Nutrition and health

Objectives:
It is unclear how dietary intake influences the ovarian cancer. Therefore, this review article (meta-analysis) has been conducted.

Is there a relationship between dietary intake of different nutrients/food groups and ovarian cancer risk?

Study design:
This review article included 97 cohort studies.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found no significant association between dietary intake and risk of ovarian cancer.

The investigators found in subgroup analyses that dietary intake of green leafy vegetables significantly reduced risk of ovarian cancer with 9% [RR = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.85 to 0.98].

The investigators found in subgroup analyses that dietary intake of allium vegetables significantly reduced risk of ovarian cancer with 21% [RR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.64 to 0.96].

The investigators found in subgroup analyses that dietary intake of fiber significantly reduced risk of ovarian cancer with 11% [RR = 0.89, 95% CI = 0.81 to 0.98].

The investigators found in subgroup analyses that dietary intake of flavonoids significantly reduced risk of ovarian cancer with 17% [RR = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.78 to 0.89].

The investigators found in subgroup analyses that dietary intake of green tea significantly reduced risk of ovarian cancer with 39% [RR = 0.61, 95% CI = 0.49 to 0.76].

The investigators found in subgroup analyses that dietary intake of tota fat significantly increased risk of ovarian cancer with 10% [RR = 1.10, 95% CI = 1.02 to 1.18].

The investigators found in subgroup analyses that dietary intake of saturated fat significantly increased risk of ovarian cancer with 11% [RR = 1.11, 95% CI = 1.01 to 1.22].

The investigators found in subgroup analyses that dietary intake of saturated fatty acid significantly increased risk of ovarian cancer with 19% [RR = 1.19, 95% CI = 1.04 to 1.36].

The investigators found in subgroup analyses that dietary intake of cholesterol significantly increased risk of ovarian cancer with 13% [RR = 1.13, 95% CI = 1.04 to 1.22].

The investigators found in subgroup analyses that dietary intake of retinol (vitamin A) significantly increased risk of ovarian cancer with 14% [RR = 1.14, 95% CI = 1.00 to 1.30].

The investigators found, in addition, acrylamide, nitrate, water disinfectants and polychlorinated biphenyls were significantly associated with an increased risk of ovarian cancer.

The investigators concluded that dietary intakes of green leafy vegetables, allium vegetables, fiber, flavonoids and green tea reduce ovarian cancer.

Original title:
Association between dietary intake and risk of ovarian cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis by Khodavandi A, Alizadeh F and Razis AFA.

Link:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32661683/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on different food groups and cancer right here.

Objectives:
Some evidence indicates that carotenoids may reduce the risk of bladder cancer (BC), but the association is unclear. Therefore, this review article (meta-analysis) has been conducted.

Do dietary carotenoid (β-cryptoxanthin, α-carotene, β-carotene and lutein and zeaxanthin) intakes or circulating carotenoid concentrations reduce bladder cancer risk in men and women?

Study design:
This review article included 22 studies (case-control and cohort studies), involving 516,740 adults.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found no association for the highest compared with the lowest category of carotenoid dietary intake and reduced risk of bladder cancer [RR = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.76 to 1.03].
No association because RR of 1 was found in the 95% CI of 0.76 to 1.03. RR of 1 means no risk/association.

The investigators found no association for the highest compared with the lowest category of circulating carotenoid concentrations and reduced risk of bladder cancer [RR = 0.36, 95% CI = 0.12 to 1.07].

The investigators found for the highest compared with the lowest category of circulating lutein and zeaxanthin concentrations a significantly reduced risk of 47% for bladder cancer [RR = 0.53, 95% CI = 0.33 to 0.84].
Significant because RR of 1 was not found in the 95% CI of 0.33 to 0.84. RR of 1 means no risk/association.

The investigators found dose-response analysis showed that bladder cancer risk significantly decreased by 42% [RR = 0.58, 95% CI = 0.36 to 0.94] for every 1 mg increase in daily dietary β-cryptoxanthin intake.

The investigators found dose-response analysis showed that bladder cancer risk significantly decreased by 76% [RR = 0.24, 95% CI = 0.08 to 0.67] for every 1 μmol/L increase in circulating concentration of α-carotene.

The investigators found dose-response analysis showed that bladder cancer risk significantly decreased by 27% [RR = 0.73, 95% CI = 0.57 to 0.94] for every 1 μmol/L increase in circulating concentration of β-carotene.

The investigators found dose-response analysis showed that bladder cancer risk significantly decreased by 56% [RR = 0.44, 95% CI = 0.28 to 0.67] for every 1 μmol/L increase in circulating concentrations of lutein and zeaxanthin.

The investigators concluded dietary β-cryptoxanthin intake and circulating concentrations of α-carotene, β-carotene and lutein and zeaxanthin reduce risk of bladder cancer.

Original title:
Carotenoid Intake and Circulating Carotenoids Are Inversely Associated With the Risk of Bladder Cancer: A Dose-Response Meta-analysis by Wu S, Liu Y, […], Ramirez AG.

Link:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31800007/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on carotenoids and cancer right here.

Objectives:
A growing number of epidemiological studies have suggested a possible association between long-chain omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) intake and the risk of cancers, but the results have been inconsistent. Therefore, this review article (meta-analysis) has been conducted.

Does dietary intake of omega-3 PUFAs reduce digestive system cancers?

Study design:
This review article included 8 case-control studies and 17 cohort studies, involving 1,247,271 participants and 23,173 patients with digestive system cancers.

