Nutrition and health

Objectives:
Previous studies suggest that dietary vitamin C is inversely associated with gastric cancer (GC), but most of them did not consider intake of fruit and vegetables. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Do higher dietary vitamin C intakes reduce gastric cancer risk after adjusting for intake of fruit and vegetables?

Study design:
This review article included 14 case-control studies with in total 5,362 cases (persons with gastric cancer) and 11,497 controls (persons without gastric cancer).

More cases were male (61.88% vs. 54.64%), older than 60 years (63.37% vs. 57.87%) and had low socioeconomic status (57.29% vs. 45.66%) compared with controls. 
In addition, a higher proportion of cases than controls were obese (21.34% vs. 19.06%), current smokers (26.58% vs. 24.14%) and ever drinkers (64.85 vs. 63.29%). 
Similarly, H. pylori seropositivity (63.82% vs. 61.86%) was more common among cases than among controls when considering only participants from the 7 studies with available information. 
A larger proportion of controls reported high intake of fruit and vegetables compared with cases. 
Most cases were of noncardia (57.03%) and intestinal type gastric cancer (33.01%). 
Cases had a lower median intake of vitamin C and fewer of them were in the highest quartiles of intake compared with controls.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found individuals in the highest quartile of dietary vitamin C intake had a significantly reduced risk of 36% for gastric cancer compared with those in the lowest quartile [OR = 0.64, 95% CI = 0.58 to 0.72]. 

The investigators found, however, when additionally adjusting for BMI and intake of fruit and vegetables, the observed association was attenuated and the OR for the highest versus lowest quartile of dietary vitamin C was 0.85 [95% CI = 0.73 to 0.98].

The investigators found a significant inverse association for noncardia gastric cancer, as well as for both intestinal and diffuse types of the disease. 

The investigators found dose-response analysis showed decreasing ORs of gastric cancer up to 150-200 mg/day of vitamin C [OR = 0.54, 95% CI = 0.41 to 0.71], whereas ORs for higher intakes were close to 1.0. 

The investigators concluded that consumption of 150-200 mg/day of vitamin C reduce gastric cancer risk. However, further well-designed prospective studies, aimed at disentangling the complex relationships between intake of fruit and vegetables, vitamins and other antioxidants and gastric cancer, are warranted to prove causality of the observed relationship between vitamin C and gastric cancer.

Original title: 
Dietary intake of vitamin C and gastric cancer: a pooled analysis within the Stomach cancer Pooling (StoP) Project by Sassano M, Seyyedsalehi  MS, […], Boffetta P. 

 

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11016516/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on cohort studies/significantly, viamin C and cancer right here. 

Objectives:
The association between soy product consumption and cancer risk varies among studies. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Do higher soy product consumption reduce cancer risk?

Study design:
This review article included 17 cohort studies and 35 case-control studies with a total of 861,372 participants and 44,932 cases (persons with cancer). 

Regarding quality assessment, the case-control studies achieved an average score of 6.7. The mean score of the cohort study was 7.2, which satisfied the criterion of high quality. 
All analyses adjusted for age and most studies adjusted for smoking status (n = 38), drinking status (n = 29), total energy intake (n = 27), BMI (n = 26) and education level (n = 26). 

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found in pooled analysis of cohort studies and case-control studies that higher consumption of total soy products significantly reduced risk of cancer with 31% [RR = 0.69, 95% CI = 0.60 to 0.80, I2 = 82.7%, p < 0.001]. 
However, this reduced risk was not significant in cohort studies (RR = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.80 to 1.01].

The investigators found higher tofu consumption significantly reduced cancer risk in both men and women.

The investigators found higher consumption of total soy products significantly reduced risk of cancer amond women with 24% [RR = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.65 to 0.89].

The investigators found in subgroup analysis that higher consumption of total soy products was significantly associated with a reduced risk for gastrointestinal cancer [RR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.61 to 0.89], prostate cancer [RR = 0.47, 95% CI = 0.31 to 0.71], lung cancer [RR = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.52 to 0.86], upper aerodigestive tract cancer [RR = 0.33, 95% CI = 0.22 to 0.49] and multiple myeloma [RR = 0.10, 95% CI = 0.01 to 0.97], but not in bladder or liver cancer.

The investigators found in pooled analysis of cohort studies and case-control studies that higher consumption of tofu significantly reduced risk of cancer with 22% [RR = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.70 to 0.86, I2 = 47.9%, p = 0.004]. 
However, this reduced risk was not significant in cohort studies [RR = 0.89, 95% CI = 0.78 to 1.01, p = 0.186].

