Nutrition and health

Objectives:
Even though many studies have examined the possible effect of low-fat diet on breast cancer survival, the relationship remains unclear. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Does low-fat diet reduce risk of recurrence of breast cancer?

Study design:
This review article included 2 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 1 large multi-center prospective cohort study with 9,966 breast cancer patients.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found post-diagnostic low-fat diet significantly reduced risk of recurrence of breast cancer by 23% [HR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.63 to 0.94, p = 0.009] and all cause mortality of breast cancer by 17% [HR = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.69 to 1.00, p = 0.05].

The investigators concluded post-diagnostic low-fat diet reduces risk of recurrence of breast cancer. However, more trials of the relationship between low-fat diet and all-cause mortality of breast cancer are still needed.

Original title:
Effect of low-fat diet on breast cancer survival: a meta-analysis by Xing MY, Xu SZ and Shen P.

Link:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24606431/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on fat consumption and breast cancer right here.

A low-fat diet is a diet with maximum 30 En% fat and maximum 7 En% saturated fat.  
30 En% fat means that the amounts of fat contribute 30% to the total calories (kcal) of the diet.
If the diet contains 2000 kcal, 66.7 grams of fat contribute 30% to this 2000 kcal.
1 gram of fat gives 9 kcal. Thus, 66.7 grams of fat provide 600 kcal and 600 kcal is 30% of 2000 kcal.

The most easy way to follow a diet a diet with maximum 30 En% fat and maximum 7 En% saturated fat is to choose only meals/products with maximum 30 En% fat and maximum 7 En% saturated fat. Check here which products contain maximum 30 En% fat and maximum 7 En% saturated fat.

However, the most practical way to follow a diet with maximum 30 En% fat and maximum 7 En% saturated fat is, all meals/products that you eat on a daily basis should contain on average maximum 30 En% fat and maximum 7 En% saturated fat.

To do this, use the 7-points nutritional profile app to see whether your daily diet contains maximum 30 En% fat and maximum 7 En% saturated fat.

Objectives:
Systematic reviews of case-control studies evaluating the relationship between dietary salt intake and gastric cancer showed a positive association, however a quantitative analysis of longitudinal cohort studies is lacking. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Does a high salt intake increase gastric cancer risk?

Study design:
This review article contained 10 cohort studies with 268,718 participants, of which 1,474 gastric cancer events and a follow-up of 6-15 years.

Meta-regression analyses did not detect specific sources of heterogeneity.

There was no evidence of publication bias.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found for high vs low salt intake a significantly increased risk of 68% for gastric cancer [RR = 1.68, 95% CI = 1.17 to 2.41, p = 0.005].

The investigators found for moderate vs low salt intake a significant increased risk of 41% for gastric cancer [RR = 1.41, 95% CI = 1.03 to 1.93, p = 0.032].

The investigators found the association was stronger in the Japanese population and higher consumption of selected salt-rich foods was also associated with greater risk.

The investigators concluded high salt intake is directly associated with an increased risk of gastric cancer in prospective population studies, with progressively increasing risk across consumption levels.

Original title:
Habitual salt intake and risk of gastric cancer: A meta-analysis of prospective studies by D’Elia L, Rossi G, […], Strazzullo P.

Link:
http://www.clinicalnutritionjournal.com/article/S0261-5614%2812%2900005-2/abstract

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find here more studies/information on sodium/salt and  cancer right here.

According to WHO, a high salt intake is a salt intake of more than 5 grams salt per day.

A diet with more than 5 grams salt per day is a diet with mainly products/meals with more than 0.25 grams salt per 100 kcal. Check here which products contain maximum 5 grams salt per 100 kcal.
Use the 7-points nutritional profile app to see whether your daily diet contains maximum 5 grams salt per 100 kcal.
 

Objectives:
Although exercise can improve insulin sensitivity, no adequate synthesis exists of exercise intervention studies with regard to their effect on insulin sensitivity. Therefore, this review article (meta-analysis) has beeen conducted.

Does exercise improve insuline sensitivity?

Study design:
This review article included data found across 2509 subjects (115 samples, 78 reports).
The median of mean age was 43 years.
The median of mean preintervention fasting insulin was 8 mU/L.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found the overall mean effect size for 2-group postintervention comparisons was 0.38 [95% CI = 0.25-0.51, I2 = 0%] and for 2-group pre-post comparisons was 0.43 [95% CI = 0.30-0.56, I2 = 52%].

The investigators found higher mean insulin sensitivity for treatment than control subjects.

The investigators found the postintervention mean of 0.38 was consistent with treatment subjects ending studies with a mean fasting insulin of 6.8 mU/L if control participants’ mean fasting insulin were 7.9 mU/L.
Exploratory moderator analyses did not document different insulin sensitivity effect sizes across intervention characteristics or sample attributes.

The investigators concluded exercise is a valuable primary care and community health strategy for healthy adults to improve insulin sensitivity and lower the risk for diabetes conferred by insulin resistance.

Original title:
Insulin Sensitivity Following Exercise Interventions: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Outcomes Among Healthy Adults by Conn VS, Koopman RJ, […], Hafdahl AR.

Link:
http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/2150131913520328

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more studies/information on physical activity and diabetes right here.

Objectives:
Is there a relationship between serum 25(OH)D (vitamin D blood level) and mortality risk in the general population?

Study design:
This review article included 14 prospective cohort studies that involved 5562 deaths out of 62548 individuals.
In the parametric model, which is based on 11 studies and 59231 individuals, the lowest quantile as the reference category has been used.

Evidence of heterogeneity for the RR was apparent when highest were compared with lowest categories [p = 0.008, I2 = 58%].

There was no evidence of publication bias.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found for “highest compared with lowest” categories of 25(OH)D, a significant reduced risk of 29% for mortality [RR = 0.71, 95% CI = 0.50-0.91].