Visual inspection of funnel plots and the Begg's and Egger's tests revealed no evidence of publication bias.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found the risk of digestive system cancers significantly decreased by 17% in individuals who consumed omega-3 PUFAs [RR = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.76 to 0.91].

The investigators found the risk estimates of digestive system cancers varied by cancer sites, study location, study design, type of omega-3 PUFAs and other confounders (smoking, alcohol consumption, body mass index and physical activity).

The investigators concluded omega-3 PUFA is a healthy dietary component for the prevention of digestive system cancers. Cancer incidence decreases with increasing omega-3 PUFAs intake for most digestive system cancer sites. The relation between omega-3 PUFAs and digestive system cancers RR is similar among different populations.

Original title:
Omega-3 PUFA Intake and the Risk of Digestive System Cancers: A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies by Jian J, Zhang and Zhao L.

Link:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32384489/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on omega-3 PUFAs and cancer right here.

Objectives:
Has oral supplementation of vitamin B (vitamins B1, B6, B12 and folic acid alone or combined) preventive effect on cognitive decline in cognitively unimpaired individuals?

Study design:
This review article included 20 RCTs, ranging from 23 to 2,919 participants per study, with a total of 12,697 participants.
8 of these 20 RCTs were deemed appropriate for the meta-analysis.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found meta-analysis did not yield a significant overall effect of supplementation with vitamin B on cognitive function [SMD = 0.02, 95% CI = -0.034 to 0.08]. A sensitivity analysis focusing on specific risk factors did not alter this result.
Some studies reported isolated significant effects of the intervention on secondary outcomes. However, these findings were outnumbered by the number of cognitive tests that did not yield significant effects.

The investigators concluded there is no overall evidence that oral vitamin B supplementation prevent cognitive decline in cognitively unimpaired individuals. The results of this review do not provide evidence that population groups with certain risk factors would profit more from the intervention than others.

Original title:
Vitamin B-Can It Prevent Cognitive Decline? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis by Behrens A, Graessel E, [...], Donath C.

Link:
https://systematicreviewsjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13643-020-01378-7

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on vitamins B1, B6, B12 and folic acid and dementia right here.

Objectives:
An increased risk of gastric cancer for pickled vegetable and salted fish intake has been suggested, yet the lack of a dose-response association warrants a quantitative analysis. Therefore, this review article (meta-analysis) has been conducted.

Do pickled vegetable and salted fish intakes increase risk of gastric cancer?

Study design:
This review article included 21 cohort studies with a total of 195,624 participants for the analysis of pickled vegetable intake and 16 cohort studies with a total of

196,384 participants for the analysis of salted fish intake.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found in a dose-response meta-analysis of 6 studies, a significantly increased risk of 15% [combined RR = 1.15, 95% CI = 1.07 to 1.23, p for heterogeneity = 0.14] for gastric cancer incidence for a 40 g/day increment in pickled vegetable intake.

The investigators found in the categorical meta-analysis of 6 studies, a marginally significant increase in the risk of gastric cancer incidence, comparing the highest to the lowest intake of salted fish [RR = 1.17, 95% CI = 0.99 to 1.38, p for heterogeneity = 0.26].

The investigators concluded intake of 40 g/day of pickled vegetable increases risk of gastric cancer incidence.

Original title:
Pickled Vegetable and Salted Fish Intake and the Risk of Gastric Cancer: Two Prospective Cohort Studies and a Meta-Analysis by Yoo JY, Cho HJ, […], Park SK.

Link:
https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/12/4/996/htm

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on vegetables and cancer right here

Objectives:
Epidemiologic studies focusing on the association between 1-carbon metabolism-related vitamins (ie, folate, vitamin B6, vitamin B2, vitamin B12) and breast cancer risk have reported inconsistent findings. Therefore, this review article (meta-analysis) has been conducted.

Does higher dietary intake of folate (folic acid), vitamin B2, B6 or B12 reduce breast cancer risk?

Study design:
This review article included 27 studies (case-control and cohort studies) with a total of 49,707 cases (persons with breast cancer) among 1,274,060 individuals.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found for the highest folate dietary intake compared with the lowest, a significantly reduced risk of 7% [pooled relative risk = 0.93, 95% CI = 0.88 to 0.99, p = 0.018] for breast cancer.

The investigators found for the highest vitamin B6 dietary intake compared with the lowest, a significantly reduced risk of 6% [pooled relative risk = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.89 to 1.00, p = 0.037] for breast cancer.

The investigators found for the highest vitamin B2 dietary intake compared with the lowest, a significantly reduced risk of 10% [pooled relative risk = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.82 to 0.99, p = 0.026] for breast cancer.

The investigators found no significant association between vitamin B12 and breast cancer risk [RR = 0.99, 95% CI = 0.94 to 1.04, p = 0.604].

The investigators found folate and vitamin B6 dietary intake significantly decreased the risk of estrogen receptor-negative (ER-)/progesterone receptor-negative (PR-) breast cancer but not ER+/PR+ breast cancer.

The investigators found an increment of 100 μg/d folate dietary intake corresponded to a 7% [RR = 0.93, 95% CI = 0.89 to 0.98, p = 9.007] deceased risk of ER-/PR- breast cancer.

The investigators concluded both higher folate, vitamin B2 and B6 dietary intake decreases risk of breast cancer, especially ER-/PR- breast cancer.

Original title:
Association Between One-carbon Metabolism-related Vitamins and Risk of Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Prospective Studies by Zeng J, Gu Y, […], Chang H.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32241696

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on folate, vitamin B2 and B6 intake and breast cancer right here.