The investigators found in pooled analysis of cohort studies and case-control studies that higher consumption of soymilk significantly reduced risk of cancer with 25% [RR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.60 to 0.86, I2 = 47.9%, p = 0.004]. 
However, this reduced risk was not significant in cohort studies [RR = 1.10, 95% CI = 0.76 to 1.58].

The investigators found a 54g per day increment of total soy products significantly reduced cancer risk by 11%, a 61g per day increment of tofu significantly reduced cancer risk by 12%, and a 23g per day increment of soymilk significantly reduced cancer risk by 28%, while none of the other soy products were associated with cancer risk. 

The investigators concluded that daily consumption of 54g total soy products, 61g tofu or 23g soymilk is associated with a lower cancer risk. More prospective cohort studies are still needed to confirm the causal relationship between soy product consumption and cancer risk.

Original title: 
Soy Product Consumption and the Risk of Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies by Wang C, Ding K, […], Hong H. 

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11013307/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on cohort studies/significantly, soy and cancer right here. 

Objectives:
Carotenoids appear to have anticancer effects. Prospective evidence for the relation between serum carotenoids and breast cancer is controversial. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Do higher carotenoids levels (likes, α-carotene, β-carotene, β-cryptoxanthin, lycopene, zeaxanthin and lutein) reduce breast cancer risk among women?

Study design:
This review article included 17 nested case-control studies and 1 cohort study, published between 1984 and 2016 with a total of 20,188 participants. 
Median follow-up ranged from 8 months to 21 years during which 7,608 breast cancer cases were reported. 
All studies assessed circulating carotenoids using high-performance liquid chromatography. The majority of studies carried out on circulating carotenoids and the risk of breast cancer were adjusted for the following variables: BMI (n = 9), dietary variables (n = 8), age (n = 9), alcohol (n = 6), age at menarche (n = 6) and age at first birth (n = 8). 
According to the quality assessment, except for 2 studies, other publications had high quality. 

There was no publication bias. 

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found that the highest levels of total carotenoids compared to the lowest were significantly related to a 24% lower risk of breast cancer [relative risk (RR) = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.62 to 0.93, I2 = 45.6%, p = 0.075]. 
According to the sensitivity analysis, no study affected the overall RR. 

The investigators found according to linear dose-response analysis, the risk of breast cancer decreased by 2% for every 10 μg/dL of total carotenoids [RR = 0.98, 95% CI = 0.97 to 0.99]. A steady drop in the risk of breast cancer was observed for total carotenoid concentrations <1200 μg/dL followed by a plateau. The level of evidence was graded as low.

The investigators found that the highest levels of α-carotene compared to the lowest were significantly related to a 23% lower risk of breast cancer [relative risk (RR) = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.68 to 0.87, I2 = 0.0%, p = 0.48]. 
According to the sensitivity analysis, no study affected the overall RR. 

The investigators found according to linear dose-response analysis, the risk of breast cancer decreased by 22% for every 10 μg/dL of α-carotene [RR = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.66 to 0.93]. 
No evidence for nonlinear association was found. The level of evidence was graded as low. 

The investigators found that the highest levels of β-carotene compared to the lowest were significantly related to a 20% lower risk of breast cancer [relative risk (RR) = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.65 to 0.98, I2 = 56.5%, p = 0.004]. 
According to the sensitivity analysis, no study affected the overall RR. 

The investigators found according to linear dose-response analysis, the risk of breast cancer decreased by 4% for every 10 μg/dL of β-carotene [RR = 0.96, 95% CI = 0.93 to 0.99]. No evidence for nonlinear association was found. The level of evidence was graded as low. 

The investigators found that the highest levels of β-cryptoxanthin compared to the lowest were significantly related to a 15% lower risk of breast cancer [relative risk (RR) = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.74 to 0.96, I2 = 0.0%, p = 0.80]. 
According to the sensitivity analysis, no study affected the overall RR. 

The investigators found according to linear dose-response analysis, the risk of breast cancer decreased by 10% for every 10 μg/dL of β-cryptoxanthin [RR = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.82 to 0.99]. 

The investigators found that the highest levels of lycopene compared to the lowest were significantly related to a 14% lower risk of breast cancer [relative risk (RR) = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.76 to 0.98, I2 = 0.0%, p = 0.46]. 
According to the sensitivity analysis, no study affected the overall RR. 

