Nutrition and health

Objectives:
An enhanced risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD) still exists even when patients with type 2 diabetes have tight control on blood sugar. Thus, identification of treatment approaches that address CVD risk factors may be useful for patients beyond the blood sugar management. Although emerging evidence suggests that nuts consumption have beneficial effects on cardiometabolic health, the effects of almond intake in patients with type 2 diabetes are still controversial. Therefore, this review article has been conducted. 

Does almond consumption improve risk factors (cholesterol, triglycerides, fasting plasma glucose, insulin, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), body mass index, weight, body fat, systolic and diastolic blood pressure and CRP) of cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes?

Study design:
This review article included 9 RCTs.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found there was a causal relationship between almond dietary intake and a  significant reduction in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL cholesterol or bad cholesterol) [WMD = -5.28 mg/dL, 95% CI = -9.92 to -0.64, p = 0.026] in patients with type 2 diabetes compared with the control group.
This lowering effect of LDL cholesterol was robust in subgroups with almond consumption >50 g/day and baseline LDL cholesterol level 130 mg/dL.

The investigators found, however, the effect of almond on total cholesterol, triglycerides, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL cholesterol or good cholesterol), fasting plasma glucose, insulin, HbA1c, body mass index, weight, body fat, systolic and diastolic blood pressure and CRP was not significant compared with the control group.

The investigators concluded that a dietary intake of at least 50 g/d almond decreases causally LDL cholesterol (bad cholesterol) but has no favourable effect on other cardiometabolic outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes. Further high-quality studies are needed to firmly establish the clinical efficacy of the almond.

Original title:
Effects of almond on cardiometabolic outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials by Moosavian SP, Rahimlou M, […], Jalili C.

Link:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35443097/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on almond consumption and diabetes right here.
 

Objectives:
While there is growing research interest in the effects of nutrition and exercise on delaying sarcopenia, the results are inconclusive and there is scarce information on regional patterns. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Do protein supplements combined with exercise improve extremity strength in healthy older adults with sarcopenia?

Study design:
This review article included 14 RCTs, involving a total of 888 healthy older adults (>60 years).

4 studies in Asian countries provided data on lower-extremity strength, involving 280 participants (138 in protein supplements + exercise group and 142 in exercise group).
Lower-extremity strength was assessed using knee extension (n = 3) or leg extension (n = 1).
The intervention period of all studies was 12 weeks.
The dosage of protein ranged from 3 g/d to 40 g/d.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found in 4 studies in Asian countries a significant increase in the lower-extremity strength in the protein supplementation + exercise group compared to the exercise group, with a SMD of 0.24 [95% CI = 0.00 to 0.47, p = 0.048, I2 = 0.0%, p = 0.513].

The investigators concluded that protein supplements (3 g/d to 40 g/d during 12 weeks) combined with exercise (knee extension and leg extension) exerts superior benefit on lower-extremity strength in healthy older adults with sarcopenia in Asian countries, when compared to exercise alone or with a placebo. However, no additional benefits from protein supplementation are observed on upper-extremity strength, muscle mass and physical performance regardless of the regions. More well-designed RCTs with information on baseline and total protein intake for longer follow-up periods are warranted to evaluate the effectiveness of protein supplementation and exercise on the prevention and management of sarcopenia in healthy older adults.

Original title:
Effects of protein supplementation and exercise on delaying sarcopenia in healthy older individuals in Asian and non-Asian countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis by Li L, He Y, […], Liu X.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8808080/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on protein and elderly right here.

Upper extremity is part of the body that includes the arm, wrist and hand.

Lower extremity refers to the part of the body from the hip to the toes.

Sarcopenia is a type of muscle loss (muscle atrophy) that occurs with aging and/or immobility. Sarcopenia can affect people in their 30s and beyond.
 

Objectives:
Epidemiological studies indicate that higher intakes of flavonoids are associated with reduced stroke risk. However, which subtypes play significant roles to protect against stroke remain unclear. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Does dietary intake of different flavonoid subclasses (flavanones, flavan-3-ols) reduce risk of stroke?

Study design:
This review article included 10 independent prospective cohort studies with 387,076 participants and 9,564 events (persons with stroke).

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found higher intakes of flavanones significantly reduced risk of stroke with 15% [RR = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.78 to 0.93].

The investigators found dose-response analysis showed that 50 mg/day increment of flavanones dietary intake was significantly associated with 11% reduction in stroke risk [RR = 0.89, 95% CI = 0.84 to 0.94].

The investigators found dose-response analysis showed that 200 mg/day increment of flavan-3-ols dietary intake was significantly associated with 14% reduction in stroke risk [RR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.75 to 0.98].

The investigators found no association with respect to other flavonoid subclasses.

The investigators concluded that both 50 mg/day flavanones and 200 mg/day flavan-3-ols dietary intake reduce stroke risk. The findings of these associations of the present study need to be confirmed in other regions and ethnic origins.

Original title:
A meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies of flavonoid subclasses and stroke risk by Li XQ, Wang C, […], Guo XF.

Link:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35023220/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on flavonoid consumption and stroke prevention right here.

Objectives:
Is IL-6 is a candidate marker for severe malaria?

Study design:
This review article included 43 studies.

Most of the included studies were prospective observational studies (19, 44.2%) and the remaining study types included cross-sectional studies (16, 37.2%), case-controlled studies (6, 14%) and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (2, 4.6%).

The studies enrolled patients with P. falciparum (32, 74.4%), P. vivax (4, 9.3%), P. falciparum/P. vivax (3, 6.98%), P. falciparum/P. knowlesi (1, 2.3%), P. falciparum/P. vivax/P. ovale (1, 2.3%), P. falciparum/P. vivax/mixed infection (1, 2.3%) and P. falciparum/P. vivax/P. ovale/P. malariae (1, 2.3%).

Some studies enrolled children (20, 46.5%), adults (16, 37.2%), all age groups (6, 14%) and not specified (1, 2.3%).

Most of the studies (31, 72.1%) used only microscopy for malaria detection although microscopy/PCR (5, 11.6%), microscopy/rapid diagnostic test (RDT; 5, 11.6%) and microscopy/RDT/PCR (2, 4.65%) were also used.