If breast cancer cells have estrogen receptors, the cancer is called ER-positive breast cancer. If breast cancer cells have progesterone receptors, the cancer is called PR-positive breast cancer. If the cells do not have either of these 2 receptors, the cancer is called ER/PR-negative.

Objectives:
The impact of light-intensity physical activity (LPA) in preventing cancer mortality has been questioned. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Does light-intensity physical activity reduce cancer mortality?

Study design:
This review article included 5 prospective cohort studies, in which the definition of light-intensity physical activity based on accelerometer readings was mainly set within 100 to 2,100 counts/min.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found 30 min/day of light-intensity physical activity significantly reduced cancer mortality with 14% [summary HR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.79 to 0.95, I2 1%] and the association between light-intensity physical activity and risk reduction in cancer mortality was linearly shaped [p nonlinearity = 0.72].

The investigators found light-intensity physical activity exhibited a comparable magnitude of risk reduction in cancer mortality of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity regardless of equal time-length [0.87 per 30 min/day vs. 0.94 per 30 min/day, p interaction = 0.46] or equal amount [0.74 vs. 0.94 per 150 metabolic equivalents-min/day, p interaction = 0.11].

The investigators found, furthermore, replacing sedentary time by light-intensity physical activity of 30 min/day significantly decreased the risk of cancer mortality by 9%.

The investigators concluded 30 min/day of light-intensity physical activity reduce cancer mortality.

Original title:
Objectively-Measured Light-Intensity Physical Activity and Risk of Cancer Mortality: A Meta-analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies by Qiu S, Cai X, […], Schumann U.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32303534

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find here more information/studies about sport nutrition and cancer.

Light intensity physical activity is an activity that is classified as 3 METS.

Objectives:
Previous studies did not draw a consistent conclusion about the effects of vitamin K combined with vitamin D on human skeletal quality. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Does vitamin K combined with vitamin D supplementation increase bone mineral density (BMD)?

Study design:
This review article included 8 RCTs with a total of 971 participants.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found vitamin K combined with vitamin D supplementation significantly increased total bone mineral density (BMD) [pooled effect size = 0.316, 95% CI = 0.031 to 0.601].

The investigators found vitamin K combined with vitamin D supplementation significantly decreased levels of undercarboxylated osteocalcin [effect size = -0.945, 95% CI = -1.113 to -0.778].

The investigators found simultaneously, subgroup analysis showed that K2 or vitamin K (not specified) supplement less than 500 μg/d, when combined with vitamin D significantly increased total bone mineral density compared with the control group fed a normal diet or the group with no treatment [effect size = 0.479, 95% CI = 0.101 to 0.858 and effect size = 0.570, 95% CI = 0.196 to 0.945, respectively).

The investigators concluded the combination of vitamin K and D supplement increases the total bone mineral density (BMD) and decreases levels of undercarboxylated osteocalcin and a more favorable effect is expected when less than 500 μg/d vitamin K2 is used.

Original title:
The combination effect of vitamin K and vitamin D on human bone quality: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials by Kuang X, Liu C, […], Li D.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32219282

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on elderly, vitamin D and K right here.

Undercarboxylated osteocalcin represents inadequately carboxylated osteocalcin and this fraction increases with vitamin K insufficiency.

Objectives:
Is there a causal relationship between dietary intake of dairy products and a positive effect on bone mineral density (BMD) in healthy postmenopausal women?

Study design:
This review article included 6 RCTs with a total of 618 participants. Milk was the main dairy product used in the trials.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found there was a significant association between dairy product consumption and bone mineral density of the lumbar spine [SMD = 0.21, 95% CI = 0.05 to 0.37, p = 0.009], femoral neck [SMD = 0.36, 95% CI = 0.19 to 0.53, p  0.001], total hip [SMD = 0.37, 95% CI = 0.20 to 0.55, p  0.001] and total body [SMD = 0.58, 95% CI = 0.39 to 0.77, p  0.001].

The investigators found subgroup analysis showed a positive effect of dairy product consumption on the bone mineral density of the total hip starting from 12 months and the femoral neck starting from 18 months. There was also a positive association with the bone mineral density in the 4 sites in people living in low-calcium intake countries.

The investigators concluded that there is a causal relationship between dietary intake of dairy products, particularly milk during at least 12 months and a positive effect on bone mineral density (BMD) in healthy postmenopausal women. Therefore, dairy product consumption should be considered an effective public health measure to prevent osteoporosis in postmenopausal women.

Original title:
Effects of dairy products on bone mineral density in healthy postmenopausal women: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials by Shi Y, Zhan Y, [...], Jiang Y.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32185512

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on dairy products and elderly right here.

Menopause is the point when a woman no longer has menstrual periods for at least 12 months. Postmenopause is the stage after menopause.

Objectives:
Does a high LDL cholesterol level (bad cholesterol) increase risk of Alzheimer's disease (AD)?

Study design:
This review article included 26 case-control studies involving 7,033 participants (2,266 Alzheimer's disease patients and 4,767 non-dementia controls).

There was no significant evidence of publication bias according to the results of Egger's test [p = 0.084].

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found results from the meta-analysis of 26 studies revealed higher levels of LDL cholesterol (>121 mg/dL) in Alzheimer's disease than that of non-dementia controls [SMD = 0.35, 95% CI = 0.12 to 0.58, p 0.01], which was consistent with the results of the fixed-effect model [SMD = 0.16, 95% CI = 0.10 to 0.22, p 0.01].
Sensitivity analyses showed that no single study exerted substantial influence on the pooled effect size after sequentially omitting a study.

