Nutritional advice

Objectives:
Does consumption of fruits and vegetables reduce risk of endometrial cancer?

Study design:
This review article included  of 21 case-control studies and 6 cohort studies.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found that vegetables consumption significantly reduced risk of endometrial cancer with 24% [pooled odds ratio [OR], relative risk [RR], hazard ratio [HR] = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.63 to 0.91].

The investigators found that cruciferous vegetables consumption significantly reduced risk of endometrial cancer with 19% [pooled OR = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.70 to 0.94].

The investigators found that dark green and yellow/orange combined vegetables consumption significantly reduced risk of endometrial cancer with 36% [pooled OR = 0.64, 95% CI = 0.42 to 0.97].

The investigators found that fruits consumption significantly reduced risk of endometrial cancer with 19% [pooled OR = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.70 to 0.92].

The investigators found these results were primarily based on studies of high quality and exhibited either by case-control only or a combination of case-control and cohort studies. Additionally, the results varied by geographic location, such as Western areas, the US and Italy.

The investigators concluded that consumption of fruits and vegetables has beneficial effects on endometrial cancer risk and that specific kinds of fruits and vegetables should be recommended differently due to their outstanding bioactive components.

Original title:
The influence of dietary vegetables and fruits on endometrial cancer risk: a meta-analysis of observational studies by Lu YT, Gunathilake M and Kim J.

Link:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36151331/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on cancer and fruit and vegetable consumption right here.

Objectives:
There is keen interest in better understanding the impacts of alpha-linolenic acid (ALA), a plant-derived n-3 fatty acid, in ameliorating the development of cancer. However, results of several prospective cohort studies present an inconsistent association between ALA intake and the incident colorectal cancer (CRC). Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Does a high dietary intake of alpha-linolenic acid or a high level of alpha-linolenic acid in blood reduce risk of colorectal cancer (colon and rectal cancer)?

Study design:
This review article included 15 cohort studies (11 studies on diet and 5 studies on biomarkers including 4 on blood and 1 on adipose tissue) with 12,239 colorectal cancer cases occurred among 861,725 participants.
The mean follow-up was 9.3 years (ranging from 1 to 28 years).
Among all of the included studies, quality scores assessed by the 9-star NOS ranged from 7 to 9, with a median quality (≤7 stars) in 2 studies and high quality (≥ 8 stars) in 13 studies.

There was no publication bias.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found higher level of alpha-linolenic acid in blood significantly reduced risk of colorectal cancer with 17% [summary RR = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.69 to 0.99, I2 = 0.0%].

The investigators found each 0.1% increase in the level of alpha-linolenic acid in blood was significantly associated with a 10% reduction in colorectal cancer risk [summary RR = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.80 to 0.99, I2 = 38.6%].

The investigators no significant dose-response association between dietary intake of alpha-linolenic acid and the incident colorectal cancer [p for non-linearity = 0.18; p for linearity = 0.24].

The investigators concluded that higher blood levels of alpha-linolenic acid reduce risk of colorectal cancer while higher dietary intake of alpha-linolenic acid does not reduce risk of colorectal cancer. Encouraging the consumption of foods rich in alpha-linolenic acid to improve its levels in the blood may potentially decrease the risk of colorectal cancer. Nevertheless, well-designed and large-scale cohort studies with biomarkers are still needed for better reconfirming the potential impacts of alpha-linolenic acid intake in the primary prevention of colorectal cancer.

Original title:
Association of Dietary Intake and Biomarker of α-Linolenic Acid With Incident Colorectal Cancer: A Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies by Dai ZB, Ren XL, […], Xu L.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9301188/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on colorectal cancer and alpha-linolenic acid consumption right here.

Objectives:
Colorectal cancer is one of the most commonly diagnosed and deadly cancers worldwide. Epidemiological studies on the relationship between folate intake and the risk of colorectal cancer have reported inconsistent findings since folate fortification in the USA. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Does a high folate (folic acid) ietary intake reduce risk of colorectal cancer (colon and rectal cancer)?

Study design:
This review article included 24 cohort studies involving 6,165,894 individuals, of which 37,280 persons with colorectal cancer.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found compared with the lowest dietary intake, the highest folate dietary intake significantly reduced risk of colorectal cancer with 12% [combined relative risk (RR) = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.83 to 0.92, p = 0.0004].
Significantly means that there is an association with a 95% confidence.

The investigators found compared with the lowest dietary intake, the highest folate dietary intake significantly reduced risk of colorectal cancer with 3% among persons witih medium alcohol consumption [RR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.96 to 0.99, p = 0.008].
Significantly because RR of 1 was not found in the 95% CI of 0.96 to 0.99. RR of 1 means no risk/association.

The investigators found compared with the lowest dietary intake, the highest folate dietary intake significantly reduced risk of colorectal cancer with 5% among persons witih high alcohol consumption [RR = 0.95, 95% CI = 0.92 to 0.97, p = 0.003].

The investigators found compared with the lowest dietary intake, the highest folate dietary intake did not reduce risk of colorectal cancer among non-drinkers [RR = 1.00, 95% CI = 0.98 to 1.02, p = 0.827].

The investigators found compared with the lowest dietary intake, the highest folate dietary intake significantly reduced risk of colon cancer with 14% [RR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.81 to 0.92, p = 0.0004].
Significantly because the calculated p-value of 0.0004 was less than the p-value of 0.05.

The investigators found compared with the lowest dietary intake, the highest folate dietary intake did not reduce risk of rectal cancer [RR = 0.92, 95% CI = 0.84 to 1.02, p = 0.112].

The investigators found compared with the lowest dietary intake, the highest folate dietary intake significantly reduced risk of colorectal cancer in USA and Europe but not in other regions.

The investigators concluded that high folate dietary intake reduces risk of colon cancer, particularly in people with medium or high alcohol consumption, but it still needs to be further confirmed.

Original title:
Folate intake and risk of colorectal cancer: a systematic review and up-to-date meta-analysis of prospective studies by Fu H, He J, […], Chang H.

Link:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35579178/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on colorectal cancer and folic acid consumption right here.

Colorectal cancer starts in the colon or the rectum. These cancers can also be called colon cancer or rectal cancer, depending on where they start.

Objectives:
The association between meat intake and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) risk is still unclear. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Does a higher dietary intake of meat increases the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma?