The investigators found that the highest levels of lutein compared to the lowest were significantly related to a 30% lower risk of breast cancer [relative risk (RR) = 0.70, 95% CI = 0.52 to 0.93, I2 = 17.1%, p = 0.30]. 
According to the sensitivity analysis, no study affected the overall RR. 

The investigators concluded that higher levels of carotenoids, α-carotene, β-carotene, β-cryptoxanthin, lycopene and lutein are related to a decreased risk of breast cancer. Additionally, each 10 μg/dL of total carotenoids, α-carotene, β-carotene and β-cryptoxanthin reduce breast cancer risk with 2%, 22%, 4% and 10%, respectively. 

Original title: 
The Association between Circulating Carotenoids and Risk of Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Studies by Dehnavi MK, Ebrahimpour-Koujan S, […], Azadbakht L.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10694674/ 

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on cohort studies/significantly, carotenoids and breast cancer right here. 

Objectives:
Even though many studies have examined the possible effect of low-fat diet on breast cancer survival, the relationship remains unclear. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Does low-fat diet reduce risk of recurrence of breast cancer?

Study design:
This review article included 2 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 1 large multi-center prospective cohort study with 9,966 breast cancer patients.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found post-diagnostic low-fat diet significantly reduced risk of recurrence of breast cancer by 23% [HR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.63 to 0.94, p = 0.009] and all cause mortality of breast cancer by 17% [HR = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.69 to 1.00, p = 0.05].

The investigators concluded post-diagnostic low-fat diet reduces risk of recurrence of breast cancer. However, more trials of the relationship between low-fat diet and all-cause mortality of breast cancer are still needed.

Original title:
Effect of low-fat diet on breast cancer survival: a meta-analysis by Xing MY, Xu SZ and Shen P.

Link:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24606431/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on fat consumption and breast cancer right here.

A low-fat diet is a diet with maximum 30 En% fat and maximum 7 En% saturated fat.  
30 En% fat means that the amounts of fat contribute 30% to the total calories (kcal) of the diet.
If the diet contains 2000 kcal, 66.7 grams of fat contribute 30% to this 2000 kcal.
1 gram of fat gives 9 kcal. Thus, 66.7 grams of fat provide 600 kcal and 600 kcal is 30% of 2000 kcal.

The most easy way to follow a diet a diet with maximum 30 En% fat and maximum 7 En% saturated fat is to choose only meals/products with maximum 30 En% fat and maximum 7 En% saturated fat. Check here which products contain maximum 30 En% fat and maximum 7 En% saturated fat.

However, the most practical way to follow a diet with maximum 30 En% fat and maximum 7 En% saturated fat is, all meals/products that you eat on a daily basis should contain on average maximum 30 En% fat and maximum 7 En% saturated fat.

To do this, use the 7-points nutritional profile app to see whether your daily diet contains maximum 30 En% fat and maximum 7 En% saturated fat.

Objectives:
Evidence shows cruciferous vegetables exhibit chemoprotective properties, commonly attributed to their rich source of isothiocyanates. However, epidemiological data examining the association between cruciferous vegetable intake and colorectal neoplasms have been inconclusive. Therefore, this review article (meta-analysis) has been conducted.

Does cruciferous vegetable intake decrease colon cancer risk?

Study design:
This review article included 33 articles.
Subgroup analysis for individual cruciferae types (n = 8 studies) and GST polymorphism (n = 8 studies) were performed. Pooled adjusted odds ratios (ORs) comparing highest and lowest categories of dietary pattern scores were calculated.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found when comparing highest with lowest categorie, cruciferous vegetable intake significantly reduced risk of colon cancer with 16% [OR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.72-0.98, p value heterogeneity 0.001].

The investigators found when comparing highest with lowest categorie, broccoli intake significantly reduced risk of colorectal neoplasms with 20% [OR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.65-0.99, p value heterogeneity = 0.02].

The investigators found stratification by GST genotype showed that the GSTT1 null genotype confered a reduction in colorectal neoplasms risk of 22% [OR = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.64-0.95, p value heterogeneity = 0.32].

The investigators concluded this meta-analysis provides support to the hypothesis that cruciferous vegetable intake protects against cancer of the colon. This meta-analysis also demonstrates the significance of gene-diet interactions and the importance of assessing individual cruciferous vegetables.

Original title:
Cruciferous vegetables and risk of colorectal neoplasms: a systematic review and meta-analysis by Tse G and Eslick GD.

Link:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24341734

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more studies/information on colon cancer and cruciferous vegetable intake right here.

