Nutrition and health

Objectives:
Do diets rich in protein causually reduce body weight of adults with overweight or obesity? 

Study design:
This review article included 37 RCTs.
The diets were included during a mean of 32 weeks interventions, ranging from 8 to 104 weeks.

There was no publication bias.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found protein intake (ranging from 18-59 energy percentage [En%]) significantly reduced body weight by 1.6 kg [95% CI = 1.2 to 2.0 kg, I2 = 56%] compared to controls (digestible carbohydrate, fiber, fat or no supplementation (no placebo used)).
This result was also found in sensitivity analysis.

The investigators found the effect size of dietary protein in body weight management was dependent on specific phenotypes, where individuals with prediabetes had more benefit compared to individuals with normoglycemia.
Furthermore, individuals without the obesity risk allele (AA genotype) had more benefit compared to individuals with the obesity risk alleles (AG and GG genotypes).

The investigators concluded that diets rich in protein (18-59 energy percentage [En%]) during 32 weeks causally have a moderate beneficial effect on body weight management of adults with overweight or obesity.

Original title:
Are Dietary Proteins the Key to Successful Body Weight Management? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Studies Assessing Body Weight Outcomes after Interventions with Increased Dietary Protein by Hansen TT, Astrup A and Sjödin A.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8468854/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on protein consumption and overweight right here.

A diet rich in protein with 18-59 energy percentage [E%] or a diet with 18-59 En% protein means that the amounts of protein contribute 18 to 59% to the total calories (kcal) of the diet.
If the diet contains 2000 kcal, 90 grams of protein contribute 18% to this 2000 kcal.
1 gram of protein gives 4 kcal. Thus 90 grams of protein provide 360 kcal (90x4 kcal) and 360 kcal is 18% of 2000 kcal.

The most easy way to follow a diet rich in protein with 18-59 energy percentage is to choose only meals/products with 18-59 En% protein. Check here which products contain 18-59 En% protein.

However, the most practical way to follow a diet with 18-59 En% protein is, all meals/products that you eat on a daily basis should contain on average 18-59 En% protein.

To do this, use the 7-points nutritional profile app to see whether your daily diet contains 18-59 En% protein.

A high-protein diet is a diet with at least 20 En% protein.

 

Objectives:
The association between vitamin C and metabolic syndrome (MetS) has been evaluated in several epidemiological studies with conflicting results. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Do dietary vitamin C intake and circulating vitamin C level reduce risk of metabolic syndrome? 

Study design:
This review article included 26 cross-sectional studies and 2 cohort studies with a total number of 110,771 participants. 23 studies were related to the dietary vitamin C level.
The sample size ranged from 143 to 27,656 persons.
The dietary vitamin C level was assessed by food-frequency questionnaire (FFQ) in 4 studies, a 24-h or 3-day recall in 18 studies and a 4-day record in 1 study.

No evidence of publication bias existed according to Begg's rank correlation test [p = 0.495].

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found when compared to the lowest dietary vitamin C intake, that the highest dietary vitamin C intake significantly reduced risk of metabolic syndrome with 7% [overall multivariable-adjusted RR = 0.93, 95% CI = 0.88 to 0.97, p = 0.003, I2 = 54.5%, p = 0.003]. The above findings were confirmed in cross-sectional studies [RR = 0.92, 95% CI = 0.87 to 0.97, p = 0.001] and 24-h or 3-day recall [RR = 0.89, 95% CI = 0.86 to 0.93, p 0.001] studies.

The investigators found when compared to the lowest circulating vitamin C level, that the highest circulating vitamin C level significantly reduced risk of metabolic syndrome with 40% [overall multivariable-adjusted RR = 0.60, 95% CI = 0.49 to 0.74, p 0.001, I2 = 22.7%, p = 0.249].

The investigators concluded that both the dietary and the circulating vitamin C level reduce risk of metabolic syndrome. However, due to the limitation of the available evidence, more well-designed prospective studies are still needed.

Original title:
Vitamin C and Metabolic Syndrome: A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies by Guo H, Ding J, [...], Zhang Y.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8531097/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on vitamin C consumption and overweight right here.

In practice, a lot of dietary vitamin C intake amounts to 200 to 300 grams of vegetables and 2-5 pieces of fruit per day. Vitamin C is found in fruit and vegetables.

A high circulating vitamin C level can be obtained through vitamin C-rich food and/or taking vitamin C supplements.

 

Objectives:
The associations between dietary carbohydrate and diverse health outcomes remain controversial and confusing. Therefore, this review article (meta-analyse) has been conducted.

What is the association between dietary carbohydrate intake and diverse health outcomes?

Study design:
This review article included 43 meta-analyses of observational research studies with 23 health outcomes, including cancer (n = 26), mortality (n = 4), metabolic diseases (n = 4), digestive system outcomes (n = 3) and other outcomes [coronary heart disease (n = 2), stroke (n = 1), Parkinson's disease (n = 1) and bone fracture (n = 2)].

This umbrella review summarized 281 individual studies with 13,164,365 participants.

33.3% studies were considered to be of high quality and 66.7% of moderate quality.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found highly suggestive evidence showed that dietary carbohydrate intake significantly increased risk of metabolic syndrome with 25% [adjusted summary odds ratio = 1.25, 95% CI = 1.15 to 1.37].

The investigators found suggestive evidence showed that dietary carbohydrate intake significantly decreased risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma with 43% [adjusted summary hazard ratio = 0.57, 95% CI = 0.42 to 0.78].

The investigators found suggestive evidence showed that dietary carbohydrate intake significantly increased risk of all-cause mortality with 19% [adjusted summary hazard ratio 1.19, 95% CI = 1.09 to 1.30].