The investigators found subgroup analysis of age showed LDL cholesterol levels in Alzheimer's disease patients aged 60-70 were higher than that of non-dementia [60 ≤ age 70: SMD = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.23 to 1.37, p 0.01].  

The investigators concluded that elevated concentration of LDL cholesterol (>121 mg/dL) is a risk factor for Alzheimer's disease. This strong association is significant in patients with Alzheimer's disease aged 60-70 years, but vanishes with increasing age. This review article provides a promising strategy for reducing the risk of Alzheimer's disease in patients with hyperlipidemia, which may be achieved by regulating LDL cholesterol concentration between 103.9 and 121 mg/dL with statins. Prospective studies that exclude potential confounders, more scientific design and adequate long-term follow-up are needed to validate this hypothesis.

Original title:
Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol and Alzheimer's Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis by Zhou Z, Liang Y, […], Zhao M.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7002548/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on cholesterol and Alzheimer's disease right here.
 

Objectives:
Previous studies have demonstrated some associations between dietary vitamin A intake and ovarian cancer risk with an inconsistent relationship. Therefore, this review article (meta-analysis) has been conducted.

Does higher dietary intake of vitamin A reduce ovarian cancer risk?

Study design:
This review article included 10 case-control studies and 5 cohort studies, involving 4,882 cases (persons with ovarian cancer) among 443,179 participants.

There was no publication bias.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found higher dietary vitamin A intake significantly reduced ovarian cancer risk with 18.4% [RR = 0.816, 95% CI = 0.723 to 0.920, I2 = 48.4%, p for heterogeneity = 0.019].
Sensitivity analysis showed that no single study had a potential impact on the pooled RR.

The investigators found higher dietary vitamin A intake significantly reduced ovarian cancer risk with 23.1% [RR = 0.769, 95% CI = 0.655 to 0.902] in case-controle studies.
However, this reduced risk was not significant in cohort studies.

The investigators found higher dietary vitamin A intake significantly reduced ovarian cancer risk with 17.5% [RR = 0.825, 95% CI = 0.720 to 0.946] in North American populations.

The investigators concluded that higher dietary intake of vitamin A reduces ovarian cancer risk, especially among North Americans. As some limitations existed in this analysis, large scale studies with detailed amount of dietary vitamin A intake are needed to verify the results.

Original title:
Dietary vitamin A intake and the risk of ovarian cancer: A meta-analysis by Wang Q and He C.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7138903/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on vitamin A intake and cancer right here.

Objectives:
Epidemiologic studies of the relationship between nitrite or nitrate consumption and risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) remain controversial. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Does dietary intake of nitrite or nitrate increase risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma?

Study design:
This review article included 8 case-control and 4 cohort studies with a total of 8,067 cases of non-Hodgkin lymphoma that reported the correlation between nitrate or nitrite consumption and risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma published between 1996 and 2013.

NOS scores ranged from 4 to 8 with a mean value of 6.
Information on nitrate and nitrite intake was obtained by personal interview, telephone interview or mailed questionnaires.

There was no evidence of publication bias.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found that high levels of nitrite dietary intake was linked to a significantly elevated risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma of 55% [OR = 1.55, 95% CI = 1.27-1.88, I2 = 41.8%, p = 0.161]. 

The investigators found, however, no connection between the risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma and high levels of nitrate dietary intake [OR = 1.02, 95% CI = 0.94-1.10, I2 = 14.2%, p = 0.308].

The investigators found that the risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma increased by 26% for each additional microgram of nitrite consumed in the diet per day [OR = 1.26, 95% CI = 1.09-1.42].

The investigators found data from the high-quality studies indicated that nitrite consumption was positively associated with carcinogenicity, leading to non-Hodgkin lymphoma [OR = 1.44, 95% CI = 1.17-1.77] and positively correlated with the development of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma [OR = 1.55, 95% CI = 1.07-2.26], but not other non-Hodgkin lymphoma subtypes.

The investigators found, in addition, high levels of nitrite dietary intake was linked to a significantly elevated risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma of 50% [OR = 1.50, 95% CI = 1.15-1.95] in females.
However, this increased risk was not significant in males [OR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.52-1.36].

The investigators concluded that nitrite dietary intake, but not that of nitrate, raises the risk of developing non-Hodgkin lymphoma, particularly diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in females. In the future, better designed prospective research studies should be conducted to confirm these findings, clarify potential biological mechanisms and instruct clinicians about non-Hodgkin lymphoma prophylaxis.

Original title:
The relationship between consumption of nitrite or nitrate and risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma by Yu M, Li C, [...], Jin J.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6969097/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on significantly/cohort studies and cancer right here.

The preservative sodium nitrite fights harmful bacteria in ham, salami and other processed and cured meats and also lends them their pink coloration.
 

Objectives:
Previous studies had been published to explore the association about carbohydrate intake on esophageal cancer risk, with inconsistent results. Therefore, this review article (meta-analysis) has been conducted.

Does dietary intake of carbohydrate reduce esophageal cancer risk?

Study design:
This review article included 13 case-control studies that assessed a total of 3,033 patients.
The quality evaluation scores of each study ranged from 6 to 9 and the methodological quality was higher.

