Nutrition and health

Objectives:
Prostate cancer (PCa) is the fifth leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Many epidemiological studies have investigated the association between prostate cancer and lycopene, however, results have been inconsistent. Therefore, this review article (meta-analysis) has been conducted.

Does lycopene reduce prostate cancer risk?

Study design:
This review article included 42 studies including 43,851 cases of prostate cancer reported from 692,012 participants.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found dietary intake of lycopene was significantly associated with a reduced prostate cancer risk of 12% [RR = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.78-0.98, p = 0.017].

The investigators found circulating concentrations of lycopene were significantly associated with a reduced prostate cancer risk of 12% [RR = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.79-0.98, p = 0.019].

The investigators found sensitivity analyses within the dose-response analysis further revealed a significant linear dose-response for dietary lycopene and prostate cancer risk such that prostate cancer decreased by 1% for every additional 2 mg of lycopene consumed [p = 0.026].

The investigators found prostate cancer risk decreased by 3.5 to 3.6% for each additional 10 μg/dL of circulating lycopene in the linear and nonlinear models, respectively [p-linear = 0.004, p-non linear = 0.006].

The investigators found no association between lycopene and advanced prostate cancer. However, there was a trend for protection against prostate cancer aggressiveness [RR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.55-1.00, p = 0.052].

The investigators concluded that higher dietary and circulating lycopene concentrations reduce prostate cancer risk. This was accompanied by dose-response relationships for dietary and circulating lycopene. Further studies are required to determine the mechanisms underlying these associations.

Original title:
Increased dietary and circulating lycopene are associated with reduced prostate cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis by Rowles JL, Ranard KM, […], Erdman JW Jr.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28440323

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on lycopene consumption and cancer right here.

Objectives:
There are conflicting reports on the correlation between manganese (Mn) levels and breast cancer. Therefore, this review article (meta-analysis) has been conducted.

Does manganese deficiency increase risk of breast cancer?

Study design:
This review article included 11 case-control studies involving 1302 subjects.

There was no evidence of publication bias. Sensitivity analysis showed that excluding any one study from the pooled analysis did not vary the results substantially.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found the random-effects meta-analysis results indicated that subjects with breast cancer had lower manganese levels in serum and hair than healthy controls [SMD = -1.51, 95% CI = -2.47 to -0.56, I2 = 97.8%, p 0.001].

The investigators found in subgroup analysis that subjects with breast cancer had lower manganese levels than healthy controls in China [SMD = -1.32, 95% CI = -2.33 to -0.32] and Korea [SMD = -4.08, 95% CI = -4.63 to -3.54], but not in Turkey [SMD = -0.96, 95% CI = -3.19 to 1.27].

The investigators found in subgroup analysis that the differences of manganese levels between patients with breast cancer and healthy controls were similar in different sample specimens:
serum [SMD = -1.24, 95% CI = -2.31 to -0.16];
hair [SMD = -1.99, 95% CI = -3.91 to -0.06] and;
different types of manganese measurement:

ICP-AAS [SMD = -1.14, 95% CI = -2.24 to -0.04];
GFAAS [SMD = -1.94, 95% CI = -2.38 to -1.49];
ICP-AES [SMD = -3.77, 95% CI = -4.70 to -2.85]. These findings can well explain that  the between-study variability was the main source of heterogeneity.

The investigators concluded there is an association between deficient manganese concentration and breast cancer. However, the subgroup analysis found that there was contradiction regarding races and geography, like China and Turkey. Thus this finding needs further confirmation by trans-regional multicenter, long-term observation in a cohort design to obtain better understanding of causal relationships between manganese levels and breast cancer, through measuring manganese at baseline to investigate whether the highest manganese category versus lowest was associated with breast cancer risk.

Original title:
The association between deficient manganese levels and breast cancer: a meta-analysis by Shen F, Cai WS, [...],Xu B.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4443096/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more studies/information on manganese and breast cancer right here.

Objectives:
What is the relationship between intake of 12 major food groups and risk of type 2 diabetes (T2D)?