The investigators concluded despite the fact that numerous systematic reviews and meta-analyses have explored the relationship between carbohydrate intake and diverse health outcomes, there is no convincing evidence of a clear role of carbohydrate intake. However, highly suggestive evidence shows carbohydrate intake is associated with higher risk of metabolic syndrome. Suggestive evidence shows carbohydrate intake is associated with higher risk of all-cause mortality and lower risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Original title:
Dietary Carbohydrate and Diverse Health Outcomes: Umbrella Review of 30 Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of 281 Observational Studies by Liu YS, Wu QJ […], Zhao YH.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8116488/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on carbohydrate consumption and obesity/overweight right here.

Objectives:
Previous meta-analysis studies have indicated inverse associations between some carotenoids and risks of metabolic syndrome, cardiovascular disease, cancer and all-cause mortality. However, the results for associations between carotenoids and type 2 diabetes (T2D) remain inconsistent and no systematic assessment has been done on this topic. Therefore, this review article (meta-analysis) has been conducted.

Do higher dietary intakes and circulating concentrations of carotenoids reduce risk of type 2 diabetes?

Study design:
This review article included 13 studies.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found for the the highest versus the lowest categories of dietary intake of β-carotene a significantly reduced risk of 22% for type 2 diabetes [pooled RR = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.70 to 0.87, I2 = 13.7%, n = 6].
This significantly reduced risk was also found for total carotenoids (n = 2), α-carotene (n = 4), and lutein/zeaxanthin (n = 4), with pooled RRs ranging from 0.80 to 0.91, whereas no significant associations were observed for β-cryptoxanthin and lycopene.

The investigators found for the the highest versus the lowest categories of circulating concentration of β-carotene a significantly reduced risk of 40% for type 2 diabetes [pooled RR = 0.60, 95% CI = 0.46 to 0.78, I2 = 56.2%, n = 7].
This significantly reduced risk was also found for total carotenoids (n = 3), lycopene (n = 4), and lutein (n = 2), with pooled RRs ranging from 0.63 to 0.85, whereas no significant association was found for circulating concentrations of α-carotene and zeaxanthin when comparing extreme categories.

The investigators found dose-response analysis indicated that nonlinear relations were observed for circulating concentrations of α-carotene, β-carotene, lutein and total carotenoids [all p-nonlinearity 0.05], but not for other carotenoids or dietary exposures.

The investigators concluded that higher dietary intakes and circulating concentrations of total carotenoids, especially β-carotene, are associated with a lower risk of type 2 diabetes. More studies are needed to confirm the causality and explore the role of foods rich in carotenoids in prevention of type 2 diabetes.

Original title:
Dietary Intake and Circulating Concentrations of Carotenoids and Risk of Type 2 Diabetes: A Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Observational Studies by Jiang YW, Sun ZH, [...], Pan A.

Link:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33979433/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on carotenoids and diabetes right here.

Objectives:
What is the association between red meat and poultry consumption and the risk of metabolic syndrome?

Study design:
This review article included 9 prospective cohort studies, which involved a total of 21,869 participants.
Among them, 8 studies were identified for red meat consumption.

No publication bias was observed according to the Begg's rank-correlation test and the Egger's test.  

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found that red meat consumption was significantly associated with a higher risk of 35% for metabolic syndrome [multi-variable adjusted RR = 1.35, 95% CI = 1.13 to 1.62, p = 0.001, I2 = 54.4%, p = 0.032].  
The same results were obtained in subgroup analysis for >5 years follow-up [RR = 1.36, 95% CI = 1.09 to 1.7, p = 0.006], non-National Cholesterol Education Program-Adult Treatment Panel (NCEP-ATP III) [RR = 1.34, 95% CI = 1.12 to 1.62, p = 0.002], Non-Asia [RR = 1.51, 95% CI = 1.29 to 1.77, p 0.001], adjustment of BMI [RR = 1.4, 95% CI = 1.23 to 1.6, p 0.001] and physical activity studies [RR = 1.48, 95% CI = 1.29 to 1.71, p 0.001].

The investigators found that unprocessed red meat consumption was significantly associated with a higher risk of 32% for metabolic syndrome [multi-variable adjusted RR = 1.32, 95% CI = 1.14 to 1.54, p = 0.0003, I2 = 0%, p = 0.397].  

The investigators found that processed red meat consumption was significantly associated with a higher risk of 48% for metabolic syndrome [multi-variable adjusted RR = 1.48, 95% CI = 1.11 to 1.97, p = 0.007, I2 = 64.7%, p = 0.097].  

The investigators found that poultry consumption was significantly associated with a lower risk of 15% for metabolic syndrome [multi-variable adjusted RR = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.75 to 0.97, p = 0.02, I2 = 0%, p = 0.707].  

The investigators concluded that red meat (processed and unprocessed) consumption is associated with a higher risk of metabolic syndrome, whereas, poultry consumption is associated with a lower risk of metabolic syndrome. More well-designed randomized controlled trials are still needed to address the issues further.

Original title:
Association of Red Meat and Poultry Consumption With the Risk of Metabolic Syndrome: A Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies by Guo H, Ding J, [...], Zhang Y.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8295459/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on meat consumption and obesity/overweight right here.

Objectives:
Nuts are recommended for cardiovascular health, yet concerns remain that nuts may contribute to weight gain due to their high energy density. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Does nut consumption contribute to an increased adiposity risk?

Study design:
This review article included 6 prospective cohort studies with 569,910 participants and 86 RCTs with 114 comparisons and 5,873 participants.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found nuts consumption was significantly associated with a lower risk of 7% for incidence of overweight/obesity [RR = 0.93, 95% CI = 0.88 to 0.98, p 0.001, moderate certainty of evidence] in prospective cohort studies.

The investigators found RCTs showed no adverse effect of nuts on body weight [MD = 0.09 kg, 95% CI = -0.09 to 0.27 kg, p 0.001, high certainty of evidence].