An ELISA was the most common method used for IL-6 measurements (30, 69.8%), followed by a bead-based assay (13, 30.2%).

Thirty-two studies (74.4%) were high quality, whereas 11 studies were moderate qualities.
Heterogeneity of the effect estimate among the included studies was the main limitation of this analysis.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found results of the meta-analysis showed that patients with severe malaria had higher mean IL-6 levels than those with non-severe malaria [WMD = 96.63 pg/mL, 95% CI = 0.88 to 19.38 pg/mL, p = 0.04, I2 = 99.9%, 13 studies].

The investigators found that the pooled effect estimate was unchanged after the publication bias was adjusted [WMD = 96.60 pg/mL, 95% CI = 4.32 to 188.89 pg/mL, p = 0.04, 13 studies].

The investigators found results of the meta-analysis showed that patients with uncomplicated malaria had higher mean IL-6 levels than the controls [WMD = 42.86 pg/mL, 95% CI = 30.17 to 55.56 pg/mL, p 0.001, I2 = 100%, 17 studies].

The investigators found results of the meta-analysis showed no differences in the mean levels of IL-6 between patients with uncomplicated malaria and those with asymptomatic malaria [WMD = 42.07 pg/mL, 95% CI = -2.23 pg/mL to -86.37 pg/mL, p = 0.063, I2 = 99.1%, 8 studies] or between patients with asymptomatic malaria and healthy controls [WMD = 1.67 pg/mL, 95% CI = -2.73 pg/mL to -6.07 pg/mL, p = 0.45, I2 = 98.1%, 2 studies].

The investigators found subgroup analysis of continents showed no differences in IL-6 levels between patients with severe malaria and non-severe malaria for studies conducted in Africa and Asia.

The investigators found results of the meta-analysis showed that a higher mean level of IL-6 was observed in patients who died compared with the levels of those who survived [WMD = 1,399.19 pg/mL, 95% CI = 384.16 to  2,414.2 pg/mL, p = 0.007, I2 = 93.1%, 4 studies].

The investigators found meta-regression analyses of continents, malarial complications, parasitemia, age, male percentage, malaria diagnostic methods and IL-6 measurement methods showed that these co-variates did not confound the effect estimate [p > 0.05].

The investigators concluded significantly increased levels of IL-6 are observed in patients with severe malaria compared with those in patients with non-severe malaria, which indicates that IL-6 is a candidate marker for severe malaria. In addition, IL-6 might be a candidate marker for malaria infection and therefore could be used to differentiate malaria infection from other febrile diseases. Therefore, it is recommended that future studies should investigate the sensitivity and specificity of increased IL-6 levels to determine the effectiveness of measuring IL-6 levels to detect malaria infection and monitor malaria severity to improve the efficiency of malaria diagnosis and management.

Original title:
Increased interleukin-6 levels associated with malaria infection and disease severity: a systematic review and meta-analysis by Wilairatana P, Mala W, […], Kotepui M.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8993930/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on food fortification/malnutrition and malaria right here.

Objectives:
Oat supplementation interventions (OSIs) may have a beneficial effect on cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. However, dietary background can modulate such effect. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Does dietary oat supplementation lower levels of blood lipids (cholesterol, triglycerides) and improve anthropometric parameters (glucose level, body mass index, weight, blood pressure, waist circumference) among participants with predominantly mild metabolic disturbances?

Study design:
This review article included 74 RCTs with a total of 4,937 predominantly hypercholesterolemic, obese subjects, with mild metabolic disturbances. Of these, 59 RCTs contributed to the meta-analyses.

The majority of included RCTs (81.1%) had some concerns for risk of bias.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found oat supplementation (as oat, oat beta-glucan-rich extracts or avenanthramides), compared to control arms without oats, significantly improved levels of:
-total cholesterol (TC) [WMD = -0.42 mmol/L, 95% CI = -0.61 to -0.22];
-LDL cholesterol [WMD = -0.29 mmol/L, 95% CI = -0.37 to -0.20];
-glucose [WMD = -0.25 nmol/L, 95% CI = -0.36 to -0.14];
-body mass index [WMD = -0.13 kg/m², 95% CI = -0.26 to -0.01];
-weight [WMD = -0.94 kg, 95% CI = -1.84 to -0.05] and;
-waist circumference [WMD = -1.06 cm, 95% CI = -1.85 to -0.27].

The investigators found RCTs on inflammation and/or oxidative stress markers were scarce and with inconsistent findings.

The investigators found RCTs comparing an oat supplementation intervention to heterogeneous interventions (e.g., wheat, eggs, rice, etc.), showed lowered levels of glycated haemoglobin, diastolic blood pressure, HDL cholesterol and apolipoprotein B.

The investigators concluded dietary oat supplementation (as oat, oat beta-glucan-rich extracts or avenanthramides) may lower levels of blood lipids and improve anthropometric parameters among obese participants with predominantly mild metabolic disturbances, regardless of dietary background or control. May lower because the majority of included RCTs had some concerns for risk of bias. Therefore, further high-quality trials are warranted to establish the role of oat supplementation intervention on blood pressure, glucose homeostasis and inflammation markers.

Original title:
Effect of oat supplementation interventions on cardiovascular disease risk markers: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials by Llanaj E, Dejanovic GM, […], Muka T.

Link:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34977959/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on oat consumption, overweight and cardiovascular diseases right here.

These products are suitable for persons with cardiovascular diseases.

Objectives:
Is there an association between dietary diversity (DDiv) and growth outcomes (stunting, wasting and underweight) in children aged 5 years?

Study design:
This review article included 70 cross-sectional studies, 4 longitudinal cohort studies, 5 case-control studies and 2 randomized controlled trials.

Of the studies, 45 focused on infants and 36 on children aged 5 years.
The reviewed articles had good quality and low risk of bias (scores >6).

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found in infants, low dietary diversity was significantly associated with stunting, wasting and being underweight [79%, 57% and 68% of the studies, respectively].

The investigators found among children aged 5 years, the association was observed in 75%, 56% and 57% of the studies, respectively, for stunting, wasting and underweight.