Study design:
This review article included prospective cohort studies.
The 12 major food groups are whole grains, refined grains, vegetables, fruits, nuts, legumes, eggs, dairy, fish, red meat, processed meat and sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB).

The meta-evidence was graded "low" for legumes and nuts; "moderate" for refined grains, vegetables, fruit, eggs, dairy and fish; and "high" for processed meat, red meat, whole grains and sugar-sweetened beverages.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found 6 out of the 12 food-groups showed a significant relation with risk of type 2 diabetes; 3 of them a decrease of risk with increasing consumption (whole grains, fruits and dairy) and 3 an increase of risk with increasing consumption (red meat, processed meat and sugar-sweetened beverages) in the linear dose-response meta-analysis.

The investigators found evidence of a non-linear relationship between fruits, vegetables, processed meat, whole grains and sugar-sweetened beverages and type 2 diabetes risk.

The investigators found optimal consumption of risk-decreasing foods resulted in a 42% reduction and consumption of risk-increasing foods was associated with a threefold type 2 diabetes risk, compared to non-consumption.

The meta-evidence was graded "low" for legumes and nuts; "moderate" for refined grains, vegetables, fruit, eggs, dairy and fish; and "high" for processed meat, red meat, whole grains, and sugar-sweetened beverages. Among the investigated food groups, selecting specific optimal intakes can lead to a considerable change in risk of type 2 diabetes.

The investigators concluded that a higher consumption of whole grains, fruits and dairy products reduces type 2 diabetes risk, while a higher consumption of red meat, processed meat and sugar-sweetened beverages increases type 2 diabetes risk.

Original title:
Food groups and risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies by Schwingshackl L, Hoffmann G, […], Boeing H.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28397016

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on consumption of meat, fruit, dairy products and nuts and type 2 diabetes right here.

Objectives:
Quantification of the association between the intake of fruit and vegetables and risk of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is controversial even though several studies have explored this association. Therefore, this review article (meta-analysis) has been conducted.

Does a high intake of vegetables and fruit decrease risk of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma?

Study design:
This review article included a total of 32 observational studies involving 10037 cases of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

There was no evidence of publication bias.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found highest vs. lowest vegetable intake, significantly reduced risk of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma with 44% [SRR = 0.56, 95% CI = 0.45-0.69, p-heterogeneity 0.001]. Significant means there is an association with a 95% confidence.

The investigators found highest vs. lowest fruit intake, significantly reduced risk of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma with 47% [SRR = 0.53, 95% CI = 0.44-0.64, p-heterogeneity 0.001].

The investigators found similar results in a linear dose-response analysis and there was evidence of non-linear associations for intakes of fruit [p non-linearity 0.001] and vegetables [p non-linearity = 0.041].

The investigators concluded that intakes of vegetables and fruit reduce risk of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Further investigation with prospective designs, validated questionnaires and good control of important confounders is warranted.

Original title:
Intake of fruit and vegetables and risk of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A meta-analysis of observational studies by Liu J, Wang J, […], Lv C.

Link:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23319052

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on review, 95% CI and heterogeneity, vegetables and fruits and cancer right here.
 

Objectives:
Prostate cancer (PCa) now remains the 2nd most frequently diagnosed cancer. In recent years, chemoprevention for prostate cancer becomes a possible concept. Especially, many phytochemicals rich foods are suggested to lower the risk of cancer. Among these foods, green tea is considered as effective prevention for various cancers. However, clinical trials and previous meta-analyses on the relationship between green tea consumption and the risk of prostate cancer have produced inconsistent outcomes. Therefore, this review article (meta-analysis) has been conducted.

Does green tea intake reduce prostate cancer risk?

Study design:
This review article included 4 cohort studies, 3 case-control studies and 3 RCTs. The cohort studies and case-control studies which investigated the association between green tea intake and prostate cancer risk included 1435 cases among 96,332 individuals and the 3 RCTs studied the relationship between EGCG and prostate cancer incidence included 87 volunteers in EGCG arms of 179 individuals.