The investigators found meta-regression showed that higher nut intake was significantly associated with reductions in body weight and body fat.

The investigators concluded that current evidence demonstrates the concern that nut consumption contributes to increased adiposity appears unwarranted.

Original title:
Are fatty nuts a weighty concern? A systematic review and meta-analysis and dose-response meta-regression of prospective cohorts and randomized controlled trials by Nishi SK, Viguiliouk E, [...], Sievenpiper JL.

Link:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34494363/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on nut consumption and obesity/overweight right here.

Objectives:
Although current guidelines recommend reduction of salt intake in patients with diabetes, the benefits of reducing salt intake in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) lack clear evidence. Therefore, this review articles has been conducted.

Does dietary sodium restriction causally reduce blood pressure in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM)?

Study design:
This review article included 8 RCTs with 10 trials (7 cross-over and 3 parallel designs).
No publication bias was found from Begg's and Egger's tests.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found compared with ordinary sodium intake, dietary sodium restriction significantly decreased 24-hour urine sodium level [WMD = -38.430 mmol/24h, 95% CI = -41.665 mmol/24h to -35.194 mmol/24h].

The investigators found dietary sodium restriction significantly lowered systolic blood pressure [WMD = -5.574 mm Hg, 95% CI = -8.314 to -2.834 mm Hg, I2 = 0.0%] and diastolic blood pressure [WMD = -1.675 mm Hg, 95% CI = -3.199 to -0.150 mm Hg, I2 = 0.0%].

The investigators concluded that dietary sodium restriction causally reduces systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

Original title:
Effect of dietary sodium restriction on blood pressure in type 2 diabetes: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials by Ren Y, Liqiang Qin L, […], Ma Y.

Link:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33838996/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on sodium and diabetes right here.

Salt consists of sodium and chloride. So a dietary sodium restriction means a reduction in dietary salt intake.

A diet with dietary salt restriction is a diet with maximum 0.2 grams of salt per 100 kcal.

The easiest way to follow this diet is to choose only products/meals with maximum 0.2 grams of salt per 100 kcal. These products from the supermarket contain maximum 0.2 grams of salt per 100 kcal.

However, the most practical way to follow this diet is, all your daily consumed products/meals should contain on average maximum 0.2 grams of salt per 100 kcal.
To do this, use the 7-points nutritional profile app to see if your daily diet contains maximum 0.2 grams of salt per 100 kcal.

Objectives:
Evidence regarding associations between potato consumption and type 2 diabetes (T2D) and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) risks is accumulating. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Does a high potato intake increase type 2 diabetes and gestational diabetes mellitus (diabetes mellitus during pregnancy) risk?

Study design:
This review article included 19 studies (13 for type 2 diabetes and 6 for gestational diabetes mellitus) with a total of 21,357 type 2 diabetes cases among 323,475 participants and 1,516 gestational diabetes mellitus cases among 29,288 pregnancies.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found meta-analysis showed a significantly increased risk of 19% [RR = 1.19, 95% CI = 1.06 to 1.34] for type 2 diabetes for total potato intakes among Western populations.

The investigators found meta-analysis showed a significantly increased risk of 8% [RR = 1.08, 95% CI = 1.00 to 1.16] for type 2 diabetes for baked/boiled/mashed potato intakes among Western populations.

The investigators found meta-analysis showed a significantly increased risk of 33% [RR = 1.33, 95% CI = 1.03 to 1.70] for type 2 diabetes for French fries/fried potato intakes among Western populations.

The investigators found dose-response meta-analysis demonstrated a significantly increased type 2 diabetes risk by 10% [95% CI = 1.07 to 1.14, p for trend 0.001], 2% [95% CI = 1.00 to 1.04, p for trend = 0.02] and 34% [95% CI = 1.24 to 1.46, p for trend 0.001] among Western populations for each 80 g/day (serving) increment in total potato, unfried potato and fried potato intakes, respectively.

The investigators found dose-response meta-analysis demonstrated a significantly increased gestational diabetes mellitus risk by 22% [95% CI = 1.06 to 1.42, p for trend 0.007] among Western populations for each 80 g/day (serving) increment in total potato intakes.

The investigators found dose-response meta-analysis demonstrated a significantly increased gestational diabetes mellitus risk by 26% [95% CI = 1.07 to 1.48, p for trend = 0.006] among Western populations for each 80 g/day (serving) increment in unfried potato intakes.

The investigators concluded that higher potato intake (at least 80g per day) is associated with higher type 2 diabetes risk among Western populations. The positive relationship presents a significant dose-response manner. Wisely controlled potato consumption may confer potential glucometabolic benefits.

Original title:
Dietary potato intake and risks of type 2 diabetes and gestational diabetes mellitus by Guo F, Zhang Q, [...], Ma L.

Link:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34130021/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on potato intakes and diabetes right here.

Objectives:
Does vitamin C supplementation improve triglyceride and cholesterol levels in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus?

Study design:
This review article included 15 studies with 872 participants.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found, findings from 15 studies indicated that vitamin C supplementation significantly decreased triglyceride (TG) levels [WMD= -16.48 mg/dL, 95% CI = -31.89 to -1.08, p 0.001] and total cholesterol (TC) levels [WMD = -13.00 mg/dL, 95% CI = -23.10 to -2.91, p 0.001] in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

The investigators found, however, vitamin C supplementation failed to improve LDL (bad cholesterol) and HDL cholesterol (good cholesterol) levels. 

The investigators found the meta-regression analysis suggested that lipid profile improvement was affected by duration of vitamin C treatment.

The investigators found dose-response analysis showed that vitamin C supplementation changed LDL cholesterol significantly based on vitamin C dose.

