Nutrition and health

Objectives:
There are conflicting reports on the correlation between manganese (Mn) levels and breast cancer. Therefore, this review article (meta-analysis) has been conducted.

Does manganese deficiency increase risk of breast cancer?

Study design:
This review article included 11 case-control studies involving 1302 subjects.

There was no evidence of publication bias. Sensitivity analysis showed that excluding any one study from the pooled analysis did not vary the results substantially.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found the random-effects meta-analysis results indicated that subjects with breast cancer had lower manganese levels in serum and hair than healthy controls [SMD = -1.51, 95% CI = -2.47 to -0.56, I2 = 97.8%, p 0.001].

The investigators found in subgroup analysis that subjects with breast cancer had lower manganese levels than healthy controls in China [SMD = -1.32, 95% CI = -2.33 to -0.32] and Korea [SMD = -4.08, 95% CI = -4.63 to -3.54], but not in Turkey [SMD = -0.96, 95% CI = -3.19 to 1.27].

The investigators found in subgroup analysis that the differences of manganese levels between patients with breast cancer and healthy controls were similar in different sample specimens:
serum [SMD = -1.24, 95% CI = -2.31 to -0.16];
hair [SMD = -1.99, 95% CI = -3.91 to -0.06] and;
different types of manganese measurement:

ICP-AAS [SMD = -1.14, 95% CI = -2.24 to -0.04];
GFAAS [SMD = -1.94, 95% CI = -2.38 to -1.49];
ICP-AES [SMD = -3.77, 95% CI = -4.70 to -2.85]. These findings can well explain that  the between-study variability was the main source of heterogeneity.

The investigators concluded there is an association between deficient manganese concentration and breast cancer. However, the subgroup analysis found that there was contradiction regarding races and geography, like China and Turkey. Thus this finding needs further confirmation by trans-regional multicenter, long-term observation in a cohort design to obtain better understanding of causal relationships between manganese levels and breast cancer, through measuring manganese at baseline to investigate whether the highest manganese category versus lowest was associated with breast cancer risk.

Original title:
The association between deficient manganese levels and breast cancer: a meta-analysis by Shen F, Cai WS, [...],Xu B.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4443096/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more studies/information on manganese and breast cancer right here.

Objectives:
Quantification of the association between the intake of fruit and vegetables and risk of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is controversial even though several studies have explored this association. Therefore, this review article (meta-analysis) has been conducted.

Does a high intake of vegetables and fruit decrease risk of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma?

Study design:
This review article included a total of 32 observational studies involving 10037 cases of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

There was no evidence of publication bias.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found highest vs. lowest vegetable intake, significantly reduced risk of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma with 44% [SRR = 0.56, 95% CI = 0.45-0.69, p-heterogeneity 0.001]. Significant means there is an association with a 95% confidence.

The investigators found highest vs. lowest fruit intake, significantly reduced risk of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma with 47% [SRR = 0.53, 95% CI = 0.44-0.64, p-heterogeneity 0.001].

The investigators found similar results in a linear dose-response analysis and there was evidence of non-linear associations for intakes of fruit [p non-linearity 0.001] and vegetables [p non-linearity = 0.041].

The investigators concluded that intakes of vegetables and fruit reduce risk of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Further investigation with prospective designs, validated questionnaires and good control of important confounders is warranted.

Original title:
Intake of fruit and vegetables and risk of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A meta-analysis of observational studies by Liu J, Wang J, […], Lv C.

Link:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23319052

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on review, 95% CI and heterogeneity, vegetables and fruits and cancer right here.
 

Objectives:
Prostate cancer (PCa) now remains the 2nd most frequently diagnosed cancer. In recent years, chemoprevention for prostate cancer becomes a possible concept. Especially, many phytochemicals rich foods are suggested to lower the risk of cancer. Among these foods, green tea is considered as effective prevention for various cancers. However, clinical trials and previous meta-analyses on the relationship between green tea consumption and the risk of prostate cancer have produced inconsistent outcomes. Therefore, this review article (meta-analysis) has been conducted.

Does green tea intake reduce prostate cancer risk?

Study design:
This review article included 4 cohort studies, 3 case-control studies and 3 RCTs. The cohort studies and case-control studies which investigated the association between green tea intake and prostate cancer risk included 1435 cases among 96,332 individuals and the 3 RCTs studied the relationship between EGCG and prostate cancer incidence included 87 volunteers in EGCG arms of 179 individuals.