The investigators found in the parametric model, the estimated summary RRs of mortality were 0.86 [95% CI = 0.82-0.91], 0.77 [95% CI = 0.70-0.84] and 0.69 [95% CI = 0.60-0.78] for individuals with an increase of 12.5, 25 and 50 nmol 25(OH)D serum values/L, respectively, from a median reference category of ∼27.5 nmol/L.
However, no significant decrease in mortality was found above ∼87.5 nmol/L.

The investigators concluded there is a nonlinear decrease in mortality risk as circulating 25(OH)D increases, with optimal concentrations ∼75-87.5 nmol/L. Because many adults do not achieve these 25(OH)D values, large prospective randomized trials are urgently needed to investigate whether vitamin D supplementation is able to reduce mortality risk in the general population.

Original title:
Vitamin D deficiency and mortality risk in the general population: a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies by Zittermann A, Iodice S, [...], Gandini S.

Link:
http://ajcn.nutrition.org/content/95/1/91.full

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on vitamin D right here. 

Objectives:
Low glycaemic index (GI) diets are beneficial in the management of hyperglycemia. Cardiovascular diseases are the major cause of mortality in diabetes therefore it is important to understand the effects of GI on blood lipids. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Does a low GI diet lower the cholesterol levels?

Study design:
This review article included 28 RCTs comparing low with high GI diets over at least 4 weeks. These 28 RCTs contained 1272 participants with studies ranged from 6 to 155 participants, one was powered on blood lipids and 3 had adequate allocation concealment.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found that compared to high GI diet low GI diet significantly reduced total cholesterol by 0.13 mmol/L [95% CI = -0.22 to -0.04, p = 0.004, 27 trials, 1441 participants]. Significantly means, it can be said with 95% confidence that low GI diet really lowered the total cholesterol levels with 0.13 mmol/L.

The investigators found that compared to high GI diet low GI diet significantly reduced LDL-cholesterol by 0.16 mmol/L [95% CI = -0.24 to -0.08, p 0.0001, 23 studies, 1281 participants]. Significantly, because the p-value was less than 0.05.

The investigators found subgroup analyses suggested that reductions in LDL-cholesterol were greatest in studies of shortest duration and greatest magnitude of GI reduction. Furthermore, lipid improvements appeared greatest and most reliable when the low GI intervention was accompanied by an increase in dietary fiber.

The investigators found sensitivity analyses, removing studies without adequate allocation concealment, lost statistical significance but retained suggested mean falls of 0.10 mmol/L in both.

The investigators found no effects on HDL-cholesterol [MD = -0.03 mmol/L, 95% CI = -0.06 to 0.00, I2 = 0%], or triglycerides [MD was 0.01 mmol/L, 95% CI = -0.06 to 0.08, I2 = 0%].

The researchers concluded that low GI diets reduce total and LDL-cholesterol (bad cholesterol) but had no effect on HDL-cholesterol (good cholesterol) or triglycerides.

Original title:
Low glycemic index diets and blood lipids: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials by Goff LM, Cowland DE, [...], Frost GS.

Link:
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0939475312001524

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on cholesterol and cardiovascular disease right here.

High LDL-cholesterol levels and high triglyceride levels increase the risk of getting cardiovascular diseases whereas high HDL-cholesterol levels decrease the risk of getting cardiovascular diseases.

A low GI diet is a diet with a GI value of 55 or lower.

Objectives:
Does soy isoflavone reduce the frequency and severity of hot flashes?

Study design:
This review article included 19 trials (13 included hot flash frequency, of which 10 for severity and 3 for composite scores).
17 trials were selected for meta-analyses to clarify the effect of soybean isoflavones on hot flash frequency (13 trials) and severity (9 trials).

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found intake of soy isoflavones (median = 54 mg aglycone equivalents) for 6 weeks to 12 months significantly reduced the frequency (combined fixed-effect and random effects model) of hot flashes by 20.6% [95% CI = -28.38 to -12.86, p 0.00001] compared with placebo [p heterogeneity = 0.0003, I2 = 67% for random effects model].

The investigators also found isoflavones significantly reduced hot flash severity by 26.2% [95% CI = -42.23 to -10.15, p = 0.001] compared with placebo [p heterogeneity 0.00001, I2 = 86% for random effects model].

The investigators found isoflavone supplements providing more than 18.8 mg of genistein (the median for all studies) were more than twice as potent at reducing hot flash frequency than lower genistein supplements.

The investigators concluded soy isoflavone supplements (54 mg per day for 6 weeks to 12 months), derived by extraction or chemical synthesis, are significantly more effective than placebo in reducing the frequency and severity of hot flashes. Additional studies are needed to further address the complex array of factors that may affect efficacy, such as dose, isoflavone form, baseline hot flash frequency and treatment duration.

Original title:
Extracted or synthesized soybean isoflavones reduce menopausal hot flash frequency and severity: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials by Taku K, Melby MK, […], Messina M.

Link:
http://journals.lww.com/menopausejournal/Abstract/2012/07000/Extracted_or_synthesized_soybean_isoflavones.11.aspx

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more studies/information on elderly and isoflavones right here.
 

Objectives:
Evidence shows cruciferous vegetables exhibit chemoprotective properties, commonly attributed to their rich source of isothiocyanates. However, epidemiological data examining the association between cruciferous vegetable intake and colorectal neoplasms have been inconclusive. Therefore, this review article (meta-analysis) has been conducted.

Does cruciferous vegetable intake decrease colon cancer risk?

Study design:
This review article included 33 articles.
Subgroup analysis for individual cruciferae types (n = 8 studies) and GST polymorphism (n = 8 studies) were performed. Pooled adjusted odds ratios (ORs) comparing highest and lowest categories of dietary pattern scores were calculated.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found when comparing highest with lowest categorie, cruciferous vegetable intake significantly reduced risk of colon cancer with 16% [OR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.72-0.98, p value heterogeneity 0.001].