The investigators concluded that vitamin C supplementation improves lipid profile via decreases in triglyceride and total cholesterol levels in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. It appears that vitamin C supplementation is more beneficial to lipid profile in long-term vs. short term interventions.

Original title:
Does vitamin C supplementation exert profitable effects on serum lipid profile in patients with type 2 diabetes? A systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis by Namkhah Z, Ashtary-Larky D, […], Asbaghi O.

Link:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33984490/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on vitamine C, cholesterol and diabetes right here.

Objectives:
Diets with high glycemic index (GI) or high glycemic load (GL) have been linked to important risk factors associated with the development of metabolic syndrome (MetS), such as dyslipidemia, higher blood glucose and insulin concentrations. However, the role of GI and GL in relation to metabolic syndrome is still understudied and controversial. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Does high dietary GI or GL increase risk of metabolic syndrome?

Study design:
This review article included 1 cohort study and 11 cross-sectional studies with a total sample size of 36,295 subjects.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found, the pooled effect sizes from the 9 studies indicated high versus low dietary GI was significantly associated with increased risk of 5% for metabolic syndrome [OR = 1.05, 95% CI = 1.01 to 1.09, I2 = 58.1%, p = 0.004].
This finding was supported by all subgroup analyses except where studies used 24-h recalls for dietary assessment.

The investigators found, additionally, a linear dose-response investigation revealed that each 5-point increment in GI was associated with 2% increase in the risk of metabolic syndrome [OR = 1.02, 95% CI = 1.01 to 1.02].
Howver, non-linear pattern was insignificant [p-nonlinearity = 0.63].

The investigators found, moreover, pooled effect sizes from 10 studies suggested that no association was found between the GL and metabolic syndrome with results remaining consistent in all subgroup analyses.

The investigators concluded that high dietary GI increases risk of metabolic syndrome. Nutrition policy and clinical practices should encourage a diet with low GI. Future studies should include both GI and GL and different criteria of metabolic syndrome to provide a better comparison.

Original title:
Glycemic index, but not glycemic load, is associated with an increased risk of metabolic syndrome: Meta-analysis of observational studies by Askari M, Dehghani A, […], Alizadeh S.

Link:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33928722/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on GI and overweight right here.

A diet with low GI is a diet with GI of 55 or lower.

Objectives:
Does spirulina supplementation improve glycemic related markers (like, fasting blood glucose, post prandial blood sugar and HbA1c levels) and lipid profile (like, triglyceride and cholesterol levels) among type 2 diabetes patients?

Study design:
This review article included 8 RCTs (9 arms).

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found, spirulina supplementation significantly reduced fasting blood glucose levels [-17.88 mg/dL, 95% CI = -26.99 to -8.78, I2 = 25%] among type 2 diabetes patients.

The investigators found, spirulina supplementation significantly reduced triglyceride levels [-30.99 mg/dL, 95% CI = -45.20 to -16.77, I2 = 50%] among type 2 diabetes patients.

The investigators found, spirulina supplementation significantly reduced total cholesterol levels [-18.47 mg/dL, 95% CI = -33.54 to -3.39, I2 = 73%] among type 2 diabetes patients.

The investigators found, spirulina supplementation significantly reduced LDL cholesterol (bad cholesterol) levels [-20.04 mg/dL, 95% CI = -34.06 to -6.02, I2 = 75%] among type 2 diabetes patients.

The investigators found, spirulina supplementation significantly reduced VLDL cholesterol levels [-6.96 mg/dL, 95% CI = -9.71 to -4.22, I2 = 33%] among type 2 diabetes patients.

The investigators found, spirulina supplementation significantly increased HDL cholesterol (good cholesterol) levels among type 2 diabetes patients.

The investigators found no significant effect on HbA1C or post prandial blood sugar among type 2 diabetes patients following spirulina supplementation.

The investigators concluded that spirulina supplementation has beneficial effects on fasting blood glucose and blood lipid profiles among type 2 diabetes patients.

Original title:
The effect of spirulina on type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis by Hatami E, Ghalishourani SS, […], Mansour-Ghanaei F.

Link:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34178867/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on lowering cholesterol levels and diabetes right here.

Objectives:
Does grapes/grape products supplementation improve glycemic indices (like HOMA-IR, Hb1Ac and fasting insulin level) in adults or in other words, does eating grapes or grape products causally improve glycemic indices in adults?

Study design:
This review article included 29 RCTs with a total of 1,297 participants.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found, overall, the grapes/grape products supplementation significantly reduced homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) [WMD = -0.54, 95% CI = -0.91 to -0.17, p = 0.004] in adults.   
Significantly because the calculated p-value of = 0.004 was less than the p-value of 0.05.

The investigators found, however, the grapes/grape products supplementation did not affect fasting insulin levels [WMD = -0.90 μIU/mL, 95% CI = -1.04 to 2.84, p = 0.362] and hemoglobin A1c (Hb1Ac) percentage [WMD = 0.00%, 95% CI = -0.10 to 0.11, p = 0.916] in the main analyses.
Did not affect because the calculated p-value of 0.916 was larger than the p-value of 0.05.

The investigators concluded that the grapes/grape products supplementation reduces homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) in adults. Further, large-scale RCTs with longer duration are required to confirm these results.

Original title:
The effect of grapes/grape products on glycemic response: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials by Moodi V, Abedi S, […], Miraghajani M.

Link:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33893683/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on fruit and diabetes right here.

Homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) is a method for assessing β-cell function and insulin resistance (IR) from basal (fasting) glucose and insulin or C-peptide concentrations. HOMA-IR is an indicator of insulin resistance in diabetic patients. The higher the value, the more resistant you are to insulin. Diabetic patients often have a high HOMA-IR value.