No publication bias was found.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found in observational studies (4 cohort studies and 3 case-control studies) for the highest versus lowest category of green tea intake a non-significant reduced prostate cancer risk of 8% [RR = 0.92, 95% CI = 0.77-1.11, I2 = 0%, p = 0.46] for all studies;

a non-significant reduced prostate cancer risk of 2.3% [RR = 0.977, 95% CI = 0.80-1.19] for cohort studies and;
a non-significant reduced prostate cancer risk of 27.7% [RR = 0.623, 95% CI = 0,368-1.056, I2  = 0%, p =  0.46] for case-control studies.

The investigators found no association between 1-5 cups of green tea per day and prostate cancer risk.

However, the investigators found 7 cups of green tea per day significantly reduced prostate cancer risk with 19% [RR = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.67-0.97]. The significant reduced prostate cancer risk increased to 26% [RR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.59-0.93] for 9 cups and to 44% [RR = 0.56, 95% CI = 0.35-0.92) for 15 cups.

The investigators found in 3 RCTs when compared to placebo green tea catechins significantly reduced prostate cancer risk  with 62% [RR = 0.38, 95% CI = 0.16-0.86, p  =  0.02].

The investigators concluded that at least 7 cups/day green tea intake reduces prostate cancer. This is further confirmed by the potential protective effect of green tea catechins on prostate cancer. Further prospective study with accurate measurement of green tea intake is required to substantiate these conclusions.

Original title:
Green tea and the risk of prostate cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis by Guo Y, Zhi F, […], Zhang X.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5380255/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on green tea consumption and cancer right here.

Objectives:
Does iron supplementation during pregnancy improve maternal haematological status and birth weight?

Study design:
This review article included 48 RCTs (17,793 women) and 44 cohort studies (1,851,682 women).

The dose of iron in RCTs ranged from 10 mg to 240 mg daily. Duration of supplementation varied from 7 to 8 weeks up to 30 weeks during pregnancy.

Significant heterogeneity existed for several outcomes that could not be explained substantially by pre-specified subgroups.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found iron supplementation during pregnancy increased maternal mean haemoglobin concentration by 4.59 g/L [95% CI = 3.72 to 5.46] compared with controls.

The investigators found iron with folic acid was associated with a significant increase in mean haemoglobin concentration of 10.41 g/L [95% CI = 5.36 to 15.46, I2 = 0%, 9 trials] and reduction in risk of anaemia in the third trimester or at delivery of 56% [95% CI = 0.37 to 0.53, I2 = 44%, 5 trials]. Significant means there is an association with a 95% confidence.

The investigators found iron supplementation during pregnancy significantly reduced the risk of anaemia with 50% [95% CI = 0.42 to 0.59] compared with controls.

The investigators found iron supplementation during pregnancy significantly reduced the risk of iron deficiency (of the mother) with 41% [95% CI = 0.46 to 0.79] compared with controls.

The investigators found iron supplementation during pregnancy significantly reduced the risk of iron deficiency anaemia with 60% [95% CI = 0.26 to 0.60] compared with controls.

The investigators found iron supplementation during pregnancy significantly reduced the risk of low birth weight (2500 g) with 19% [95% CI = 0.71 to 0.93] compared with controls.

However, the investigators found iron supplementation during pregnancy non-significantly reduced the risk of preterm birth with 16% [95% CI = 0.68 to 1.03] compared with controls. Non-significant means there is no association with a 95% confidence.

The investigators found in cohort studies that anaemia in the first or second trimester was significantly associated with a higher risk for low birth weight of 29% [adjusted odds ratio 1.29, 95% CI = 1.09 to 1.53] and preterm birth with 21% [adjusted odds ratio = 1.21, 95% CI = 1.13 to 1.30].

The investigators found in exposure-response analysis that for every 10 mg increase in iron dose/day, up to 66 mg/day, the relative risk of maternal anaemia was significantly 0.88 [95% CI = 0.84 to 0.92, p for linear trend 0.001].

The investigators found in exposure-response analysis that birth weight increased by 15.1 g [95% CI = 6.0 to 24.2, p for linear trend = 0.005] and risk of low birth weight significantly decreased by 3% [relative risk = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.95 to 0.98, p for linear trend 0.001] every 10 mg increase in dose/day.

