This tab will answer the following nutritional question: How can nutrition contribute positively to my health?

One swallow does not make a summer. A famous Dutch saying that could not be any more obvious. Just because one single scientific study about a certain topic makes certain claims, it does not necessarily mean it is true. On the other hand, a review article (a collection of scientific studies on a certain topic) of randomized, placebo-controlled double blind clinical trials (RCTs) will answer the following question:
"Do taking dietary supplements make sense?" Yes for a positive conclusion and no for a negative conclusion.

One swallow does not make a summer. A famous Dutch saying that could not be any more obvious. Just because one single scientific study about a certain topic makes certain claims, it does not necessarily mean it is true. On the other hand, a review article (a collection of scientific studies on a certain topic) of cohort studies or case-control studies will answer the following question:
"Should I change my diet?".

Find scientific studies on vitamin A: type vitamin A in Search field.

Nutrition and health

Higher carotenoids blood concentration reduce liver disease

Objectives:
Due to the high incidence of liver disease and the severity of adverse outcomes, liver disease has become a serious public health problem, bringing a huge disease burden to individuals, families and society. Most studies have shown significant differences in serum carotenoid content and dietary carotenoid intake between liver disease patients and non-liver disease patients, but some studies have reported contrary results.Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Do higher serum concentrations of carotenoids (such as, α-carotene, β-carotene, lycopene, cryptoxanthin and lutein/zeaxanthin) or higher dietary intakes of carotenoids reduces the risk of liver disease?

Study design:
This review article included 3 RCT studies, 6 cohort studies, 11 case-control studies, 9 cross-sectional studies and 1 RCT-combined cross-sectional study.

The Egger test showed no publication bias.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found pooled meta-analysis showed that higher serum α-carotene [SMD = -0.58, 95% CI = -0.83 to -0.32, p < 0.001], β-carotene [SMD = -0.81, 95% CI = -1.13 to -0.49, p < 0.001] and lycopene [SMD = -1.06, 95% CI = -1.74 to -0.38, p < 0.001] significantly reduced the risk and severity of liver disease.

The investigators found, however, no significant difference was observed between serum β-cryptoxanthin [SMD = 0.02, 95% CI = -0.41 to 0.45, p = 0.92] and lutein/zeaxanthin [SMD = 0.62, 95% CI = -1.20 to 2.45, p = 0.502] and the risk and severity of liver disease.

The investigators found dietary β-carotene intake [SMD = -0.22, 95% CI = -0.31 to -0.13, p < 0.001] significantly reduced the risk of liver disease.

The investigators found an intake of more than 6 mg of carotenoids on an energy-restricted diet can effectively alleviate the symptoms of NAFLD.

The investigators concluded that higher serum concentrations of α-carotene, β-carotene and lycopene reduce risk of liver disease. Meanwhile, dietary intake of β-carotene reduces the incidence of liver disease.

Original title:
A systematic review of dietary and circulating carotenoids and liver disease by Hu B, Sui J, […], Xia H.

Link:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39229651/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on cohort studies/significantly, carotenoids and chronic disease right here.

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is one of the most common causes of chronic liver disease worldwide.

20g plant protein reduce type 2 diabetes

Objectives:
While clinical studies indicate that dietary protein may benefit glucose homeostasis in type 2 diabetes (T2D), the impact of dietary protein, including whether the protein is of animal or plant origin, on the risk of type 2 diabetes is uncertain. Therefore, an update of the meta-analysis has been conducted.

Is there an associations between total, animal and plant protein dietary intakes and the risk of type 2 diabetes?

Study design:
This review article included 16 prospective cohort studies, involving 615,125 participants and 52,342 type 2 diabetes cases. Of which 11 studies reported data on intake of both animal and plant protein.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found dietary intakes of total protein were significantly associated with an increased risk of 14% for type 2 diabetes [pooled effect size = 1.14, 95% CI = 1.04 to 1.24].

The investigators found every increase of 20g dietary intakes of total protein were significantly associated with an increased risk of 3% for type 2 diabetes.

The investigators found dietary intakes of animal protein were significantly associated with an increased risk of 18% for type 2 diabetes [pooled effect size = 1.18, 95% CI = 1.09 to 1.27].

The investigators found every increase of 20g dietary intakes of animal protein were significantly associated with an increased risk of 7% for type 2 diabetes.

The investigators found, in contrast, there was no association between dietary intake of plant protein and type 2 diabetes risk [pooled effect size = 0.98, 95% CI = 0.89 to 1.08].

The investigators found every replacement of 20 grams animal by plant protein was

significantly associated with a reduced risk of 20% for type 2 diabetes [pooled effect size = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.76 to 0.84].

The investigators concluded that long-term consumption of animal, but not plant, protein is associated with a dose-dependent increase in the risk of type 2 diabetes, with the implication that replacement of animal with plant protein intake may lower the risk of type 2 diabetes.

Original title:
Association between total, animal, and plant protein intake and type 2 diabetes risk in adults: A systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies by Ardakani AF, Anjom-Shoae J, […], Horowitz M.

Link:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39032197/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on protein and diabetes right here.