Objectives:
Excess body weight, including overweight and obesity, is one of the major factors influencing human health and plays an important role in the global burden of disease. Carotenoids serve as precursors of vitamin A-related retinoids and are considered to have potential effects on many diseases. However, the influence of carotenoids on people with excess body weight is unclear. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Does carotenoid supplementation reduce risk of overweight and obesity in overweight or obese subjects?

Study design:
This review article included 7 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 8 observational studies with 28,944 subjects and data on multiple carotenoid subgroups, including lycopene, astaxanthin, cryptoxanthin, α-carotene, and β-carotene.

In all included RCTs, the intervention duration was 20 days at the shortest and 16 weeks at the longest and the range of intervention doses was 1.2-60 mg/d.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found that the insufficiency of serum carotenoids significantly increased risk of overweight and obesity with 73% [OR = 1.73, 95% CI = 1.57 to 1.91, p 0.001].

The investigators found, moreover, carotenoid supplementation was significantly associated with body weight reductions [SMD = -2.34 kg, 95% CI = -3.80 to -0.87 kg, p 0.001], body mass index decrease [SMD = -0.95 kg/cm², 95% CI = -1.88 to -0.01 kg/cm², p 0.001] and waist circumference losses [SMD = -1.84 cm, 95% CI = -3.14 to -0.54 cm, p 0.001].

The investigators concluded that 1.2-60 mg/d carotenoid supplementation reduces risk of overweight and obesity in overweight or obese subjects. Furthermore, an insufficiency of serum carotenoids is a risk factor for overweight and obesity. Additional data from large clinical trials are needed.

Original title:
The association between carotenoids and subjects with overweight or obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis by Yao N, Yan S, […], Cui W.

Link:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33977977/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on carotenoid consumption and obesity/overweight right here.

Am I overweight?
 

Objectives:
Does chromium supplementation improve lipid profile (serum levels of triglyceride and cholesterol) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM)?

Study design:
This review article included  24 RCTs (with 28 effect sizes).

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found that chromium supplementation resulted in a significant decrease in serum levels of triglyceride (TG) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus [MD = -6.54 mg/dL, 95 % CI = -13.08 to -0.00, p = 0.050].
Significant means that there is an association with a 95% confidence.

The investigators found that chromium supplementation resulted in a significant decrease in serum levels of total cholesterol (TC) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus [WMD = -7.77 mg/dL, 95 % CI = -11.35 to -4.18, p 0.001].

The investigators found that chromium supplementation significantly increased high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL cholesterol or good cholesterol) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus [WMD = 2.23 mg/dL, 95 % CI = 0.07 to 4.40, p = 0.043] level.

The investigators found, however, chromium supplementation did not have significant effects on low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL cholesterol or bad cholesterol) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus [WMD = -8.54 mg/dL, 95 % CI = -19.58 to 2.49, p = 0.129] level.

The investigators concluded that chromium supplementation decreases serum levels of triglyceride (TG) and total cholesterol (TC) and increases HDL cholesterol (good cholesterol) levels in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. It should be noted that the lipid-lowering properties of chromium supplementation are small and may not reach clinical importance.

Original title:
Effects of chromium supplementation on lipid profile in patients with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials by Asbaghi O, Naeini F, […], Naeini AA.

Link:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33813266/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on chromium, cholesterol and diabetes right here.

Objectives:
The evidence on the association between obesity and atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence was equivocal. Therefore, this review article (meta-analysis) has been conducted.

Does obesity increase risk of atrial fibrillation recurrence in patients undergoing catheter ablation?

Study design:
This review article included 20 studies with 52,771 patients.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found that obesity was significantly associated with higher atrial fibrillation recurrence [OR = 1.30, 95% C = 1.16 to 1.47, p 0.001, I2 = 72.7%] and similar rate of adverse events [OR = 1.21, 95% CI = 0.87 to 1.67, p = 0.264, I2 = 23.9%] in patients undergoing catheter ablation.

The investigators found meta-regression showed that the association varied by age [coefficient = -0.03, p = 0.024].

The investigators found meta-analysis of highest versus lowest BMI showed that the highest group had higher atrial fibrillation recurrence [OR = 1.37, 95% CI = 1.18 to 1.58, p 0.001, I2 = 64.9%] and adverse events [OR = 2.02, 95% CI = 1.08 to 3.76, p = 0.028, I2 = 49.5%] in patients undergoing catheter ablation.

The investigators found the dose-response relationship for BMI and atrial fibrillation recurrence was nonlinear [p nonlinearity 0.001], the curve became steeper at 30-35 kg/m².

The investigators found for adverse events, an increase of 1% for every 1 kg/m² increase in BMI [OR = 1.01, 95% CI = 1.00 to 1.02, p = 0.001], the relationship was nonlinear [p nonlinearity = 0.001].

The investigators concluded that obesity is associated with higher atrial fibrillation recurrence in patients undergoing catheter ablation. High BMI is associated with a higher risk for adverse events.

Original title:
BMI and atrial fibrillation recurrence post catheter ablation: A dose-response meta-analysis by Pranata R, Henrina J, […], Munawar M.

Link:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33544873/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on cardiovascular diseases and obesity/overweight right here.

Catheter ablation is a procedure that uses radiofrequency energy (similar to microwave heat) to destroy a small area of heart tissue that is causing rapid and irregular heartbeats. Destroying this tissue helps restore your heart’s regular rhythm. Catheter ablation is also called radiofrequency ablation.

Am I overweight?
 

Objectives:
A few randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have assessed the effect of brown rice consumption on metabolic parameters (such as, weight, height, waist circumference, fasting glucose, LDL, HDL, total cholesterol, triglycerides and blood pressure) compared to white rice, with inconsistent findings. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Is the effect of brown rice on adiposity indices (such as, weight, height and waist circumference), lipid profile (such as, LDL, HDL, total cholesterol and triglycerides) and glycemic markers (such as, fasting blood glucose) higher compared to white rice in adult subjects?

