Nutrition and health

Objectives:
Increasing evidence suggests that high consumption of meat is linked to lung cancer but the previous meta-analyses did not properly address the role of tobacco smoking as a potential confounder. Therefore, this review article (meta-analysis) has been conducted.

Does high consumption of meat increase lung cancer risk among never and non-smokers?

Study design:
This review article included 14 independent observational studies and a total of 5,368 subjects with lung cancer.
There was no indication of publication bias.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found in 11 studies, a statistically significant 24% increased risk of lung cancer for high consumption of red meat [Summary Relative Risk = 1.24, 95% CI = 1.01-1.51, I2 = 31%].

The investigators found no significant associations between high consumption of other types of meat, fish or for heterocyclic amines and lung cancer risk.

The investigators found no significant risk estimates for the increase of one serving per week of any type of meat or fish.

The investigators concluded a high intake of red meat increases the risk of lung cancer among never and non-smokers.

Original title:
Carcinogenicity of High Consumption of Meat and Lung Cancer Risk Among Non-Smokers: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis by Gnagnarella P, Caini S, […], Gandini S.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29016198

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on meat consumption, randomized controlled trials/cohort studies/subgroup analysis and cancer right here.

According to international recommendations, adults should aim to have a maximum of 70g red meat per day or 500g per week (cooked weight).
 

Objectives:
Several studies have investigated the relationship between serum selenium concentration and cervical cancer, but the results were inconsistent. Therefore, this review article (meta-analysis) has been conducted.

Do high serum selenium levels reduce risk of cervical cancer among women?

Study design:
This review article included 12 studies investigating the association by univariate analysis and 5 studies by multivariate analysis.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found in univariate analysis, that serum selenium levels in women with cervical cancer were significantly lower than in women without cervical cancer [SMD = -4.86, 95% CI = -6.03 to -3.69]. Subgroup analysis showed consistent results.

The investigators found in multivariate analysis, that serum selenium levels in women with cervical cancer were significantly lower than in women without cervical cancer [OR = 0.55, 95% CI = 0.42-0.73].

The investigators found after treatment, the serum selenium levels increased significantly [SMD = 2.59, 95% CI = 0.50-4.69].

The investigators concluded high serum selenium levels reduce risk of cervical cancer among women.

Original title:
Serum Selenium Levels and Cervical Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis by He D, Wang Z, […], Chen D.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28255860

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on selenium, randomized controlled trials/cohort studies/subgroup analysis and cancer right here.

Univariate analysis is the simplest form of analyzing data. "Uni" means "one", thus in other words your data has only one variable.

High serum selenium levels can be obtained by consuming selenium-rich food items and/or taking selenium supplements.
 

Objectives:
Do patients with type 2 diabetes benefit from a low carbohydrate diet?

Study design:
This review article included a total of 9 RCTs with 734 patients with type 2 diabetes.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found that low carbohydrate diet significantly reduced HbA1c level [WMD = -0.44, 95% CI = -0.61 to -0.26, p= 0.00] of patients with type 2 diabetes.

The investigators found that low carbohydrate diet significantly reduced triglycerides concentration [WMD = -0.33, 95% CI = -0.45 to -0.21, p = 0.00] of patients with type 2 diabetes.

The investigators found that low carbohydrate diet significantly increased HDL cholesterol concentration (WMD = 0.07, 95% CI = 0.03 to 0.11, p = 0.00] of patients with type 2 diabetes.

The investigators found that low carbohydrate diet was not associated with decreased level of total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol.

The investigators found subgroup analyses showed that short term intervention of low carbohydrate diet was effective for weight loss [WMD = -1.18, 95% CI = -2.32 to -0.04, p = 0.04] in patients with type 2 diabetes.

The investigators concluded there is a beneficial effect of low carbohydrate diet intervention on glucose control in patients with type 2 diabetes. The low carbohydrate diet intervention also has a positive effect on triglycerides and HDL cholesterol concentrations, but without significant effect on long term weight loss.

Original title:
Efficacy of low carbohydrate diet for type 2 diabetes mellitus management: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials by Meng Y, Bai H, […], Chen L.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28750216

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on carbohydrates and diabetes right here.

A low carbohydrate diet is a diet that is largely made up of meals/products with 20-40 En% carbohydrate. Practically, this means that all meals/products that you eat on a daily basis should on average contain 20-40 En% carbohydrate.
20-40 En% carbohydrate means that the total amounts of carbohydrate make up for a 20-40% of the total kcal of the diet. Check here which products contain 20-40 En% carbohydrate.

Objectives:
Several epidemiological studies have suggested that vitamin E could reduce the risk of uterine cervical neoplasm. However, controversial data were presented by different reports. Therefore, this review article (meta-analysis) has been conducted.

Do both high vitamin E intake and circulating vitamin E levels reduce risk of uterine cervical neoplasm?

Study design:
This review article included 15 case-control studies, involving 3,741 cases (those with uterine cervical neoplasm) and 6,328 controls (those without uterine cervical neoplasm).

There was no obvious publication bias.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found in pooled analysis that the highest intake of vitamin E significantly reduced risk of cervical neoplasia with 42% [OR = 0.58, 95% CI = 0.47-0.72, I2 = 83%]. In addition, both vitamin E intake and blood levels of vitamin E were negatively correlated with cervical neoplasia risk.

The investigators found in subgroup analysis that the highest intake of dietary vitamin E significantly reduced risk of cervical neoplasia with 32% [OR = 0.68, 95% CI = 0.49-0.94, I2 = 70%].

The investigators found in subgroup analysis that the highest vitamin E blood levels significantly reduced risk of cervical neoplasia with 48% [OR = 0.52, 95% CI = 0.40-0.69, I2 = 86%].

The investigators found in subgroup analysis that vitamin E significantly reduced risk of cervical neoplasia with 40% [OR = 0.60, 95% CI = 0.45-0.78, I2 = 84%] in studies conducted in America and Europe.

The investigators found in subgroup analysis that the highest intake of vitamin E significantly reduced risk of cervical neoplasia with 46% [OR = 0.54, 95% CI = 0.39-0.76, I2 = 75%] in studies conducted in Asia.

The investigators found subgroup analysis stratified by different types of cervical neoplasm indicated that the highest intake (or serum level) of vitamin E significantly decreased risk of cervical cancer with 47% [OR = 0.53, 95% CI = 0.390.73, I2 = 77%] and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) with 46% [OR = 0.54, 95% CI = 0.43-0.70, I2 = 79%]. Meanwhile, sensitivity analysis to assess the influence of each single study on the pooled ORs by omitting a research in each turn, showed combined ORs were not substantially different, indicating that the results of this meta-analysis were stable and reliable.