Furthermore, the investigators found for each 1 g/L increase in mean haemoglobin, birth weight increased by 14.0 g [95% CI = 6.8 to 21.8, p for linear trend = 0.002]. However, mean haemoglobin was not associated with the risk of low birth weight and preterm birth.

The investigators found no evidence of a significant effect on duration of gestation, small for gestational age births and birth length and duration of iron use was not significantly associated with the outcomes after adjustment for dose.

The investigators concluded daily prenatal use of iron substantially improved birth weight in a linear dose-response fashion, probably leading to a reduction in risk of low birth weight. An improvement in prenatal mean haemoglobin concentration linearly increased birth weight and a linear decrease in maternal anaemia with higher doses of iron, up to 66 mg/day.

Original title:
Anaemia, prenatal iron use, and risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis by Haider BA, Olofin I, […], Fawzi WW.

Link:
http://www.bmj.com/content/346/bmj.f3443

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on iron and pregnancy right here.

Iron deficiency anaemia occurs when there isn't enough iron in the body. Anaemia is a condition where the amount of haemoglobin in the blood is below the normal level.
Iron deficiency anaemia has been defined as haemoglobin 110 g/L and serum ferritin 12 µg/L.

Objectives:
The association between meat consumption and the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is still inconclusive. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Does meat consumption increase risk of hepatocellular carcinoma?

Study design:
This review article included 7 cohort studies and 10 case-control studies.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found for the highest vs. lowest consumption levels a non-significant increased risk for hepatocellular carcinoma of 10% [RR = 1.10, 95% CI = 0.85-1.42] for red meat, a non-significant increased risk of 1% [RR = 1.01, 95% CI = 0.79-1.28] for processed meat and a non-significant decreased risk of 3% [RR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.85-1.11] for total meat. Non-significant means, there is no association with a 95% confidence.

The investigators found for the highest vs. lowest consumption levels a significant decreased risk for hepatocellular carcinoma of 31% [RR = 0.69, 95% CI = 0.58-0.81] for white meat and a significant decreased risk of 22% [RR = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.67-0.90] for fish. The results remained quite stable after stratification by the confounding factors.
Significant means, there is an association with a 95% confidence.

The investigators concluded a high level of white meat or fish consumption reduces the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma, while intake of red meat, processed meat or total meat is not associated with hepatocellular carcinoma risk. These results suggest that dietary intervention may be a promising approach for prevention of hepatocellular carcinoma, which still need to be confirmed by further well-designed prospective studies and experimental research.

Original title:
Systematic review with meta-analysis: meat consumption and the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma by Luo J, Yang Y, [...], Zhu Y.

Link:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24588342

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more studies/information on fish consumption, meat consumption and cancer right here.

A review article of cohort studies or case-control studies will answer the following question:
"Should I change my diet?".

Objectives:
Is there an association between meat intake and risk of esophageal cancer?

Study design:
This review article included 7 cohort studies and 28 case-control studies.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found for the highest versus lowest total meat consumption categories a non-significant increased risk of 19% [95% CI = 0.98-1.46] for esophageal cancer.

The investigators found for the highest versus lowest red meat consumption categories a significant increased risk of 55% [95% CI = 1.22-1.96] for esophageal cancer.

The investigators found for the highest versus lowest processed meat consumption categories a significant increased risk of 33% [95% CI = 1.04-1.69] for esophageal cancer.

The investigators found for the highest versus lowest white meat consumption categories a significant decreased risk of 28% [95% CI = 0.60-0.86] for esophageal cancer.

The investigators found for the highest versus lowest poultry consumption categories a significant decreased risk of 17% [95% CI = 0.72-0.96] for esophageal cancer.

The investigators found for the highest versus lowest fish consumption categories a non-significant decreased risk of 5% [95% CI = 0.76-1.19] for esophageal cancer.

The investigators found when stratified by histological subtype, positive associations among esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and red meat, white meat and poultry and esophageal adenocarcinoma with total meat and processed meat.

The investigators concluded red meat and processed meat consumption increase risk of esophageal cancer, while white meat and poultry decrease risk of esophageal cancer. Fish consumption is not associated with incidence of esophageal cancer.

Original title:
Meat consumption is associated with esophageal cancer risk in a meat- and cancer-histological-type dependent manner by Zhu HC, Yang X, […], Sun XC.

Link:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24395380

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more studies/information on meat consumption and cancer right here.
 