Study design:
This review article included 13 RCTs.
In accordance with Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach, the certainly of the included evidence was low and very low.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found brown rice significantly reduced:
weight by -1.63 kg [95% CI = -2.15 to -1.11, I2 = 97%, n = 6];
body mass index (BMI) by -0.58 kg/m² [95% CI = -0.78 to -0.37, I2 = 96%, n = 6] and;
waist circumference by -2.56 cm [95% CI = -4.86 to -0.26, I2 = 88%, n = 5] compared with white rice.

The investigators found, moreover, brown rice had no significant effect on lipid profile and glycemic markers.

The investigators found pre-germinated brown rice significantly declined:
weight by -1.75 kg [95% CI = -2.70 to -0.81, I2 = 99%, n = 4];
total cholesterol by -24.22 mg/dL [95% CI = -33.03 to -15.41, I2 = 78%, n = 5];
triglyceride (TG) by -43.28 mg/dL [95% CI = -74.05 to -12.50, I2 = 90%, n = 5];
low-density lipoprotein (LDL or bad cholesterol) by -20.05 mg/dL [95% CI = -29.57 to -10.52, I2 = 71%, n = 5] and;
fasting blood glucose (FBG) by -15.83 mg/dL [95% CI = -25.20 to -6.46, I2 = 91%, n = 5] compared to white rice.

The investigators concluded brown rice has anti-obesity effects in comparison with white rice. However, it has no beneficial effects on lipid profile and glycemic markers. Furthermore, pre-germinated brown rice has better functional effects on promoting lipid profile and fasting blood glucose compared to brown rice.

Original title:
The effect of brown rice compared to white rice on adiposity indices, lipid profile, and glycemic markers: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials by Golzarand M, Toolabi K, […], Mirmiran P.

Link:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33905269

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on rice consumption and obesity/overweight right here.

Objectives:
Several mechanisms have been proposed for the effect of vitamin E on weight loss. Yet various interventional studies with wide ranges of doses and durations have reported contradictory results. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Does vitamin E supplementation reduce overweight?

Study design:
This review article included 24 RCTs.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found there was no significant effect of vitamin E supplements on weight [WMD = 0.15, 95% CI = -1.35 to 1.65, p = 0.847], body mass index (BMI) [WMD = 0.04, 95% CI = -0.29 to 0.37, p = 0.815] and waist circumference (WC) [WMD = -0.19 kg, 95% CI = -2.06 to 1.68, p = 0.842], respectively.

The investigators found, however, subgroup analysis revealed that vitamin E supplementation in studies conducted on participants with normal BMI (18.5-24.9) had increasing impact on BMI [p = 0.047].  

The investigators concluded there is no significant effect of vitamin E supplementation on weight, BMI and waist circumference (WC). However, vitamin E supplementation increases BMI in participants with normal BMI (18.5-24.9).

Original title:
Can vitamin E supplementation affect obesity indices? A systematic review and meta-analysis of twenty-four randomized controlled trials by Emami MR, Jamshidi S, […], Aryaeian N.

Link:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33632535/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on vitamin E and obesity/overweight right here.

Objectives:
Does L-arginine supplementation improve biomarkers (fasting blood sugar, insulin, HbA1c and HOMA-IR values) of glycemic control in adults?

Study design:
This review article included 12 randomised clinical trials (RCTs).

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found L-arginine supplementation had no significant effect on serum fasting blood sugar (FBS) [weighted mean difference (WMD) = -3.38 mg/dL, 95% CI = -6.79 to 0.04, p = 0.53], serum insulin [WMD = -0.12 Hedges' g, 95% CI = -0.33 to 0.09, p = 0.27], glycated haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) [WMD = -0.04%, 95% CI = -0.25 to 0.17, p = 0.71] and homeostasis model assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) [WMD = -0.48, 95% CI = -1.15 to 0.19, p = 0.15].
No significant because the calculated p-value of 0.15 was larger than the p-value of 0.05.

The investigators concluded although several animal studies have proposed that L-arginine supplementation might improve blood glucose control, the present review article could not confirm this benefit in humans.

Original title:
Effects of L-arginine supplementation on biomarkers of glycemic control: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials by Karimi E, Hatami E, […], Askari G.

Link:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33426939/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on L-arginine and diabetes right here.

Arginine is classified as a semiessential or conditionally essential amino acid, depending on the developmental stage and health status of the individual, that helps the body build protein. L-arginine is also found in most protein-rich foods, including fish, red meat, poultry, soy, whole grains, beans and dairy products.
 

Objectives:
Does garlic supplementation reduce adiponectin and leptin serum levels?

Study design:
This review article included 5 RCTs.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found that garlic supplementation did not significantly affect adiponectin [Hedges's = 0.20, 95% CI = -0.06 to 0.47, p = 0.12] and leptin [Hedges's = 0.08, 95% CI = -0.26 to 0.41, p = 0.65] concentrations in comparison with placebo.

The investigators found, however, in the subgroup analysis, significantly increased serum adiponectin level was seen following garlic supplementation in trials with a mean age of participants ˂30 years [Hedges's = 0.44, 95% CI = 0.01 to 0.87, p = 0.04], the doses ˂1.5 g/day [Hedges's = 0.38, 95% CI = 0.02 to 0.71, p = 0.04] and trials with duration ≥8 weeks [Hedges's = 0.48, 95% CI = 0.08 to 0.89, p = 0.02].

The investigators concluded that ˂1.5 g/day garlic supplementation during ≥8 weeks reduces adiponectin level among participants ˂30 years.

Original title:
Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials on the effects of garlic supplementation on serum adiponectin and leptin levels by Shekarchizadeh-Esfahani P, Hassani B, […], Soraya N.