Objectives:
Does physical activity reduce gastric cancer risk?

Study design:
This review article included 7 cohort studies (with mean reported follow-up ranging from 6 to 18.8 years) and 9 case control studies reporting 11,111 cases of gastric cancer among 1,606,760 patients.

There was no evidence of publication bias, both quantitatively [Begg and Mazumdar rank correlation test, p = 0.62] and qualitatively, on visual inspection of the funnel plot.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found the risk of gastric cancer was 21% [OR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.71-0.87, I2 = 55%]  lower among the most physically active people as compared with the least physically active people, after adjustment for important confounders, including age, obesity, and other risk factors for gastric cancer (smoking, alcohol, dietary patterns and socioeconomic status).
This protective effect was seen for gastric cancers in the cardia [OR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.63-1.00, 4 studies] and distal stomach [OR = 0.63, 95% CI = 0.52-0.76, 5 studies].

The investigators found increasing physical activity was associated with a reduced risk of gastric cancer in both men [OR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.75-0.99, 10 studies] and women [OR = 0.72, 95% CI = 0.55-0.94, 3 studies].

The investigators found in 12 studies that increased recreational physical activity showed an 18% reduction in gastric cancer risk [OR = 0.82, 95% CI = 0.72-0.94].

The investigators found the effect size was significantly smaller in high-quality studies [OR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.75-0.99, 6 studies] as compared with low-quality studies [OR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.69-0.81, 10 studies]. The results were consistent across sex, study quality, study design and geographic location.

The investigators concluded physical activity - especially recreational physical activity - is associated with reduced risk of gastric cancer. Lifestyle interventions focusing on increasing physical activity may decrease the global burden of gastric cancer, in addition to a myriad of other health benefits with being physically active, which include cardiovascular, metabolic and psychologic wellbeing.

Original title:
Physical Activity Is Associated with Reduced Risk of Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis by Singh S, Varayil JE, […], Iyer PG.

Link:
http://cancerprevention.aacrjournals.org/content/7/1/12.abstract

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more studies/information on physical activity and cancer right here.

Objectives:
The association of red meat consumption with the risk of stomach cancer has been reported by many studies, with inconclusive results. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Does a high red meat consumption increase stomach cancer risk?

Study design:
This review article included a total of 18 studies (cohort and case-control studies) involving 1,228,327 subjects.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found for the highest versus lowest categories of red meat intake a significant increased risk of 37% for gastric cancer [pooled RR = 1.37, 95% CI = 1.18-1.59, I2 = 67.6%, p 0.001].

The investigators found in population-based case-control studies, a significant increased risk of 58% for gastric cancer [pooled RR = 1.58, 95% CI = 1.22-2.06, I2 = 73.0%, p 0.001].

The investigators found in hospital-based case-control studies, a significant increased risk of 63% for gastric cancer [pooled RR = 1.63, 95% CI = 1.38-1.92, I2 = 19.1%, p = 0.284].

The investigators found, however, no association among cohort studies [RR = 1.00, 95% CI = 0.83-1.20, I2 = 33.9%, p = 0.158].

The investigators found the significant association was also presented in the subgroup analysis by geographic area (Asia, Europe), publication year (≥2000), sample size (1,000, ≥1,000) and quality score (7 stars, ≥7 stars).

The investigators found in dose-response analysis that every 100 g/day increment in red meat intake significant increased gastric cancer risk with 17% [RR = 1.17, 95% CI = 1.05-1.32].

The investigators found in linear regression model that the risk of gastric cancer increased with increasing level of red meat consumption.

The investigators concluded that a increased intake of red meat might be a risk factor for stomach cancer. Might be because the risk was not significant among cohort studies. Therefore, further larger prospective cohort studies are warranted to verify this association.

Original title:
Red meat consumption and stomach cancer risk: a meta-analysis by Song P, Lu M, […], Zhao Q.

Link:
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00432-014-1637-z

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more studies/information on meat intake and cancer right here.
 

Objectives:
The association between meat consumption and the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is still inconclusive. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Does meat consumption increase risk of hepatocellular carcinoma?

Study design:
This review article included 7 cohort studies and 10 case-control studies.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found for the highest vs. lowest consumption levels a non-significant increased risk for hepatocellular carcinoma of 10% [RR = 1.10, 95% CI = 0.85-1.42] for red meat, a non-significant increased risk of 1% [RR = 1.01, 95% CI = 0.79-1.28] for processed meat and a non-significant decreased risk of 3% [RR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.85-1.11] for total meat. Non-significant means, there is no association with a 95% confidence.