The investigators concluded the findings indicate an association between low dietary diversity (DDiv) of infants and children aged 5 years with stunting. However, this association remains uncertain with wasting and being underweight.

Original title:
Association of Dietary Diversity With Growth Outcomes in Infants and Children Aged Under 5 Years: A Systematic Review by Gol RM, Kheirouri S and Alizadeh M.

Link:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35000681/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on food fortification/malnutrition right here.

Objectives:
Evidence associating diet with the incidence of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is inconclusive. Therefore, this umbrella review article has been conducted.

What is the association between diet and renal cell carcinoma incidence?

Study design:
This umbrella review article included 22 meta-analyses with a total of 502 individual studies and 64 summary hazard ratios (HRs) for renal cell carcinoma incidence: dietary patterns or dietary quality indices (n = 6), foods (n = 13), beverages (n = 4), alcohol (n = 7), macronutrients (n =15) and micronutrients (n =19).

No meta-analyses had high methodological quality.

59% of these 502 individual studies were cohort studies (n = 298), 39% were case-control studies (n = 196) and 2% were pooled studies (n = 8).

Sixty (94%) exposures in the included meta-analyses had more than 1,000 cases or 20,000 participants.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found no dietary factors showed convincing or highly suggestive evidence of association with renal cell carcinoma incidence in the overall analysis.

The investigators found in the overall analysis that dietary intake of vegetables significantly reduced risk of renal cell carcinoma with 26% [summary HR = 0.74, 95% = 0.63 to 0.86, suggestive evidence].

The investigators found in the overall analysis that dietary intake of vitamin C significantly reduced risk of renal cell carcinoma with 23% [summary HR = 0.77, 95% = 0.66 to 0.90, suggestive evidence].

The investigators found in the overall analysis that moderate drinking significantly reduced risk of renal cell carcinoma with 23% [summary HR = 0.77, 95% = 0.70 to 0.84, convincing evidence] in Europe and North America.

The investigators found in the overall analysis that dietary intake cruciferous vegetables significantly reduced risk of renal cell carcinoma with 22% [summary HR = 0.78, 95% = 0.70 to 0.86, highly suggestive evidence] in North America.

The investigators concluded dietary intake of vegetables and vitamin C could reduce renal cell carcinoma risk. Moderate drinking might be beneficial for Europeans and North Americans and cruciferous vegetables might be beneficial to North Americans, but the results should be interpreted with caution because no meta-analyses had high methodological quality. More researches are needed in the future.

Original title:
The role of diet in renal cell carcinoma incidence: an umbrella review of meta-analyses of observational studies by Liao Z, Fang Z, […], Luo Z.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8812002/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on cancer, vegetables, vitamin C right here.

An umbrella review article is a scientific article which only includes meta-analyses (also called review articles). The results found in an umbrella review article are more reliable than found in an individual review article.

One swallow does not make a summer. A famous Dutch saying that could not be any more obvious. Just because one single scientific study about a certain topic makes certain claims, it does not necessarily mean it is true. On the other hand, a review article (a collection of scientific studies on a certain topic) of randomized, placebo-controlled double blind clinical trials (RCTs) will answer the following question:
"Do taking dietary supplements make sense?" Yes for a positive conclusion and no for a negative conclusion.

One swallow does not make a summer. A famous Dutch saying that could not be any more obvious. Just because one single scientific study about a certain topic makes certain claims, it does not necessarily mean it is true. On the other hand, a review article (a collection of scientific studies on a certain topic) of (prospective) cohort studies or case-control studies will answer the following question:
"Should I change my diet?".

Objectives:
There is currently a lack of high-quality research on the best dietary recommendations for patients with early glaucoma or at high risk for glaucoma. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Does a high dietary vitamin intake reduce risk of glaucoma?

Study design:
This review article included 8 cohort studies, with a total of 262,189 patients.

There was no publication bias.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found that high-dose dietary intake of vitamins A was significantly associated with a 27% low risk of glaucoma [OR = 0.63, 95% CI = 0.53 to 0.76 , p 001, I2 = 49%].

The investigators found that high-dose dietary intake of vitamins B (a combination of B1, B2, B3, B6 and B12) was significantly associated with a 29% low risk of glaucoma [OR = 0.71, 95% CI = 0.64 to 0.80, p 0.001, I2 = 29%].

The investigators found no association between high-dose dietary intake of vitamins C, D or E and lower risk of glaucoma.

The investigators concluded that high-dose dietary intake of vitamins A and B, but not vitamins C, D or E, is associated with a low prevalence of glaucoma. Overall, middle-aged and elderly people or patients with early glaucoma should consume vitamin-rich foods rich or take additional vitamin supplements.

Original title:
Vitamin intake and glaucoma risk: A systematic review and meta-analysis by Han FF and Fu XX.             

Link:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0181551222000419?via%3Dihub

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find here more information/studies about chronic diseases, vitamin A and B.
 

Objectives:
There is some evidence regarding the positive effects of ginger supplementation on metabolic profile in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM). However, they are conflicting and therefore, this review article has been conducted. 

Does ginger supplementation improve metabolic profile (FBS, HbA1c, TC, TG, LDL, HDL, SBP and DBP) in patients with type 2 diabetes?

Study design:
This review article included 10 RCTs.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found pooled meta-analysis showed a significant reduction in fasting blood sugar (FBS) level following ginger supplementation by polling 8 effect sizes [WMD = -18.81, 95% CI = -28.70 to -8.92, I2 = 77.4%].

The investigators found pooled meta-analysis showed a significant reduction in HbA1c level following ginger supplementation by polling 7 effect sizes [WMD = -0.57, 95% CI = -0.93 to -0.20, I2 = 88.6%].

The investigators found pooled meta-analysis showed a significant reduction in systolic blood pressure (SBP) following ginger supplementation by polling 5 effect sizes [WMD = -4.20, 95% CI = -7.64 to -0.77, I2 = 97%].

The investigators found pooled meta-analysis showed a significant reduction in diastolic blood pressure (DBP) following ginger supplementation by polling 5 effect sizes [WMD = -1.61, 95% CI = -3.04 to -0.18, I2 = 93.2%].

The investigators found pooled meta-analysis showed ginger supplementation had no significant influence on lipid profile involving triglyceride (TG), total cholesterol (TC), LDL cholesterol and HDL cholesterol.