Study design:
This review article included 17 observational studies involving 2,915,680 participants, of which 4,953 cases of hepatocellular carcinoma.

10 studies reported red meat intake, 9 reported white meat intake, 9 reported fish intake, 7 reported processed meat intake and 5 reported total meat intake.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found results showed that the consumption of red meat [relative risk = 1.04, 95% CI = 0.91 to 1.18, I2 = 50.50%, p = 0.033] and total meat intake [relative risk = 1.01, 95% CI =  0.90 to 1.13, I2 = 15.50%, p = 0.316] were not significantly associated with risk of hepatocellular carcinoma.

The investigators found, however, a higher dietary intake of processed meat significantly increased the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma with 20% [relative risk = 1.20, 95% CI = 1.02 to 1.41, I2 = 26.30%, p = 0.228].
Significant because relative risk of 1 was not found in the 95% CI of 1.02 to 1.41. Relative risk of 1 means no risk/association.

The investigators found, in contrast, a higher dietary intake of white meat significantly decreased the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma with 24% [relative risk = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.63 to 0.92, I2 = 68.30%, p = 0.001].

The investigators found, in contrast, a higher dietary intake of fish significantly decreased the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma with 9% [relative risk = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.86 to 0.96, I2 = 40.90%, p = 0.095].

The investigators concluded that a higher dietary intake of processed meat increases the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma, while a higher dietary intake of both white meat and fish decrease the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma. Therefore, these findings suggest that dietary intervention may be an effective approach to preventing hepatocellular carcinoma. These need to be verified with further well-designed observational studies and experimental clinical research.  

Original title:
Meat Intake and the Risk of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies by Yu J, Liu Z, […], Chen W.

Link:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35583453/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on cancer and meat consumption right here.

Processed meats are meats that have been preserved by smoking or salting, curing or adding chemical preservatives. They include deli meats, bacon and hot dogs.

Objectives:
Evidence associating diet with the incidence of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is inconclusive. Therefore, this umbrella review article has been conducted.

What is the association between diet and renal cell carcinoma incidence?

Study design:
This umbrella review article included 22 meta-analyses with a total of 502 individual studies and 64 summary hazard ratios (HRs) for renal cell carcinoma incidence: dietary patterns or dietary quality indices (n = 6), foods (n = 13), beverages (n = 4), alcohol (n = 7), macronutrients (n =15) and micronutrients (n =19).

No meta-analyses had high methodological quality.

59% of these 502 individual studies were cohort studies (n = 298), 39% were case-control studies (n = 196) and 2% were pooled studies (n = 8).

Sixty (94%) exposures in the included meta-analyses had more than 1,000 cases or 20,000 participants.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found no dietary factors showed convincing or highly suggestive evidence of association with renal cell carcinoma incidence in the overall analysis.

The investigators found in the overall analysis that dietary intake of vegetables significantly reduced risk of renal cell carcinoma with 26% [summary HR = 0.74, 95% = 0.63 to 0.86, suggestive evidence].

The investigators found in the overall analysis that dietary intake of vitamin C significantly reduced risk of renal cell carcinoma with 23% [summary HR = 0.77, 95% = 0.66 to 0.90, suggestive evidence].

The investigators found in the overall analysis that moderate drinking significantly reduced risk of renal cell carcinoma with 23% [summary HR = 0.77, 95% = 0.70 to 0.84, convincing evidence] in Europe and North America.

The investigators found in the overall analysis that dietary intake cruciferous vegetables significantly reduced risk of renal cell carcinoma with 22% [summary HR = 0.78, 95% = 0.70 to 0.86, highly suggestive evidence] in North America.

The investigators concluded dietary intake of vegetables and vitamin C could reduce renal cell carcinoma risk. Moderate drinking might be beneficial for Europeans and North Americans and cruciferous vegetables might be beneficial to North Americans, but the results should be interpreted with caution because no meta-analyses had high methodological quality. More researches are needed in the future.

Original title:
The role of diet in renal cell carcinoma incidence: an umbrella review of meta-analyses of observational studies by Liao Z, Fang Z, […], Luo Z.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8812002/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on cancer, vegetables, vitamin C right here.

An umbrella review article is a scientific article which only includes meta-analyses (also called review articles). The results found in an umbrella review article are more reliable than found in an individual review article.

One swallow does not make a summer. A famous Dutch saying that could not be any more obvious. Just because one single scientific study about a certain topic makes certain claims, it does not necessarily mean it is true. On the other hand, a review article (a collection of scientific studies on a certain topic) of randomized, placebo-controlled double blind clinical trials (RCTs) will answer the following question:
"Do taking dietary supplements make sense?" Yes for a positive conclusion and no for a negative conclusion.

One swallow does not make a summer. A famous Dutch saying that could not be any more obvious. Just because one single scientific study about a certain topic makes certain claims, it does not necessarily mean it is true. On the other hand, a review article (a collection of scientific studies on a certain topic) of (prospective) cohort studies or case-control studies will answer the following question:
"Should I change my diet?".

Objectives:
Does a high olive oil consumption reduce cancer risk?

Study design:
This review article included 37 case-control studies with 17,369 cases (persons with cancer) and 28,294 controls (persons without cancer) and 8 cohort studies with 12,461 incident cases among 929,771 subjects (participants).

Significant publication bias was detected via Egger’s test in the analysis on overall cancer risk [p 0.001], breast cancer [p = 0.013] and gastrointestinal cancer risk [p = 0.048].

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found in pooled analysis of case-control and cohort studies that highest olive oil consumption was significantly associated with a 31% lower risk of any cancer [pooled RR = 0.69, 95% CI = 0.62 to 0.77].  
Significantly means that there is an association with a 95% confidence.

The investigators found subgroup analyses showed that the protective effect of high olive oil consumption in terms of cancer risk was also significant in case-control studies [37 study arms, RR = 0.65, 95% CI = 0.57 to 0.74] but not in cohort studies [8 study arms, RR = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.77 to 1.05].
Furthermore, the protective association was also found in a multivariate analysis [32 study arms, RR = 0.72, 95% CI = 0.65 to 0.81], a high study quality analysis [RR = 0.72, 95% CI = 0.64 to 0.81], Mediterranean participants [RR = 0.69, 95% CI = 0.60 to 0.79] and non-Mediterranean participants [RR = 0.49, 95% CI = 0.34 to 0.71].