Objectives:
Epidemiological studies assessing the relationship between dietary vitamin B2 and the risk of breast cancer have produced inconsistent results. Therefore, this review article (meta-analysis) has been conducted.

Does dietary vitamin B2 intake reduce breast cancer risk?

Study design:
This review article included 10 epidemiologic studies (cohort or patient-controle studies) comprising totally 12,268 breast cancer patients.

No publication bias was found.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found comparing the highest to the lowest dietary vitamin B2 intake a significant reduced risk of 15% for breast cancer [pooled relative risk = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.76-0.95, I2 = 40.7%].

The investigators found dose-response analysis showed that an increment of 1 mg/day dietary vitamin B2 intake significantly reduced risk of breast cancer with 6% [relative risk = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.90-0.99].

The investigators concluded that dietary vitamin B2 intake, at least 1 mg/day, is related to the reduced risk of breast cancer. However, additional research is also necessary to further explore this association.

Original title:
Dietary vitamin B2 intake and breast cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis by Yu L, Tan Y and Zhu L.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28035488

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on vitamin B2 and breast cancer right here.
 

Objectives:
Is there an association of intake of different vitamins and multiple-vitamin supplements and the incidence of colorectal cancer?

Study design:
This review article included 47 articles (cohort studies).

There was unacceptable heterogeneity for studies of multiple-vitamin supplements, so findings were inconclusive.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found a significant reduced risk of 12% [multivariable-adjusted RR = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.81-0.95] for colorectal cancer when comparing the highest versus lowest dietary vitamin B9 (folate) intake. Significant means that there is an association with a 95% confidence.

The investigators found a significant reduced risk of 13% [multivariable-adjusted RR = 0.87, 95% CI = 0.77-0.99] for colorectal cancer when comparing the highest versus lowest dietary vitamin D intake. Significant because RR of 1 was not found in the 95% CI of 0.77 to 0.99. RR of 1 means no risk/association.

The investigators found a significant reduced risk of 12% [multivariable-adjusted RR = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.79-0.99] for colorectal cancer when comparing the highest versus lowest dietary vitamin B6 intake.

The investigators found a significant reduced risk of 14% [multivariable-adjusted RR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.76-0.97] for colorectal cancer when comparing the highest versus lowest dietary vitamin B2 intake.

The investigators found, however, no association between both dietary vitamine A, C, E, B3 and B12 and the risk of colorectal cancer.

The investigators concluded high dietary vitamin B9 (folate), D, B6 and B2 intake reduces risk of colorectal cancer, but further study is needed.

Original title:
Vitamin and multiple-vitamin supplement intake and incidence of colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis of cohort studies by Liu Y, Yu Q, […], Li K.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25491145

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more studies/information on vitamines and colorectal cancer right here.

Objectives:
Red meat intake has been associated with risk of colorectal cancer, potentially mediated through heterocyclic amines. The metabolic efficiency of N-acetyltransferase 2 (NAT2) required for the metabolic activation of such amines is influenced by genetic variation. The interaction between red meat intake, NAT2 genotype and colorectal cancer has been inconsistently reported. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Is there an interaction between red meat intake, NAT2 genotype and colorectal cancer?

Study design:
This review article included 11 retrospective case-control studies with 8,290 colorectal cancer cases and 9,115 controls (subjects without colorectal cancer).

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found the highest quartile of red meat intake was associated with a 41% increased risk of colorectal cancer compared with the lowest quartile [OR = 1.41, 95% CI = 1.29-1.55].
However, a significant association was observed only for studies with retrospective diet data, not for studies with diet prospectively assessed before cancer diagnosis.

The investigators found when combining all studies, high red meat intake was similarly associated with colorectal cancer in those with a rapid/intermediate NAT2 genotype [OR = 1.38, 95% CI = 1.20-1.59] as with a slow genotype [OR = 1.43, 95% CI = 1.28-1.61, p interaction = 0.9].

The investigators concluded high red meat intake was associated with increased risk of colorectal cancer only from retrospective case-control studies and not modified by NAT2 enzyme activity.

Original title:
Red Meat Intake, NAT2, and Risk of Colorectal Cancer: A Pooled Analysis of 11 Studies by Ananthakrishnan AN, Du M, […], Chan AT.

Link:
http://cebp.aacrjournals.org/content/cebp/24/1/198.full.pdf

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more studies/information on red meat consumption and colorectal cancer right here.

