Nutritional advice

Objectives:
Fish oil supplementation has been shown to be associated with a lower risk of metabolic syndrome and benefit a wide range of chronic diseases, such as cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes and several types of cancers. However, the evidence of fish oil supplementation on glucose metabolism and insulin sensitivity is still controversial. Therefore, this review article (meta-analysis) has been conducted.

Does fish oil supplementation improve insulin sensitivity in humans?

Study design:
This review article included a total of 17 RCTs with 672 participants. One of the 17 studies was crossover design and others were parallel design.
The doses of active ingredients of fish oil (n-3 fatty acids) ranged from 1 g/d to 4 g/d. Duration of the interventions was ranged from 4 weeks to 24 weeks.
There was no suggestion of small study effect based on visual inspection of the funnel plot. Results of the Egger’s (p = 0.78) and Begg’s (p = 0.43) tests showed that there was no potential publication bias.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found pooled analysis showed that fish oil supplementation had no effects on insulin sensitivity overall [SMD = 0.17, 95% CI = -0.15 to 0.48, p = 0.292, I2 = 58.1%, p = 0.001].

The investigators found subgroup analysis showed that fish oil supplementation significantly improved insulin sensitivity among people who were experiencing at least one symptom of metabolic disorders [SMD = 0.53, 95% CI = 0.17 to 0.88, p 0.001].

The investigators found subgroup analysis showed a positive effect of fish oil on insulin sensitivity among the short-term intervention group (12 weeks) rather than the long-term intervention group [SMD = 0.31, 95% CI = 0.01-0.61, p = 0.04].

The investigators found subgroup analysis showed that fish oil had no effects on insulin sensitivity among the healthy people or people with T2DM.

The investigators found there were no significant differences between subgroups of methods of insulin sensitivity and doses of omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (n-3 PUFA) of fish oil supplementation.

The investigators found in sensitivity analysis that summary results did not differ significantly when omitting studies one at a time.

The investigators concluded that fish oil supplementation during 12 weeks improves insulin sensitivity among people who were experiencing at least one symptom of metabolic disorders.

Original title:
Fish oil supplementation and insulin sensitivity: a systematic review and meta-analysis by Gao H, Geng T, [...], Zhao Q.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5496233/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on fish oil supplements and diabetes right here.

 

Objectives:
The potential glucose-lowering effects of pomegranate have been reported in animal and observational studies, but intervention studies in humans have generated mixed results. Therefore, this review article (meta-analysis) has been conducted.

What are the effects of pomegranate supplementation on measures of glucose control, insulin levels and insulin sensitivity in humans?

Study design:
This review article included 16 RCTs with 538 subjects. 14 trials adopted parallel study designs and the 2 remaining trials used crossover designs.
The total number of subjects included in each study ranged from 14 to 74 subjects.
The mean age of participants in each trial ranged from 30 to 70 years, with differing age ranges in most studies.
11 studies used pomegranate juice as a supplement (the dosage ranged from 120 to 500 ml/day).
2 studies used pomegranate seed oil as treatments (the dosage ranged from 400 to 2000 mg/day).
3 studies utilized pomegranate extract as the intervention (the dosage ranged from 710 to 1420 mg/day).  
The duration of the pomegranate intervention varied from 1 to 12 weeks (median: 5.5 weeks).

Overall, significant heterogeneity was detected for FBI and HOMA-IR, but subgroup analysis could not identify factors significantly influencing these parameters.
No significant publication bias was found.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found that pomegranate did not significantly affect the measures of:
-FBG (fasting blood glucose) [WMD = -0.6 mg/dL, 95% CI = -2.79 to 1.58, p = 0.59, I2 = 0%];
-FBI (fasting blood insulin) [WMD = 0.29 μIU/mL, 95% CI = -1.16 to 1.75, p = 0.70, I2 = 60.4%];
-HOMA-IR (homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance) [WMD = -0.04, 95% CI = -0.53 to 0.46, p = 0.88, I2 = 59.8%] or;
-HbA1c (glycated haemoglobin) [WMD = -0.11%, 95% CI = -0.39 to 0.18, p = 0.46, I2 = 0%].
These results were robust in sensitivity analysis.