The investigators found when comparing highest with lowest categorie, broccoli intake significantly reduced risk of colorectal neoplasms with 20% [OR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.65-0.99, p value heterogeneity = 0.02].

The investigators found stratification by GST genotype showed that the GSTT1 null genotype confered a reduction in colorectal neoplasms risk of 22% [OR = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.64-0.95, p value heterogeneity = 0.32].

The investigators concluded this meta-analysis provides support to the hypothesis that cruciferous vegetable intake protects against cancer of the colon. This meta-analysis also demonstrates the significance of gene-diet interactions and the importance of assessing individual cruciferous vegetables.

Original title:
Cruciferous vegetables and risk of colorectal neoplasms: a systematic review and meta-analysis by Tse G and Eslick GD.

Link:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24341734

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more studies/information on colon cancer and cruciferous vegetable intake right here.

Objectives:
Does physical activity reduce gastric cancer risk?

Study design:
This review article included 7 cohort studies (with mean reported follow-up ranging from 6 to 18.8 years) and 9 case control studies reporting 11,111 cases of gastric cancer among 1,606,760 patients.

There was no evidence of publication bias, both quantitatively [Begg and Mazumdar rank correlation test, p = 0.62] and qualitatively, on visual inspection of the funnel plot.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found the risk of gastric cancer was 21% [OR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.71-0.87, I2 = 55%]  lower among the most physically active people as compared with the least physically active people, after adjustment for important confounders, including age, obesity, and other risk factors for gastric cancer (smoking, alcohol, dietary patterns and socioeconomic status).
This protective effect was seen for gastric cancers in the cardia [OR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.63-1.00, 4 studies] and distal stomach [OR = 0.63, 95% CI = 0.52-0.76, 5 studies].

The investigators found increasing physical activity was associated with a reduced risk of gastric cancer in both men [OR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.75-0.99, 10 studies] and women [OR = 0.72, 95% CI = 0.55-0.94, 3 studies].

The investigators found in 12 studies that increased recreational physical activity showed an 18% reduction in gastric cancer risk [OR = 0.82, 95% CI = 0.72-0.94].

The investigators found the effect size was significantly smaller in high-quality studies [OR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.75-0.99, 6 studies] as compared with low-quality studies [OR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.69-0.81, 10 studies]. The results were consistent across sex, study quality, study design and geographic location.

The investigators concluded physical activity - especially recreational physical activity - is associated with reduced risk of gastric cancer. Lifestyle interventions focusing on increasing physical activity may decrease the global burden of gastric cancer, in addition to a myriad of other health benefits with being physically active, which include cardiovascular, metabolic and psychologic wellbeing.

Original title:
Physical Activity Is Associated with Reduced Risk of Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis by Singh S, Varayil JE, […], Iyer PG.

Link:
http://cancerprevention.aacrjournals.org/content/7/1/12.abstract

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more studies/information on physical activity and cancer right here.

Objectives:
In view of the vital role of oxidative stress in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease (AD), the potential of antioxidant supplements to prevent AD have gained much interest, while there are conflicting results on this topic in recent years. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Does dietary intake of vitamin C and E and β-carotene decrease risk of Alzheimer's disease?

Study design:
This review article included 7 articles (dietary intake, but no supplements).

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found a significant decreased risk for Alzheimer disease of 24% [pooled relative risk = 0.76 95% CI = 0.67-0.84] for dietary intake of vitamin E and of 17% [pooled relative risk = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.72-0.94] for dietary intake of vitamin C.

However, the investigators found a non-significant decreased risk of 12% [pooled relative risk = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.73-1.03] for dietary intake of β-carotene.

The investigators concluded dietary intakes of vitamin C and E lower the risk of Alzheimer's disease, with vitamin E exhibiting the most pronounced protective effects. The findings will be of significance to the prevention and interventional treatment of Alzheimer's disease.

Original title:
Dietary intakes of vitamin E, vitamin C, and β-carotene and risk of Alzheimer's disease: a meta-analysis by Li FJ, Shen L and Ji HF.

Link:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22543848

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on vitamin C and E and carotenoids right here. 

Objectives:
Does diabetes increase risk of incident dementia and mild cognitive impairment?

Study design:
This review article included 19 prospective longitudinal studies including 6184 subjects with diabetes and 38530 subjects without diabetes. All subjects were without dementia or mild cognitive impairment at baseline (=at the beginning of the study).

There was no publication bias.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found persons with diabetes had a significant increased risk of 46% for Alzheimer's disease [RR = 1.46, 95% CI = 1.20-1.77]. Significant means that there is an association with a 95% confidence.

The investigators found persons with diabetes had a significant increased risk of 148% for vascular dementia [RR = 2.48, 95% CI = 2.08-2.96].

The investigators found persons with diabetes had a significant increased risk of 51% for any dementia [RR = 1.51, 95% CI = 1.31-1.74]. Significant because RR of 1 was not found in the 95% CI of 1.31 to 1.74. RR of 1 means no risk/association.

The investigators found persons with diabetes had a significant increased risk of 21% for mild cognitive impairment [RR = 1.21, 95% CI = 1.02-1.45].

The investigators concluded diabetes is a risk factor for incident dementia (including Alzheimer's disease, vascular dementia and any dementia) and mild cognitive impairment.

Original title:
Diabetes as a risk factor for dementia and mild cognitive impairment: a meta-analysis of longitudinal studies by Cheng G, Huang G, [...], Wang H.

Link:
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1445-5994.2012.02758.x/epdf

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more studies/information on elderly and diabetes right here.

Objectives:
Previous meta-analyses identified an inverse association of coffee consumption with the risk of type 2 diabetes. However, an updated meta-analysis is needed because new studies comparing the trends of association for caffeinated and decaffeinated coffee have since been published. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Does coffee intake reduce type 2 diabetes risk in a dose-response manner?