The investigators concluded that both vitamin E intake and circulating vitamin E levels could reduce cervical neoplasia risk, including cervical cancer and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. In other words, sufficient supplementation of vitamin E might reduce the risk of cervical neoplasia. However, more randomized controlled trials and cohort studies with high quality are required to further validate this inverse relationship.

Original title:
Effect of vitamin E supplementation on uterine cervical neoplasm: A meta-analysis of case-control studies by Hu X, Li S, [...], Zhu X.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5567498/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on vitamin E, randomized controlled trials/cohort studies/subgroup analysis and cancer right here.

Higher intake of vitamin E is an intake which covers the recommended daily allowance of vitamin E of at least 1 day.

Objectives:
Dietary fat may play a role in lung carcinogenesis. Findings from epidemiologic studies, however, remain inconsistent. Therefore, this review article (meta-analysis) has been conducted.

Is there an association between dietary fat intake and the risk of lung cancer?

Study design:
This review article included 10 prospective cohort studies with a total of 1,445,850 participants, of which 18,822 incident cases (subjects with lung cancer).

The mean follow-up was 9.4 years. 

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found high intakes of total fat were associated with a 7% significant increased risk of lung cancer [for highest v lowest quintile: HR = 1.07, 95% CI = 1.00 to 1.15].

The investigators found high intakes of saturated fat were associated with a 14% significant increased risk of lung cancer [for highest v lowest quintile: HR = 1.14, 95% CI = 1.07 to 1.22].

The investigators found high intakes of saturated fat were associated with a 23% significant increased risk of lung cancer among current smokers [for highest v lowest quintile: HR = 1.23, 95% CI = 1.13 to 1.35, p for trend 0.001].

The investigators found high intakes of saturated fat were associated with a 61% significant increased risk of squamous cell lung cancer [for highest v lowest quintile: HR = 1.61, 95% CI = 1.38 to 1.88].

The investigators found high intakes of saturated fat were associated with a 40% significant increased risk of small cell carcinoma lung cancer [for highest v lowest quintile: HR = 1.40, 95% CI = 1.17 to 1.67].

The investigators found a high intake of polyunsaturated fat was associated with a 8% significant decreased risk of lung cancer [for highest v lowest quintile: HR = 0.92, 95% CI = 0.87 to 0.98, p for trend = 0.02].

The investigators found a 5% energy substitution of saturated fat with polyunsaturated fat was associated with a 16% and 17% lower risk of small cell and squamous cell carcinoma, respectively.

The investigators found no associations for monounsaturated fat.

The investigators concluded that high intakes of polyunsaturated fat decrease risk of lung cancer, while high intakes of saturated fat increase risk of lung cancer, particularly among smokers and for squamous cell and small cell carcinoma.

Original title:
Dietary Fat Intake and Lung Cancer Risk: A Pooled Analysis by Yang JJ, Yu D1, […], Shu XO.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28742456

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on fat and cancer right here.

A daily diet with high intakes of saturated fat is a diet that is largely made up of meals/products with more than 10 En% saturated fat, with a small part of meals/products with less than 10 En% saturated fat. Practically, this means that all meals/products that you eat on a daily basis should contain on average more than 10 En% saturated fat.
Check here which products contain more than 10% En% saturated fat.

A daily diet with low intakes of saturated fat is a diet that is largely made up of meals/products with less than 7 En% saturated fat, with a small part of meals/products with more than 7 En% saturated fat. Practically, this means that all meals/products that you eat on a daily basis should contain on average less than 7 En% saturated fat.
Check here which products contain less than 7% En% saturated fat.

Objectives:
Polyunsaturated fats (PUFAs) have been shown to reduce type 2 diabetes (T2DM) risk and improve insulin responsiveness in T2DM subjects, but whether the plant sources of omega-3 PUFA (alpha-linolenic acid [ALA]) have an effect on glycemic control requires further investigation. Therefore, this review article (meta-analysis) has been conducted.

Does alpha-linolenic acid dietary intake reduce diabetes risk?

Study design:
This review article included a total of 8 RCTs involving 212 participants with type 2 diabetes.
5 trials (62.5%) were parallel designs and 3 (37.5%) were crossover designs.
Participants were generally middle-aged (median age  =  54 years, range  =  47-64 years) and overweight or obese (median BMI  =  30.7, range  =  28.0-33.2).
Overall, participants had controlled diabetes (median HbA1c = 6.8%, median FBG = 7.95 mmol/L) and the majority of studies indicated the use of hypoglycemic drugs or other medications, although all studies excluded the use of insulin therapy.
The dose of ALA ranged from 1.5 to 7.4 g/day with a median assigned dose of 4.4, 5.4 and 5.4 g/day of ALA for trials that reported HbA1c, FBG and FBI, respectively.
The median duration of the treatment was 3 months, ranging from 2 to 12 months.
7 studies (87.5%) were considered high quality (MQS ≥8).

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found compared to a control diet, a median dose of 4.4 g/day of alpha-linolenic acid intake for a median duration of 3 months did not affect HbA1c (%) of patients with type 2 diabetes [MD =  -0.01, 95% = -0.32 to 0.31, p  =  0.96].

The investigators found compared to a control diet, a median alpha-linolenic acid dose of 5.4 g/day did not lower fasting blood glucose (FBG) of patients with type 2 diabetes [MD  = 0 .07, 95% CI = -0.61 to 0.76, p  = 0 .84] or fasting blood insulin (FBI) of patients with type 2 diabetes [MD  =  7.03, 95% CI = -5.84 to 19.89, p  = 0 .28].

The investigators found summary effect estimates were generally compromised by considerable and unexplained heterogeneity [I2 ≥ 75%].

The investigators found in the subgroup analysis of continuous predictors, a reduction in HbA1c (%) and FBG (mmol/L) was significantly associated with an increased intake of ALA.

The investigators found further adjustment for publication bias using Duval and Tweedie's trim-and-fill analysis provided an adjusted, significant MD of 0.25 [95% CI = -0.38 to -0.12, 0.001) for HbA1c (%).