Objectives:
Is supplementation of formula milk with LCPUFA (long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids) both safe and beneficial for full-term infants, while focusing on effects on visual function, neurodevelopment and physical growth?

Study design:
This review article included 15 RCTs (n = 1889).
9 studies assessed visual acuity, 6 of which used visual evoked potentials (VEP), 2 Teller cards and 1 both. 4 studies reported beneficial effects and the remaining 5 did not.
GRADE analysis of the outcomes indicated that the overall quality of evidence was low.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found a meta-analysis of 3 RCTs (n = 244) showed significant benefit for sweep VEP acuity at 12 months (log of the minimum angle of resolution) [MD = -0.15, 95% CI = -0.17 to -0.13, I2 = 0%, low-quality of evidence].
However, the meta-analysis of 3 other RCTs (n = 256) showed no benefit for visual acuity measured with Teller cards at 12 months (cycles/degree) [MD = -0.01, 95% CI = -0.12 to 0.11, I2 = 0%, low-quality of evidence].

The investigators found meta-analysis of 4 RCTs (n = 661) revealed no significant differences between LCPUFA and placebo groups in BSID Mental Developmental Index scores at 18 months [MD = 0.06, 95% CI = -2.01 to 2.14, I2 = 75%, low-quality of evidence] and no significant differences in BSID Psychomotor Development Index scores at 18 months [MD = 0.69, 95% CI = -0.78 to 2.16, I2 = 61%, low-quality of evidence].

There were also no significant differences between the two groups in BSID-II scores at one year and two years of age.

The investigators found meta-analysis of 5 RCTs (n = 521) showed that the supplemented group had lower weight (z scores) at one year of age [MD = -0.23, 95% CI = -0.40 to -0.06, I2 = 83%, low-quality of evidence] and that the two groups showed no significant differences with respect to length and head circumference (z scores).

The investigators found meta-analysis at 18 months and at two years revealed no significant differences between the two groups with respect to weight (kg), length (cm) and head circumference (cm).

The investigators concluded there are no beneficial effects or harms of LCPUFA supplementation on neurodevelopmental outcomes of formula-fed full-term infants and no consistent beneficial effects on visual acuity. Therefore, routine supplementation of full-term infant milk formula with LCPUFA cannot be recommended at this time.

Original title:
Long chain polyunsaturated fatty acid supplementation in infants born at term by Jasani B, Simmer K, […], Rao SC.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28281303

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on pregnancy and LCPUFA right here.
 

Objectives:
The association between dietary carbohydrate intake and colorectal cancer risk remains controversial. Therefore, this review article (meta-analysis) has been conducted.

Does higher dietary carbohydrate intake increase colorectal cancer risk?

Study design:
This review article included 8 case-controle studies en 9 prospective cohort studies involving 14,402 colorectal cancer patients among 846004 participants; 17 studies with 9,235 cases were to assess the association on colon cancer and 13  studies with 3,272 cases were to  assess the association on rectum cancer. 

No publication bias was found.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found no association between dietary carbohydrate intake and colorectal cancer risk [pooled RR = 1.08, 95% CI = 0.93-1.23, I2 = 68.3%, p-heterogeneity 0.001]. No association because RR of 1 was found in the 95% CI of 0.93 to 1.23. RR of 1 means no risk/association.

The investigators found no association between dietary carbohydrate intake and colon cancer risk [pooled RR = 1.09, 95% CI = 0.95-1.25, I2 = 48.3%].

The investigators found no association between dietary carbohydrate intake and rectum cancer risk [pooled RR = 1.17, 95% CI = 0.98-1.39, I2 = 17.8%].

The investigators found in subgroup analyses for study design, a non-significant association for both case-control studies [summary RR = 1.40, 95% CI = 0.93-2.09] and cohort studies [summary RR = 0.99, 95% CI = 0.85-1.15].  

The investigators found in stratified analysis by geographic locations, higher dietary   carbohydrate intake had no significant association on colorectal cancer risk among American populations [summary RR = 1.08, 95% CI = 0.89-1.30], European populations [summary RR = 1.23, 95% CI = 0.91-1.64] or Asian population [summary RR = 0.98, 95% CI = 0.65-1.46].

The investigators found higher dietary carbohydrate intake significantly increased risk of colorectal cancer with 23% in men populations [summary RR = 1.23, 95% CI = 1.01-1.57], but not in women populations.