No publication bias was found.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found in observational studies (4 cohort studies and 3 case-control studies) for the highest versus lowest category of green tea intake a non-significant reduced prostate cancer risk of 8% [RR = 0.92, 95% CI = 0.77-1.11, I2 = 0%, p = 0.46] for all studies;

a non-significant reduced prostate cancer risk of 2.3% [RR = 0.977, 95% CI = 0.80-1.19] for cohort studies and;
a non-significant reduced prostate cancer risk of 27.7% [RR = 0.623, 95% CI = 0,368-1.056, I2  = 0%, p =  0.46] for case-control studies.

The investigators found no association between 1-5 cups of green tea per day and prostate cancer risk.

However, the investigators found 7 cups of green tea per day significantly reduced prostate cancer risk with 19% [RR = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.67-0.97]. The significant reduced prostate cancer risk increased to 26% [RR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.59-0.93] for 9 cups and to 44% [RR = 0.56, 95% CI = 0.35-0.92) for 15 cups.

The investigators found in 3 RCTs when compared to placebo green tea catechins significantly reduced prostate cancer risk  with 62% [RR = 0.38, 95% CI = 0.16-0.86, p  =  0.02].

The investigators concluded that at least 7 cups/day green tea intake reduces prostate cancer. This is further confirmed by the potential protective effect of green tea catechins on prostate cancer. Further prospective study with accurate measurement of green tea intake is required to substantiate these conclusions.

Original title:
Green tea and the risk of prostate cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis by Guo Y, Zhi F, […], Zhang X.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5380255/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on green tea consumption and cancer right here.

Objectives:
Olive oil (OO) as food is composed mainly of fatty acids and bioactive compounds depending from the extraction method. Both had been discussed as health promoting with still open questions. Therefore, this meta-analysis (systematic review) has been conducted.

Does olive oil intake reduce risk of type 2 diabetes?

Study design:
This review article included 4 cohort studies including 15,784 type 2 diabetes cases and 29 intervention trials.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found the highest olive oil intake category showed a 16% reduced risk of type 2 diabetes [RR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.77, 0.92) compared with the lowest. The reduced risk was significant.

The investigators found evidence for a nonlinear relationship between olive oil intake and the reduced risk of type 2 diabetes.

The investigators found in patients with type 2 diabetes that olive oil supplementation resulted in a significantly more pronounced reduction in HbA1c [MD = -0.27%, 95% CI = -0.37 to -0.17] and fasting plasma glucose [MD = -0.44 mmol/L, 95% CI = -0.66 to -0.22] as compared with the control groups.

The investigators concluded that the intake of olive oil is beneficial for the prevention and management of type 2 diabetes. This conclusion regards olive oil as food and might not been valid for single components comprising this food.

Original title:
Olive oil in the prevention and management of type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies and intervention trials by Schwingshackl L, Lampousi AM, […], Boeing H1.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28394365

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on olive oil intake and diabetes right here.

Objectives:
The association between meat consumption and the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is still inconclusive. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Does meat consumption increase risk of hepatocellular carcinoma?

Study design:
This review article included 7 cohort studies and 10 case-control studies.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found for the highest vs. lowest consumption levels a non-significant increased risk for hepatocellular carcinoma of 10% [RR = 1.10, 95% CI = 0.85-1.42] for red meat, a non-significant increased risk of 1% [RR = 1.01, 95% CI = 0.79-1.28] for processed meat and a non-significant decreased risk of 3% [RR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.85-1.11] for total meat. Non-significant means, there is no association with a 95% confidence.

The investigators found for the highest vs. lowest consumption levels a significant decreased risk for hepatocellular carcinoma of 31% [RR = 0.69, 95% CI = 0.58-0.81] for white meat and a significant decreased risk of 22% [RR = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.67-0.90] for fish. The results remained quite stable after stratification by the confounding factors.
Significant means, there is an association with a 95% confidence.

The investigators concluded a high level of white meat or fish consumption reduces the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma, while intake of red meat, processed meat or total meat is not associated with hepatocellular carcinoma risk. These results suggest that dietary intervention may be a promising approach for prevention of hepatocellular carcinoma, which still need to be confirmed by further well-designed prospective studies and experimental research.