The investigators concluded alpha-linolenic acid-enriched diet with a median alpha-linolenic acid dose of 4.4 g/day during 3 months has no effects on HbA1c, FBG or FBI in patients with type 2 diabetes. The scarce number of existing RCTs and the presence of heterogeneity in the meta-analysis limit the ability to make firm conclusions about alpha-linolenic acid in type 2 diabetes management. The potential for alpha-linolenic acid to have dose-dependent effects warrants further research in this area.

Original title:
The effect of alpha-linolenic acid on glycemic control in individuals with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials by Jovanovski E1, Li D, […], Vuksan V.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5457843/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on PUFA and diabetes right here.

4.4 g/day alpha-linolenic acid can be achieved by taking 1 to 2 tablespoons of flax or salba-chia seeds or about 12 whole walnuts per day.

 

Objectives:
Recently, several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reported the association between the use of vitamin or antioxidant supplements and the risk of bladder cancer. However, those findings remain inconsistent and some studies even reported that vitamin and antioxidant supplements increased the risk of bladder cancer. Therefore, this review article (meta-analysis) has been conducted.

Is there an association between the use of vitamin or antioxidant supplements and the risk of bladder cancer?

Study design:
This review article included 14 RCTs with a total of 147,383 participants, which involved 89,972 in the supplement group and 57,411 in the control group.

The supplementation and follow-up periods ranged between 1 and 13 years.

The types of vitamin and antioxidant supplements were as follows: vitamin A, vitamin B6, vitamin C, vitamin D, vitamin E, beta-carotene, folic acid and selenium.
The dosage regimens in individual trials were as follows: vitamin A (200 mg or 25,000, 36,000 or 40,000 IU daily), vitamin B6 (25 or 100 mg daily), vitamin C (2,000 mg daily), vitamin D (1,600 IU daily), vitamin E (50 mg or 400 IU daily), beta-carotene (20 or 30 mg daily; 50 mg alternate day; 75 mg daily for 3-month cycles), folic acid (1.6 mg daily) and selenium (200 μg daily).

Publication bias was not observed [Begg's funnel plot, symmetrical and Egger's test, p for bias = 0.378].

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found in fixed-effect meta-analysis of all 14 trials that vitamin or antioxidant supplementation was not associated with the risk of bladder cancer [RR = 1.04, 95% CI = 0.92-1.17, I2 = 39.7%].

The investigators found regarding types of supplements, any type of vitamin and antioxidant supplements had no beneficial effect on the risk of bladder cancer:
-vitamin A [RR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.65-1.13, I2 = 61.7%, n = 5];
-vitamin B6 [RR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.49-1.20, I2 = 78.8%, n = 3];
-vitamin C [RR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.36-1.54, I2 = 88.8%, n = 2];
-vitamin D [RR = 1.05, 95% CI = 0.85-1.29, n = 1];
-vitamin E [RR = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.69-1.19, I2 = 60.9%, n = 6];
-beta-carotene [RR = 1.19, 95% CI = 0.96-1.46, I2 = 0.0%, n = 6];
-folate [RR = 1.05, 95% CI = 0.85-1.29, n = 1] and
-selenium [RR = 1.09, 95% CI = 0.81-1.46, I2 = 0.0%, n = 2].

The investigators found overall, there was no significant effect of vitamin and antioxidant supplements in the subgroup meta-analyses by various factors such as dose of supplements, type of cancer prevention, methodological quality, duration of treatment, provider of supplements, type of control and number of participants.
However, the risk of bladder cancer was marginally increased in trials with the use of beta-carotene alone [RR = 1.44, 95% CI = 1.00-2.09, I2 = 0.0%, n = 3].

The investigators concluded that vitamin and antioxidant supplements have no overall preventive effect against bladder cancer. Instead, subgroup meta-analyses showed that beta-carotene supplementation marginally increased the risk of bladder cancer. Even though further large, high-quality trials are required to confirm these associations, the effects (either beneficial or harmful) of vitamin or antioxidant supplements on bladder cancer should not be overemphasized.

Original title:
Effects of Vitamin and Antioxidant Supplements in Prevention of Bladder Cancer: a Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials by Park SJ, Myung SK, […], Lee YJ.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5334161/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on vitamins, selenium, beta-carotene, antioxidants and cancer right here.

Objectives:
Protective effects of calcium supplementation against colorectal adenomas have been documented in systematic reviews; however, the results have not been conclusive. Therefore, this review article (meta-analysis) has been conducted.

Does calcium supplementation reduce colorectal adenomas?

Study design:
This review article included 5 RCTs involving 2,234 patients with a history of adenomas.
Based on visual inspection of the funnel plots as well as on quantitative measurement that used the Egger regression test, there was weak evidence of publication bias.
No major serious adverse events were associated with the use of calcium, but there was an increase in the incidence of hypercalcemia [p  = 0 .0095].
Random errors were evaluated with trial sequential analyses (TSAs). However, TSA indicated a lack of firm evidence for a beneficial effect of calcium supplementation.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found quantitative pooling of results from all 5 RCTs indicated that the use of supplemental calcium lasting 3 to 5 years showed a statistically significant 17% reduction in risk of any recurrent colorectal adenomas [RR = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.75-0.93, I2  =  8.5%, p  =  0.36].

The investigators found in the sensitivity analysis of 3 trials with low bias risk a statistically significant 12% reduction in the recurrence of any colorectal adenomas [RR = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.79-0.99, I2  =  0%, p  =  0.54] in patients who were administered supplemental calcium versus placebo.

The investigators found no association between supplemental calcium and recurrence of advanced colorectal adenomas in trials with low risk of bias [RR = 1.02, 95% CI = 0.67-1.55, I2 =  17.5%].

The investigators found in the subgroup analysis of 3 trials with elemental calcium dose ≤ 1200 mg/day, a statistically significant 16% reduction in the recurrent of any colorectal adenomas [RR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.73-0.97, I2  =  38.5%, p  = 0 .19].

However, a greater reduction of 26% [RR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.56-0.97, I2  =  0%, p  = 0 .70] was observed in the subgroup analysis of 2 trials with elemental calcium dose ≥ 1600 mg/day.
Subgroup analyses demonstrated no statistically significant association with the reduction of advanced colorectal adenomas in any doses.

The investigators concluded the available good quality RCTs suggests a possible beneficial effect of calcium supplementation – preferably at least 1600 mg/day elemental calcium – on the recurrence of colorectal adenomas. However, TSA indicated that the accumulated evidence is still inconclusive. Therefore, large well-designed randomized trials with low risk of bias are needed.