The investigators found meta-regression analysis showed that the factor (dose of pomegranate juice supplementation) was not associated with the treatment effects on FBG level [coefficient = -0.006, 95% CI = -0.023 to 0.011, p = 0.46].

The investigators found no significant difference in the FBG-lowering effect between trials that were conducted in subjects with cardiovascular disease risk [WMD = 0.30 mg/dL, 95% CI = -2.36 to 2.97, p = 0.82] and those that were conducted in healthy individuals [WMD = -2.53 mg/dL, 95% CI = -6.36 to 1.30, p = 0.19].

The investigators found no statistically significant differences in the pooled effects of pomegranate on FBG in the subgroups stratified by study designs, intervention durations, types of intervention, baseline BMI and baseline FBG levels (FBG levels at the beginning of the studie).

The investigators concluded pomegranate supplements have no favourable effect on improvements in glucose and insulin metabolism. The current evidence suggests that daily pomegranate supplementation is not recommended as a potential therapeutic strategy in glycemic management. Further large-scale RCTs with longer duration are required to confirm these results.

Original title:
Lack of efficacy of pomegranate supplementation for glucose management, insulin levels and sensitivity: evidence from a systematic review and meta-analysis by Huang H, Liao D, […], Zhu Y.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5629805/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on fruit consumption and diabetes right here.
 

Objectives:
Do patients with type 2 diabetes benefit from a low carbohydrate diet?

Study design:
This review article included a total of 9 RCTs with 734 patients with type 2 diabetes.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found that low carbohydrate diet significantly reduced HbA1c level [WMD = -0.44, 95% CI = -0.61 to -0.26, p= 0.00] of patients with type 2 diabetes.

The investigators found that low carbohydrate diet significantly reduced triglycerides concentration [WMD = -0.33, 95% CI = -0.45 to -0.21, p = 0.00] of patients with type 2 diabetes.

The investigators found that low carbohydrate diet significantly increased HDL cholesterol concentration (WMD = 0.07, 95% CI = 0.03 to 0.11, p = 0.00] of patients with type 2 diabetes.

The investigators found that low carbohydrate diet was not associated with decreased level of total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol.

The investigators found subgroup analyses showed that short term intervention of low carbohydrate diet was effective for weight loss [WMD = -1.18, 95% CI = -2.32 to -0.04, p = 0.04] in patients with type 2 diabetes.

The investigators concluded there is a beneficial effect of low carbohydrate diet intervention on glucose control in patients with type 2 diabetes. The low carbohydrate diet intervention also has a positive effect on triglycerides and HDL cholesterol concentrations, but without significant effect on long term weight loss.

Original title:
Efficacy of low carbohydrate diet for type 2 diabetes mellitus management: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials by Meng Y, Bai H, […], Chen L.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28750216

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on carbohydrates and diabetes right here.

A low carbohydrate diet is a diet that is largely made up of meals/products with 20-40 En% carbohydrate. Practically, this means that all meals/products that you eat on a daily basis should on average contain 20-40 En% carbohydrate.
20-40 En% carbohydrate means that the total amounts of carbohydrate make up for a 20-40% of the total kcal of the diet. Check here which products contain 20-40 En% carbohydrate.

Objectives:
Polyunsaturated fats (PUFAs) have been shown to reduce type 2 diabetes (T2DM) risk and improve insulin responsiveness in T2DM subjects, but whether the plant sources of omega-3 PUFA (alpha-linolenic acid [ALA]) have an effect on glycemic control requires further investigation. Therefore, this review article (meta-analysis) has been conducted.

Does alpha-linolenic acid dietary intake reduce diabetes risk?