Original title:
Systematic review with meta-analysis: meat consumption and the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma by Luo J, Yang Y, [...], Zhu Y.

Link:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24588342

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more studies/information on fish consumption, meat consumption and cancer right here.

A review article of cohort studies or case-control studies will answer the following question:
"Should I change my diet?".

Objectives:
Is there an association between meat intake and risk of esophageal cancer?

Study design:
This review article included 7 cohort studies and 28 case-control studies.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found for the highest versus lowest total meat consumption categories a non-significant increased risk of 19% [95% CI = 0.98-1.46] for esophageal cancer.

The investigators found for the highest versus lowest red meat consumption categories a significant increased risk of 55% [95% CI = 1.22-1.96] for esophageal cancer.

The investigators found for the highest versus lowest processed meat consumption categories a significant increased risk of 33% [95% CI = 1.04-1.69] for esophageal cancer.

The investigators found for the highest versus lowest white meat consumption categories a significant decreased risk of 28% [95% CI = 0.60-0.86] for esophageal cancer.

The investigators found for the highest versus lowest poultry consumption categories a significant decreased risk of 17% [95% CI = 0.72-0.96] for esophageal cancer.

The investigators found for the highest versus lowest fish consumption categories a non-significant decreased risk of 5% [95% CI = 0.76-1.19] for esophageal cancer.

The investigators found when stratified by histological subtype, positive associations among esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and red meat, white meat and poultry and esophageal adenocarcinoma with total meat and processed meat.

The investigators concluded red meat and processed meat consumption increase risk of esophageal cancer, while white meat and poultry decrease risk of esophageal cancer. Fish consumption is not associated with incidence of esophageal cancer.

Original title:
Meat consumption is associated with esophageal cancer risk in a meat- and cancer-histological-type dependent manner by Zhu HC, Yang X, […], Sun XC.

Link:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24395380

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more studies/information on meat consumption and cancer right here.
 

Objectives:
Epidemiological studies assessing the relationship between dietary vitamin B2 and the risk of breast cancer have produced inconsistent results. Therefore, this review article (meta-analysis) has been conducted.

Does dietary vitamin B2 intake reduce breast cancer risk?

Study design:
This review article included 10 epidemiologic studies (cohort or patient-controle studies) comprising totally 12,268 breast cancer patients.

No publication bias was found.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found comparing the highest to the lowest dietary vitamin B2 intake a significant reduced risk of 15% for breast cancer [pooled relative risk = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.76-0.95, I2 = 40.7%].

The investigators found dose-response analysis showed that an increment of 1 mg/day dietary vitamin B2 intake significantly reduced risk of breast cancer with 6% [relative risk = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.90-0.99].

The investigators concluded that dietary vitamin B2 intake, at least 1 mg/day, is related to the reduced risk of breast cancer. However, additional research is also necessary to further explore this association.

Original title:
Dietary vitamin B2 intake and breast cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis by Yu L, Tan Y and Zhu L.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28035488

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on vitamin B2 and breast cancer right here.
 

Objectives:
Nutrition therapy is an integral part of self-management education in patients with type 2 diabetes. Carbohydrates with a low glycemic index are recommended, but the ideal amount of carbohydrate in the diet is unclear. Therefore, this meta-analysis (systematic review) has been conducted.

Has carbohydrate restriction (below 45 En% carbohydrate) beneficial effects on glycemic control in type 2 diabetes?

Study design:
This review article included 10 RCTs. In total, 1,376 subjects with type 2 diabetes were included in this analysis. Forty-nine percent were male and the average age was 58 years. The majority were obese; mean BMI ranged from 26 kg/m² in an Asian population to 37 kg/m² in an American population.

The duration of the intervention varied from 3 to 24 months.

The average predefined targets for the assigned carbohydrate restriction were 25 En% (range 14-40 En%). The average reported intake was 30 En% (range 14-45 En%) after 3 or 6 months of intervention and 38 En% (range 27-45 En%) at 1 year (5 trials).