Original title:
Effects of calcium on the incidence of recurrent colorectal adenomas: A systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials by Veettil SK, Ching SM, […], Chaiyakunapruk N.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5556213/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on calcium and colorectal cancer right here.

Colorectal adenomas can lead to colorectal cancer.

Objectives:
With only 5-10% of breast cancer cases attributed to genetic inheritance, prevention efforts have focused on modifiable risk factors. Physical activity plays a role in reducing breast cancer risk; however, the interaction between physical activity and other modifiable risk factors, such as obesity, has received little attention. Therefore, this review article (meta-analysis) has been conducted.

What is the relationship between physical activity and breast cancer and how it may be modified by body mass index (BMI)?

Study design:
This review article included 18 cohort and 11 case-control studies.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found overall, a significant reduction of 15% for breast cancer risk in postmenopausal women with a BMI 25 kg/m² for high versus low levels of physical activity [RR = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.79-0.92]. 

The investigators found overall, a significant reduction of 13% for breast cancer risk in postmenopausal women with a BMI ≥25 kg/m² for high versus low levels of physical activity for women [RR = 0.87, 95% CI = 0.81-0.93]. 

The investigators found overall, a non-significant reduction of 7% for breast cancer risk in postmenopausal women with a BMI ≥30 kg/m² for high versus low levels of physical activity for women [RR = 0.93, 95% CI = 0.76-1.13]. 

The investigators found, however, physical activity was not associated with a significant reduction in risk of breast cancer in premenopausal women in any BMI group.

The investigators concluded high levels of physical activity reduce risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women with a BMI until 30. Since the included studies used diverse methods for assessment of physical activity and categories of BMI, results should be interpreted with caution and additional work is needed.

Original title:
Does obesity modify the relationship between physical activity and breast cancer risk? by Neil-Sztramko SE, Boyle T, […], Campbell KL.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28803384

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on breast cancer, BMI and physical activity right here.

Objectives:
In the 2007 World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research Second Expert Report, the expert panel judged that there was strong evidence that alcoholic drinks and body fatness increased esophageal cancer risk, whereas fruits and vegetables probably decreased its risk. The judgments were mainly based on case-control studies. As part of the Continuous Update Project (CUP), this review article (meta-analysis) has been conducted.

What is the relationship between nutrition and esophageal cancer risk?

Study design:
This review article included a total of 57 cohort studies, used in previous 13 meta-analyses.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found a significant reduced risk of 11% for esophageal adenocarcinoma for every increment of 100g/day vegetable intake [RR = 0.89, 95% CI = 0.80-0.99, n = 3].

The investigators found a significant increased risk of 47% for esophageal adenocarcinoma for every 5 unit increment in BMI [RR = 1.47, 95% CI = 1.34-1.61, n = 9].

The investigators found a significant reduced risk of 16% for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma for every increment of 100g/day fruit intake [RR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.75-0.94, n = 3].

The investigators found a significant reduced risk of 36% for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma for every 5 unit increment in BMI [RR = 0.64, 95% CI = 0.56-0.73, n = 8].

The investigators found a significant increased risk of 59% for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma for every increment of 50g/day processed meat intake [RR = 1.59, 95% CI = 1.11-2.28, n = 3].

The investigators found a significant increased risk of 37% for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma for every increment of 100g/day processed and red meat intake [RR = 1.37, 95% CI = 1.04-1.82, n = 3].

The investigators found a significant increased risk of 25% for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma for every increment of 10g/day alcohol intake [RR = 1.25, 95% CI = 1.12-1.41, n = 6].

The investigators concluded evidence from cohort studies shows a protective role of vegetables and body weight control in esophageal adenocarcinomas development. For squamous cell carcinomas, higher intakes of red and processed meats and alcohol increase the risk, whereas fruits intake has a protective role.

Original title:
An update of the WCRF/AICR systematic literature review and meta-analysis on dietary and anthropometric factors and esophageal cancer risk by Vingeliene S, Chan DSM, […], Norat T.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28666313

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on vegetable, fruit, alcohol and meat consumption, significant/cohort/95% CI and cancer right here.
 

Objectives:
The relationship between intake of fish and n-3 fatty acids and endometrial cancer risk has not been consistent across epidemiological studies. Therefore, this review article (meta-analysis) has been conducted.

Do fish consumption and dietary EPA and DHA intake reduce endometrial cancer risk?

Study design:
This review article included 4 prospective cohort studies, 1 case-cohort study and 11 case-control studies (including 8 population-based case-control studies and 3 hospital-based case-control studies).
The prospective cohort studies had a mean follow-up of 6.5 to 9.1 years.
The highest category of fish ranged from >1-2 servings/week to >15.4 servings/week,
The highest category of DHA ranged from 143 to 227 mg/d.
The highest category of EPA ranged from 74.7 to 127 mg/d.

When fish intake was reported in unit of g/d, it was converted to serving/week by assuming 1 serving = 100g.
Overall, all 16 studies were classified as high-quality studies.
There was no publication bias.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found a non-significant association between the highest vs. lowest category of fish consumption and endometrial cancer risk [RR = 1.04, 95% CI = 0.84-1.30, I2 = 80.4%].
According to the subgroup analyses, the null association persisted in strata according to study design, location, type of controls, number of cases, publication year and adjustments of energy intake, reproductive factors and smoking.

The investigators found in subgroup analyses for every one additional serving/week of fish intake, a significant reduced risk of 10% for endometrial cancer in studies conducted in Europe [RR = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.84-0.97]. Significant means that there is an association with a 95% confidence.

The investigators found in subgroup analyses for every one additional serving/week of fish intake, a significant increased risk of 15% for endometrial cancer in studies conducted in Asia [RR = 1.15, 95% CI = 1.10-1.21]. Significant because RR of 1 was not found in the 95% CI of 1.10 to 1.21. RR of 1 means no risk/association.

The investigators found in studies adjusting for smoking for every one additional serving/week of fish intake, a significant reduced risk of 5% for endometrial cancer [RR = 0.95, 95% CI = 0.91-1.00].

The investigators found in studies without an adjustment of smoking for every one additional serving/week of fish intake, a significant increased risk of 14% for endometrial cancer [RR = 1.14, 95% CI = 1.09-1.19].

The investigators found a non-significant inverse association between the highest category of DHA intake and endometrial cancer risk [RR = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.64-1.11, I2 = 59.6%]. However, the dose-response analysis suggested a significant non-linear relationship between DHA intake and endometrial cancer risk [p = 0.04 and p for heterogeneity = 0.39], with a decreased risk being detected for an intake of DHA no more than 175 mg/d.