Study design:
This review article included a total of 8 RCTs involving 212 participants with type 2 diabetes.
5 trials (62.5%) were parallel designs and 3 (37.5%) were crossover designs.
Participants were generally middle-aged (median age  =  54 years, range  =  47-64 years) and overweight or obese (median BMI  =  30.7, range  =  28.0-33.2).
Overall, participants had controlled diabetes (median HbA1c = 6.8%, median FBG = 7.95 mmol/L) and the majority of studies indicated the use of hypoglycemic drugs or other medications, although all studies excluded the use of insulin therapy.
The dose of ALA ranged from 1.5 to 7.4 g/day with a median assigned dose of 4.4, 5.4 and 5.4 g/day of ALA for trials that reported HbA1c, FBG and FBI, respectively.
The median duration of the treatment was 3 months, ranging from 2 to 12 months.
7 studies (87.5%) were considered high quality (MQS ≥8).

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found compared to a control diet, a median dose of 4.4 g/day of alpha-linolenic acid intake for a median duration of 3 months did not affect HbA1c (%) of patients with type 2 diabetes [MD =  -0.01, 95% = -0.32 to 0.31, p  =  0.96].

The investigators found compared to a control diet, a median alpha-linolenic acid dose of 5.4 g/day did not lower fasting blood glucose (FBG) of patients with type 2 diabetes [MD  = 0 .07, 95% CI = -0.61 to 0.76, p  = 0 .84] or fasting blood insulin (FBI) of patients with type 2 diabetes [MD  =  7.03, 95% CI = -5.84 to 19.89, p  = 0 .28].

The investigators found summary effect estimates were generally compromised by considerable and unexplained heterogeneity [I2 ≥ 75%].

The investigators found in the subgroup analysis of continuous predictors, a reduction in HbA1c (%) and FBG (mmol/L) was significantly associated with an increased intake of ALA.

The investigators found further adjustment for publication bias using Duval and Tweedie's trim-and-fill analysis provided an adjusted, significant MD of 0.25 [95% CI = -0.38 to -0.12, 0.001) for HbA1c (%).

The investigators concluded alpha-linolenic acid-enriched diet with a median alpha-linolenic acid dose of 4.4 g/day during 3 months has no effects on HbA1c, FBG or FBI in patients with type 2 diabetes. The scarce number of existing RCTs and the presence of heterogeneity in the meta-analysis limit the ability to make firm conclusions about alpha-linolenic acid in type 2 diabetes management. The potential for alpha-linolenic acid to have dose-dependent effects warrants further research in this area.

Original title:
The effect of alpha-linolenic acid on glycemic control in individuals with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials by Jovanovski E1, Li D, […], Vuksan V.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5457843/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on PUFA and diabetes right here.

4.4 g/day alpha-linolenic acid can be achieved by taking 1 to 2 tablespoons of flax or salba-chia seeds or about 12 whole walnuts per day.

 

Objectives:
It has been unclear whether supplemental probiotics therapy improves clinical outcomes in type 2 diabetic patients. Therefore, this meta-analysis (systematic review) has been conducted.

Do probiotics supplements improve clinical outcomes in type 2 diabetic patients?

Study design:
This review article included 12 RCTs involving 684 type 2 diabetic patients.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found a significant decreased glucose level in the probiotics group [pooled standardized mean difference = -0.18 mg/dL, 95% CI = -0.35 to -0.01, p = 0.04, I2 = 64%, p = 0.004] compared to the control group.

The investigators found a significant reduction in HbA1c in the probiotics group [pooled standardized mean difference = -0.38%, 95% CI = -0.62 to -0.14, p = 0.002, I2 = 0%, p = 0.72] compared to the control group.

The investigators found a significant reduction in fasting insulin level in the probiotics group [pooled standardized mean difference = -0.38, 95% CI = -0.59 to -0.18, p = 0.003, I2 = 0%, p = 0.81] compared to the control group.

The investigators found a significant reduced HOMA-IR level in the probiotics group [pooled standardized mean difference = -0.99, 95% CI = -1.52 to -0.4, p = 0.0002, I2 = 86%, p 0.00001] compared to the control group.