Link:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33792129/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find here more information/studies about review article/significant and garlic.

Adiponectin is a fat-derived hormone that appears to play a crucial role in protecting against insulin resistance/diabetes and atherosclerosis (atherosclerosis is the dominant cause of cardiovascular disease (CVD)). Decreased adiponectin levels are thought to play a central role in the development of obesity, cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes in humans.

Objectives:
Previous meta-analyses, with some methodological controversies, have assessed the relation between nut consumption and type 2 diabetes (T2D) risk and pointed to contradictory results. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Does nut consumption reduce risk of type 2 diabetes?

Study design:
This review article included 5 prospective cohort studies and 3 cross-sectional studies.
The certainty of the evidence using NutriGrade was very low for all the exposures.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found meta-analyses of cross-sectional studies and prospective cohort studies, comparing the highest with the lowest categories, revealed a nonsignificant association between total nut consumption and type 2 diabetes.
Nonsignificant means that there is no association with a 95% confidence.

The investigators found meta-analyses of prospective cohort studies showed that peanut butter consumption significantly reduced type 2 diabetes incidence with 13% [RR = 0.87, 95% CI = 0.77 to 0.98, I2 = 50.6%, p = 0.16], whereas no association was observed between peanuts or tree nuts and type 2 diabetes.

The investigators found there was no evidence of a linear dose-response or nonlinear dose-response gradient for total nut and peanut consumption in prospective cohort studies.

The investigators concluded peanut butter consumption may reduce type 2 diabetes incidence. May reduce because the certainty of the evidence using NutriGrade was very low.

Original title:
Nut consumption and type 2 diabetes risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies by Becerra-Tomás N, Paz-Graniel I, […], Salas-Salvadó J.

Link:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33471083/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on nut consumption and diabetes right here.
 

Objectives:
Peripheral neuropathy (PN) is common in patients with diseases that are in turn associated with deficiency of the B-vitamins, and vitamin treatment has shown mixed results. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Does a low vitamin B level increase the risk of peripheral neuropathy?

Study design:
This review article included 46 observational studies and 7 interventional studies.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found the presence of peripheral neuropathy was significantly associated with lowered B12 levels [1.51, 95% CI = 1.23 to 1.84, n = 34, I2 = 43.3%, p = 0.003].

The investigators found the presence of peripheral neuropathy was significantly associated with elevated methylmalonic acid levels [2.53, 95% CI = 1.39 to 4.60, n = 9, I2 = 63.8%, p = 0.005].

The investigators found the presence of peripheral neuropathy was significantly associated with elevated homocysteine levels [3.48, 95% CI = 2.01 to 6.04, n = 15, I2 = 70.6%, p 0.001].

The investigators found treatment with vitamin B1 was associated with a significant improvement in symptoms of peripheral neuropathy [5.34, 95% CI = 1.87 to 15.19, n = 3, I2 = 64.6%, p = 0.059].

The investigators found B12 treatment (vs. the comparators) showed a non-significant association with symptom improvement [1.36, 95% CI = 0.66 to 2.79, n = 4, I2 = 28.9%].

The investigators found analysis of 7 trials combined showed a non-significant higher odds ratio for improvement under treatment with the B-vitamins [2.58, 95% CI = 0.98 to 6.79, I2 = 80.0%, p 0.001].

The investigators concluded peripheral neuropathy is associated with lowered plasma vitamin B12 and elevated methylmalonic acid and homocysteine levels. Well-designed studies, especially in non-diabetes peripheral neuropathy, are needed.

Original title:
Association between neuropathy and B-vitamins: A systematic review and meta-analysis by Stein J, Geisel J and Obeid R.

Link:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33619867/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find here more information/studies about review article/significant, vitamin B1 y B12 and chronic diseases.

Peripheral neuropathy refers to the conditions that result when nerves that carry messages to and from the brain and spinal cord from and to the rest of the body are damaged or diseased.

Increased methylmalonic acid levels are a sensitive indicator of mild vitamin B12 deficiency.
 

Objectives:
Recent systematic reviews and meta-analyses of randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials (double-blind, placebo-controlled RCTs) have reported controversial findings regarding the associations between calcium supplements on the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Do calcium supplements increase risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD)?

Study design:
This review article included 13 RCTs with 28,935 participants in an intervention group (group with calcium supplements) and 14,243 in a control group (group without calcium supplements).

The mean age of the study participants was 66.3 years (range: 35 to 97 years) and 92.8% of those were women.
Publication bias was not observed.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found calcium supplements significantly increased the risk of cardiovascular disease with 15% in healthy postmenopausal women [RR = 1.15, 95% CI = 1.06 to 1.25, I2 = 0.0%, n = 14].

The investigators found calcium supplements significantly increased the risk of coronary heart disease with 16% in healthy postmenopausal women [RR = 1.16, 95% CI = 1.05 to 1.28, I2 = 0.0%, n = 9].

The investigators found in the subgroup meta-analysis, dietary calcium intake of 700-1000 mg per day or supplementary calcium intake of 1000 mg per day significantly increased the risk of cardiovascular disease and coronary heart disease.

The investigators concluded that the use of calcium supplements (1000 mg per day) is significantly associated with the increased risk of cardiovascular disease and coronary heart disease by 15%, specifically in postmenopausal women. These findings should be explicitly confirmed by conducting further RCTs with cardiovascular disease outcome measures as well as the incidence of osteoporosis or fractures as the primary endpoints.

Original title:
Calcium Supplements and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials by Myung SK, Kim HB, […], Oh SW.

Link:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33530332/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on calcium consumption, elderly and cardiovascular diseases right here.

Objectives:
Does a low-carbohydrate diet (LCD) causally increase adiponectin concentration in adults?