The investigators concluded that there is a significant inverse association between every one additional serving/week of fish intake and endometrial cancer risk in studies conducted in Europe and studies adjusted for smoking. Furthermore, there is a significant non-linear relationship between DHA intake and risk of endometrial cancer, with a decreased risk being detected for an intake of DHA no more than 175 mg/d. Further well-designed studies are warranted to better characterize the relationship between fish, n-3 PUFA and endometrial cancer development.

Original title:
Dietary n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids, fish consumption, and endometrial cancer risk: a meta-analysis of epidemiological studies by Hou R, Yao SS, […], Jiang L.

Link:
http://www.impactjournals.com/oncotarget/index.php?journal=oncotarget&page=article&op=view&path[]=18295&path[]=58664

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on fish consumption, significant/cohort/95% CI and cancer right here.
These fish contain 175 mg DHA.
 

Objectives:
Although several epidemiological studies have investigated the association between dietary calcium intake and the risk of esophageal cancer, the results are inconsistent. Therefore, this review article (meta-analysis) has been conducted.

Does dietary calcium intake reduce risk of esophageal cancer?

Study design:
This review article included 3 cohort studies and 14 case-control studies, including 3,396 cases (subjects with esophageal cancer) and 346,815 controls (subjects without esophageal cancer).

Egger’s test showed no evidence of significant publication bias.

The sample size was large enough to evaluate the effect of calcium intake on esophageal cancer.

A dose-response effect analysis could not be performed due to the incomplete data of dietary calcium intake.

The average of highest dietary calcium intake in Asian populations was 621 mg/day.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found for highest vs. lowest dietary calcium intake a significant reduced risk of 20% for esophageal cancer [pooled OR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.71-0.91, I2 = 33.6%].
This significant reduced risk was also found in studies conducted in Asia [OR = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.52-0.86, I2 = 0.0%], studies published after 2000 [OR = 0.64, 95% CI = 0.53-0.77, I2 = 0.0%), studies adjusted for dietary energy intake [OR = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.70-0.98, I2 = 3.6%], studies of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma [OR = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.60-0.96, I2 = 28.3%], cohort studies [OR = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.54-0.84, I2 = 23.6%] and studies with high quality score [OR = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.66-0.87, I2 = 12.7%].

The investigators found in sensitivity analysis (conducted by leaving one study out in turn and pooling the ORs of the remaining studies) the summary ORs did not substantially change, which indicated that the results were statistically robust.

The investigators concluded that a higher intake (621 mg/day) of dietary calcium has protective effect against esophageal cancer - especially esophageal squamous cell cancer - in Asian populations. To further solidify the association of dietary calcium intake with the risk of esophageal cancer, well-designed studies - especially prospective cohort studies with validated FFQ and adjusted for dietary energy intake - should be conducted.

Original title:
Protective Effect of Dietary Calcium Intake on Esophageal Cancer Risk: A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies by Li Q, Cui, L, […], Wang L.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5452240/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on calcium, significant/cohort/95% CI and cancer right here.
 

Objectives:
It has been unclear whether supplemental probiotics therapy improves clinical outcomes in type 2 diabetic patients. Therefore, this meta-analysis (systematic review) has been conducted.

Do probiotics supplements improve clinical outcomes in type 2 diabetic patients?

Study design:
This review article included 12 RCTs involving 684 type 2 diabetic patients.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found a significant decreased glucose level in the probiotics group [pooled standardized mean difference = -0.18 mg/dL, 95% CI = -0.35 to -0.01, p = 0.04, I2 = 64%, p = 0.004] compared to the control group.

The investigators found a significant reduction in HbA1c in the probiotics group [pooled standardized mean difference = -0.38%, 95% CI = -0.62 to -0.14, p = 0.002, I2 = 0%, p = 0.72] compared to the control group.

The investigators found a significant reduction in fasting insulin level in the probiotics group [pooled standardized mean difference = -0.38, 95% CI = -0.59 to -0.18, p = 0.003, I2 = 0%, p = 0.81] compared to the control group.

The investigators found a significant reduced HOMA-IR level in the probiotics group [pooled standardized mean difference = -0.99, 95% CI = -1.52 to -0.4, p = 0.0002, I2 = 86%, p 0.00001] compared to the control group.

The investigators found a significant reduced CRP level in the probiotics group [pooled standardized mean difference = -1.34 mg/L, 95% CI = -1.76 to -0.92, p 0.00001, I2 = 90%, p 0.00001] compared to the control group.

The investigators found a non-significant reduction in both triglyceride levels [SMD = -0.23, 95% CI = -0.48 to 0.02, p = 0.07, I2 = 52%, p = 0.03] and cholesterol levels [total cholesterol: SMD = -0.18, 95% CI = -0.42 to 0.06, p = 0.14, I2 = 47%, p = 0.05 and LDL-cholesterol: SMD = -0.03, 95% CI = -0.20 to 0.14, p = 0.73, I2 = 3%, p = 0.41] in the probiotics group compared to the control group.

The investigators concluded that probiotics supplementation is associated with significant improvement in HbA1c and fasting insulin in type 2 diabetes patients. These results may provide evidence for encouraging use of probiotics in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. However, more randomized placebo-controlled trials with larger sample sizes are warranted to confirm these findings.

Original title:
Effect of Probiotics on Glucose and Lipid Metabolism in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Meta-Analysis of 12 Randomized Controlled Trials by Yao K, Zeng L, [...], Zou X.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5491138/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on probiotics and diabetes right here.

Objectives:
Evidence shows cruciferous vegetables exhibit chemoprotective properties, commonly attributed to their rich source of isothiocyanates. However, epidemiological data examining the association between cruciferous vegetable intake and colorectal neoplasms have been inconclusive. Therefore, this review article (meta-analysis) has been conducted.

Does cruciferous vegetable intake decrease colon cancer risk?

Study design:
This review article included 33 articles.
Subgroup analysis for individual cruciferae types (n = 8 studies) and GST polymorphism (n = 8 studies) were performed. Pooled adjusted odds ratios (ORs) comparing highest and lowest categories of dietary pattern scores were calculated.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found when comparing highest with lowest categorie, cruciferous vegetable intake significantly reduced risk of colon cancer with 16% [OR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.72-0.98, p value heterogeneity 0.001].