The investigators found a significant reduced CRP level in the probiotics group [pooled standardized mean difference = -1.34 mg/L, 95% CI = -1.76 to -0.92, p 0.00001, I2 = 90%, p 0.00001] compared to the control group.

The investigators found a non-significant reduction in both triglyceride levels [SMD = -0.23, 95% CI = -0.48 to 0.02, p = 0.07, I2 = 52%, p = 0.03] and cholesterol levels [total cholesterol: SMD = -0.18, 95% CI = -0.42 to 0.06, p = 0.14, I2 = 47%, p = 0.05 and LDL-cholesterol: SMD = -0.03, 95% CI = -0.20 to 0.14, p = 0.73, I2 = 3%, p = 0.41] in the probiotics group compared to the control group.

The investigators concluded that probiotics supplementation is associated with significant improvement in HbA1c and fasting insulin in type 2 diabetes patients. These results may provide evidence for encouraging use of probiotics in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. However, more randomized placebo-controlled trials with larger sample sizes are warranted to confirm these findings.

Original title:
Effect of Probiotics on Glucose and Lipid Metabolism in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Meta-Analysis of 12 Randomized Controlled Trials by Yao K, Zeng L, [...], Zou X.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5491138/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on probiotics and diabetes right here.

Objectives:
What is the relationship between intake of 12 major food groups and risk of type 2 diabetes (T2D)?

Study design:
This review article included prospective cohort studies.
The 12 major food groups are whole grains, refined grains, vegetables, fruits, nuts, legumes, eggs, dairy, fish, red meat, processed meat and sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB).

The meta-evidence was graded "low" for legumes and nuts; "moderate" for refined grains, vegetables, fruit, eggs, dairy and fish; and "high" for processed meat, red meat, whole grains and sugar-sweetened beverages.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found 6 out of the 12 food-groups showed a significant relation with risk of type 2 diabetes; 3 of them a decrease of risk with increasing consumption (whole grains, fruits and dairy) and 3 an increase of risk with increasing consumption (red meat, processed meat and sugar-sweetened beverages) in the linear dose-response meta-analysis.

The investigators found evidence of a non-linear relationship between fruits, vegetables, processed meat, whole grains and sugar-sweetened beverages and type 2 diabetes risk.

The investigators found optimal consumption of risk-decreasing foods resulted in a 42% reduction and consumption of risk-increasing foods was associated with a threefold type 2 diabetes risk, compared to non-consumption.

The meta-evidence was graded "low" for legumes and nuts; "moderate" for refined grains, vegetables, fruit, eggs, dairy and fish; and "high" for processed meat, red meat, whole grains, and sugar-sweetened beverages. Among the investigated food groups, selecting specific optimal intakes can lead to a considerable change in risk of type 2 diabetes.

The investigators concluded that a higher consumption of whole grains, fruits and dairy products reduces type 2 diabetes risk, while a higher consumption of red meat, processed meat and sugar-sweetened beverages increases type 2 diabetes risk.

Original title:
Food groups and risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies by Schwingshackl L, Hoffmann G, […], Boeing H.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28397016

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on consumption of meat, fruit, dairy products and nuts and type 2 diabetes right here.

Objectives:
Olive oil (OO) as food is composed mainly of fatty acids and bioactive compounds depending from the extraction method. Both had been discussed as health promoting with still open questions. Therefore, this meta-analysis (systematic review) has been conducted.

Does olive oil intake reduce risk of type 2 diabetes?

Study design:
This review article included 4 cohort studies including 15,784 type 2 diabetes cases and 29 intervention trials.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found the highest olive oil intake category showed a 16% reduced risk of type 2 diabetes [RR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.77, 0.92) compared with the lowest. The reduced risk was significant.

The investigators found evidence for a nonlinear relationship between olive oil intake and the reduced risk of type 2 diabetes.