The investigators concluded supplementation with ginger reduces fasting blood sugar, HbA1c, systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure in patients with type 2 diabetes. Further large RCTs are required to shed light on this issue.

Original title:
The effect of ginger supplementation on metabolic profiles in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials by Ebrahimzadeh A, Ebrahimzadeh A, […], Milajerdi A.

Link:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35031435/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on lowering blood pressure and diabetes right here.
 

Objectives:
Does a high serum vitamin D level reduce risk of latent tuberculosis infection?

Study design:
This review article included 2 case-control studies and 3 cohort studies with a total of 1,516 subjects, comprising 117 latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) patients.
Diagnosis of LTBI in all studies was based upon QFN-GIT, IGRAs and/or TST.
2 case-control and 3 cohort studies were considered as high quality.

Between-studies heterogeneity varied from none to small for the meta-analyses with I2 values ranging from 64.5 to 75.7%. However, sensitivity analysis and visual inspection of funnel plots for checking asymmetry and publication bias weren’t done because only 2 articles were included in association of vitamin D and the risk of LTBI and 3 in association of vitamin D and the incidence of LTBI.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found in a pooled analysis of 2 case-control studies with 41 LTBI cases and 142 control subjects, that relatively high serum vitamin D level was not significantly associated with a decreased risk of latent tuberculosis infection [OR = 0.51, 95% CI = 0.05 to 5.65, p = 0.58, I2 = 64.5%].
Not significantly because the calculated p-value of 0.58 was larger than the p-value of 0.05.

The investigators found in a pooled analysis of 3 cohort studies involving 1,333 participants, that relatively high serum vitamin D levels did not reduce the incidence of latent tuberculosis infection [RR = 0.56, 95% CI = 0.19 to 1.67, p = 0.300, I2 = 75.7%].

The investigators concluded that serum vitamin D levels are not associated with incidence of latent tuberculosis infection and relatively high serum vitamin D level is not a protective factor for latent tuberculosis infection. Further RCTs are needed to verify whether sufficient vitamin D levels and vitamin D supplementation prevents latent tuberculosis infection.

Original title:
Vitamin D and the risk of latent tuberculosis infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis by Cao Y, Wang X, […], Du J.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8772077/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on food fortification/malnutrition and vitamin D right here.

Objectives:
Does a high olive oil consumption reduce cancer risk?

Study design:
This review article included 37 case-control studies with 17,369 cases (persons with cancer) and 28,294 controls (persons without cancer) and 8 cohort studies with 12,461 incident cases among 929,771 subjects (participants).

Significant publication bias was detected via Egger’s test in the analysis on overall cancer risk [p 0.001], breast cancer [p = 0.013] and gastrointestinal cancer risk [p = 0.048].

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found in pooled analysis of case-control and cohort studies that highest olive oil consumption was significantly associated with a 31% lower risk of any cancer [pooled RR = 0.69, 95% CI = 0.62 to 0.77].  
Significantly means that there is an association with a 95% confidence.

The investigators found subgroup analyses showed that the protective effect of high olive oil consumption in terms of cancer risk was also significant in case-control studies [37 study arms, RR = 0.65, 95% CI = 0.57 to 0.74] but not in cohort studies [8 study arms, RR = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.77 to 1.05].
Furthermore, the protective association was also found in a multivariate analysis [32 study arms, RR = 0.72, 95% CI = 0.65 to 0.81], a high study quality analysis [RR = 0.72, 95% CI = 0.64 to 0.81], Mediterranean participants [RR = 0.69, 95% CI = 0.60 to 0.79] and non-Mediterranean participants [RR = 0.49, 95% CI = 0.34 to 0.71].

The investigators found in pooled analysis of case-control and cohort studies that highest olive oil consumption was significantly associated with a 33% lower risk of breast cancer [pooled RR = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.52 to 0.86].  
Significantly because RR of 1 was not found in the 95% CI of 0.52 to 0.86. RR of 1 means no risk/association.

The investigators found subgroup analyses showed that the beneficial effect was reproducible in case-control studies [RR = 0.63, 95% CI = 0.45 to 0.87] but not in cohort studies.
Furthermore, high olive oil consumption was linked to a reduced breast cancer risk in Mediterranean [RR = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.49 to 0.92] and non-Mediterranean populations [RR = 0.25, 95% CI = 0.07 to 0.89].

The investigators found in pooled analysis of case-control and cohort studies that highest olive oil consumption was significantly associated with a 23% lower risk of gastrointestinal cancer [pooled RR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.66 to 0.89].  
Subgroup analyses showed an inverse relationship between highest olive oil consumption and risk for esophageal cancer [RR = 0.47, 95%CI = 0.24 to 0.93] and pancreatic cancer [RR = 0.58, 95% CI = 0.35 to 0.97].
Furthermore, significant effects were also found in case-control studies [RR = 0.72, 95% CI = 0.61 to 0.85), studies within the Mediterranean area [RR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.67 to 0.88], multivariate analyses [RR = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.63 to 0.90] and high quality studies [RR = 0.73, 95% CI = 0.62 to 0.86].

The investigators found in pooled analysis of case-control and cohort studies that highest olive oil consumption was significantly associated with a 26% lower risk of upper aerodigestive cancer [pooled RR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.60 to 0.91].  
Subgroup analyses showed results remained significant for case-control studies [RR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.60 to 0.91], multivariate analyses [RR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.66 to 0.86] and studies of high quality [RR = 0.68, 95% CI = 0.52 to 0.89].

The investigators found in pooled analysis of case-control studies that highest olive oil consumption was significantly associated with a 54% lower risk of urinary tract cancer [pooled RR = 0.46, 95% CI = 0.29 to 0.72].  
Subgroup analyses showed results remained significant for studies of high quality [RR = 0.46, 95% CI = 0.32 to 0.66].

The investigators concluded highest versus lowest olive oil consumption is associated with 31% lower cancer risk, especially for breast, overall gastrointestinal, upper aerodigestive and urinary tract cancer. Additional prospective cohort studies on various cancer types, especially in non-Mediterranean regions, as well as large randomized trials, seem desirable in order to provide further insight into the role of olive oil in preventing cancer.