Study design:
This review article included 28 prospective cohort studies with 1109272 study participants and 45335 cases of type 2 diabetes. The follow-up duration ranged from 10 months to 20 years.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found for compared with no or rare coffee consumption, a significant reduced risk of type 2 diabetes of:
8% [RR = 0.92, 95% CI = 0.90-0.94] for 1 cup/day;
15% [RR= 0.85, 95% CI = 0.82-0.88] for 2 cups/day;
21% [RR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.75-0.83] for 3 cups/day;
25% [RR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.71-0.80] for 4 cups/day;
29% [RR = 0.71, 95% CI = 0.65-0.76] for 5 cups/day and;
33% [RR = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.61-0.74] for 6 cups/day.

The investigators found a significant decreased risk of type 2 diabetes of 9% [RR = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.89-0.94] for an increasement of 1 cup/day caffeinated coffee and 6% [RR = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.91-0.98] for an increasement of 1 cup/day decaffeinated coffee [p for difference = 0.17].

The investigators concluded coffee consumption is inversely associated with the risk of type 2 diabetes in a dose-response manner. Both caffeinated and decaffeinated coffee is associated with reduced diabetes risk.

Original title:
Caffeinated and decaffeinated coffee consumption and risk of type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and a dose-response meta-analysis by Ding M, Bhupathiraju SN, […], Hu FB.

Link:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24459154

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more studies/information on coffee consumption and diabetes right here.
 

Objectives:
The prevalence of obesity and diabetes is increasing among children, adolescents and adults. Although estimates of the efficacy of exercise training on fasting insulin and insulin resistance have been provided for adults, similar estimates have not been provided for youth. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Study design:
This review article included 24 trials.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found a small to moderate effect for exercise training on fasting insulin and improving insulin resistance in youth [Hedges’ d effect size = 0.48, 95% CI = 0.22-0.74, p 0.001 and 0.31, 95% CI = 0.06-0.56, p 0.05, respectively].

The investigators concluded there is evidence to support the use of exercise training in the prevention and treatment of type 2 diabetes in youth.

Original title:
Exercise and Insulin Resistance in Youth: A Meta-Analysis by Fedewa MV, Gist NH, […], Dishman RK.

Link:
http://www.pediatricsdigest.mobi/content/133/1/e163.abstract

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on diabetes and sport nutrition right here.

Objectives:
The association of red meat consumption with the risk of stomach cancer has been reported by many studies, with inconclusive results. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Does a high red meat consumption increase stomach cancer risk?

Study design:
This review article included a total of 18 studies (cohort and case-control studies) involving 1,228,327 subjects.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found for the highest versus lowest categories of red meat intake a significant increased risk of 37% for gastric cancer [pooled RR = 1.37, 95% CI = 1.18-1.59, I2 = 67.6%, p 0.001].

The investigators found in population-based case-control studies, a significant increased risk of 58% for gastric cancer [pooled RR = 1.58, 95% CI = 1.22-2.06, I2 = 73.0%, p 0.001].

The investigators found in hospital-based case-control studies, a significant increased risk of 63% for gastric cancer [pooled RR = 1.63, 95% CI = 1.38-1.92, I2 = 19.1%, p = 0.284].

The investigators found, however, no association among cohort studies [RR = 1.00, 95% CI = 0.83-1.20, I2 = 33.9%, p = 0.158].

The investigators found the significant association was also presented in the subgroup analysis by geographic area (Asia, Europe), publication year (≥2000), sample size (1,000, ≥1,000) and quality score (7 stars, ≥7 stars).

The investigators found in dose-response analysis that every 100 g/day increment in red meat intake significant increased gastric cancer risk with 17% [RR = 1.17, 95% CI = 1.05-1.32].

The investigators found in linear regression model that the risk of gastric cancer increased with increasing level of red meat consumption.

The investigators concluded that a increased intake of red meat might be a risk factor for stomach cancer. Might be because the risk was not significant among cohort studies. Therefore, further larger prospective cohort studies are warranted to verify this association.

Original title:
Red meat consumption and stomach cancer risk: a meta-analysis by Song P, Lu M, […], Zhao Q.

Link:
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00432-014-1637-z

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more studies/information on meat intake and cancer right here.
 

Objectives:
An increased intake of magnesium might lower blood pressure (BP), yet evidence from clinical trials is inconsistent, perhaps as a result of small sample size or heterogeneity in study design. Therefore, this review article (meta-analysis) has been conducted.

Are there dose-dependent effects of magnesium supplementation on blood pressure?

Study design:
This review article included 20 RCTs included 14 of hypertensive and 6 of normotensive persons totaling 1220 participants.
The doses of magnesium ranged from 10 to 40 mmol/day (median: 15.4 mmol/day or 370 mg per day).

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found magnesium supplementation resulted in only a small overall non-significant reduction in blood pressure. The pooled net estimates of blood pressure change were -0.6 mmHg [95% CI = -2.2 to 1.0] for systolic blood pressure and -0.8 mmHg [95% CI = -1.9 to 0.4] for diastolic blood pressure.

However, the investigators found an apparent dose-dependent effect of magnesium, with significant reductions of 4.3 mmHg systolic blood pressure [95% CI = 6.3 to 2.2, p 0.001) and non-significant reductions of 2.3 mmHg diastolic blood pressure [95% CI = 4.9 to 0.0, p = 0.09) for each 10 mmol/day (240 mg/day) increase in magnesium dose.

The investigators concluded there is a dose-dependent blood pressure reductions, especially systolic blood pressure from magnesium supplementation. However, adequately powered trials with sufficiently high doses of magnesium supplements need to be performed to confirm this relationship.

Original title:
The effect of magnesium supplementation on blood pressure: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials by Jeea SH, Miller ER, [...], Klagb MJ.

Link:
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0895706102029643

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more studies/information on magnesium and lowering blood pressure right here.  

Objectives:
Lutein and zeaxanthin are thought to have beneficial effects on protecting the lens against cataract formation, but findings from epidemiologic studies have been inconsistent. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Does dietary lutein and zeaxanthin intake reduce age-related cataract risk?