The investigators found in pooled analysis of case-control and cohort studies that highest olive oil consumption was significantly associated with a 33% lower risk of breast cancer [pooled RR = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.52 to 0.86].  
Significantly because RR of 1 was not found in the 95% CI of 0.52 to 0.86. RR of 1 means no risk/association.

The investigators found subgroup analyses showed that the beneficial effect was reproducible in case-control studies [RR = 0.63, 95% CI = 0.45 to 0.87] but not in cohort studies.
Furthermore, high olive oil consumption was linked to a reduced breast cancer risk in Mediterranean [RR = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.49 to 0.92] and non-Mediterranean populations [RR = 0.25, 95% CI = 0.07 to 0.89].

The investigators found in pooled analysis of case-control and cohort studies that highest olive oil consumption was significantly associated with a 23% lower risk of gastrointestinal cancer [pooled RR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.66 to 0.89].  
Subgroup analyses showed an inverse relationship between highest olive oil consumption and risk for esophageal cancer [RR = 0.47, 95%CI = 0.24 to 0.93] and pancreatic cancer [RR = 0.58, 95% CI = 0.35 to 0.97].
Furthermore, significant effects were also found in case-control studies [RR = 0.72, 95% CI = 0.61 to 0.85), studies within the Mediterranean area [RR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.67 to 0.88], multivariate analyses [RR = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.63 to 0.90] and high quality studies [RR = 0.73, 95% CI = 0.62 to 0.86].

The investigators found in pooled analysis of case-control and cohort studies that highest olive oil consumption was significantly associated with a 26% lower risk of upper aerodigestive cancer [pooled RR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.60 to 0.91].  
Subgroup analyses showed results remained significant for case-control studies [RR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.60 to 0.91], multivariate analyses [RR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.66 to 0.86] and studies of high quality [RR = 0.68, 95% CI = 0.52 to 0.89].

The investigators found in pooled analysis of case-control studies that highest olive oil consumption was significantly associated with a 54% lower risk of urinary tract cancer [pooled RR = 0.46, 95% CI = 0.29 to 0.72].  
Subgroup analyses showed results remained significant for studies of high quality [RR = 0.46, 95% CI = 0.32 to 0.66].

The investigators concluded highest versus lowest olive oil consumption is associated with 31% lower cancer risk, especially for breast, overall gastrointestinal, upper aerodigestive and urinary tract cancer. Additional prospective cohort studies on various cancer types, especially in non-Mediterranean regions, as well as large randomized trials, seem desirable in order to provide further insight into the role of olive oil in preventing cancer.

Original title:
Olive oil intake and cancer risk: A systematic review and meta-analysis by Markellos C, Ourailidou ME, […], Psaltopoulout T.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8751986/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on cancer, olive oil consumption right here.

The conclusions in scientific studies are even more reliable when they are also found in cohort studies, multivariate analyzes (studies where adjustments were made for multiple confounding factors) and high-quality studies.
 

Objectives:
Does postoperative coffee or caffeine consumption causally reduce risk of postoperative ileus (POI) in patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery?

Study design:
This review article included 4 RCTs with 312 subjects.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found postoperative coffee or caffeine consumption significantly decreased the time to first bowel movement [MD = -10.36 h, 95% CI = -14.61 to -6.11], shortened the length of hospital stay [MD = -0.95 days, 95% CI = -1.57 to -0.34] and was significantly  associated with a 36%-decreased risk of the use of any laxatives after the procedure [RR = 0.64, 95% CI = 0.44 to 0.92].

The investigators found the time to first flatus, time to tolerance of solid food, risk of any postoperative complication, postoperative reinsertion of a nasogastric (NG) tube and anastomotic leakage showed no statistical differences between groups.

The investigators concluded postoperative coffee or caffeine consumption causally improves bowel movement and decreases the duration of hospital stay in patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery. This method is safe and can prevent or treat postoperative ileus (POI).

Original title:
The effect of coffee/caffeine on postoperative ileus following elective colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials by Yang TW, Wang CT, […], Tsai MC.

Link:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34993568/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on caffeine and cancer right here.

Postoperative ileus is a prolonged absence of bowel function after surgical procedures, usually abdominal surgery.

Objetivos:
¿Reduce el consumo de frutas y verduras el riesgo de cáncer del conducto biliar?

Diseño del estudio:
Este artículo de revisión incluyó 14 estudios.

No hubo sesgo de publicación entre los estudios [p Begg = 0.53, p Egger = 0.84 para hortalizas y p Begg = 0.95, p Egger = 0.64 para frutas].

Resultados y conclusiones:
Los investigadores encontraron para el consumo más alto en comparación con más bajo, un riesgo significativamente reducido del 52% para el cáncer del conducto biliar [RR resumido = 0.48, 95% IC = 0.22 a 0.74, I2 = 86.8%, p 0.001, n = 10] para el consumo de verduras.

Los investigadores encontraron para el consumo más alto en comparación con más bajo, un riesgo significativamente reducido del 53% para el cáncer del conducto biliar [RR resumido = 0.47, 95% IC = 0.32 a 0.61, I2 = 63.3%, p = 0.001, n = 13] para el consumo de fruta.

Los investigadores encontraron por cada incremento de 100 gramos/día de consumo de verduras, un riesgo significativamente reducido del 69% para el cáncer del conducto biliar [RR = 0.31, 95% IC = 0.20 a 0.47, I2 = 63.3, n = 8].

Los investigadores concluyeron que el consumo de frutas y verduras reduce el riesgo de cáncer del conducto biliar. Se necesitan más estudios prospectivos bien diseñados para confirmar estos hallazgos.

Título original:
Vegetable, Fruit Consumption and Risk of Biliary Cancer: Evidence from a Meta-Analysis by Huai J and Xiaohua Ye X.

Enlace:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32731775/

Información adicional de El Mondo:
Encontrar aquí más información/estudios sobre significativamente/estudios de cohorte, el consumo de frutas y verduras y el cáncer.