The investigators concluded that higher dietary carbohydrate intake increases colorectal cancer risk in men populations. Further studies are wanted to confirm this relationship.

Original title:
A meta-analysis between dietary carbohydrate intake and colorectal cancer risk: Evidence from 17 observational studies by Huang J, Pan G, [...], Zhu Z.

Link:
http://www.bioscirep.org/content/ppbioscirep/early/2017/03/15/BSR20160553.full.pdf

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on carbohydrates and colorectal cancer right here.
 

Objectives:
Previous observational studies regarding the existence of an association between folate intake and the risk of breast cancer have been inconsistent. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Does a higher dietary folate intake reduce breast cancer risk?

Study design:
This review article included 14 prospective cohort studies that reported data on 677,858 individuals.
The participant follow-up period ranged 4.7-17.4 years and the number of individuals per study ranged 11,699-88,818.
There was no publication bias.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found no association between dietary folate intake and breast cancer risk for highest versus lowest category  [RR =  0.97, 95% CI = 0.90-1.05, p  = 0.451, I2 =  57.5%, p = 0.004].

The investigators found dose-response meta-analysis findings showed no association between the risk of breast cancer and a 100 µg/day increase in dietary folate intake [RR = 0.99, 95% CI = 0.98-1.01, p = 0.361, I2 = 66.2%, p 0.001].

The investigators found evidence of a nonlinear relationship between dietary folate intake and the risk of breast cancer.

A daily dietary folate intake of 200-320 µg was associated with a reduced risk of breast cancer. However, daily folate intake levels >400 µg was associated with a increased risk of breast cancer.

The investigators found overall folate intake level was associated with a reduced breast cancer risk of 36% if the patients had a daily alcohol intake >10 g [RR for highest versus lowest category = 0.64, 95% CI = 0.43-0.97].

The investigators concluded there are no effects of increased dietary folate intake on the incidence of breast cancer. But, a daily dietary folate intake of 200-320 µg was associated with a reduced risk of breast cancer. However, daily folate intake levels >400 µg was associated with a increased risk of breast cancer. Future studies should focus on specific populations in order to analyze primary breast cancer prevention.

Original title:
Folate Intake and the Risk of Breast Cancer: A Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Studies by Zhang YF, Shi WW, […], Zhou YH.

Link:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4059748/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more studies/information on folate intake and breast cancer right here.
 

Objectives:
There is no published systematic review and meta-analysis regarding the effect of olive oil consumption on cancer occurrence. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Does olive oil consumption reduce cancer risk?

Study design:
This review article included 19 case-control studies (13800 cancer patients and 23340 controls).

Random effects meta-analysis was applied in order to evaluate the research hypothesis.
Heterogeneity of the effect-size measures was observed in studies performed in the Mediterranean region (n = 15, p = 0.0002), whereas no heterogeneity was observed in non-Mediterranean studies (n = 4, p = 0.12).

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found when comparing with the lowest, the highest category of olive oil consumption was significantly associated with lower odds of having any type of cancer [log odds ratio = -0.41, 95% CI = -0.53 to -0.29, Cohran's Q = 47.52, p = 0.0002, I2 = 62%].

The investigators found both Mediterranean and non-Mediterranean people reported olive oil intake were less likely to have developed any type of cancer.

The investigators found olive oil consumption was significantly associated with lower odds of developing breast cancer [logOR = -0.4,  95% CI = -0.78 to -0.12] and a cancer of the digestive system [logOR = -0.36, 95% CI = -0.50 to -0.21] compared with the lowest intake.

The investigators concluded olive oil consumption probably reduces risk of any type of cancer, especially breast cancer and cancer of the digestive system. Probably, because this review article only included case-control studies and there was heterogeneity.
The reduced risk is similar to studies performed in Mediterranean as well as non-Mediterranean countries. However, it is still unclear whether olive oil's monounsaturated fatty acid content or its antioxidant components are responsible for its beneficial effects.

Original title:
Olive oil intake is inversely related to cancer prevalence: a systematic review and a meta-analysis of 13800 patients and 23340 controls in 19 observational studies by Psaltopoulou T, Kosti RI, […], Panagiotakos DB.

Link:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3199852/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more studies on olive oil consumption and fat.