Original title:
Olive oil intake and cancer risk: A systematic review and meta-analysis by Markellos C, Ourailidou ME, […], Psaltopoulout T.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8751986/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on cancer, olive oil consumption right here.

The conclusions in scientific studies are even more reliable when they are also found in cohort studies, multivariate analyzes (studies where adjustments were made for multiple confounding factors) and high-quality studies.
 

Objectives:
Severe hypertension in pregnancy is a hypertensive crisis that requires urgent and intensive care due to its high maternal and fetal mortality. However, there is still a conflict of opinion on the recommendations of antihypertensive therapy.

What are the optimal blood pressure (BP) levels to prevent severe hypertension in pregnant women with nonsevere hypertension?

Study design:
This review article included 40 RCTs with 6,355 patients.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found blood pressure lowering treatment significantly lowered risk of severe hypertension with 54% [RR = 0.46, 95% CI = 0.37 to 0.56], preeclampsia with 18% [RR = 0.82, 95% CI = 0.69 to 0.98], severe preeclampsia with 62% [RR = 0.38, 95% CI = 0.17 to 0.84], placental abruption with 48% [RR = 0.52, 95% CI = 0.32 to 0.86] and preterm birth with 19% [37 weeks: RR = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.71 to 0.93], while the risk of small for gestational age infants was significantly increased with 25% [RR = 1.25, 95% CI = 1.02 to 1.54].

The investigators found an achieved systolic blood pressure (SBP) of 130 mmHg significantly reduced the risk of severe hypertension to nearly one-third compared with a systolic blood pressure of ≥140 mmHg, with a significant interaction of the blood pressure levels achieved with BP-lowering therapy.

The investigators found there was no significant interaction between the subtypes of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and blood pressure lowering treatment, except for placental abruption.

The investigators concluded blood pressure lowering treatment aimed at a systolic blood pressure 130 mmHg and accompanied by the careful monitoring of fetal growth should be recommended to prevent severe hypertension in pregnant women with nonsevere hypertension.

Original title:
Optimal blood pressure target to prevent severe hypertension in pregnancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis by Abe M, Arima H, […], Mukoyama M.

Link:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35136186/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on food fortification/malnutrition and pregnancy right here.

Objectives:
Does a higher intake of dietary antioxidants (like vitamin C and E, β-carotene, zinc, anthocyanins, lutein) reduce risk of Parkinson's disease (PD)?

Study design:
This review article included 6 prospective cohort studies and 2 nested case-control studies (448,737 participants with 4,654 persons with Parkinson's disease) and 6 case-control studies (1,948 persons without Parkinson's disease and 1, 273 persons with Parkinson's disease).

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found comparded to the lowest dietary vitamine E intake, that the highest dietary vitamine E intake significantly reduced risk of Parkinson's disease with 16% [pooled RR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.71 to 0.99, n = 7 cohort studies].
Significantly means that there is an association with a 95% confidence.

The investigators found compared to the lowest dietary anthocyanins intake, that the highest dietary anthocyanins intake significantly reduced risk of Parkinson's disease with 24% [pooled RR = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.61 to 0.96, n = 2 cohort studies].
Significantly because pooled RR of 1 was not found in the 95% CI of 0.61 to 0.96. RR of 1 means no risk/association.

The investigators found compared to the lowest dietary lutein intake, that the highest dietary lutein intake significantly increased risk of Parkinson's disease with 86% [pooled RR = 1.86, 95% CI = 1.20 to 2.88, n = 3 case-control studies].

The investigators found in dose-response meta-analyses that every increment of dietary vitamin C intake with 50 mg/d significantly reduced risk of Parkinson's disease with 6% [RR = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.88 to 0.99, n = 6].

The investigators found in dose-response meta-analyses that every increment of dietary vitamin E intake with 5 mg/d significantly reduced risk of Parkinson's disease with 16% [RR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.70 to 0.99, n = 7].

The investigators found in dose-response meta-analyses that every increment of dietary β-carotene intake with 2 mg/d significantly reduced risk of Parkinson's disease with 6% [RR = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.89 to 0.99, n = 6].

The investigators found in dose-response meta-analyses that every increment of dietary zinc intake with 1 mg/d significantly reduced risk of Parkinson's disease with 35% [RR = 0.65, 95% CI = 0.49 to 0.86, n = 1].

The investigators concluded that higher intake of antioxidant-rich foods reduces risk of Parkinson's disease. Future, well-designed prospective studies are needed to validate the present findings.

Original title:
Dietary Antioxidants and Risk of Parkinson's Disease: A Systematic Review and Dose-response Meta-analysis of Observational Studies by Talebi S, Ghoreishy SM, […], Mohammadi H.

Link:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35030236/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find here more information/studies about RCTs/significant and antioxidants.
 

Objectives:
Does postoperative coffee or caffeine consumption causally reduce risk of postoperative ileus (POI) in patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery?

Study design:
This review article included 4 RCTs with 312 subjects.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found postoperative coffee or caffeine consumption significantly decreased the time to first bowel movement [MD = -10.36 h, 95% CI = -14.61 to -6.11], shortened the length of hospital stay [MD = -0.95 days, 95% CI = -1.57 to -0.34] and was significantly  associated with a 36%-decreased risk of the use of any laxatives after the procedure [RR = 0.64, 95% CI = 0.44 to 0.92].

The investigators found the time to first flatus, time to tolerance of solid food, risk of any postoperative complication, postoperative reinsertion of a nasogastric (NG) tube and anastomotic leakage showed no statistical differences between groups.

The investigators concluded postoperative coffee or caffeine consumption causally improves bowel movement and decreases the duration of hospital stay in patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery. This method is safe and can prevent or treat postoperative ileus (POI).

Original title:
The effect of coffee/caffeine on postoperative ileus following elective colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials by Yang TW, Wang CT, […], Tsai MC.

Link:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34993568/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on caffeine and cancer right here.

Postoperative ileus is a prolonged absence of bowel function after surgical procedures, usually abdominal surgery.