Objectives:
Data on the association of nut intake with risk of cancer and its mortality are conflicting. Although previous meta-analyses summarized available findings in this regard, some limitations may distort their findings. Moreover, none of these meta-analyses examined the dose-response associations of total nut intake with the risk of specific cancers as well as associations between specific types of nuts and cancer mortality. Therefore, this review article (meta-analysis) has been conducted.

Do higher nut dietary intakes reduce risk of cancer incidence and mortality?

Study design:
This review article included in total 43 articles (observational studies) on cancer risk and 9 articles (observational studies) on cancer mortality.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found when comparing the highest with lowest intakes of total nuts, the highest intakes of total nuts (tree nuts and peanuts), significantly reduced risk of cancer with 16% [summary effect size = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.81 to 0.92, p 0.001, I2 = 58.1%, p 0.01].

The investigators found when comparing the highest with lowest intakes of tree nuts, the highest intakes of tree nuts significantly reduced risk of cancer with 13% [pooled effect size = 0.87, 95% CI = 0.78 to 0.96, p 0.01, I2 = 15.8%, p = 0.28].

The investigators found based on the dose-response analysis, a 5-g/d increase in total nut intake was associated with 3%, 6% and 25% lower risks of overall, pancreatic and colon cancers, respectively.  

The investigators found in terms of cancer mortality, 13%, 18% and 8% risk reductions with higher intakes of total nuts, tree nuts and peanuts, respectively.

The investigators found, in addition, a 5-g/d increase in total nut intake was associated with a 4% lower risk of cancer mortality.

The investigators concluded there is a protective association between total nut and tree nut intake and the risk of cancer and its mortality.

Original title:
Association of Total Nut, Tree Nut, Peanut, and Peanut Butter Consumption with Cancer Incidence and Mortality: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies by Naghshi S, Sadeghian M, […], Sadeghi O.

Link:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33307550/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on significant/cohort studies, nuts consumption and cancer right here.

Tree nuts in this review article are walnuts, pistachios, macadamia nuts, pecans, cashews, almonds, hazelnuts and Brazil nuts.

Objectives:
Epidemiological studies showing the correlation between folate (folic acid) and the breast cancer risk have revealed inconsistent results. Therefore, this review article (meta-analysis) has been conducted.

Do higher folate dietary intakes or plasma folate levels reduce risk of breast cancer?

Study design:
This review article included 39 studies on folate dietary intake (19 were prospective cohort studies, which included 37,917 cases (persons with breast cancer) and 20 were case-control studies, which included 13,074 cases and 17,497 controls (persons without breast cancer)) and 12 studies on plasma folate level (10 were case-control studies, consisting of 7,850 cases and 8,898 controls and 2 cohort studies, consisting of 815 incident cases).

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found when compared to the lowest folate dietary intake, the highest folate dietary intake significantly reduced risk of breast cancer with 15% [combined OR = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.79 to 0.92, I2 = 75.2%, p 0.001].
This reduced risk was not significant for cohort studies [OR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.91 to 1.03, I2 = 53.3%, p = 0.316].

The investigators found for every 100-μg/day increase in folate dieatary intake, a significantly reduced risk of 2% for breast cancer [combined OR = 0.98, 95% CI = 0.97 to 0.99, I2 = 72.8%, p = 0.002].
This reduced risk was also significantly in cohort studies [summary OR = 0.99, 95% CI = 0.98 to 1.00]. 
Significant means that there is an association with a 95% confidence.

The investigators found stratification by menopausal status showed that a higher folate dietary intake significantly reduced risk of breast cancer in premenopausal women with 20% [OR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.66 to 0.97, p = 0.022] but not in postmenopausal women [OR = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.83 to 1.06, p = 0.320].
Significant because OR of 1 was not found in the 95% CI of 0.66 to 0.97. OR of 1 means no risk.

The investigators found the highest versus lowest plasma folate levels had no correlation with the risk of breast cancer [combined OR = 0.98, 95% CI = 0.82 to 1.17, I2 = 63.0%, p = 0.822].

The investigators concluded there is a negative correlation between folate dieatary intake, at least 100-μg/day and the risk of breast cancer. However, plasma folate levels have no correlation with the risk of breast cancer. Therefore, whether folate dietary intake has practical clinical significance requires further study and the use of additional folate supplements should be carefully considered.

Original title:
Association of folate intake and plasma folate level with the risk of breast cancer: a dose-response meta-analysis of observational studies by Ren X, Xu P, [...], Dai Z.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7695428/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on significant/cohot studies, folate (folic acid) consumption and breast cancer right here.

The plasma folate level can be increased by taking folate-rich foods and/or folate supplements.

Objectives:
The association between vitamin C intake and breast cancer is unclear. Therefore, this review article (meta-analysis) has been conducted.

Does a higher vitamin C intake reduce risk of breast cancer incidence, mortality and recurrence?

Study design:
This review article included 24 cohort studies and 30 case-control studies.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found pooled results suggested that the highest versus lowest vitamin C intake was significantly associated with a 14% lower risk of breast cancer incidence [relative risk = 0.86, 95% = 0.81 to 0.92, I2 = 78.7%, p 0.00].
Sensitivity analysis indicated that the overall results remained consistent even after excluding studies individually.

The investigators found the use of random-effects model indicated that a 100-mg/day increment in vitamin C intake had no significant effect on breast cancer risk.

The investigators found stratification by study design showed a 26% lower risk of breast cancer incidence for vitamin C intake in case-control studies [RR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.65 to 0.84, p 0.001]. However, a non-significant inverse association was found in cohort studies [RR = 0.96, 95% CI = 0.89 to 1.04, p = 0.295].

The investigators found when the studies were stratified by the source of vitamin C, a 11% lower risk of breast cancer incidence with dietary intake [RR = 0.89, 95% CI = 0.82 to 0.96, p = 0.004] but not with supplements [RR = 1.02, 95% CI = 0.94 to 1.10, p = 0.678].

The investigators found that the highest versus lowest vitamin C intake was significantly associated with a 22% lower risk of breast cancer mortality [HR = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.69 to 0.88, I2 = 2.6%].

The investigators found that the highest versus lowest vitamin C intake was significantly associated with a 19% lower risk of breast cancer recurrence [HR = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.67 to 0.99, p = 0.043, I2 = 0.0%].

The investigators concluded that higher vitamin C dietary intake is significantly associated with a reduced risk of breast cancer incidence, mortality and recurrence.