Study design:
This review article included 6 prospective cohort studies, involving 4416 cases and 41999 participants.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found for comparing the highest with the lowest categories of dietary lutein and zeaxanthin intake, a significant reduced risk for nuclear cataract of 25% [RR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.65-0.85], but the reduced risk was not significant for cortical cataract [RR = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.53-1.17] and for posterior subcapsular cataract [RR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.40-1.13]. Significant means, there is an association with a 95% confidence.

The investigators found in dose-response analysis that every 300 μg/d increment in dietary lutein and zeaxanthin intake was significantly associated with a 3% [RR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.94-0.99] reduction in the risk of nuclear cataract.

The investigators found in dose-response analysis that every 300 μg/d increment in dietary lutein and zeaxanthin intake was non-significantly associated with a 1% [RR = 0.99, 95% CI = 0.95-1.02] reduction in the risk of cortical cataract. Non-significantly means, there is no association with a 95% confidence.

The investigators found in dose-response analysis that every 300 μg/d increment in dietary lutein and zeaxanthin intake was non-significantly associated with a 3% [RR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.93-1.01] reduction in the risk of posterior subcapsular cataract. Non-significantly because RR of 1 was found in 95% CI of 0.93 to 1.01. RR of 1 means no risk.

The investigators concluded dietary lutein and zeaxanthin intake (at least 300 μg/d) is associated with a reduced risk of age-related cataract, especially nuclear cataract in a dose-response manner, indicating a beneficial effect of lutein and zeaxanthin in age-related cataract prevention.

Original title:
A dose–response meta-analysis of dietary lutein and zeaxanthin intake in relation to risk of age-related cataract by Ma L, Hao ZX, [...], Pan JP.

Link:
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00417-013-2492-3

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more studies/information on elderly right here.

Objectives:
Quantification of the association between the intake of fruit and vegetables and risk of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is controversial even though several studies have explored this association. Therefore, this review article (meta-analysis) has been conducted.

Does a high intake of vegetables and fruit decrease risk of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma?

Study design:
This review article included a total of 32 observational studies involving 10037 cases of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

There was no evidence of publication bias.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found highest vs. lowest vegetable intake, significantly reduced risk of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma with 44% [SRR = 0.56, 95% CI = 0.45-0.69, p-heterogeneity 0.001]. Significant means there is an association with a 95% confidence.

The investigators found highest vs. lowest fruit intake, significantly reduced risk of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma with 47% [SRR = 0.53, 95% CI = 0.44-0.64, p-heterogeneity 0.001].

The investigators found similar results in a linear dose-response analysis and there was evidence of non-linear associations for intakes of fruit [p non-linearity 0.001] and vegetables [p non-linearity = 0.041].

The investigators concluded that intakes of vegetables and fruit reduce risk of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Further investigation with prospective designs, validated questionnaires and good control of important confounders is warranted.

Original title:
Intake of fruit and vegetables and risk of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A meta-analysis of observational studies by Liu J, Wang J, […], Lv C.

Link:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23319052

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on review, 95% CI and heterogeneity, vegetables and fruits and cancer right here.
 

Objectives:
Does a low salt intake reduce blood pressure?

Study design:
This review article included 34 randomized trials with 3230 participants (the median age was 50 (range 22-73)), of which 22 were in hypertensive individuals and 12 in normotensive individuals. Of the 34 trials, 23 used crossover design and 11 used paralleled comparisons. 22 of the 34 trials were double blind, in 11 the observer was blind to blood pressure and one did not report any blinding procedure.

The study duration varied from 4 weeks to 3 years (median 4 weeks). With the usual salt intake the median 24 hour urinary sodium was 160 mmol (range 125-200 mmol), equivalent to a salt intake of 9.4 g/day (range 7.3-11.7 g/day) and the median blood pressure was 141/86 mmHg.

Despite the fact that only 7 out of 34 trials performed intention to treat analysis, the percentage of participants lost to follow-up after randomization was small (6.7% on average).

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found meta-analysis showed that the mean change in urinary sodium (reduced salt v usual salt) was -75 mmol/24 h (equivalent to a reduction of 4.4 g/day salt), and with this reduction in salt intake, the mean change in blood pressure was -4.18 mmHg [95% CI = -5.18 to -3.18, I2 = 75%] for systolic blood pressure and -2.06 mmHg [95% CI = -2.67 to -1.45, I2 = 68%] for diastolic blood pressure.

The investigators found meta-regression showed that age, ethnic group, blood pressure status (hypertensive or normotensive) and the change in 24 hour urinary sodium were all significantly associated with the fall in systolic blood pressure, explaining 68% of the variance between studies.

The investigators found a 100 mmol reduction in 24 hour urinary sodium (equivalent to a reduction 6 g/day salt) was associated with a fall in systolic blood pressure of 5.8 mmHg [95% CI = -2.5 to -9.2,  p = 0.001] after adjustment for age, ethnic group and blood pressure status.
For diastolic blood pressure, age, ethnic group, blood pressure status and the change in 24 hour urinary sodium explained 41% of the variance between studies.

The investigators found meta-analysis by subgroup showed that in people with hypertension the mean effect was -5.39 mmHg [95% CI = -6.62 to -4.15, I2 = 61%] for systolic blood pressure and -2.82 mmHg [95% CI = -3.54 to -2.11, I2 = 52%] for diastolic blood pressure.
In normotensive people, the figures were -2.42 mmHg [95% CI = -3.56 to -1.29, I2 = 66%] and -1.00 mmHg [95% CI = -1.85 to -0.15, I2 = 66%], respectively.

The investigators found further subgroup analysis showed that the decrease in systolic blood pressure was significant in both white and black people and in men and women.