Objectives:
What is the safety of dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DHA-PQ) compared to artemether-lumefantrine (AL) for the treatment of uncomplicated P. falciparum malaria among children in Africa?

Study design:
This review article included 18 studies involving 10,498 African children with uncomplicated P. falciparum malaria.

A target dose (range) of 4 (2-10) mg/kg bw per day dihydroartemisinin and 18 (16-27) mg/kg bw per day piperaquine given once a day for 3 days for children weighing ≥25 kg.
The target doses and ranges for children weighing 25 kg are 4 (2.5-10) mg/kg bw per day dihydroartemisinin and 24 (20-32) mg/kg bw per day piperaquine once a day for 3 days.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found, compared to AL, DHA-PQ significantly increased frequency of early vomiting with 126% [RR = 2.26, 95% CI = 1.46 to 3.50, I2 = 0%, participants = 7,796, studies = 10, high quality of evidence].

The investigators found, compared to AL, DHA-PQ significantly increased frequency of cough with 6% [RR = 1.06, 95% CI = 1.01 to 1.11, I2 = 0%, participants = 8,013, studies = 13, high quality of evidence].

The investigators found, compared to AL, DHA-PQ significantly increased frequency of diarrhoea with 16% [RR = 1.16, 95% CI = 1.03 to 1.31, I2 = 8%, participants = 6,841, studies = 11, high quality of evidence].

The investigators concluded that both drugs are well tolerated by children. There are comparable occurrences of adverse events in both treatment arms. But, early vomiting, diarrhoea and cough are common and more frequent in African children who are treated with the DHA-PQ than that of AL (high quality of evidence). All serious adverse events are consistent with malaria symptoms and judged to be unrelated to study medication. More studies comparing AL with DHA-PQ are needed to determine the comparative safety of these drugs.

Original title:
Safety of dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine versus artemether-lumefantrine for the treatment of uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria among children in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials by Assefa DG, Zeleke ED, […], Makonnen E.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8725395/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on food fortification/malnutrition and malaria right here.

Objectives:
Even though many studies have examined the possible effect of low-fat diet on breast cancer survival, the relationship remains unclear. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Does low-fat diet reduce risk of recurrence of breast cancer?

Study design:
This review article included 2 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 1 large multi-center prospective cohort study with 9,966 breast cancer patients.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found post-diagnostic low-fat diet significantly reduced risk of recurrence of breast cancer by 23% [HR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.63 to 0.94, p = 0.009] and all cause mortality of breast cancer by 17% [HR = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.69 to 1.00, p = 0.05].

The investigators concluded post-diagnostic low-fat diet reduces risk of recurrence of breast cancer. However, more trials of the relationship between low-fat diet and all-cause mortality of breast cancer are still needed.

Original title:
Effect of low-fat diet on breast cancer survival: a meta-analysis by Xing MY, Xu SZ and Shen P.

Link:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24606431/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on fat consumption and breast cancer right here.

A low-fat diet is a diet with maximum 30 En% fat and maximum 7 En% saturated fat.  
30 En% fat means that the amounts of fat contribute 30% to the total calories (kcal) of the diet.
If the diet contains 2000 kcal, 66.7 grams of fat contribute 30% to this 2000 kcal.
1 gram of fat gives 9 kcal. Thus, 66.7 grams of fat provide 600 kcal and 600 kcal is 30% of 2000 kcal.

The most easy way to follow a diet a diet with maximum 30 En% fat and maximum 7 En% saturated fat is to choose only meals/products with maximum 30 En% fat and maximum 7 En% saturated fat. Check here which products contain maximum 30 En% fat and maximum 7 En% saturated fat.

However, the most practical way to follow a diet with maximum 30 En% fat and maximum 7 En% saturated fat is, all meals/products that you eat on a daily basis should contain on average maximum 30 En% fat and maximum 7 En% saturated fat.

To do this, use the 7-points nutritional profile app to see whether your daily diet contains maximum 30 En% fat and maximum 7 En% saturated fat.

Objectives:
Although exercise can improve insulin sensitivity, no adequate synthesis exists of exercise intervention studies with regard to their effect on insulin sensitivity. Therefore, this review article (meta-analysis) has beeen conducted.

Does exercise improve insuline sensitivity?

Study design:
This review article included data found across 2509 subjects (115 samples, 78 reports).
The median of mean age was 43 years.
The median of mean preintervention fasting insulin was 8 mU/L.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found the overall mean effect size for 2-group postintervention comparisons was 0.38 [95% CI = 0.25-0.51, I2 = 0%] and for 2-group pre-post comparisons was 0.43 [95% CI = 0.30-0.56, I2 = 52%].

The investigators found higher mean insulin sensitivity for treatment than control subjects.

The investigators found the postintervention mean of 0.38 was consistent with treatment subjects ending studies with a mean fasting insulin of 6.8 mU/L if control participants’ mean fasting insulin were 7.9 mU/L.
Exploratory moderator analyses did not document different insulin sensitivity effect sizes across intervention characteristics or sample attributes.

The investigators concluded exercise is a valuable primary care and community health strategy for healthy adults to improve insulin sensitivity and lower the risk for diabetes conferred by insulin resistance.

Original title:
Insulin Sensitivity Following Exercise Interventions: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Outcomes Among Healthy Adults by Conn VS, Koopman RJ, […], Hafdahl AR.

Link:
http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/2150131913520328

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more studies/information on physical activity and diabetes right here.

Objectives:
Evidence shows cruciferous vegetables exhibit chemoprotective properties, commonly attributed to their rich source of isothiocyanates. However, epidemiological data examining the association between cruciferous vegetable intake and colorectal neoplasms have been inconclusive. Therefore, this review article (meta-analysis) has been conducted.

Does cruciferous vegetable intake decrease colon cancer risk?

Study design:
This review article included 33 articles.
Subgroup analysis for individual cruciferae types (n = 8 studies) and GST polymorphism (n = 8 studies) were performed. Pooled adjusted odds ratios (ORs) comparing highest and lowest categories of dietary pattern scores were calculated.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found when comparing highest with lowest categorie, cruciferous vegetable intake significantly reduced risk of colon cancer with 16% [OR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.72-0.98, p value heterogeneity 0.001].