The investigators found in patients with type 2 diabetes that olive oil supplementation resulted in a significantly more pronounced reduction in HbA1c [MD = -0.27%, 95% CI = -0.37 to -0.17] and fasting plasma glucose [MD = -0.44 mmol/L, 95% CI = -0.66 to -0.22] as compared with the control groups.

The investigators concluded that the intake of olive oil is beneficial for the prevention and management of type 2 diabetes. This conclusion regards olive oil as food and might not been valid for single components comprising this food.

Original title:
Olive oil in the prevention and management of type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies and intervention trials by Schwingshackl L, Lampousi AM, […], Boeing H1.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28394365

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on olive oil intake and diabetes right here.

Objectives:
Nutrition therapy is an integral part of self-management education in patients with type 2 diabetes. Carbohydrates with a low glycemic index are recommended, but the ideal amount of carbohydrate in the diet is unclear. Therefore, this meta-analysis (systematic review) has been conducted.

Has carbohydrate restriction (below 45 En% carbohydrate) beneficial effects on glycemic control in type 2 diabetes?

Study design:
This review article included 10 RCTs. In total, 1,376 subjects with type 2 diabetes were included in this analysis. Forty-nine percent were male and the average age was 58 years. The majority were obese; mean BMI ranged from 26 kg/m² in an Asian population to 37 kg/m² in an American population.

The duration of the intervention varied from 3 to 24 months.

The average predefined targets for the assigned carbohydrate restriction were 25 En% (range 14-40 En%). The average reported intake was 30 En% (range 14-45 En%) after 3 or 6 months of intervention and 38 En% (range 27-45 En%) at 1 year (5 trials).

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found following a carbohydrate diet of 30 En% (range 14-45 En%) during 3 to 6 months significantly reduced HbA1c level of patients with type 2 diabetes with 0.34% [95% CI = 0.06 to 0.63] compared with a diet of 45-60 En% carbohydrate (high-carbohydrate diet).
Owing to heterogeneity, however, the quality of the evidence for this is only moderate. However, at 1 year or later, HbA1c level (seven trials included) was similar in the two groups.

The investigators found the greater the carbohydrate restriction, the greater the glucose-lowering effect [R = -0.85, p 0.01].

The investigators found the effect of the 2 types of diet on BMI/body weight, LDL cholesterol, QoL and attrition rate was similar throughout interventions.

The investigators concluded that carbohydrate restriction (below 45 En% carbohydrate) has a greater effect on glycemic control in type 2 diabetes than an high-carbohydrate diet in the short term. The magnitude of the effect was correlated to the carbohydrate intake, the greater the restriction, the greater glucose lowering, a relationship that has not been demonstrated earlier. However, in the long term, the glucose-lowering effect of high-carbohydrate diet (HCD) and low-carbohydrate diets (LCD) was similar.

Original title:
Systematic review and meta-analysis of dietary carbohydrate restriction in patients with type 2 diabetes by Snorgaard O, Poulsen GM, [...], Astrup A.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5337734/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on carbohydrates and diabetes right here.

Objectives:
Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have observed contrasting results on the effects of vitamin C on circulating biomarkers of glycaemic and insulin regulation. Therefore, this meta-analysis (systematic review) has been conducted.

Has vitamin C supplementation a favorable effect on circulating biomarkers of glycaemic and insulin regulation?

Study design:
This review article included 22 RCTs with 937 participants.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found overall, vitamin C supplementation did not modify glucose, HbA1c and insulin concentrations.

The investigators found, however, subgroup analyses showed that vitamin C supplementation significantly reduced glucose concentrations with 0.44 mmol/L [95% CI = -0.81 to -0.07, p =0.01] in patients with type 2 diabetes and in interventions with a duration greater than 30 days [-0.53%, 95% CI = -0.79 to -0.10, p = 0.02].

The investigators found vitamin C administration had greater effects on fasting [-13.63 pmol/L, 95% CI = -22.73 to -4.54, p 0.01] compared to postprandial insulin concentration. However, meta-regression analyses showed that age was a modifier of the effect of vitamin C on insulin concentration.