In the publication bias assessment, the results from funnel plots and Egger’s test detected no publication bias.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found in overall analysis for the highest category versus lowest category of dietary carbohydrate a significantly reduced risk of 37.3% [summarized OR = 0.627, 95% CI = 0.505 to 0.778, I2 = 59.9%, p for heterogeneity = 0.001] for esophageal cancer.
Sensitivity analyses showed no single study had essential effect on the overall result.

The investigators found for the highest category versus lowest category of dietary carbohydrate a significantly reduced risk of 43.1% [summarized OR = 0.569, 95% CI = 0.417 to 0.777] for esophageal adenocarcinoma.

The investigators found for the highest category versus lowest category of dietary carbohydrate a significantly reduced risk of 33.5% [summarized OR = 0.665, 95% CI = 0.453 to 0.975] for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

The investigators found in subgroup analysis by study design that the association was significant in population-based case-control studies, but not in the hospital-based case-control studies.

The investigators concluded that dietary intake of carbohydrate may contribute to the lower development of esophageal cancer. May contribute because this review article only included case-control studies and no cohort studies. As some limitations existed in tbjs meta-analysis, large scale prospective studies with detailed type of dietary carbohydrate intake are needed to verify these results.

Original title:
Dietary carbohydrate intake and the risk of esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis by Xuan F, Li W, […], Liu C.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7042123/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on carbohydrate intake and cancer right here.

The 2 main subtypes of esophageal cancer are esophageal squamous-cell carcinoma (often abbreviated to ESCC) and esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC).
 

Objectives:
Does post-diagnosis dietary supplement use decrease total mortality, cancer mortality and recurrence among cancer survivors?

Study design:
This review article included observational studies and randomized clinical trials (RCT).

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found in 4 observational studies, compared to no supplementation, calcium supplementation significantly reduced total mortality with 12% [RR = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.77 to 1.00, I2 = 0%] among all cancer survivors.

The investigators found in 3 observational studies, compared to no supplementation, calcium supplementation significantly reduced cancer mortality with 29% [RR = 0.71, 95% CI = 0.53 to 0.95, I2 = 0%] among all cancer survivors.

The investigators found in 2 observational studies, compared to no supplementation, calcium supplementation significantly reduced cancer mortality with 34% [RR = 0.66, 95% CI = 0.47 to 0.94, I2 = 0%] among colorectal cancer survivors.

The investigators found in 2 observational studies and 2 RCT’s, compared to no supplementation, vitamin D supplementation significantly reduced total mortality with 14% [RR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.76 to 0.99, I2 = 0%] among all cancer survivors.

The investigators found in 4 observational studies, compared to no supplementation, vitamin C supplementation significantly reduced total mortality with 21% [RR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.68 to 0.92, I2 = 0%] among breast cancer survivors.

The investigators found in 2 observational studies, compared to no supplementation, vitamin D supplementation significantly reduced total mortality with 15% [RR = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.72 to 0.99, I2 = 0%] among breast cancer survivors.

The investigators found in 3 observational studies, compared to no supplementation, vitamin E supplementation significantly reduced total mortality with 24% [RR = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.64 tot 0.90, I2 = 0%] among breast cancer survivors.

The investigators found in 2 observational studies, compared to no supplementation, multivitamins supplementation significantly reduced cancer recurrence with 21% [RR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.64 to 0.97, I2 = 0%] among breast cancer survivors.

The investigators found in 2 observational studies, compared to no supplementation, vitamin C supplementation significantly reduced cancer recurrence with 24% [RR = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.64 to 0.91, I2 = 0%] among breast cancer survivors.

The investigators found in 2 observational studies, compared to no supplementation, vitamin E supplementation significantly reduced cancer recurrence with 31% [RR = 0.69, 95% CI = 0.55 to 0.85, I2 = 0%] among breast cancer survivors.

The investigators concluded post-diagnosis dietary supplement use (particularly calcium, vitamin C, D and E) decreases total mortality, cancer mortality and recurrence among cancer survivors.

Original title:
Dietary Supplement Use after Cancer Diagnosis in Relation to Total Mortality, Cancer Mortality and Recurrence: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis by Kanellopoulou A, Riza E, […], Benetou V.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32148118

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on calcium, vitamin C, D, E, breast cancer and colorectal cancer right here.

Objectives:
Several epidemiological studies have been performed to evaluate the association of dietary intake of vitamin C-oriented foods (DIVCF) with risk of fracture and bone mineral density (BMD) loss, but the results remain controversial. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Does dietary intake of vitamin C-oriented foods decrease risk of fracture and bone mineral density loss?

Study design:
This review article included 4 cohort studies, 11 case-control studies and 2 cross-sectional studies with a total of 19,484 subjects.

The studies received a quality score of ≥5, indicating that the methodological quality of the studies was generally good.

No evidence of publication bias was found in the evaluation of dietary intake of vitamin C-oriented foods and the risk of hip fracture.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found that the people with a higher dietary intake of vitamin C-oriented foods had a significantly 34% [RR = 0.66, 95% CI = 0.47 to 0.94, I2 = 79.5%, p = 0.000] lower risk of hip fracture.

The investigators found that the people with a higher dietary intake of vitamin C-oriented foods had a significantly 42% [RR = 0.58, 95% CI = 0.38 to 0.89] lower risk of hip fracture in case-control studies.
However, this reduced risk was not significant in cohort studies [RR = 0.92, 95% CI = 0.59 to 1.44]. 

The investigators found that the people with a higher dietary intake of vitamin C-oriented foods had a significantly 34% [RR = 0.66, 95% CI = 0.48 to 0.92] lower risk of osteoporosis.