The investigators found when comparing highest with lowest categorie, broccoli intake significantly reduced risk of colorectal neoplasms with 20% [OR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.65-0.99, p value heterogeneity = 0.02].

The investigators found stratification by GST genotype showed that the GSTT1 null genotype confered a reduction in colorectal neoplasms risk of 22% [OR = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.64-0.95, p value heterogeneity = 0.32].

The investigators concluded this meta-analysis provides support to the hypothesis that cruciferous vegetable intake protects against cancer of the colon. This meta-analysis also demonstrates the significance of gene-diet interactions and the importance of assessing individual cruciferous vegetables.

Original title:
Cruciferous vegetables and risk of colorectal neoplasms: a systematic review and meta-analysis by Tse G and Eslick GD.

Link:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24341734

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more studies/information on colon cancer and cruciferous vegetable intake right here.

Objectives:
Does physical activity reduce gastric cancer risk?

Study design:
This review article included 7 cohort studies (with mean reported follow-up ranging from 6 to 18.8 years) and 9 case control studies reporting 11,111 cases of gastric cancer among 1,606,760 patients.

There was no evidence of publication bias, both quantitatively [Begg and Mazumdar rank correlation test, p = 0.62] and qualitatively, on visual inspection of the funnel plot.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found the risk of gastric cancer was 21% [OR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.71-0.87, I2 = 55%]  lower among the most physically active people as compared with the least physically active people, after adjustment for important confounders, including age, obesity, and other risk factors for gastric cancer (smoking, alcohol, dietary patterns and socioeconomic status).
This protective effect was seen for gastric cancers in the cardia [OR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.63-1.00, 4 studies] and distal stomach [OR = 0.63, 95% CI = 0.52-0.76, 5 studies].

The investigators found increasing physical activity was associated with a reduced risk of gastric cancer in both men [OR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.75-0.99, 10 studies] and women [OR = 0.72, 95% CI = 0.55-0.94, 3 studies].

The investigators found in 12 studies that increased recreational physical activity showed an 18% reduction in gastric cancer risk [OR = 0.82, 95% CI = 0.72-0.94].

The investigators found the effect size was significantly smaller in high-quality studies [OR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.75-0.99, 6 studies] as compared with low-quality studies [OR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.69-0.81, 10 studies]. The results were consistent across sex, study quality, study design and geographic location.

The investigators concluded physical activity - especially recreational physical activity - is associated with reduced risk of gastric cancer. Lifestyle interventions focusing on increasing physical activity may decrease the global burden of gastric cancer, in addition to a myriad of other health benefits with being physically active, which include cardiovascular, metabolic and psychologic wellbeing.

Original title:
Physical Activity Is Associated with Reduced Risk of Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis by Singh S, Varayil JE, […], Iyer PG.

Link:
http://cancerprevention.aacrjournals.org/content/7/1/12.abstract

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more studies/information on physical activity and cancer right here.

Objectives:
Previous meta-analyses identified an inverse association of coffee consumption with the risk of type 2 diabetes. However, an updated meta-analysis is needed because new studies comparing the trends of association for caffeinated and decaffeinated coffee have since been published. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Does coffee intake reduce type 2 diabetes risk in a dose-response manner?

Study design:
This review article included 28 prospective cohort studies with 1109272 study participants and 45335 cases of type 2 diabetes. The follow-up duration ranged from 10 months to 20 years.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found for compared with no or rare coffee consumption, a significant reduced risk of type 2 diabetes of:
8% [RR = 0.92, 95% CI = 0.90-0.94] for 1 cup/day;
15% [RR= 0.85, 95% CI = 0.82-0.88] for 2 cups/day;
21% [RR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.75-0.83] for 3 cups/day;
25% [RR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.71-0.80] for 4 cups/day;
29% [RR = 0.71, 95% CI = 0.65-0.76] for 5 cups/day and;
33% [RR = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.61-0.74] for 6 cups/day.

The investigators found a significant decreased risk of type 2 diabetes of 9% [RR = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.89-0.94] for an increasement of 1 cup/day caffeinated coffee and 6% [RR = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.91-0.98] for an increasement of 1 cup/day decaffeinated coffee [p for difference = 0.17].

The investigators concluded coffee consumption is inversely associated with the risk of type 2 diabetes in a dose-response manner. Both caffeinated and decaffeinated coffee is associated with reduced diabetes risk.

Original title:
Caffeinated and decaffeinated coffee consumption and risk of type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and a dose-response meta-analysis by Ding M, Bhupathiraju SN, […], Hu FB.

Link:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24459154

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more studies/information on coffee consumption and diabetes right here.
 

Objectives:
The prevalence of obesity and diabetes is increasing among children, adolescents and adults. Although estimates of the efficacy of exercise training on fasting insulin and insulin resistance have been provided for adults, similar estimates have not been provided for youth. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Study design:
This review article included 24 trials.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found a small to moderate effect for exercise training on fasting insulin and improving insulin resistance in youth [Hedges’ d effect size = 0.48, 95% CI = 0.22-0.74, p 0.001 and 0.31, 95% CI = 0.06-0.56, p 0.05, respectively].

The investigators concluded there is evidence to support the use of exercise training in the prevention and treatment of type 2 diabetes in youth.

Original title:
Exercise and Insulin Resistance in Youth: A Meta-Analysis by Fedewa MV, Gist NH, […], Dishman RK.

Link:
http://www.pediatricsdigest.mobi/content/133/1/e163.abstract

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on diabetes and sport nutrition right here.

Objectives:
The association of red meat consumption with the risk of stomach cancer has been reported by many studies, with inconclusive results. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Does a high red meat consumption increase stomach cancer risk?

Study design:
This review article included a total of 18 studies (cohort and case-control studies) involving 1,228,327 subjects.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found for the highest versus lowest categories of red meat intake a significant increased risk of 37% for gastric cancer [pooled RR = 1.37, 95% CI = 1.18-1.59, I2 = 67.6%, p 0.001].

The investigators found in population-based case-control studies, a significant increased risk of 58% for gastric cancer [pooled RR = 1.58, 95% CI = 1.22-2.06, I2 = 73.0%, p 0.001].