The investigators found when comparing highest with lowest categorie, broccoli intake significantly reduced risk of colorectal neoplasms with 20% [OR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.65-0.99, p value heterogeneity = 0.02].

The investigators found stratification by GST genotype showed that the GSTT1 null genotype confered a reduction in colorectal neoplasms risk of 22% [OR = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.64-0.95, p value heterogeneity = 0.32].

The investigators concluded this meta-analysis provides support to the hypothesis that cruciferous vegetable intake protects against cancer of the colon. This meta-analysis also demonstrates the significance of gene-diet interactions and the importance of assessing individual cruciferous vegetables.

Original title:
Cruciferous vegetables and risk of colorectal neoplasms: a systematic review and meta-analysis by Tse G and Eslick GD.

Link:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24341734

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more studies/information on colon cancer and cruciferous vegetable intake right here.

Objectives:
Does physical activity reduce gastric cancer risk?

Study design:
This review article included 7 cohort studies (with mean reported follow-up ranging from 6 to 18.8 years) and 9 case control studies reporting 11,111 cases of gastric cancer among 1,606,760 patients.

There was no evidence of publication bias, both quantitatively [Begg and Mazumdar rank correlation test, p = 0.62] and qualitatively, on visual inspection of the funnel plot.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found the risk of gastric cancer was 21% [OR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.71-0.87, I2 = 55%]  lower among the most physically active people as compared with the least physically active people, after adjustment for important confounders, including age, obesity, and other risk factors for gastric cancer (smoking, alcohol, dietary patterns and socioeconomic status).
This protective effect was seen for gastric cancers in the cardia [OR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.63-1.00, 4 studies] and distal stomach [OR = 0.63, 95% CI = 0.52-0.76, 5 studies].

The investigators found increasing physical activity was associated with a reduced risk of gastric cancer in both men [OR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.75-0.99, 10 studies] and women [OR = 0.72, 95% CI = 0.55-0.94, 3 studies].

The investigators found in 12 studies that increased recreational physical activity showed an 18% reduction in gastric cancer risk [OR = 0.82, 95% CI = 0.72-0.94].

The investigators found the effect size was significantly smaller in high-quality studies [OR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.75-0.99, 6 studies] as compared with low-quality studies [OR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.69-0.81, 10 studies]. The results were consistent across sex, study quality, study design and geographic location.

The investigators concluded physical activity - especially recreational physical activity - is associated with reduced risk of gastric cancer. Lifestyle interventions focusing on increasing physical activity may decrease the global burden of gastric cancer, in addition to a myriad of other health benefits with being physically active, which include cardiovascular, metabolic and psychologic wellbeing.

Original title:
Physical Activity Is Associated with Reduced Risk of Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis by Singh S, Varayil JE, […], Iyer PG.

Link:
http://cancerprevention.aacrjournals.org/content/7/1/12.abstract

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more studies/information on physical activity and cancer right here.

Objectives:
Does diabetes increase risk of incident dementia and mild cognitive impairment?

Study design:
This review article included 19 prospective longitudinal studies including 6184 subjects with diabetes and 38530 subjects without diabetes. All subjects were without dementia or mild cognitive impairment at baseline (=at the beginning of the study).

There was no publication bias.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found persons with diabetes had a significant increased risk of 46% for Alzheimer's disease [RR = 1.46, 95% CI = 1.20-1.77]. Significant means that there is an association with a 95% confidence.

The investigators found persons with diabetes had a significant increased risk of 148% for vascular dementia [RR = 2.48, 95% CI = 2.08-2.96].

The investigators found persons with diabetes had a significant increased risk of 51% for any dementia [RR = 1.51, 95% CI = 1.31-1.74]. Significant because RR of 1 was not found in the 95% CI of 1.31 to 1.74. RR of 1 means no risk/association.

The investigators found persons with diabetes had a significant increased risk of 21% for mild cognitive impairment [RR = 1.21, 95% CI = 1.02-1.45].

The investigators concluded diabetes is a risk factor for incident dementia (including Alzheimer's disease, vascular dementia and any dementia) and mild cognitive impairment.

Original title:
Diabetes as a risk factor for dementia and mild cognitive impairment: a meta-analysis of longitudinal studies by Cheng G, Huang G, [...], Wang H.

Link:
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1445-5994.2012.02758.x/epdf

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more studies/information on elderly and diabetes right here.

Objectives:
Previous meta-analyses identified an inverse association of coffee consumption with the risk of type 2 diabetes. However, an updated meta-analysis is needed because new studies comparing the trends of association for caffeinated and decaffeinated coffee have since been published. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Does coffee intake reduce type 2 diabetes risk in a dose-response manner?

Study design:
This review article included 28 prospective cohort studies with 1109272 study participants and 45335 cases of type 2 diabetes. The follow-up duration ranged from 10 months to 20 years.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found for compared with no or rare coffee consumption, a significant reduced risk of type 2 diabetes of:
8% [RR = 0.92, 95% CI = 0.90-0.94] for 1 cup/day;
15% [RR= 0.85, 95% CI = 0.82-0.88] for 2 cups/day;
21% [RR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.75-0.83] for 3 cups/day;
25% [RR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.71-0.80] for 4 cups/day;
29% [RR = 0.71, 95% CI = 0.65-0.76] for 5 cups/day and;
33% [RR = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.61-0.74] for 6 cups/day.

The investigators found a significant decreased risk of type 2 diabetes of 9% [RR = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.89-0.94] for an increasement of 1 cup/day caffeinated coffee and 6% [RR = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.91-0.98] for an increasement of 1 cup/day decaffeinated coffee [p for difference = 0.17].

The investigators concluded coffee consumption is inversely associated with the risk of type 2 diabetes in a dose-response manner. Both caffeinated and decaffeinated coffee is associated with reduced diabetes risk.

Original title:
Caffeinated and decaffeinated coffee consumption and risk of type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and a dose-response meta-analysis by Ding M, Bhupathiraju SN, […], Hu FB.

Link:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24459154

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more studies/information on coffee consumption and diabetes right here.
 

Objectives:
The prevalence of obesity and diabetes is increasing among children, adolescents and adults. Although estimates of the efficacy of exercise training on fasting insulin and insulin resistance have been provided for adults, similar estimates have not been provided for youth. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Study design:
This review article included 24 trials.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found a small to moderate effect for exercise training on fasting insulin and improving insulin resistance in youth [Hedges’ d effect size = 0.48, 95% CI = 0.22-0.74, p 0.001 and 0.31, 95% CI = 0.06-0.56, p 0.05, respectively].

