeal cancer with 13.5% [OR = 0.865, 95% CI = 0.806 to 0.929].

The investigators concluded that habitual tea consumption is associated with prevention of nasopharyngeal cancer development. Additional studies are needed to further understand the molecular role of bioactive compound and potential health benefit of tea consumption in nasopharyngeal cancer prevention.

Original title:
The Association between Tea Consumption and Nasopharyngeal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis by Okekpa SI, Basria R, […], Musa MY.

Link:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32856842/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on tea consumption and cancer right here.

Objectives:
The number of cancer survivors is growing rapidly worldwide, especially long-term survivors. Although a healthy diet with a high vegetable and fruit consumption is a key factor in primary cancer prevention, there is a lack of specific dietary recommendations for cancer survivors, except in the case of breast cancer [World Cancer Research Fund (WCRF)/American Institute for Cancer Research (AICR) report]. Therefore, this review article (meta-analysis) has been conducted.

Does the general recommendation to consume ≥5 servings of vegetables and fruit per day (400 g/d) meet the needs of cancer survivors?

Study design:
This review article included 28 cohort studies.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found a high vegetable intake before diagnosis significantly reduced overall mortality in survivors of head and neck cancer with 25% [HR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.65 to 0.87].  

The investigators found a high vegetable intake before diagnosis significantly reduced overall mortality in survivors of ovarian cancer with 22% [HR = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.66 to 0.91].  

The investigators found a high fruit intake before diagnosis significantly reduced overall mortality in survivors of ovarian cancer with 18% [HR = 0.82, 95% CI = 0.70 to 0.96].  

The investigators found the evidence was insufficient for survivors of other cancers, although these associations generally tended to be protective. Therefore, more studies are needed to clarify the association between vegetable and fruit consumption and the prognosis of these different types of cancer.

The investigators concluded the general recommendation to consume ≥5 servings of vegetables and fruit per day (400 g/d) could underestimate the needs of cancer survivors, particularly those with ovarian tumors, in which the recommendation could increase to 600 g/d (i.e., 300 g/d of vegetables and 300 g/d of fruit).

Original title:
Vegetable and Fruit Consumption and Prognosis Among Cancer Survivors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies by Hurtado-Barroso S, Trius-Soler M, […], Zamora-Ros R.

Link:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32717747/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on vegetables and fruit and cancer right here.

Objectives:
Isoflavones have a structure similar to 17β-estradiol, so they may be useful to postmenopausal women in preventing bone loss related to estrogen deficiency. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Do isoflavone supplements increase bone mineral density (BMD) in postmenopausal women?

Study design:
This review article included 63 RCTs, involving 6,427 postmenopausal women.

Isoflavone interventions were generally safe and well tolerated.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found statistically significant differences in bone mineral density at the last follow-up visit between the two groups (isoflavones vs. control) at the lumbar spine [MD = 21.34 mg/cm², 95% CI = 8.21 to 34.47 mg/cm², p = 0.001], the femoral neck [MD = 28.88 mg/cm², 95% CI = 15.05 to 42.71 mg/cm², p 0.0001] and the distal radius [MD = 19.27 mg/cm², 95% CI = 5.65 to 32.89 mg/cm², p = 0.006].
This improved bone mineral density was found for genistein 54 mg/day and ipriflavone (a synthetic isoflavone) 600 mg/day.

The investigators concluded isoflavone interventions, genistein (54 mg/day) and ipriflavone (600 mg/day) in particular, have beneficial effects on bone mineral density outcomes and are safe in postmenopausal women. They may be considered as a complementary or alternative option in the prevention and treatment of menopause-related osteoporosis.

Original title:
Effects of Isoflavone Interventions on Bone Mineral Density in Postmenopausal Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials by Sansai K, Takuathung MN, [...], Koonrungsesomboon N.

Link:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32524173/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on isoflavones and elderly right here.