Original title:
Association of vitamin C intake with breast cancer risk and mortality: a meta-analysis of observational studies by Zhang D, Xu P, [...], Dai Z.

Link:
https://www.aging-us.com/article/103769/text

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on significant/cohot studies, vitamin C consumption and cancer right here.
 

Objectives:
Heated debates have been on-going about tea consumption and the incidence of cancer, especially in head and neck cancer types. Therefore, this review article (meta-analysis) has been conducted.

Does habitual tea consumption reduce risk of nasopharyngeal cancer?

Study design:
This review article included 6 articles.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found that habitual tea consumption significantly reduced risk of nasopharyngeal cancer with 13.5% [OR = 0.865, 95% CI = 0.806 to 0.929].

The investigators concluded that habitual tea consumption is associated with prevention of nasopharyngeal cancer development. Additional studies are needed to further understand the molecular role of bioactive compound and potential health benefit of tea consumption in nasopharyngeal cancer prevention.

Original title:
The Association between Tea Consumption and Nasopharyngeal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis by Okekpa SI, Basria R, […], Musa MY.

Link:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32856842/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on tea consumption and cancer right here.

Objectives:
The number of cancer survivors is growing rapidly worldwide, especially long-term survivors. Although a healthy diet with a high vegetable and fruit consumption is a key factor in primary cancer prevention, there is a lack of specific dietary recommendations for cancer survivors, except in the case of breast cancer [World Cancer Research Fund (WCRF)/American Institute for Cancer Research (AICR) report]. Therefore, this review article (meta-analysis) has been conducted.

Does the general recommendation to consume ≥5 servings of vegetables and fruit per day (400 g/d) meet the needs of cancer survivors?

Study design:
This review article included 28 cohort studies.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found a high vegetable intake before diagnosis significantly reduced overall mortality in survivors of head and neck cancer with 25% [HR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.65 to 0.87].  

The investigators found a high vegetable intake before diagnosis significantly reduced overall mortality in survivors of ovarian cancer with 22% [HR = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.66 to 0.91].  

The investigators found a high fruit intake before diagnosis significantly reduced overall mortality in survivors of ovarian cancer with 18% [HR = 0.82, 95% CI = 0.70 to 0.96].  

The investigators found the evidence was insufficient for survivors of other cancers, although these associations generally tended to be protective. Therefore, more studies are needed to clarify the association between vegetable and fruit consumption and the prognosis of these different types of cancer.

The investigators concluded the general recommendation to consume ≥5 servings of vegetables and fruit per day (400 g/d) could underestimate the needs of cancer survivors, particularly those with ovarian tumors, in which the recommendation could increase to 600 g/d (i.e., 300 g/d of vegetables and 300 g/d of fruit).

Original title:
Vegetable and Fruit Consumption and Prognosis Among Cancer Survivors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies by Hurtado-Barroso S, Trius-Soler M, […], Zamora-Ros R.

Link:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32717747/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on vegetables and fruit and cancer right here.

Objectives:
It is unclear how dietary intake influences the ovarian cancer. Therefore, this review article (meta-analysis) has been conducted.

Is there a relationship between dietary intake of different nutrients/food groups and ovarian cancer risk?

Study design:
This review article included 97 cohort studies.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found no significant association between dietary intake and risk of ovarian cancer.

The investigators found in subgroup analyses that dietary intake of green leafy vegetables significantly reduced risk of ovarian cancer with 9% [RR = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.85 to 0.98].

The investigators found in subgroup analyses that dietary intake of allium vegetables significantly reduced risk of ovarian cancer with 21% [RR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.64 to 0.96].

The investigators found in subgroup analyses that dietary intake of fiber significantly reduced risk of ovarian cancer with 11% [RR = 0.89, 95% CI = 0.81 to 0.98].

The investigators found in subgroup analyses that dietary intake of flavonoids significantly reduced risk of ovarian cancer with 17% [RR = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.78 to 0.89].

The investigators found in subgroup analyses that dietary intake of green tea significantly reduced risk of ovarian cancer with 39% [RR = 0.61, 95% CI = 0.49 to 0.76].

The investigators found in subgroup analyses that dietary intake of tota fat significantly increased risk of ovarian cancer with 10% [RR = 1.10, 95% CI = 1.02 to 1.18].

The investigators found in subgroup analyses that dietary intake of saturated fat significantly increased risk of ovarian cancer with 11% [RR = 1.11, 95% CI = 1.01 to 1.22].

The investigators found in subgroup analyses that dietary intake of saturated fatty acid significantly increased risk of ovarian cancer with 19% [RR = 1.19, 95% CI = 1.04 to 1.36].

The investigators found in subgroup analyses that dietary intake of cholesterol significantly increased risk of ovarian cancer with 13% [RR = 1.13, 95% CI = 1.04 to 1.22].

The investigators found in subgroup analyses that dietary intake of retinol (vitamin A) significantly increased risk of ovarian cancer with 14% [RR = 1.14, 95% CI = 1.00 to 1.30].

The investigators found, in addition, acrylamide, nitrate, water disinfectants and polychlorinated biphenyls were significantly associated with an increased risk of ovarian cancer.

The investigators concluded that dietary intakes of green leafy vegetables, allium vegetables, fiber, flavonoids and green tea reduce ovarian cancer.

Original title:
Association between dietary intake and risk of ovarian cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis by Khodavandi A, Alizadeh F and Razis AFA.

Link:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32661683/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on different food groups and cancer right here.

Objectives:
Some evidence indicates that carotenoids may reduce the risk of bladder cancer (BC), but the association is unclear. Therefore, this review article (meta-analysis) has been conducted.

Do dietary carotenoid (β-cryptoxanthin, α-carotene, β-carotene and lutein and zeaxanthin) intakes or circulating carotenoid concentrations reduce bladder cancer risk in men and women?

Study design:
This review article included 22 studies (case-control and cohort studies), involving 516,740 adults.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found no association for the highest compared with the lowest category of carotenoid dietary intake and reduced risk of bladder cancer [RR = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.76 to 1.03].
No association because RR of 1 was found in the 95% CI of 0.76 to 1.03. RR of 1 means no risk/association.

The investigators found no association for the highest compared with the lowest category of circulating carotenoid concentrations and reduced risk of bladder cancer [RR = 0.36, 95% CI = 0.12 to 1.07].