The investigators concluded there is evidence to support the use of exercise training in the prevention and treatment of type 2 diabetes in youth.

Original title:
Exercise and Insulin Resistance in Youth: A Meta-Analysis by Fedewa MV, Gist NH, […], Dishman RK.

Link:
http://www.pediatricsdigest.mobi/content/133/1/e163.abstract

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on diabetes and sport nutrition right here.

Objectives:
Reported associations between protein intake from different sources and type 2 diabetes (T2D) have been inconsistent.Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Study design:
This review article included 11 prospective cohort studies with 505,624 participants and 37,918 type 2 diabetes cases (follow-up range: 5-24 years).

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found for the comparison of the highest with lowest categories of total protein intakes a significant higher risk of 9% for type 2 diabetes [RR = 1.09, 95% CI = 1.06 to 1.13]. Significant means that there is an association with a 95% confidence.

The investigators found for the comparison of the highest with lowest categories of animal protein intakes a significant higher risk of 19% for type 2 diabetes [RR = 1.19, 95% CI = 1.11 to 1.28].

The investigators found for the comparison of the highest with lowest categories of plant protein intakes a non-significant reduced risk of 5% for type 2 diabetes [RR = 0.95, 95% CI = 0.89 to 1.02]. Non-significant means it cannot be said with a 95% confidence that a daily higher intake of plant protein really reduced risk of type 2 diabetes with 5%.

The investigators found for the comparison of the highest with lowest categories of plant protein intakes a significant reduced risk of 7% for type 2 diabetes among women [RR = 0.93, 95% CI = 0.85 to 1.00].

The investigators found for the comparison of the highest with lowest categories of plant protein intakes a significant reduced risk of 9% for type 2 diabetes among US populations [RR = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.84 to 0.97].

The investigators concluded that a higher intake of total and animal protein are both associated with an increased risk of of type 2 diabetes. However, a higher intake of plant protein decreases risk of type 2 diabetes among women and US populations.

Original title:
Dietary protein intake and risk of type 2 diabetes: results from the Melbourne Collaborative Cohort Study and a meta-analysis of prospective studies by Shang X, Scott D, […], Sanders KM.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27629053

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on diabetes and protein right here.

Objectives:
There have been inconsistent results about the association between consumption of fruits and vegetables and renal cell carcinoma (RCC) risk. Therefore, this review article (meta-analysis) has been conducted.

Does consumption of fruits and vegetables reduce renal cell carcinoma risk?

Study design:
This review article included 19 observational studies (4 cohort, 1 pooled and 14 case-control studies), involving 10,215 subjects with renal cell carcinoma.

Only 4 studies adjusted for all the 3 main risk factors for renal cell carcinoma (16 studies adjusted for tobacco smoking, 15 for BMI and 4 for hypertension).
The majority of included studies (16/19) were of high quality (NOS score ≥ 7).

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found for highest vs. lowest vegetables intake a significant reduced risk of 27% for renal cell carcinoma [SRR = 0.73, 95% CI = 0.63-0.85, I2 = 53.5%, p = 0.004]. Significant means that there is an association with a 95% confidence.

The investigators found for highest vs. lowest vegetables intake a non-significant reduced risk of 13% for renal cell carcinoma in cohort studies [SRR = 0.87, 95% CI = 0.72-1.06].

The investigators found in dose-response analysis a significant reduced risk of 10% for renal cell carcinoma per 1 serving/day vegetables intake [SRR = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.84-0.96, I2 = 69.0%, p 0.001].

The investigators found a non-linear association between vegetable intake and renal cell carcinoma risk [p = 0.001 for non-linearity] with a significant reduction in renal cell carcinoma risk when increasing the intake up to about 3 servings/d intake of vegetables. Higher intake was associated with a further, but more modest decrease in risk.

The investigators found for highest vs. lowest fruits intake a significant reduced risk of 14% for renal cell carcinoma [SRR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.75-0.98, I2 = 47.4%, p = 0.012].

The investigators found for highest vs. lowest fruits intake a significant reduced risk of 28% for renal cell carcinoma among European [SRR = 0.72, 95% CI = 0.56-0.93]. However, this reduced risk was not significant among North Americans [SRR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.81-1.16].

The investigators found for highest vs. lowest fruits intake a significant reduced risk of 22% for renal cell carcinoma in population-based case-control studies [SRR = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.63-0.97]. However, this reduced risk was not significant in cohort studies [SRR = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.73-1.10] and in hospital-based case-control studies [SRR = 0.96, 95% CI = 0.69-1.33].

The investigators found in dose-response analysis no associaition between 1 serving/day increment of fruits and renal cell carcinoma risk [SRR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.93-1.01, I2 = 57.8%, p = 0.011].

The investigators found a linear association between fruits intake and renal cell carcinoma risk [p = 0.221 for non-linearity].

The investigators concluded that consumption of 1-3 servings/d vegetables and high fruits may lower the risk of renal cell carcinoma development. May lower, because significant associations for vegetables and fruits were only observed in case-control, but not in cohort studies. Because of the measurement errors of exposure assessment, the high heterogeneity across studies and unmeasured confounding factors, further investigation with good designs are needed.

Original title:
Consumption of fruits and vegetables and risk of renal cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis of observational studies by Zhang S, Jia Z, [...], Yang J.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5438616/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on vegetables and fruits consumption, significant/cohort/95% CI and cancer right here.

Objectives:
The association of red meat consumption with the risk of stomach cancer has been reported by many studies, with inconclusive results. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Does a high red meat consumption increase stomach cancer risk?

Study design:
This review article included a total of 18 studies (cohort and case-control studies) involving 1,228,327 subjects.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found for the highest versus lowest categories of red meat intake a significant increased risk of 37% for gastric cancer [pooled RR = 1.37, 95% CI = 1.18-1.59, I2 = 67.6%, p 0.001].

The investigators found in population-based case-control studies, a significant increased risk of 58% for gastric cancer [pooled RR = 1.58, 95% CI = 1.22-2.06, I2 = 73.0%, p 0.001].

The investigators found in hospital-based case-control studies, a significant increased risk of 63% for gastric cancer [pooled RR = 1.63, 95% CI = 1.38-1.92, I2 = 19.1%, p = 0.284].

The investigators found, however, no association among cohort studies [RR = 1.00, 95% CI = 0.83-1.20, I2 = 33.9%, p = 0.158].