The investigators found in hospital-based case-control studies, a significant increased risk of 63% for gastric cancer [pooled RR = 1.63, 95% CI = 1.38-1.92, I2 = 19.1%, p = 0.284].

The investigators found, however, no association among cohort studies [RR = 1.00, 95% CI = 0.83-1.20, I2 = 33.9%, p = 0.158].

The investigators found the significant association was also presented in the subgroup analysis by geographic area (Asia, Europe), publication year (≥2000), sample size (1,000, ≥1,000) and quality score (7 stars, ≥7 stars).

The investigators found in dose-response analysis that every 100 g/day increment in red meat intake significant increased gastric cancer risk with 17% [RR = 1.17, 95% CI = 1.05-1.32].

The investigators found in linear regression model that the risk of gastric cancer increased with increasing level of red meat consumption.

The investigators concluded that a increased intake of red meat might be a risk factor for stomach cancer. Might be because the risk was not significant among cohort studies. Therefore, further larger prospective cohort studies are warranted to verify this association.

Original title:
Red meat consumption and stomach cancer risk: a meta-analysis by Song P, Lu M, […], Zhao Q.

Link:
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00432-014-1637-z

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more studies/information on meat intake and cancer right here.
 

Objectives:
The association between meat consumption and the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is still inconclusive. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Does meat consumption increase risk of hepatocellular carcinoma?

Study design:
This review article included 7 cohort studies and 10 case-control studies.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found for the highest vs. lowest consumption levels a non-significant increased risk for hepatocellular carcinoma of 10% [RR = 1.10, 95% CI = 0.85-1.42] for red meat, a non-significant increased risk of 1% [RR = 1.01, 95% CI = 0.79-1.28] for processed meat and a non-significant decreased risk of 3% [RR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.85-1.11] for total meat. Non-significant means, there is no association with a 95% confidence.

The investigators found for the highest vs. lowest consumption levels a significant decreased risk for hepatocellular carcinoma of 31% [RR = 0.69, 95% CI = 0.58-0.81] for white meat and a significant decreased risk of 22% [RR = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.67-0.90] for fish. The results remained quite stable after stratification by the confounding factors.
Significant means, there is an association with a 95% confidence.

The investigators concluded a high level of white meat or fish consumption reduces the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma, while intake of red meat, processed meat or total meat is not associated with hepatocellular carcinoma risk. These results suggest that dietary intervention may be a promising approach for prevention of hepatocellular carcinoma, which still need to be confirmed by further well-designed prospective studies and experimental research.

Original title:
Systematic review with meta-analysis: meat consumption and the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma by Luo J, Yang Y, [...], Zhu Y.

Link:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24588342

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more studies/information on fish consumption, meat consumption and cancer right here.

A review article of cohort studies or case-control studies will answer the following question:
"Should I change my diet?".

Objectives:
Is there an association between meat intake and risk of esophageal cancer?

Study design:
This review article included 7 cohort studies and 28 case-control studies.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found for the highest versus lowest total meat consumption categories a non-significant increased risk of 19% [95% CI = 0.98-1.46] for esophageal cancer.

The investigators found for the highest versus lowest red meat consumption categories a significant increased risk of 55% [95% CI = 1.22-1.96] for esophageal cancer.

The investigators found for the highest versus lowest processed meat consumption categories a significant increased risk of 33% [95% CI = 1.04-1.69] for esophageal cancer.

The investigators found for the highest versus lowest white meat consumption categories a significant decreased risk of 28% [95% CI = 0.60-0.86] for esophageal cancer.

The investigators found for the highest versus lowest poultry consumption categories a significant decreased risk of 17% [95% CI = 0.72-0.96] for esophageal cancer.

The investigators found for the highest versus lowest fish consumption categories a non-significant decreased risk of 5% [95% CI = 0.76-1.19] for esophageal cancer.

The investigators found when stratified by histological subtype, positive associations among esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and red meat, white meat and poultry and esophageal adenocarcinoma with total meat and processed meat.

The investigators concluded red meat and processed meat consumption increase risk of esophageal cancer, while white meat and poultry decrease risk of esophageal cancer. Fish consumption is not associated with incidence of esophageal cancer.

Original title:
Meat consumption is associated with esophageal cancer risk in a meat- and cancer-histological-type dependent manner by Zhu HC, Yang X, […], Sun XC.

Link:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24395380

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more studies/information on meat consumption and cancer right here.
 

Objectives:
Previous observational studies regarding the existence of an association between folate intake and the risk of breast cancer have been inconsistent. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Does a higher dietary folate intake reduce breast cancer risk?

Study design:
This review article included 14 prospective cohort studies that reported data on 677,858 individuals.
The participant follow-up period ranged 4.7-17.4 years and the number of individuals per study ranged 11,699-88,818.
There was no publication bias.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found no association between dietary folate intake and breast cancer risk for highest versus lowest category  [RR =  0.97, 95% CI = 0.90-1.05, p  = 0.451, I2 =  57.5%, p = 0.004].

The investigators found dose-response meta-analysis findings showed no association between the risk of breast cancer and a 100 µg/day increase in dietary folate intake [RR = 0.99, 95% CI = 0.98-1.01, p = 0.361, I2 = 66.2%, p 0.001].

The investigators found evidence of a nonlinear relationship between dietary folate intake and the risk of breast cancer.

A daily dietary folate intake of 200-320 µg was associated with a reduced risk of breast cancer. However, daily folate intake levels >400 µg was associated with a increased risk of breast cancer.

The investigators found overall folate intake level was associated with a reduced breast cancer risk of 36% if the patients had a daily alcohol intake >10 g [RR for highest versus lowest category = 0.64, 95% CI = 0.43-0.97].

The investigators concluded there are no effects of increased dietary folate intake on the incidence of breast cancer. But, a daily dietary folate intake of 200-320 µg was associated with a reduced risk of breast cancer. However, daily folate intake levels >400 µg was associated with a increased risk of breast cancer. Future studies should focus on specific populations in order to analyze primary breast cancer prevention.

Original title:
Folate Intake and the Risk of Breast Cancer: A Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Studies by Zhang YF, Shi WW, […], Zhou YH.

Link:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4059748/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more studies/information on folate intake and breast cancer right here.