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found following a carbohydrate diet of 30 En% (range 14-45 En%) during 3 to 6 months significantly reduced HbA1c level of patients with type 2 diabetes with 0.34% [95% CI = 0.06 to 0.63] compared with a diet of 45-60 En% carbohydrate (high-carbohydrate diet).
Owing to heterogeneity, however, the quality of the evidence for this is only moderate. However, at 1 year or later, HbA1c level (seven trials included) was similar in the two groups.

The investigators found the greater the carbohydrate restriction, the greater the glucose-lowering effect [R = -0.85, p 0.01].

The investigators found the effect of the 2 types of diet on BMI/body weight, LDL cholesterol, QoL and attrition rate was similar throughout interventions.

The investigators concluded that carbohydrate restriction (below 45 En% carbohydrate) has a greater effect on glycemic control in type 2 diabetes than an high-carbohydrate diet in the short term. The magnitude of the effect was correlated to the carbohydrate intake, the greater the restriction, the greater glucose lowering, a relationship that has not been demonstrated earlier. However, in the long term, the glucose-lowering effect of high-carbohydrate diet (HCD) and low-carbohydrate diets (LCD) was similar.

Original title:
Systematic review and meta-analysis of dietary carbohydrate restriction in patients with type 2 diabetes by Snorgaard O, Poulsen GM, [...], Astrup A.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5337734/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on carbohydrates and diabetes right here.

Objectives:
Is there an association of intake of different vitamins and multiple-vitamin supplements and the incidence of colorectal cancer?

Study design:
This review article included 47 articles (cohort studies).

There was unacceptable heterogeneity for studies of multiple-vitamin supplements, so findings were inconclusive.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found a significant reduced risk of 12% [multivariable-adjusted RR = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.81-0.95] for colorectal cancer when comparing the highest versus lowest dietary vitamin B9 (folate) intake. Significant means that there is an association with a 95% confidence.

The investigators found a significant reduced risk of 13% [multivariable-adjusted RR = 0.87, 95% CI = 0.77-0.99] for colorectal cancer when comparing the highest versus lowest dietary vitamin D intake. Significant because RR of 1 was not found in the 95% CI of 0.77 to 0.99. RR of 1 means no risk/association.

The investigators found a significant reduced risk of 12% [multivariable-adjusted RR = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.79-0.99] for colorectal cancer when comparing the highest versus lowest dietary vitamin B6 intake.

The investigators found a significant reduced risk of 14% [multivariable-adjusted RR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.76-0.97] for colorectal cancer when comparing the highest versus lowest dietary vitamin B2 intake.

The investigators found, however, no association between both dietary vitamine A, C, E, B3 and B12 and the risk of colorectal cancer.

The investigators concluded high dietary vitamin B9 (folate), D, B6 and B2 intake reduces risk of colorectal cancer, but further study is needed.

Original title:
Vitamin and multiple-vitamin supplement intake and incidence of colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis of cohort studies by Liu Y, Yu Q, […], Li K.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25491145

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more studies/information on vitamines and colorectal cancer right here.

Objectives:
Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have observed contrasting results on the effects of vitamin C on circulating biomarkers of glycaemic and insulin regulation. Therefore, this meta-analysis (systematic review) has been conducted.

Has vitamin C supplementation a favorable effect on circulating biomarkers of glycaemic and insulin regulation?

Study design:
This review article included 22 RCTs with 937 participants.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found overall, vitamin C supplementation did not modify glucose, HbA1c and insulin concentrations.

The investigators found, however, subgroup analyses showed that vitamin C supplementation significantly reduced glucose concentrations with 0.44 mmol/L [95% CI = -0.81 to -0.07, p =0.01] in patients with type 2 diabetes and in interventions with a duration greater than 30 days [-0.53%, 95% CI = -0.79 to -0.10, p = 0.02].

The investigators found vitamin C administration had greater effects on fasting [-13.63 pmol/L, 95% CI = -22.73 to -4.54, p 0.01] compared to postprandial insulin concentration. However, meta-regression analyses showed that age was a modifier of the effect of vitamin C on insulin concentration.