The investigators found for the highest compared with the lowest category of circulating lutein and zeaxanthin concentrations a significantly reduced risk of 47% for bladder cancer [RR = 0.53, 95% CI = 0.33 to 0.84].
Significant because RR of 1 was not found in the 95% CI of 0.33 to 0.84. RR of 1 means no risk/association.

The investigators found dose-response analysis showed that bladder cancer risk significantly decreased by 42% [RR = 0.58, 95% CI = 0.36 to 0.94] for every 1 mg increase in daily dietary β-cryptoxanthin intake.

The investigators found dose-response analysis showed that bladder cancer risk significantly decreased by 76% [RR = 0.24, 95% CI = 0.08 to 0.67] for every 1 μmol/L increase in circulating concentration of α-carotene.

The investigators found dose-response analysis showed that bladder cancer risk significantly decreased by 27% [RR = 0.73, 95% CI = 0.57 to 0.94] for every 1 μmol/L increase in circulating concentration of β-carotene.

The investigators found dose-response analysis showed that bladder cancer risk significantly decreased by 56% [RR = 0.44, 95% CI = 0.28 to 0.67] for every 1 μmol/L increase in circulating concentrations of lutein and zeaxanthin.

The investigators concluded dietary β-cryptoxanthin intake and circulating concentrations of α-carotene, β-carotene and lutein and zeaxanthin reduce risk of bladder cancer.

Original title:
Carotenoid Intake and Circulating Carotenoids Are Inversely Associated With the Risk of Bladder Cancer: A Dose-Response Meta-analysis by Wu S, Liu Y, […], Ramirez AG.

Link:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31800007/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on carotenoids and cancer right here.

Objectives:
A growing number of epidemiological studies have suggested a possible association between long-chain omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) intake and the risk of cancers, but the results have been inconsistent. Therefore, this review article (meta-analysis) has been conducted.

Does dietary intake of omega-3 PUFAs reduce digestive system cancers?

Study design:
This review article included 8 case-control studies and 17 cohort studies, involving 1,247,271 participants and 23,173 patients with digestive system cancers.

Visual inspection of funnel plots and the Begg's and Egger's tests revealed no evidence of publication bias.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found the risk of digestive system cancers significantly decreased by 17% in individuals who consumed omega-3 PUFAs [RR = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.76 to 0.91].

The investigators found the risk estimates of digestive system cancers varied by cancer sites, study location, study design, type of omega-3 PUFAs and other confounders (smoking, alcohol consumption, body mass index and physical activity).

The investigators concluded omega-3 PUFA is a healthy dietary component for the prevention of digestive system cancers. Cancer incidence decreases with increasing omega-3 PUFAs intake for most digestive system cancer sites. The relation between omega-3 PUFAs and digestive system cancers RR is similar among different populations.

Original title:
Omega-3 PUFA Intake and the Risk of Digestive System Cancers: A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies by Jian J, Zhang and Zhao L.

Link:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32384489/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on omega-3 PUFAs and cancer right here.

Objectives:
An increased risk of gastric cancer for pickled vegetable and salted fish intake has been suggested, yet the lack of a dose-response association warrants a quantitative analysis. Therefore, this review article (meta-analysis) has been conducted.

Do pickled vegetable and salted fish intakes increase risk of gastric cancer?

Study design:
This review article included 21 cohort studies with a total of 195,624 participants for the analysis of pickled vegetable intake and 16 cohort studies with a total of

196,384 participants for the analysis of salted fish intake.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found in a dose-response meta-analysis of 6 studies, a significantly increased risk of 15% [combined RR = 1.15, 95% CI = 1.07 to 1.23, p for heterogeneity = 0.14] for gastric cancer incidence for a 40 g/day increment in pickled vegetable intake.

The investigators found in the categorical meta-analysis of 6 studies, a marginally significant increase in the risk of gastric cancer incidence, comparing the highest to the lowest intake of salted fish [RR = 1.17, 95% CI = 0.99 to 1.38, p for heterogeneity = 0.26].

The investigators concluded intake of 40 g/day of pickled vegetable increases risk of gastric cancer incidence.

Original title:
Pickled Vegetable and Salted Fish Intake and the Risk of Gastric Cancer: Two Prospective Cohort Studies and a Meta-Analysis by Yoo JY, Cho HJ, […], Park SK.

Link:
https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/12/4/996/htm

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on vegetables and cancer right here

Objectives:
Epidemiologic studies focusing on the association between 1-carbon metabolism-related vitamins (ie, folate, vitamin B6, vitamin B2, vitamin B12) and breast cancer risk have reported inconsistent findings. Therefore, this review article (meta-analysis) has been conducted.

Does higher dietary intake of folate (folic acid), vitamin B2, B6 or B12 reduce breast cancer risk?

Study design:
This review article included 27 studies (case-control and cohort studies) with a total of 49,707 cases (persons with breast cancer) among 1,274,060 individuals.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found for the highest folate dietary intake compared with the lowest, a significantly reduced risk of 7% [pooled relative risk = 0.93, 95% CI = 0.88 to 0.99, p = 0.018] for breast cancer.

The investigators found for the highest vitamin B6 dietary intake compared with the lowest, a significantly reduced risk of 6% [pooled relative risk = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.89 to 1.00, p = 0.037] for breast cancer.

The investigators found for the highest vitamin B2 dietary intake compared with the lowest, a significantly reduced risk of 10% [pooled relative risk = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.82 to 0.99, p = 0.026] for breast cancer.

The investigators found no significant association between vitamin B12 and breast cancer risk [RR = 0.99, 95% CI = 0.94 to 1.04, p = 0.604].

The investigators found folate and vitamin B6 dietary intake significantly decreased the risk of estrogen receptor-negative (ER-)/progesterone receptor-negative (PR-) breast cancer but not ER+/PR+ breast cancer.

The investigators found an increment of 100 μg/d folate dietary intake corresponded to a 7% [RR = 0.93, 95% CI = 0.89 to 0.98, p = 9.007] deceased risk of ER-/PR- breast cancer.

The investigators concluded both higher folate, vitamin B2 and B6 dietary intake decreases risk of breast cancer, especially ER-/PR- breast cancer.