The investigators found for the highest vs. lowest consumption levels a significant decreased risk for hepatocellular carcinoma of 31% [RR = 0.69, 95% CI = 0.58-0.81] for white meat and a significant decreased risk of 22% [RR = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.67-0.90] for fish. The results remained quite stable after stratification by the confounding factors.
Significant means, there is an association with a 95% confidence.

The investigators concluded a high level of white meat or fish consumption reduces the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma, while intake of red meat, processed meat or total meat is not associated with hepatocellular carcinoma risk. These results suggest that dietary intervention may be a promising approach for prevention of hepatocellular carcinoma, which still need to be confirmed by further well-designed prospective studies and experimental research.

Original title:
Systematic review with meta-analysis: meat consumption and the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma by Luo J, Yang Y, [...], Zhu Y.

Link:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24588342

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more studies/information on fish consumption, meat consumption and cancer right here.

A review article of cohort studies or case-control studies will answer the following question:
"Should I change my diet?".

Objectives:
Is there an association between meat intake and risk of esophageal cancer?

Study design:
This review article included 7 cohort studies and 28 case-control studies.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found for the highest versus lowest total meat consumption categories a non-significant increased risk of 19% [95% CI = 0.98-1.46] for esophageal cancer.

The investigators found for the highest versus lowest red meat consumption categories a significant increased risk of 55% [95% CI = 1.22-1.96] for esophageal cancer.

The investigators found for the highest versus lowest processed meat consumption categories a significant increased risk of 33% [95% CI = 1.04-1.69] for esophageal cancer.

The investigators found for the highest versus lowest white meat consumption categories a significant decreased risk of 28% [95% CI = 0.60-0.86] for esophageal cancer.

The investigators found for the highest versus lowest poultry consumption categories a significant decreased risk of 17% [95% CI = 0.72-0.96] for esophageal cancer.

The investigators found for the highest versus lowest fish consumption categories a non-significant decreased risk of 5% [95% CI = 0.76-1.19] for esophageal cancer.

The investigators found when stratified by histological subtype, positive associations among esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and red meat, white meat and poultry and esophageal adenocarcinoma with total meat and processed meat.

The investigators concluded red meat and processed meat consumption increase risk of esophageal cancer, while white meat and poultry decrease risk of esophageal cancer. Fish consumption is not associated with incidence of esophageal cancer.

Original title:
Meat consumption is associated with esophageal cancer risk in a meat- and cancer-histological-type dependent manner by Zhu HC, Yang X, […], Sun XC.

Link:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24395380

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more studies/information on meat consumption and cancer right here.
 

Objectives:
Previous observational studies regarding the existence of an association between folate intake and the risk of breast cancer have been inconsistent. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Does a higher dietary folate intake reduce breast cancer risk?

Study design:
This review article included 14 prospective cohort studies that reported data on 677,858 individuals.
The participant follow-up period ranged 4.7-17.4 years and the number of individuals per study ranged 11,699-88,818.
There was no publication bias.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found no association between dietary folate intake and breast cancer risk for highest versus lowest category  [RR =  0.97, 95% CI = 0.90-1.05, p  = 0.451, I2 =  57.5%, p = 0.004].

The investigators found dose-response meta-analysis findings showed no association between the risk of breast cancer and a 100 µg/day increase in dietary folate intake [RR = 0.99, 95% CI = 0.98-1.01, p = 0.361, I2 = 66.2%, p 0.001].

The investigators found evidence of a nonlinear relationship between dietary folate intake and the risk of breast cancer.

A daily dietary folate intake of 200-320 µg was associated with a reduced risk of breast cancer. However, daily folate intake levels >400 µg was associated with a increased risk of breast cancer.

The investigators found overall folate intake level was associated with a reduced breast cancer risk of 36% if the patients had a daily alcohol intake >10 g [RR for highest versus lowest category = 0.64, 95% CI = 0.43-0.97].

The investigators concluded there are no effects of increased dietary folate intake on the incidence of breast cancer. But, a daily dietary folate intake of 200-320 µg was associated with a reduced risk of breast cancer. However, daily folate intake levels >400 µg was associated with a increased risk of breast cancer. Future studies should focus on specific populations in order to analyze primary breast cancer prevention.

Original title:
Folate Intake and the Risk of Breast Cancer: A Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Studies by Zhang YF, Shi WW, […], Zhou YH.

Link:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4059748/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more studies/information on folate intake and breast cancer right here.