The investigators found meta-analysis of data on hormones and lipids showed that the mean change was:
0.26 ng/mL/h [95% CI = 0.17 to 0.36, I2 = 70%] for plasma renin activity;
73.20 pmol/L [95% CI = 44.92 to 101.48, I2 = 62%] for aldosterone;
187 pmol/L [95% CI = 39 to 336, I2 = 5%] for noradrenaline (norepinephrine);
37 pmol/L [95% CI = -1 to 74, I2 = 12%] for adrenaline (epinephrine);
0.05 mmol/L [95% CI = -0.02 to 0.11, I2 = 0%] for total cholesterol;
0.05 mmol/L [95% CI = -0.01 to 0.12, I2 = 0%] for low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-cholesterol or bad cholesterol);
-0.02 mmol/L [95% CI = -0.06 to 0.01, I2 = 16%] high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-cholesterol or good cholesterol) and:
0.04 mmol/L [95% CI = -0.02 to 0.09, I2 = 0%] for triglycerides.

The investigators concluded a modest reduction in salt intake of 4.4 g/day for 4 or more weeks causes, from a population viewpoint, important falls in blood pressure in people with both raised and normal blood pressure.
Salt reduction is associated with a small physiological increase in plasma renin activity, aldosterone and noradrenaline and no significant change in lipid concentrations.
The current recommendations to reduce salt intake from 9-12 to 5-6 g/day will have a major effect on blood pressure, but a further reduction to 3 g/day will have a greater effect and should become the long term target for population salt intake.

Original title:
Effect of longer term modest salt reduction on blood pressure: Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials by He FJ, Li J and MacGregor GA.

Link:
http://www.bmj.com/content/346/bmj.f1325

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more studies/information on sodium intake and hypertension right here.
A daily diet with a maximum of 3 grams salt per day is a diet with a maximum of 0.15 gram salt per 100 kcal.
A daily diet with a maximum of 0.15 gram salt per 100 kcal is a diet with mainly products/meals with a maximum of 0.15 gram salt per 100 kcal.

Objectives:
Previous trials have shown that zinc supplementation can decrease the risk of diarrhea, pneumonia and malaria in children; however, the effects of zinc supplementation on mortality remain unclear. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Does zinc supplementation reduce total mortality and cause-specific mortality in preschool children?

Study design:
This review article included 8 RCTs which included 87,854 children and reported 1,558 events of mortality. The population of the trials ranged from 96 to 42,546 and the follow-up for subjects ranged from 6 to 17.6 months.

Egger and Begg tests showed no evidence of publication bias for total mortality [p value for Egger = 0.207, p value for Begg = 0.902].

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found overall, zinc supplementation had no effect on:
total mortality [RR = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.56-1.04, p = 0.084];
diarrhea-related mortality [RR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.53-1.20, p = 0.276];
pneumonia-related mortality [RR = 0.52, 95% CI = 0.11-2.39, p = 0.399];
malaria-related mortality [RR = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.77-1.06, p = 0.196] or;  

other causes of mortality [RR = 0.98, 95% CI = 0.67-1.44, p = 0.917]. No effect because RR of 1 was found in the 95% CI of 0.67 to 1.44. RR of 1 means no risk/effect/association.

The investigators found subgroup analysis indicated that zinc supplementation was significantly associated with a reduction in total mortality risk if the participants were boys, aged greater than 12 months and the duration of the follow-up period was less than 12 months. Significant means, there is an association with a 95% confidence

The investigators concluded zinc supplementation reduces total mortality risk if the participants are boys, aged greater than 12 months and the duration of the follow-up period is less than 12 months.

Original title:
Effects of zinc supplementation on the incidence of mortality in preschool children: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials by Fu W, Ding LR, [...], Zhou YH.

Link:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3823854/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on malnutrition and zinc right here.
 

Objectives:
Does iron supplementation during pregnancy improve maternal haematological status and birth weight?

Study design:
This review article included 48 RCTs (17,793 women) and 44 cohort studies (1,851,682 women).

The dose of iron in RCTs ranged from 10 mg to 240 mg daily. Duration of supplementation varied from 7 to 8 weeks up to 30 weeks during pregnancy.

Significant heterogeneity existed for several outcomes that could not be explained substantially by pre-specified subgroups.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found iron supplementation during pregnancy increased maternal mean haemoglobin concentration by 4.59 g/L [95% CI = 3.72 to 5.46] compared with controls.

The investigators found iron with folic acid was associated with a significant increase in mean haemoglobin concentration of 10.41 g/L [95% CI = 5.36 to 15.46, I2 = 0%, 9 trials] and reduction in risk of anaemia in the third trimester or at delivery of 56% [95% CI = 0.37 to 0.53, I2 = 44%, 5 trials]. Significant means there is an association with a 95% confidence.

The investigators found iron supplementation during pregnancy significantly reduced the risk of anaemia with 50% [95% CI = 0.42 to 0.59] compared with controls.

The investigators found iron supplementation during pregnancy significantly reduced the risk of iron deficiency (of the mother) with 41% [95% CI = 0.46 to 0.79] compared with controls.

The investigators found iron supplementation during pregnancy significantly reduced the risk of iron deficiency anaemia with 60% [95% CI = 0.26 to 0.60] compared with controls.

The investigators found iron supplementation during pregnancy significantly reduced the risk of low birth weight (2500 g) with 19% [95% CI = 0.71 to 0.93] compared with controls.

However, the investigators found iron supplementation during pregnancy non-significantly reduced the risk of preterm birth with 16% [95% CI = 0.68 to 1.03] compared with controls. Non-significant means there is no association with a 95% confidence.

The investigators found in cohort studies that anaemia in the first or second trimester was significantly associated with a higher risk for low birth weight of 29% [adjusted odds ratio 1.29, 95% CI = 1.09 to 1.53] and preterm birth with 21% [adjusted odds ratio = 1.21, 95% CI = 1.13 to 1.30].

The investigators found in exposure-response analysis that for every 10 mg increase in iron dose/day, up to 66 mg/day, the relative risk of maternal anaemia was significantly 0.88 [95% CI = 0.84 to 0.92, p for linear trend 0.001].