Original title:
Association Between One-carbon Metabolism-related Vitamins and Risk of Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Prospective Studies by Zeng J, Gu Y, […], Chang H.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32241696

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on folate, vitamin B2 and B6 intake and breast cancer right here.

If breast cancer cells have estrogen receptors, the cancer is called ER-positive breast cancer. If breast cancer cells have progesterone receptors, the cancer is called PR-positive breast cancer. If the cells do not have either of these 2 receptors, the cancer is called ER/PR-negative.

Objectives:
The impact of light-intensity physical activity (LPA) in preventing cancer mortality has been questioned. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Does light-intensity physical activity reduce cancer mortality?

Study design:
This review article included 5 prospective cohort studies, in which the definition of light-intensity physical activity based on accelerometer readings was mainly set within 100 to 2,100 counts/min.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found 30 min/day of light-intensity physical activity significantly reduced cancer mortality with 14% [summary HR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.79 to 0.95, I2 1%] and the association between light-intensity physical activity and risk reduction in cancer mortality was linearly shaped [p nonlinearity = 0.72].

The investigators found light-intensity physical activity exhibited a comparable magnitude of risk reduction in cancer mortality of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity regardless of equal time-length [0.87 per 30 min/day vs. 0.94 per 30 min/day, p interaction = 0.46] or equal amount [0.74 vs. 0.94 per 150 metabolic equivalents-min/day, p interaction = 0.11].

The investigators found, furthermore, replacing sedentary time by light-intensity physical activity of 30 min/day significantly decreased the risk of cancer mortality by 9%.

The investigators concluded 30 min/day of light-intensity physical activity reduce cancer mortality.

Original title:
Objectively-Measured Light-Intensity Physical Activity and Risk of Cancer Mortality: A Meta-analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies by Qiu S, Cai X, […], Schumann U.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32303534

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find here more information/studies about sport nutrition and cancer.

Light intensity physical activity is an activity that is classified as 3 METS.

Objectives:
Previous studies have demonstrated some associations between dietary vitamin A intake and ovarian cancer risk with an inconsistent relationship. Therefore, this review article (meta-analysis) has been conducted.

Does higher dietary intake of vitamin A reduce ovarian cancer risk?

Study design:
This review article included 10 case-control studies and 5 cohort studies, involving 4,882 cases (persons with ovarian cancer) among 443,179 participants.

There was no publication bias.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found higher dietary vitamin A intake significantly reduced ovarian cancer risk with 18.4% [RR = 0.816, 95% CI = 0.723 to 0.920, I2 = 48.4%, p for heterogeneity = 0.019].
Sensitivity analysis showed that no single study had a potential impact on the pooled RR.

The investigators found higher dietary vitamin A intake significantly reduced ovarian cancer risk with 23.1% [RR = 0.769, 95% CI = 0.655 to 0.902] in case-controle studies.
However, this reduced risk was not significant in cohort studies.

The investigators found higher dietary vitamin A intake significantly reduced ovarian cancer risk with 17.5% [RR = 0.825, 95% CI = 0.720 to 0.946] in North American populations.

The investigators concluded that higher dietary intake of vitamin A reduces ovarian cancer risk, especially among North Americans. As some limitations existed in this analysis, large scale studies with detailed amount of dietary vitamin A intake are needed to verify the results.

Original title:
Dietary vitamin A intake and the risk of ovarian cancer: A meta-analysis by Wang Q and He C.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7138903/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on vitamin A intake and cancer right here.

Objectives:
Epidemiologic studies of the relationship between nitrite or nitrate consumption and risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) remain controversial. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Does dietary intake of nitrite or nitrate increase risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma?

Study design:
This review article included 8 case-control and 4 cohort studies with a total of 8,067 cases of non-Hodgkin lymphoma that reported the correlation between nitrate or nitrite consumption and risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma published between 1996 and 2013.

NOS scores ranged from 4 to 8 with a mean value of 6.
Information on nitrate and nitrite intake was obtained by personal interview, telephone interview or mailed questionnaires.

There was no evidence of publication bias.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found that high levels of nitrite dietary intake was linked to a significantly elevated risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma of 55% [OR = 1.55, 95% CI = 1.27-1.88, I2 = 41.8%, p = 0.161]. 

The investigators found, however, no connection between the risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma and high levels of nitrate dietary intake [OR = 1.02, 95% CI = 0.94-1.10, I2 = 14.2%, p = 0.308].

The investigators found that the risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma increased by 26% for each additional microgram of nitrite consumed in the diet per day [OR = 1.26, 95% CI = 1.09-1.42].

The investigators found data from the high-quality studies indicated that nitrite consumption was positively associated with carcinogenicity, leading to non-Hodgkin lymphoma [OR = 1.44, 95% CI = 1.17-1.77] and positively correlated with the development of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma [OR = 1.55, 95% CI = 1.07-2.26], but not other non-Hodgkin lymphoma subtypes.

The investigators found, in addition, high levels of nitrite dietary intake was linked to a significantly elevated risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma of 50% [OR = 1.50, 95% CI = 1.15-1.95] in females.
However, this increased risk was not significant in males [OR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.52-1.36].

The investigators concluded that nitrite dietary intake, but not that of nitrate, raises the risk of developing non-Hodgkin lymphoma, particularly diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in females. In the future, better designed prospective research studies should be conducted to confirm these findings, clarify potential biological mechanisms and instruct clinicians about non-Hodgkin lymphoma prophylaxis.

Original title:
The relationship between consumption of nitrite or nitrate and risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma by Yu M, Li C, [...], Jin J.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6969097/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on significantly/cohort studies and cancer right here.

The preservative sodium nitrite fights harmful bacteria in ham, salami and other processed and cured meats and also lends them their pink coloration.
 

Objectives:
Previous studies had been published to explore the association about carbohydrate intake on esophageal cancer risk, with inconsistent results. Therefore, this review article (meta-analysis) has been conducted.

Does dietary intake of carbohydrate reduce esophageal cancer risk?

Study design:
This review article included 13 case-control studies that assessed a total of 3,033 patients.
The quality evaluation scores of each study ranged from 6 to 9 and the methodological quality was higher.