Objectives:
Is a low maternal circulating 25 hydroxyvitamin D (25-OHD) associated with an increased risk of preterm birth or spontaneous preterm birth and can vitamin D supplementation alone during pregnancy reduce risk of preterm birth?

Study design:
This review article included 6 RCTs and 18 observational studies.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found maternal circulating 25-OHD deficiency significantly increased risk of preterm birth with 25% [pooled OR = 1.25, 95% CI = 1.13-1.38]. However, maternal circulating 25-OHD insufficiency was not associated with an increased risk of preterm birth [pooled OR = 1.09, 95% CI = 0.89-1.35]. Not associated because OR of 1 was found in 95% CI of 0.89 to 1.35. OR of 1 means no risk/association.

The investigators found vitamin D supplementation alone during pregnancy significantly reduced risk of preterm birth with 43% [pooled RR = 0.57, 95% CI = 0.36-0.91]. Significantly because RR of 1 was not found in 95% CI of 0.36 to 0.91. RR of 1 means no risk/association.

The investigators found maternal circulating 25-OHD 50 nmol/L significantly increased risk of spontaneous preterm birth with 45% [pooled OR = 1.45, 95% CI = 1.20-1.75]. 

The investigators concluded a maternal circulating 25-OHD 50 nmol/L increases risk of spontaneous preterm birth and vitamin D supplementation alone during pregnancy reduces risk of preterm birth. However, extrapolation of the results must be done with caution and there is urgent need for larger, better-designed RCT to confirm this effect.

Original title:
Vitamin D and risk of preterm birth: Up-to-date meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and observational studies by Zhou SS, Tao YH, […], Tao FB.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28150405

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies about vitamin D, pregnancy, review article, significant and 95% CI right here.

Objectives:
Many studies suggest that high-fat diets are linked to the etiology of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). However, the findings are inconsistent and therefore the association between fat and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma remains unclear. Therefore, this review article (meta-analysis) has been conducted.

Does a high fat dietary intake increase non-Hodgkin's lymphoma risk?

Study design:
This review article included two cohort studies and eight case-control studies.

The funnel plot revealed no evidence for publication bias.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found a significant higher risk of 26% for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma for total fat consumption [RR = 1.26, 95% CI = 1.12-1.42]. Significant because RR of 1 was not found in the 95% CI of 1.12 to 1.42. RR of 1 means no risk/association.

The investigators found subgroup analysis showed a significant higher risk of 41% for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma for total fat consumption [RR = 1.41, 95% CI = 1.08-1.84]. However, there was no significant association between total fat consumption and increase risk of follicular lymphoma [RR = 1.21, 95% CI = 0.97-1.52], small lymphocytic lymphoma/chronic lymphocytic leukemia [RR = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.68-1.23] nor with T cell lymphoma [RR = 1.12, 95% CI = 0.60-2.09].
No significant because RR of 1 was found in the 95% CI of 0.60 to 2.09. RR of 1 means no risk/association.

The investigators concluded that total fat consumption increases non-Hodgkin's lymphoma; especially diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

Original title:
Dietary Fat Consumption and Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Risk: A Meta-analysis by Han TJ, Li JS, [...], Xu HZ.

Link:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28094569

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on fat and cancer right here.

Lymphoma is the most common blood cancer. The two main forms of lymphoma are Hodgkin lymphoma and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). The human body has two main types of lymphocytes that can develop into lymphomas:

1. B lymphocytes (B cells) and;
2. T lymphocytes (T cells).

B-cell lymphomas are much more common than T-cell lymphomas and account for approximately 85 percent of all non-Hodgkin lymphomas. Diffuse large B cell lymphomas (DLBCLs) are the commonest subtype of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. They constitute about 30 to 40% of adult non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

A high total fat consumption corresponds to a diet with >35 En% fat and/or >10 En% saturated fat. A diet with >35 En% fat is a diet with a lot of products/meals providing >35 En% fat.
 

Objectives:
Several epidemiological studies investigating the association between dietary vitamin E intake and the risk of lung cancer have demonstrated inconsistent results. Therefore, this review article (meta-analysis) has been conducted.

Does dietary vitamin E intake reduce lung cancer risk?

Study design:
This review article included 9 cohort studies with 4,164 lung cancer cases among 435,532 participants.

The Egger’s test showed no evidence of publication bias [t = 1.24, p = 0.246].

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found for the highest versus lowest categories of dietary vitamin E intake a reduced risk of 16% for lung cancer [pooled RR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.76-0.93, I2 = 41.1%].