The investigators found higher dietary intake of vitamin C-oriented foods was negatively associated with the risk of bone mineral density loss at the lumbar spine [pooled r = 0.15, 95% CI = 0.09 to 0.23] and at the femoral neck [pooled r = 0.20, 95% CI = 0.11 to 0.34].

The investigators concluded that higher dietary intake of vitamin C-oriented foods reduces the risk of hip fracture, osteoporosis and bone mineral density loss, suggesting that people should consume more vitamin C to decrease the risk of hip fracture, osteoporosis and bone mineral density loss, particularly lumbar spine and femoral neck.

Original title:
Can Dietary Intake of Vitamin C-Oriented Foods Reduce the Risk of Osteoporosis, Fracture, and BMD Loss? Systematic Review With Meta-Analyses of Recent Studies by Zeng LF, Luo MH, […], Liu J.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7008177/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on vitamin C and elderly right here.
 

Objectives:
Current evidence on associations between intakes of linoleic acid (LA), the predominant n-6 (ω-6) fatty acid and mortality is inconsistent and has not been summarized by a systematic review and meta-analysis. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Does higher linoleic acid intake, assessed by dietary surveys or biomarkers decrease mortality from all causes, cardiovascular disease (CVD) and cancer?

Study design:
This review article included 44 prospective cohort studies with 811,069 participants with dietary intake assessment (170,076 all-cause, 50,786 cardiovascular disease and 59,684 cancer deaths) and 65,411 participants with biomarker measurements (9,758 all-cause, 6,492 cardiovascular disease and 1,719 cancer deaths).

Meta-regressions suggested baseline age and dietary assessment methods as potential sources of heterogeneity for the association between linoleic acid and total mortality.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found when compared with the lowest categories of dietary linoleic acid intake, that the highest categories of dietary linoleic acid intake significantly reduced total mortality risk with 13% [pooled RR = 0.87, 95% CI = 0.81 to 0.94, I2 = 67.9%].

The investigators found when compared with the lowest categories of dietary linoleic acid intake, that the highest categories of dietary linoleic acid intake significantly reduced cardiovascular disease mortality risk with 13% [pooled RR = 0.87, 95% CI = 0.82 to 0.92, I2 = 3.7%].

The investigators found when compared with the lowest categories of dietary linoleic acid intake, that the highest categories of dietary linoleic acid intake significantly reduced cancer mortality risk with 11% [pooled RR = 0.89, 95% CI = 0.85 to 0.93, I2 = 0%].

The investigators found for each standard deviation increment in linoleic acid concentrations in adipose tissue/blood compartments a significantly reduced total mortality risk of 9% [pooled RR = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.87 to 0.95, I2 = 64.1%].

The investigators found for each standard deviation increment in linoleic acid concentrations in adipose tissue/blood compartments a significantly reduced cardiovascular disease mortality risk of 11% [pooled RR = 0.89, 95% CI = 0.85 to 0.94, I2 = 28.9%].

The investigators found for each standard deviation increment in linoleic acid concentrations in adipose tissue/blood compartments a significantly reduced cancer mortality risk of 9% [pooled RR = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.84 to 0.98, I2 = 26.3%].

The investigators concluded higher linoleic acid intake, assessed by dietary surveys or biomarkers, reduces risk of mortality from all causes, cardiovascular disease and cancer. These data support the potential long-term benefits of PUFA intake in lowering the risk of cardiovascular disease and premature death.

Original title:
Dietary intake and biomarkers of linoleic acid and mortality: systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies by Li J, Guasch-Ferré M, […], Hu FB.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32020162

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on linoleic acid intake and mortality right here.
Linoleic acid is a PUFA.
 

Objectives:
Does high waist circumference increase liver cancer?

Study design:
This review article included  5 prospective cohort studies with 2,547,188 participants.
Participants were aged 46-58 years, with a mean age of 51 years.
The mean follow-up of participants in the studies was 7.8 years.
The mean quality (NOS scores) of the studies included was 7 (ranging from 5 to 9).

Funnel plots did not show significant asymmetry between the studies included.
Furthermore, Begg's and Egger's regression test did not show any significant publication bias (p = 0.62 and p = 0.60, respectively).

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found combined results of the studies included with random-effects model showed that the highest waist circumference category was significantly associated with an increased risk of 59% for liver cancer [HR = 1.59, 95% CI = 1.38-1.83, I2 = 0%, p = 0.42] compared to the lowest waist circumference category.

The investigators concluded that waist circumference is a significant risk factor related to the incidence of liver cancer.

Original title:
Waist Circumference and Risk of Liver Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of over 2 Million Cohort Study Participants by Rahmani J, Kord Varkaneh H, [...], Zhang Y.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7024879/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on cancer and obesity/overweight right here.

Objectives:
Epidemiologic studies have investigated the association between nut intake and risk for multiple cancers. However, current findings are inconsistent and no definite conclusion has been drawn from prospective studies. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Does nut consumption reduce cancer risk?

Study design:
This review article included 33 cohort studies with more than 50,000 cancer cases.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found when comparing the highest with the lowest category of nut consumption, high consumption of nuts significantly decreased risk of overall cancer with 10% [RR = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.85-0.95].
Significant association was only obtained for intake of tree nuts.

The investigators found when comparing the highest with the lowest category of nut consumption, high consumption of nuts significantly decreased risk of cancer from the digestive system with 17% [RR = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.77-0.89].