The investigators found in exposure-response analysis that birth weight increased by 15.1 g [95% CI = 6.0 to 24.2, p for linear trend = 0.005] and risk of low birth weight significantly decreased by 3% [relative risk = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.95 to 0.98, p for linear trend 0.001] every 10 mg increase in dose/day.

Furthermore, the investigators found for each 1 g/L increase in mean haemoglobin, birth weight increased by 14.0 g [95% CI = 6.8 to 21.8, p for linear trend = 0.002]. However, mean haemoglobin was not associated with the risk of low birth weight and preterm birth.

The investigators found no evidence of a significant effect on duration of gestation, small for gestational age births and birth length and duration of iron use was not significantly associated with the outcomes after adjustment for dose.

The investigators concluded daily prenatal use of iron substantially improved birth weight in a linear dose-response fashion, probably leading to a reduction in risk of low birth weight. An improvement in prenatal mean haemoglobin concentration linearly increased birth weight and a linear decrease in maternal anaemia with higher doses of iron, up to 66 mg/day.

Original title:
Anaemia, prenatal iron use, and risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis by Haider BA, Olofin I, […], Fawzi WW.

Link:
http://www.bmj.com/content/346/bmj.f3443

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on iron and pregnancy right here.

Iron deficiency anaemia occurs when there isn't enough iron in the body. Anaemia is a condition where the amount of haemoglobin in the blood is below the normal level.
Iron deficiency anaemia has been defined as haemoglobin 110 g/L and serum ferritin 12 µg/L.

Objectives:
Previous systematic reviews suggest beneficial effects of flavonoids on biomarkers of cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk, but have overlooked the impact of dose response or food complexity. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Do taking flavonoid supplements improve flow-mediated dilation (FMD) and blood pressure?

Study design:
This review article included 63 RCTs.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found meta-analyses of combined flavonoid subclasses showed significant improvements in FMD [chronic: 0.73%, 95% CI = 0.17 to 1.30, 14 RCTs and acute: 2.33%, 95% CI = 1.58 to 3.08, 18 RCTs].

The investigators found meta-analyses of combined flavonoid subclasses showed significant improvements in blood pressures [systolic: -1.46 mmHg, 95% CI = -0.38 to -0.53, 63 RCTs and diastolic: -1.25 mmHg, 95% CI = -1.82 to -0.67, 63 RCTs].

The investigators found similar benefits were observed for the flavan-3-ol, catechol flavonoids (catechins, quercetin, cyanidin etc.), procyanidins, epicatechin and catechin subgroups.

The investigators found dose-response relationships were non-linear for FMD (R2 ≤ 0.30), with greater associations observed when applying polynomial regression analyses (R2 ≤ 0.72). However, there was no indication of a dose response for blood pressure.

The investigators concluded flavonoid subclasses supplements show significant improvements in FMD and blood pressure. However, the flavonoid bioactivity does not follow a classical linear dose-response association and this may have important biological implications.

Original title:
Relative impact of flavonoid composition, dose and structure on vascular function: A systematic review of randomised controlled trials of flavonoid-rich food products by Kay CD, Hooper L, […], Cassidy A.

Link:
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mnfr.201200363/abstract;jsessionid=2CCB9E4E779A221E42AA38998C865DA6.d02t03?deniedAccessCustomisedMessage=&userIsAuthenticated=false

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on RCTs, lowering blood pressure and cardiovascular disease right here.

The optimal blood pressure for a healthy adult is120 mmHg systolic pressure and 80 mmHg diastolic pressure.

When blood flow increases through a vessel, the vessel dilates. This phenomenon has been coined flow-mediated dilatation (FMD). Flow-mediated dilation is an accepted technique to quantify endothelial function and has shown to have prognostic value for future cardiovascular disease (CVD). 

Objectives:
The association between meat consumption and the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is still inconclusive. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Does meat consumption increase risk of hepatocellular carcinoma?

Study design:
This review article included 7 cohort studies and 10 case-control studies.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found for the highest vs. lowest consumption levels a non-significant increased risk for hepatocellular carcinoma of 10% [RR = 1.10, 95% CI = 0.85-1.42] for red meat, a non-significant increased risk of 1% [RR = 1.01, 95% CI = 0.79-1.28] for processed meat and a non-significant decreased risk of 3% [RR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.85-1.11] for total meat. Non-significant means, there is no association with a 95% confidence.

The investigators found for the highest vs. lowest consumption levels a significant decreased risk for hepatocellular carcinoma of 31% [RR = 0.69, 95% CI = 0.58-0.81] for white meat and a significant decreased risk of 22% [RR = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.67-0.90] for fish. The results remained quite stable after stratification by the confounding factors.
Significant means, there is an association with a 95% confidence.

The investigators concluded a high level of white meat or fish consumption reduces the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma, while intake of red meat, processed meat or total meat is not associated with hepatocellular carcinoma risk. These results suggest that dietary intervention may be a promising approach for prevention of hepatocellular carcinoma, which still need to be confirmed by further well-designed prospective studies and experimental research.

Original title:
Systematic review with meta-analysis: meat consumption and the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma by Luo J, Yang Y, [...], Zhu Y.

Link:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24588342

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more studies/information on fish consumption, meat consumption and cancer right here.

A review article of cohort studies or case-control studies will answer the following question:
"Should I change my diet?".

Objectives:
Is there an association between meat intake and risk of esophageal cancer?

Study design:
This review article included 7 cohort studies and 28 case-control studies.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found for the highest versus lowest total meat consumption categories a non-significant increased risk of 19% [95% CI = 0.98-1.46] for esophageal cancer.

The investigators found for the highest versus lowest red meat consumption categories a significant increased risk of 55% [95% CI = 1.22-1.96] for esophageal cancer.

The investigators found for the highest versus lowest processed meat consumption categories a significant increased risk of 33% [95% CI = 1.04-1.69] for esophageal cancer.