Study design:
This review article included 11 RCTs with 534 participants in low-carbohydrate diet group and 513 participants in control group (group without a low-carbohydrate diet).
Proportion of carbohydrate from calorie was from 4 to 34% (4-34 En%).
Time of the follow-up varied between studies and ranged from 6 to 152 weeks.
Meta-regression analysis revealed that age [β = 0.04, p = 0.15], baseline BMI [β= -0.15, p = 0.15], time of follow-up [β = 0.01, p = 0.17], energy percentage of carbohydrates [β = 0.004, p = 0.90], energy percentage of protein [β = -0.12, p = 0.08], energy percentage of fat [β = 0.20, p = 0.61] and baseline adiponectin [β = 0.001, p = 0.97] are not sources of heterogeneity

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found low-carbohydrate diet significantly increased adiponectin concentration [0.02 µg/mL, 95% CI = 0.01 to 0.03, p 0.001].

The investigators found dose-response analysis indicated a nonlinear association between the percentage of carbohydrate and change in adiponectin level from baseline [p = 0.04].

The investigators found in subgroup analysis based on the proportion of carbohydrate from calorie, there was a significant increase in adiponectin concentration in studies that prescribed 30% of calorie from carbohydrates [0.12 µg/mL, 95% CI = 0.07 to 0.18].
In contrast, diets which consisted ≥30% of carbohydrates had no significant effect on adiponectin [0.50 µg/mL, 95% CI = -0.46 to 1.48].

The investigators concluded that a diet with 30% of calorie from carbohydrates (diet with 30 En% carbohydrates) causally increases adiponectin concentration in adults.

Original title:
Effect of low-carbohydrate diet on adiponectin level in adults: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials by Shemirani F, Golzarand M, […], Mahmoudi M.

Link:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33455438/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on carbohydrate consumption, diabetes and cardiovascular diseases right here.

The most easy way to follow a diet with maximum 30% of calorie from carbohydrates (diet with 30 En% carbohydrates) is to choose only meals/products with maximum 30 En% carbohydrates. Check here which products contain maximum 30 En% carbohydrates. However, the most practical way to follow a diet with maximum 30 En% carbohydrates is, all meals/products that you eat on a daily basis should on average contain maximum 30 En% carbohydrates.
30 En% carbohydrates means that the total amounts of carbohydrates make up for a 30% of the total kcal of the diet.

Adiponectin is a protein hormone produced and secreted exclusively by adipocytes (fat cells) that regulates the metabolism of lipids and glucose. Adiponectin influences the body's response to insulin. Adiponectin also has antiinflammatory effects on the cells lining the walls of blood vessels.
 

Objectives:
Vitamin D deficiency during pregnancy or infancy is associated with adverse growth in children. No systematic review has been conducted to summarize available evidence on the effect of vitamin D supplementation in pregnancy and infancy on growth and body composition in children. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Does vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy or infancy increase adiposity (severe or morbid overweight) risk in childhood?

Study design:
This review article included 12 RCTs with a total of 4,583 participants.
The doses of vitamin D in the intervention group (group with vitamin D supplements) were 60,000 IU/4 weeks (1,500 mcg/4 weeks) or 60,000 IU/8 weeks and in the control group (group without vitamin D supplements) was 400 IU/day.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy was associated with higher triceps skinfold thickness (mm) [MD = 0.33, 95% CI = 0.12 to 0.54, I2 = 34%] in neonates.

The investigators found vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy or infancy was associated with significantly increased length for age z-score in infants at 1 year of age [MD = 0.29, 95% CI = 0.03 to 0.54, I2 = 0%].

The investigators found vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy or infancy was associated with lower body mass index (BMI) (kg/m²) [MD = -0.19, 95% CI = -0.34 to -0.04, I2 = 0%] and body mass index z-score (BMIZ) [MD = -0.12, 95% CI = -0.21 to -0.04, I2 = 0%] in offspring at 3-6 years of age.

The investigators found vitamin D supplementation during early life was not observed to be associated with children’s bone, lean or fat mass.

The investigators concluded vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy or infancy is associated with reduced adiposity (severe or morbid overweight) in childhood. Future large well-designed double blinded RCTs are needed to assess the effectiveness of vitamin D supplementation in early life on children’s bone health, lean mass and adiposity.

Original title:
Effect of Vitamin D Supplementation in Early Life on Children's Growth and Body Composition: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials by Ma K, Wei SQ, [...], Wen SW.

Link:
https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/13/2/524/htm

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on vitamin D and obesity/overweight right here.

Objectives:
Fish oil has been shown to reduce the risk of metabolic disorders. However, the effects of fish oil intervention on glucose metabolism and insulin sensitivity are still controversial, especially in children. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Do fish oil supplements (EPA + DHA) improve insulin sensitivity in children?

Study design:
This review article included 13 RCTs with 567 children in placebo group (group without fish oil supplements) and 565 in fish oil group (intervention group).

No heterogeneity was found for the pooled and subgroup analyses.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found compared with the placebo group, fish oil intervention had beneficial effects on insulin sensitivity in the pooled analysis [WMD = -0.219, 95% CI = -0.392 to -0.046, p = 0.013].

These beneficial effects were also found in subgroup analyses, when the fish oil intervention period was short-term (≤6 months) low dose (eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) + docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) dose 1.5 g/day) and high ratio (eicosapentaenoic acid to docosahexaenoic acid ≥1).

The investigators concluded fish oil supplements, especially 1.5 g/day EPA + DHA during 6 months, improve insulin sensitivity in children.

Original title:
Effect of Fish Oil on Insulin Sensitivity in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized, Controlled Trials by Hou M, Zhou W, [...], Lv H.

Link:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33388274/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on EPA + DHA and diabetes right here.