The investigators found per 20 g/day increase in nut consumption was related to a 10% [RR = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.82-0.99] decrease in cancer risk.

The investigators concluded that consumption of 20 grams of tree nuts per day reduces cancer of the digestive system.

Original title:
Nut Consumption and Risk of Cancer: A Meta-analysis of Prospective Studies by Long J, Ji Z, […], Cheng L.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32041895

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on nut consumption and cancer right here.

Objectives:
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a common type of dementia, which has caused heavy global economic and health burden and the using of statins to treat Alzheimer disease has caused widely debated. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Does statin use decrease Alzheimer disease?

Study design:
This review article included a total of 9 RCTs containing 1,489 patients. Of them, 742 patients in the statins group, 747 patients in the control group (group without statins).

There were 9 studies used the MMSE scale, 5 studies used the ADAS-Cog scale, 4 studies used the NPI scale and 6 studies used the ADL scale.

Sensitivity analysis and publication bias test were both negative and the results were relatively reliable and stable.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found meta-analysis of the 9 studies that reported the MMSE scale scores indicated that there was no significant effect of statins as compared with control group [pooled WMD = 1.09, 95% CI = -0.00 to 2.18, p = 0.05, I2 = 87.9%].

The investigators found meta-analysis of the 5 studies that reported the ADAS-Cog scale scores also indicated that there was no significant effect of statins as compared with control group [pooled WMD = -0.16, 95% CI = -2.67 to 2.36, p = 0.90, I2 = 80.1%].

The investigators found meta-analysis of the 4 studies that reported the NPI scale scores indicated that treatment with statins significantly slowed the rise in the NPI scale scores as compared with control group [pooled WMD = -1.16, 95% CI = -1.88 to -0.44, p = 0.002, I2 = 45.4%].

The investigators found meta-analysis of the 6 studies that reported the ADL scale scores indicated that treatment with statins significantly improve patients' daily living ability [pooled WMD = -4.06, 95% CI = -6.88 to -1.24, p = 0.005, I2 = 86.7%].

The investigators found results of subgroup analysis indicated that the use of statins in the short term (≤ 12 months) associated with the change of the MMSE scale scores [pooled WMD = 1.78, 95% CI = 0.53 to 3.04, p = 0.005, I2 = 79.6%].

The investigators concluded statins used in Alzheimer disease patients have beneficial effects on the scores of MMSE scale in the short term (≤ 12 months) and statins slow the deterioration of neuropsychiatric status and improve activities of daily living ability in Alzheimer disease patients.

Original title:
The efficacy of statins in the treatment of Alzheimer's disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial by Xuan K, Zhao T, […], Sun Y.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31930449

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on dementia right here.
 

Objectives:
Which factors are associated with the risk of stomach cancer?

Study design:
This review article included 232 observational studies involving 33,831,063 participants.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found H. pylori infection significantly increased risk of stomach cancer with 156% [OR = 2.56, 95% CI = 2.18 to 3.00].

The investigators found formerly smoked significantly increased risk of stomach cancer with 43% [OR = 1.43, 95% CI = 1.29 to 1.59].

The investigators found currently smoking significantly increased risk of stomach cancer with 61% [OR = 1.61, 95% CI = 1.49 to 1.75].

The investigators found currently drinking significantly increased risk of stomach cancer with 19% [OR = 1.19, 95% CI = 1.10 to 1.29].

The investigators found formerly drank significantly increased risk of stomach cancer with 73% [OR = 1.73, 95% CI = 1.17 to 2.56].

The investigators found intake of fruits ≥3 times/week significantly decreased risk of stomach cancer with 52% [OR = 0.48, 95% CI = 0.37 to 0.63].

The investigators found intake of vegetables ≥3 times/week significantly decreased risk of stomach cancer with 38% [OR = 0.62, 95% CI = 0.49 to 0.79].

The investigators found using pickled vegetables significantly increased risk of stomach cancer with 28% [OR = 1.28, 95% CI = 1.09 to 1.51].

The investigators found green tea significantly decreased risk of stomach cancer with 12% [OR = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.80 to 0.97].

The investigators concluded that both smoking, drinking and H. pylori infection increase the risk of stomach cancer, while both ≥3 times/week fruit and vegetables and green tea reduce the risk of developing stomach cancer.

Original title:
Risk factors for stomach cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis by Poorolajal J, Moradi L, [...], Gohari-Ensaf F.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32023777

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on alcohol, tea, vegetable and fruit and cancer right here.

Objectives:
Despite growing evidence for the association between other dietary macronutrients and bone health, limited and inconsistent knowledge is available regarding carbohydrate intake. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Does a high carbohydrate intake increase risk of fracture?

Study design:
This review article included observational studies.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found no association between carbohydrate intake and the risk of fracture in high versus low intake meta-analysis [overall relative risk = 1.24, 95% CI = 0.84 to 1.84, p = 0.27, I2 = 57.7%, p = 0.05].

The investigators found, moreover, there was no relationship between carbohydrate intake and the risk of fracture in both linear [overall RR = 1.00, 95% CI = 0.94 to 1.05, p = 0.88, I2 = 68.1%, p = 0.48] and nonlinear [p non-linearity = 0.14] models.

The investigators concluded high carbohydrate intake does not increase risk of fracture.

Original title:
Dietary carbohydrate intake and risk of bone fracture: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies by Mozaffari H, Daneshzad E and Azadbakht L.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31982636

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on carbohydrates and elderly right here.
 

Objectives:
Which factors increase risk of dementia?