The investigators found for the highest versus lowest white meat consumption categories a significant decreased risk of 28% [95% CI = 0.60-0.86] for esophageal cancer.

The investigators found for the highest versus lowest poultry consumption categories a significant decreased risk of 17% [95% CI = 0.72-0.96] for esophageal cancer.

The investigators found for the highest versus lowest fish consumption categories a non-significant decreased risk of 5% [95% CI = 0.76-1.19] for esophageal cancer.

The investigators found when stratified by histological subtype, positive associations among esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and red meat, white meat and poultry and esophageal adenocarcinoma with total meat and processed meat.

The investigators concluded red meat and processed meat consumption increase risk of esophageal cancer, while white meat and poultry decrease risk of esophageal cancer. Fish consumption is not associated with incidence of esophageal cancer.

Original title:
Meat consumption is associated with esophageal cancer risk in a meat- and cancer-histological-type dependent manner by Zhu HC, Yang X, […], Sun XC.

Link:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24395380

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more studies/information on meat consumption and cancer right here.
 

Objectives:
Several reviews and meta-analyses have examined the effects of iodine on mental development. However, none focused on young children, so they were incomplete in summarizing the effects on this important age group. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Is there a relationship between iodine and mental development of children 5 years old and under?

Study design:
This review article included 24 studies (14 cohort en 10 intervention studies).
Studies providing supplementation to women before or during pregnancy tended to give injections of iodized oil of 950 mg; only the studies conducted in China and DR Congo gave lower doses (400 and 475 mg, respectively).
The median sample size per group across the 10 intervention studies was 50 with a range of 7 to 624.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found that the best estimate to date of the effect size of iodine supplementation on mental development in children 5 years old and under was 0.49, which translated into 7.4 IQ points lost due to iodine deficiency.

The investigators found 6.9 to 10.2 IQ points lower in iodine deficient children compared with iodine replete children.

The investigators concluded, regardless of study design, iodine deficiency has a substantial impact on mental development in children 5 years old and under. To further quantify the importance of iodine for mental development in young children, this review points to the need for well-designed randomized controlled trials with adequate sample sizes as well as studies that assess the effectiveness of iodized salt.

Original title:
Iodine and Mental Development of Children 5 Years Old and Under: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis by Bougma K, Aboud FE, […], Marquis GS.

Link:
http://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/5/4/1384/htm

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on iodine right here. 

Objectives:
Previous observational studies regarding the existence of an association between folate intake and the risk of breast cancer have been inconsistent. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Does a higher dietary folate intake reduce breast cancer risk?

Study design:
This review article included 14 prospective cohort studies that reported data on 677,858 individuals.
The participant follow-up period ranged 4.7-17.4 years and the number of individuals per study ranged 11,699-88,818.
There was no publication bias.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found no association between dietary folate intake and breast cancer risk for highest versus lowest category  [RR =  0.97, 95% CI = 0.90-1.05, p  = 0.451, I2 =  57.5%, p = 0.004].

The investigators found dose-response meta-analysis findings showed no association between the risk of breast cancer and a 100 µg/day increase in dietary folate intake [RR = 0.99, 95% CI = 0.98-1.01, p = 0.361, I2 = 66.2%, p 0.001].

The investigators found evidence of a nonlinear relationship between dietary folate intake and the risk of breast cancer.

A daily dietary folate intake of 200-320 µg was associated with a reduced risk of breast cancer. However, daily folate intake levels >400 µg was associated with a increased risk of breast cancer.

The investigators found overall folate intake level was associated with a reduced breast cancer risk of 36% if the patients had a daily alcohol intake >10 g [RR for highest versus lowest category = 0.64, 95% CI = 0.43-0.97].

The investigators concluded there are no effects of increased dietary folate intake on the incidence of breast cancer. But, a daily dietary folate intake of 200-320 µg was associated with a reduced risk of breast cancer. However, daily folate intake levels >400 µg was associated with a increased risk of breast cancer. Future studies should focus on specific populations in order to analyze primary breast cancer prevention.

Original title:
Folate Intake and the Risk of Breast Cancer: A Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Studies by Zhang YF, Shi WW, […], Zhou YH.

Link:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4059748/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more studies/information on folate intake and breast cancer right here.
 

Objectives:
Increasing evidence suggests that the Mediterranean diet can reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease. Olive oil is the hallmark of this dietary pattern. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Does olive oil consumption reduce risk of cardiovascular disease?

Study design:
This review article included case-control, prospective cohort studies and a randomised controlled trial investigating the specific association between olive oil consumption and the risk of cardiovascular disease (101,460 participants) or stroke (38,673 participants). The results of all observational studies were adjusted for total energy intake.

Evidence of heterogeneity was apparent for cardiovascular disease, but not for stroke. Both the Egger test (p = 0.06) and the funnel plot suggested small-study effects.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found in case-controle studies a non-significant reduced risk of 27% [relative risk = 0.73, 95% CI = 0.44-1.21] for cardiovascular disease for a 25g increase in olive oil consumption.

The investigators found in cohort studies a non-significant reduced risk of 4% [relative risk = 0.96, 95% CI = 0.78-1.18] for cardiovascular disease for a 25g increase in olive oil consumption.

The investigators found in cohort studies olive oil consumption significantly reduced risk of stroke with 26% [relative risk = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.60-0.92].

The investigators found random-effects model showed a significant reduced risk of 18% [RR = 0.82, 95% CI = 0.70, 0.96] for combining all cardiovascular events (CHD and stroke).

The investigators concluded available studies support an inverse association of olive oil consumption with stroke and with stroke and cardiovascular disease combined. This finding is in agreement with the recent successful results of the PREDIMED randomised controlled trial.

Original title:
Olive oil consumption and risk of CHD and/or stroke: a meta-analysis of case-control, cohort and intervention studies by Martínez-González MA, Dominguez LJ and Delgado-Rodríguez M.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24775425

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more studies/information on cardiovascular disease right here.