The investigators found in subgroup analysis by geographic location a significant inverse association of dietary vitamin E intake with lung cancer for the European and American populations [pooled RR = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.75-0.95), but not for the Asian population. Significant means that there is an association with a 95% confidence.

The investigators found every 2 mg/d increase in dietary vitamin E intake statistically decreased the risk of lung cancer by 5% [RR = 0.95, 95% CI = 0.91-0.99, p linearity = 0.0237].

The investigators concluded that higher dietary vitamin E intake; at least 2 mg per day exerts a protective effect against lung cancer.

Original title:
Association of dietary vitamin E intake with risk of lung cancer: a dose-response meta-analysis by Zhu YJ, Bo YC, [...], Qiu CG.

Link:
http://apjcn.nhri.org.tw/server/APJCN/26/2/271.pdf

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on vitamin E and cancer right here.
 

Objectives:
Epidemiological studies suggest that soya consumption as a source of phyto-oestrogens and isoflavones may be associated with a reduced risk of colorectal cancer. However, findings have not yet been synthesised for all groups of phyto-oestrogens. Therefore, this review article (meta-analysis) has been conducted.

Does soya consumption reduce colorectal cancer risk?

Study design:
This review article included 16 studies (case-control studies and cohort studies).

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found in case-controle studies a significant reduced risk of 24% [pooled RR = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.69-0. 84] for colorectal cancer when comparing the highest phyto-oestrogens with the lowest intake category. However, the reduced risk for colorectal cancer was not significant in cohort studies [pooled RR = 0.95, 95% CI = 0.85-1.06].

The investigators found in case-controle studies a significant reduced risk of 23% [pooled RR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.69-0. 85] for colorectal cancer when comparing the highest isoflavones with the lowest intake category. However, the reduced risk for colorectal cancer was not significant in cohort studies [pooled RR = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.84-1.05].

The investigators found in case-controle studies a significant reduced risk of 30% [pooled RR = 0.70, 95% CI = 0.56-0. 89] for colorectal cancer when comparing the highest lignans with the lowest intake category. However, the reduced risk for colorectal cancer was not significant in cohort studies [pooled RR = 1.00, 95% CI = 0.64-1.57].

The investigators found dose-response analysis yielded an 8% reduced risk of colorectal neoplasms for every 20 mg/d increase in isoflavones intake in Asians [pooled RR = 0.92, 95% CI = 0.86-0.97].

The investigators found dose-response analysis showed a non-linear inverse association with colorectal cancer risk for lignans intake, but no association for circulating enterolactone concentrations was observed.

The investigators concluded every 20 mg/d increase in isoflavones dietary intake reduces risk of colorectal neoplasms with 8% in Asians.

Original title:
Phyto-oestrogens and colorectal cancer risk: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of observational studies by Jiang R, Botma A, […], Chang-Claude J.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28091359

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on isoflavones, colorectal cancer and cohort study/review article right here.

Objectives:
Some observational studies have shown that elevated serum selenium levels are associated with reduced prostate cancer risk. However, not all published studies support these results. Therefore, this review article (meta-analysis) has been conducted.

Does an elevated serum selenium level reduce prostate cancer risk?

Study design:
This review article included 12 case-control studies, 4 cohort studies and 1 RCT with 6,136 prostate cancer cases among 34,901 participants.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found elevated serum selenium levels significantly decreased prostate cancer risk with 24% [pooled OR = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.64 to 0.91, I2  =  60.8%, p  =  0.001].  Significant means that there is an association with a 95% confidence.

The investigators found in subgroup analysis, an inverse association between elevated serum selenium levels and prostate cancer risk in case-control studies, current and former smokers, high-grade cancer cases, advanced cancer cases and different populations. However, such correlations were not found among cohort studies, nonsmokers, low-grade cancer cases and early stage cancer cases.

The investigators concluded that elevated serum selenium levels may decrease high-grade prostate cancer among current and former smokers. May decrease because the inverse relationship between elevated serum selenium levels and prostate cancer risk was not significant among cohort studies. Therefore, further cohort studies and randomized control trials based on non-Western populations are required.

Original title:
Serum selenium levels and prostate cancer risk: A MOOSE-compliant meta-analysis by Cui Z, Liu D, […], Liu G.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5293444/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on selenium and cancer right here.