The investigators found the significant association was also presented in the subgroup analysis by geographic area (Asia, Europe), publication year (≥2000), sample size (1,000, ≥1,000) and quality score (7 stars, ≥7 stars).

The investigators found in dose-response analysis that every 100 g/day increment in red meat intake significant increased gastric cancer risk with 17% [RR = 1.17, 95% CI = 1.05-1.32].

The investigators found in linear regression model that the risk of gastric cancer increased with increasing level of red meat consumption.

The investigators concluded that a increased intake of red meat might be a risk factor for stomach cancer. Might be because the risk was not significant among cohort studies. Therefore, further larger prospective cohort studies are warranted to verify this association.

Original title:
Red meat consumption and stomach cancer risk: a meta-analysis by Song P, Lu M, […], Zhao Q.

Link:
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00432-014-1637-z

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more studies/information on meat intake and cancer right here.
 

Objectives:
Does allium vegetable consumption reduce gastric cancer risk?

Study design:
This review article included 22 case-control and 4 cohort studies with more than 10,000 cases.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found in 10 case-control and 4 cohort studies for the highest versus lowest allium vegetables intake category a significant reduced risk of 22% for gastric cancer [OR = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.67-0.91].

The investigators found in 12 case-control studies for the highest versus lowest garlic intake category a significant reduced risk of 40% for gastric cancer [OR = 0.60, 95% CI = 0.47-0.76].

The investigators found in 13 case-control studies for the highest versus lowest onion intake category a significant reduced risk of 45% for gastric cancer [OR = 0.55, 95% CI = 0.41-0.73].

The investigators found in 4 cohort studies for the highest versus lowest allium vegetables intake category a non-significant increased risk of 2% for gastric cancer [RR = 1.02, 95% CI = 0.88-1.18]. Non-significant means no association with 95% confidence.

The investigators concluded high allium vegetable consumption, like garlic and onion is likely to reduce gastric cancer risk. Likely because this evidence is derived mainly from case-control studies. Therefore, further data from large cohorts are desirable for conclusive confirmation.

Original title:
Allium vegetable intake and gastric cancer: a case-control study and meta-analysis by Turati F, Pelucchi C, […], Galeone C.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25215621

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more studies/information on allium vegetable consumption and cancer right here.

Objectives:
Garlic is a common spicy flavouring agent also used for certain therapeutic purposes. Garlic's effects on blood glucose have been the subject of many clinical and animal studies. However, studies reporting hypoglycemic effects of garlic in humans are conflicting. Therefore, this review article (meta-analysis) has been conducted.

Has garlic supplementation lowering effects on glycemic control measurements such as fasting blood glucose (FBG), postprandial glucose (PPG) and glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c)?

Study design:
This review article included a total of 7 RCTs (parallel design) that involved 9 comparisons with 513 subjects. The trials varied in size from 33 to 180 subjects. The study duration varied from 4 to 24 week (median: 12 week). The trials enrolled male and female subjects, both healthy and with diabetes.

Doses of garlic in the treatment group ranged from 600 to 1500 mg/d.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found pooled analyses showed that garlic supplementation resulted in a statistically significant lowering in fasting blood glucose [SMD = -1.67, 95% CI = -2.80 to -0.55, p = 0.004].

The investigators could not perform a pooled analyse for postprandial glucose (PPG) control and glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) outcomes, because only 1 study included in the meta-analysis reported PPG variables and only 2 studies reported HbA1c variables.

The investigators concluded that garlic supplementation (600 to 1500 mg/d) during 12 weeks results in a lowering in fasting blood glucose. More trials are needed to investigate the effectiveness of garlic on HbA1c and PPG.

Original title:
Garlic intake lowers fasting blood glucose: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials by Hou LQ, Liu YH and Zhang YY.

Link:
http://apjcn.nhri.org.tw/server/APJCN/24/4/575.pdf

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on diabetes and garlic right here.

Objectives:
Previous studies regarding the relationship between legume intake and risk of prostate cancer have reported inconsistent results. Therefore, this review article (meta-analysis) has been conducted.

Does legume intake reduce prostate cancer risk?

Study design:
This review article included 8 prospective cohort studies reporting 281,034 individuals and 10,234 incident prostate cancer cases.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found when comparing high consumption of legumes with low consumption a significant reduced risk of 15% [RR = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.75-0.96, p = 0.010, I2 = 45.8%] for prostate cancer.

The investigators found dose-response meta-analysis indicated that the risk of prostate cancer reduced by 3.7% [95% CI = 1.5%-5.8%] for each 20 grams per day increment of legume intake.

The investigators concluded that a high dietary intake of legumes, at least 20 grams per day is associated with a low incidence of prostate cancer.

Original title:
Legume intake and risk of prostate cancer: a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies by Li J and Mao QQ.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28423366

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on vegetables consumption and cancer right here.

Objectives:
Thyroid cancer (TC) is the most common malignancy of the endocrine system. The relationship between iodine intake and thyroid cancer risk is controversial always. Therefore, this review article (meta-analysis) has been conducted.

Does dietary intake of iodine reduce thyroid cancer risk?

Study design:
This review article included 8 case-control studies with in total 2213 subjects with thyroid cancer and 2761 subjects without thyroid cancer.

With regard to publication bias, owing to the limited number (below 10) of studies included in the saltwater fish, shellfish and iodine intake analyses, publication bias was not assessed.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found adequate or excess iodine dietary intake (>300 μg/d) significantly decreased the risk of thyroid cancer with 26% [OR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.60-0.92].

The investigators found high consumption of saltwater fish (≥3 times/wk or ≥12 times/mo) significantly decreased the risk of thyroid cancer with 28% [OR = 0.72, 95% CI = 0.55-0.95, p = 0.02].

The investigators found high consumption of shellfish (≥3 times/wk or ≥12 times/mo) significantly decreased the risk of thyroid cancer with 30% [OR = 0.70, 95% CI = 0.52-0.96, p = 0.03].

The investigators concluded a higher intake of dietary iodine (>300 μg/d) may decrease the risk of thyroid cancer in populations mainly based in coastal cities or on islands. May decrease, because this review article did not include cohort  studies.

Original title:
The relationship between iodine intake and the risk of thyroid cancer: A meta-analysis by Cao LZ, Peng XD, [...], Li S.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5440127/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on iodine and fish consumption, meta-analysis/cohort studies and cancer right here.