Study design:
This review article included 34 prospective cohort studies, among which 24 were eligible for meta-analysis. A total of 159,594 non-demented adults were enrolled at baseline before 65 years and 13,540 people were diagnosed with dementia after follow-up.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found obesity significantly increased risk of dementia with 78% [RR = 1.78, 95% CI = 1.31-2.41].

The investigators found diabetes mellitus significantly increased risk of dementia with 69% [RR = 1.69, 95% CI = 1.38-2.07].

The investigators found current smoking significantly increased risk of dementia with 61% [RR = 1.61, 95% CI = 1.32-1.95].

The investigators found hypercholesterolemia significantly increased risk of dementia with 57% [RR = 1.57, 95% CI = 1.19-2.07].
However, the sensitivity analyses showed that the result of hypercholesterolemia was not reliable, which need to be confirmed by more high-quality studies.

The investigators found hypertension significantly increased risk of dementia with 41% [RR = 1.41, 95% CI = 1.23-1.62] for borderline blood pressure.

The investigators found hypertension significantly increased risk of dementia with 72% [RR = 1.72, 95% CI = 1.25-2.37] for high systolic blood pressure.
However, the sensitivity analyses showed that the result of high systolic blood pressure was not reliable, which need to be confirmed by more high-quality studies.

The investigators found hyperhomocysteinemia, psychological stress and heavy drinking were also associated with elevated dementia risk.

The investigators found, in addition, physical exercise, a healthy diet and hormone therapy in middle age were associated with the reduction of dementia risk.

The investigators concluded middle-aged people with obesity or diabetes and current smokers in midlife are at higher risk of developing dementia later in life.

Original title:
Midlife Modifiable Risk Factors for Dementia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of 34 Prospective Cohort Studies by Li XY, Zhang M, [...], Tan L.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31902364

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on obesity, diabetes, hypertension and dementia right here.
 

Objectives:
Does dietary intake of fiber reduce risk of endometrial cancer?

Study design:
This review article included 16 studies, involving 6,563 cases (persons with endometrial cancer).

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found dietary fiber intake significantly reduced risk of endometrial cancer with 14% [RR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.78 to 0.93].
In stratified analysis, this trend was more pronounced in the case-control studies and in studies conducted in the Americas and Asia.

The investigators found dietary fiber intake significantly reduced risk of endometrial cancer with 26% after adjusting for education level [RR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.60 to 0.88].

The investigators found dietary fiber intake significantly reduced risk of endometrial cancer with 30% after adjusting for age [RR = 0.70, 95% CI = 0.57 to 0.83].

The investigators found dietary fiber intake significantly reduced risk of endometrial cancer with 19% in studies with NOS scores of 6 (the higher the NOS scores, the more reliable the studies are) [RR = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.67 to 0.95].

The investigators found dietary fiber intake significantly reduced risk of endometrial cancer with 25% in studies with NOS scores of 7 [RR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.62 to 0.88].

The investigators concluded dietary fiber intake reduces risk of endometrial cancer. Further efforts should be made to confirm these findings.

Original title:
Association between dietary fiber and endometrial cancer: a meta-analysis by Li H, Mao H, [...], Nan Y.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31584301

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on fiber, significantly/review article and cancer right here

Objectives:
Does dietary intake of garlic reduce risk of colorectal cancer?

Study design:
This review article included 11 studies involving 12,558 cases (persons with colorectal cancer).

There was no notable evidence of publication bias.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found for the highest versus the lowest garlic consumption categories, a significantly reduced risk of 20% [integrated relative risk = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.69 to 0.91] for colorectal cancer.
The sensitivity analysis revealed no notable alterations of the integrated results.
Significant means that there is an association with a 95% confidence.

The investigators found in case-control studies for the highest versus the lowest garlic consumption categories, a significantly reduced risk of 29% [relative risk = 0.71, 95% CI = 0.60 to 0.84] for colorectal cancer.
Significant because relative risk of 1 was not found in the 95% CI of 0.60 to 0.84. Relative risk of 1 means no risk/association.

The investigators found in cohort studies for the highest versus the lowest garlic consumption categories, a non-significantly reduced risk of 1% [relative risk = 0.99, 95% CI = 0.80 to 1.23] for colorectal cancer.
Non-significantly because relative risk of 1 was found in the 95% CI of 0.80 to 1.23. Relative risk of 1 means no risk/association.

The investigators concluded that dietary intake of garlic could reduce risk of colorectal cancer. Could reduce because the risk was not significant in cohort studies.

Original title:
Garlic intake and the risk of colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis by Zhou X, Qian H, […], Zeng L.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31895803

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on significantly/cohort studies, garlic consumption and colorectal cancer right here.

Objectives:
Can the biomarker miRNAs predict Alzheimer's disease?

Study design:
This review article included 10 studies containing 770 Alzheimer's disease and 664 normal controls (persons without Alzheimer's disease).

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found miRNAs presented excellent diagnostic performance and the overall sensitivity was 0.80 [95% CI = 0.75-0.83], specificity was 0.83 [95% CI = 0.78-0.87] and diagnostic odds ratio was 14 [95% CI = 11-19].

The investigators found subgroup analysis suggested that the Caucasian group and blood group showed a better performance in Alzheimer's disease diagnosis and the diagnostic odds ratio was 42 and 34, respectively.

The investigators concluded that miRNAs may be a promising biomarker for Alzheimer's disease.

Original title:
Blood circulating miRNAs as biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis by Zhang YH, Bai SF and Yan JQ.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31385521

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on dementia and elderly.