The investigators found the effect size of vitamin C supplementation was associated with baseline BMI and plasma glucose levels and with the duration of the intervention.

The investigators concluded vitamin C supplementation has greater reduction in glucose concentrations in patients with type 2 diabetes, older individuals and with more prolonged supplementation (greater than 30 days). Personalized interventions with vitamin C may represent a feasible future strategy to enhance benefits and efficacy of interventions. Nevertheless, results need to be interpreted cautiously due to limitations in the primary studies.

Original title:
Effects of vitamin C supplementation on glycaemic control: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials by Ashor AW, Werner AD, […], Siervo M.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28294172

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on vitamin C and diabetes right here.

Objectives:
Does magnesium supplementation reduce risk of cardiovascular disease among diabetic subjects?

Study design:
This review article included RCTs.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found magnesium supplementation significantly improved fasting plasma glucose with 4.641 mg/dL [WMD = -4.641 mg/dL, 95% CI = -7.602 to -1.680, p = 0.002]. A more beneficial effect of magnesium supplementation was observed in diabetic subjects with hypomagnesaemia.

The investigators found magnesium supplementation significantly improved high-density lipoprotein (HDL or good cholesterol) with 3.197 mg/dL [WMD = 3.197 mg/dL, 95% CI = 1.455 to 4.938, p 0.001]. A more beneficial effect of magnesium supplementation was observed in diabetic subjects with hypomagnesaemia.

The investigators found magnesium supplementation significantly improved low-density lipoprotein (LDL or bad cholesterol) with 10.668 mg/dL [WMD = -10.668 mg/dL, 95% CI = -19.108 to -2.228, p = 0.013]. A more beneficial effect of magnesium supplementation was observed in diabetic subjects with hypomagnesaemia.

The investigators found magnesium supplementation significantly improved plasma triglycerides with 15.323 mg/dL [WMD = -15.323 mg/dL, 95% CI = -28.821 to -1.826, p = 0.026]. A more beneficial effect of magnesium supplementation was observed in diabetic subjects with hypomagnesaemia.

The investigators found magnesium supplementation significantly improved systolic blood pressure with 3.056 mmHg [WMD = 3.056 mmHg, 95% CI = -5.509 to -0.603, p = 0.015]. A more beneficial effect of magnesium supplementation was observed in diabetic subjects with hypomagnesaemia.

The investigators concluded magnesium supplementation has a favourable effect on risk factors of cardiovascular diseases. Although future large RCTs are needed for making robust guidelines for clinical practice.

Original title:
Effect of magnesium supplementation on type 2 diabetes associated cardiovascular risk factors: a systematic review and meta-analysis by Verma H and Garg R.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28150351

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on cardiovascular diseases, cholesterol and magnesium right here.

Objectives:
The conclusions from epidemiological studies are controversial between apple and pear consumption and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) risk. Therefore, this meta-analysis (systematic review) has been conducted.

Study design:
This review article included a total of 5 independent prospective cohort studies with 14,120 T2DM incident cases among 228,315 participants.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found consumption of apples and pears was associated with 18% reduction in type 2 diabetes mellitus risk [multivariate-adjusted relative risk = 0.82, 95% CI = 0.75-0.88, I2 = 0.00%] when comparing the highest versus lowest category.

The investigators found dose-response analysis showed that one serving per week increment of apple and pear consumption was associated with a 3% [95% CI = 0.96-0.98, p for trend 0.001] reduction in type 2 diabetes mellitus risk.

The investigators concluded a higher consumption of apples and pears; at least one serving per week reduces type 2 diabetes mellitus risk.

Original title:
Apple and pear consumption and type 2 diabetes mellitus risk: a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies by Guo XF, Yang B, […], Li D.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28186516

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on fruit consumption and diabetes right here.