In the publication bias assessment, the results from funnel plots and Egger’s test detected no publication bias.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found in overall analysis for the highest category versus lowest category of dietary carbohydrate a significantly reduced risk of 37.3% [summarized OR = 0.627, 95% CI = 0.505 to 0.778, I2 = 59.9%, p for heterogeneity = 0.001] for esophageal cancer.
Sensitivity analyses showed no single study had essential effect on the overall result.

The investigators found for the highest category versus lowest category of dietary carbohydrate a significantly reduced risk of 43.1% [summarized OR = 0.569, 95% CI = 0.417 to 0.777] for esophageal adenocarcinoma.

The investigators found for the highest category versus lowest category of dietary carbohydrate a significantly reduced risk of 33.5% [summarized OR = 0.665, 95% CI = 0.453 to 0.975] for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

The investigators found in subgroup analysis by study design that the association was significant in population-based case-control studies, but not in the hospital-based case-control studies.

The investigators concluded that dietary intake of carbohydrate may contribute to the lower development of esophageal cancer. May contribute because this review article only included case-control studies and no cohort studies. As some limitations existed in tbjs meta-analysis, large scale prospective studies with detailed type of dietary carbohydrate intake are needed to verify these results.

Original title:
Dietary carbohydrate intake and the risk of esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis by Xuan F, Li W, […], Liu C.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7042123/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on carbohydrate intake and cancer right here.

The 2 main subtypes of esophageal cancer are esophageal squamous-cell carcinoma (often abbreviated to ESCC) and esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC).
 

Objectives:
Does post-diagnosis dietary supplement use decrease total mortality, cancer mortality and recurrence among cancer survivors?

Study design:
This review article included observational studies and randomized clinical trials (RCT).

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found in 4 observational studies, compared to no supplementation, calcium supplementation significantly reduced total mortality with 12% [RR = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.77 to 1.00, I2 = 0%] among all cancer survivors.

The investigators found in 3 observational studies, compared to no supplementation, calcium supplementation significantly reduced cancer mortality with 29% [RR = 0.71, 95% CI = 0.53 to 0.95, I2 = 0%] among all cancer survivors.

The investigators found in 2 observational studies, compared to no supplementation, calcium supplementation significantly reduced cancer mortality with 34% [RR = 0.66, 95% CI = 0.47 to 0.94, I2 = 0%] among colorectal cancer survivors.

The investigators found in 2 observational studies and 2 RCT’s, compared to no supplementation, vitamin D supplementation significantly reduced total mortality with 14% [RR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.76 to 0.99, I2 = 0%] among all cancer survivors.

The investigators found in 4 observational studies, compared to no supplementation, vitamin C supplementation significantly reduced total mortality with 21% [RR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.68 to 0.92, I2 = 0%] among breast cancer survivors.

The investigators found in 2 observational studies, compared to no supplementation, vitamin D supplementation significantly reduced total mortality with 15% [RR = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.72 to 0.99, I2 = 0%] among breast cancer survivors.

The investigators found in 3 observational studies, compared to no supplementation, vitamin E supplementation significantly reduced total mortality with 24% [RR = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.64 tot 0.90, I2 = 0%] among breast cancer survivors.

The investigators found in 2 observational studies, compared to no supplementation, multivitamins supplementation significantly reduced cancer recurrence with 21% [RR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.64 to 0.97, I2 = 0%] among breast cancer survivors.

The investigators found in 2 observational studies, compared to no supplementation, vitamin C supplementation significantly reduced cancer recurrence with 24% [RR = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.64 to 0.91, I2 = 0%] among breast cancer survivors.

The investigators found in 2 observational studies, compared to no supplementation, vitamin E supplementation significantly reduced cancer recurrence with 31% [RR = 0.69, 95% CI = 0.55 to 0.85, I2 = 0%] among breast cancer survivors.

The investigators concluded post-diagnosis dietary supplement use (particularly calcium, vitamin C, D and E) decreases total mortality, cancer mortality and recurrence among cancer survivors.

Original title:
Dietary Supplement Use after Cancer Diagnosis in Relation to Total Mortality, Cancer Mortality and Recurrence: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis by Kanellopoulou A, Riza E, […], Benetou V.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32148118

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on calcium, vitamin C, D, E, breast cancer and colorectal cancer right here.

Objectives:
Does high waist circumference increase liver cancer?

Study design:
This review article included  5 prospective cohort studies with 2,547,188 participants.
Participants were aged 46-58 years, with a mean age of 51 years.
The mean follow-up of participants in the studies was 7.8 years.
The mean quality (NOS scores) of the studies included was 7 (ranging from 5 to 9).

Funnel plots did not show significant asymmetry between the studies included.
Furthermore, Begg's and Egger's regression test did not show any significant publication bias (p = 0.62 and p = 0.60, respectively).

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found combined results of the studies included with random-effects model showed that the highest waist circumference category was significantly associated with an increased risk of 59% for liver cancer [HR = 1.59, 95% CI = 1.38-1.83, I2 = 0%, p = 0.42] compared to the lowest waist circumference category.

The investigators concluded that waist circumference is a significant risk factor related to the incidence of liver cancer.

Original title:
Waist Circumference and Risk of Liver Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of over 2 Million Cohort Study Participants by Rahmani J, Kord Varkaneh H, [...], Zhang Y.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7024879/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on cancer and obesity/overweight right here.

Objectives:
Epidemiologic studies have investigated the association between nut intake and risk for multiple cancers. However, current findings are inconsistent and no definite conclusion has been drawn from prospective studies. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Does nut consumption reduce cancer risk?

Study design:
This review article included 33 cohort studies with more than 50,000 cancer cases.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found when comparing the highest with the lowest category of nut consumption, high consumption of nuts significantly decreased risk of overall cancer with 10% [RR = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.85-0.95].
Significant association was only obtained for intake of tree nuts.

The investigators found when comparing the highest with the lowest category of nut consumption, high consumption of nuts significantly decreased risk of cancer from the digestive system with 17% [RR = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.77-0.89].

The investigators found per 20 g/day increase in nut consumption was related to a 10% [RR = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.82-0.99] decrease in cancer risk.

The investigators concluded that consumption of 20 grams of tree nuts per day reduces cancer of the digestive system.

Original title:
Nut Consumption and Risk of Cancer: A Meta-analysis of Prospective Studies by Long J, Ji Z, […], Cheng L.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32041895

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on nut consumption and cancer right here.