The standard serving size is a 1/2 cup of sliced fruit. A medium pear produces approximately 1 cup of fruit; so an average medium pear equals two fruit servings.
1 small apple = 1 serving.
 

Objectives:
The association between serum folate and vitamin B12 levels and the risk of diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) remains unclear. Therefore, this review article (meta-analysis) has been conducted.

Do reduced serum levels of folate and vitamin B12 increase peripheral neuropathy risk among patients with type 2 diabetes?

Study design:
This review article included 16 studies of serum folate levels (1190 patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy and 1501 patients without diabetic peripheral neuropathy) and 18 studies of serum vitamin B12 levels (1239 patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy and 1562 patients without diabetic peripheral neuropathy) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found reduced serum levels of folate in patients with type 2 diabetes and diabetic peripheral neuropathy compared with patients with type 2 diabetes but without diabetic peripheral neuropathy [WMD = -1.64, 95% CI = -2.46 to -0.81].
A subgroup analysis confirmed this association in the Chinese population, but not in the Caucasian and mixed populations.

The investigators found reduced serum levels of vitamin B12 in patients with type 2 diabetes and diabetic peripheral neuropathy compared with patients with type 2 diabetes but without diabetic peripheral neuropathy [WMD = -70.86, 95% CI = -101.55 to -40.17].
A subgroup analysis confirmed this association in the Chinese population, but not in the Caucasian and mixed populations.

The investigators concluded reduced serum levels of folate and vitamin B12 increase peripheral neuropathy risk among patients with type 2 diabetes. These findings support the need for further controlled studies in defined patient populations and the importance of monitoring serum folate and vitamin B12 levels in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Original title:
Serum folate, vitamin B12 levels and diabetic peripheral neuropathy in type 2 diabetes: A meta-analysis by Wang D, Zhai JX and Liu DW.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28081987

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on diabetes, folate and vitamin B12 right here.

Diabetic peripheral neuropathy is a long-term complication of diabetes. Exposure to high blood glucose levels over an extended period of time causes damage to the peripheral nerves; the nerves that go to the arms, hands, legs and feet. It is one of many complications associated with diabetes, with nearly 60 percent of diabetics having some form of nerve damage.

Objectives:
Is there an association between individual micronutrients and blood pressure in patients with type 2 diabetes?

Study design:
This review article included 11 RCTs (13 interventions, 723 patients with type 2 diabetes and ages ranging from 50.7 to 66.8 years and 54% of them were males. The duration of diabetes varied from 4.6 to 8.6 years) with 3 to 52 weeks of follow-up were classified according to the type of micronutrient intervention: sodium (n = 1), vitamin C (n = 2), vitamin D (n = 7) and magnesium (n = 1).
Only a meta-analysis of vitamin C and D was able to perform with the available data.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found vitamin C significantly reduced diastolic blood pressure of patients with type 2 diabetes with 2.88mmHg [WMD = -2.88 mmHg, 95% CI = -5.31 to -0.46, p = 0.020].
However, vitamin C not significantly reduced systolic blood pressure [WMD = -3.93mmHg, 95% CI = -14.78 to 6.92, p = 0.478].
Significant means that there is an association with a 95% confidence.

The investigators found vitamin D significantly reduced diastolic blood pressure of patients with type 2 diabetes with 2.44mmHg [WMD = -2.44 mmHg, 95% CI = -3.49 to -1.39, p  0.001].

The investigators found vitamin D significantly reduced systolic blood pressure of patients with type 2 diabetes with 4.56mmHg [WMD = -4.56 mmHg, 95% CI = -7.65 to -1.47, p = 0.004].

The investigators concluded vitamin D and possibly vitamin C have beneficial effects on blood pressure in patients with type 2 diabetes. Therefore, these interventions might represent a novel approach to the treatment of hypertension in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Original title:
Effects of individual micronutrients on blood pressure in patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials by de Paula TP, Kramer CK, [...], Azevedo MJ.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5233957/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on diabetes and vitamin C and D right here.