The investigators found the effect size of vitamin C supplementation was associated with baseline BMI and plasma glucose levels and with the duration of the intervention.

The investigators concluded vitamin C supplementation has greater reduction in glucose concentrations in patients with type 2 diabetes, older individuals and with more prolonged supplementation (greater than 30 days). Personalized interventions with vitamin C may represent a feasible future strategy to enhance benefits and efficacy of interventions. Nevertheless, results need to be interpreted cautiously due to limitations in the primary studies.

Original title:
Effects of vitamin C supplementation on glycaemic control: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials by Ashor AW, Werner AD, […], Siervo M.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28294172

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on vitamin C and diabetes right here.

Objectives:
Red meat intake has been associated with risk of colorectal cancer, potentially mediated through heterocyclic amines. The metabolic efficiency of N-acetyltransferase 2 (NAT2) required for the metabolic activation of such amines is influenced by genetic variation. The interaction between red meat intake, NAT2 genotype and colorectal cancer has been inconsistently reported. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Is there an interaction between red meat intake, NAT2 genotype and colorectal cancer?

Study design:
This review article included 11 retrospective case-control studies with 8,290 colorectal cancer cases and 9,115 controls (subjects without colorectal cancer).

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found the highest quartile of red meat intake was associated with a 41% increased risk of colorectal cancer compared with the lowest quartile [OR = 1.41, 95% CI = 1.29-1.55].
However, a significant association was observed only for studies with retrospective diet data, not for studies with diet prospectively assessed before cancer diagnosis.

The investigators found when combining all studies, high red meat intake was similarly associated with colorectal cancer in those with a rapid/intermediate NAT2 genotype [OR = 1.38, 95% CI = 1.20-1.59] as with a slow genotype [OR = 1.43, 95% CI = 1.28-1.61, p interaction = 0.9].

The investigators concluded high red meat intake was associated with increased risk of colorectal cancer only from retrospective case-control studies and not modified by NAT2 enzyme activity.

Original title:
Red Meat Intake, NAT2, and Risk of Colorectal Cancer: A Pooled Analysis of 11 Studies by Ananthakrishnan AN, Du M, […], Chan AT.

Link:
http://cebp.aacrjournals.org/content/cebp/24/1/198.full.pdf

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more studies/information on red meat consumption and colorectal cancer right here.

Objectives:
The association between dietary carbohydrate intake and colorectal cancer risk remains controversial. Therefore, this review article (meta-analysis) has been conducted.

Does higher dietary carbohydrate intake increase colorectal cancer risk?

Study design:
This review article included 8 case-controle studies en 9 prospective cohort studies involving 14,402 colorectal cancer patients among 846004 participants; 17 studies with 9,235 cases were to assess the association on colon cancer and 13  studies with 3,272 cases were to  assess the association on rectum cancer. 

No publication bias was found.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found no association between dietary carbohydrate intake and colorectal cancer risk [pooled RR = 1.08, 95% CI = 0.93-1.23, I2 = 68.3%, p-heterogeneity 0.001]. No association because RR of 1 was found in the 95% CI of 0.93 to 1.23. RR of 1 means no risk/association.

The investigators found no association between dietary carbohydrate intake and colon cancer risk [pooled RR = 1.09, 95% CI = 0.95-1.25, I2 = 48.3%].

The investigators found no association between dietary carbohydrate intake and rectum cancer risk [pooled RR = 1.17, 95% CI = 0.98-1.39, I2 = 17.8%].

The investigators found in subgroup analyses for study design, a non-significant association for both case-control studies [summary RR = 1.40, 95% CI = 0.93-2.09] and cohort studies [summary RR = 0.99, 95% CI = 0.85-1.15].  

The investigators found in stratified analysis by geographic locations, higher dietary   carbohydrate intake had no significant association on colorectal cancer risk among American populations [summary RR = 1.08, 95% CI = 0.89-1.30], European populations [summary RR = 1.23, 95% CI = 0.91-1.64] or Asian population [summary RR = 0.98, 95% CI = 0.65-1.46].

The investigators found higher dietary carbohydrate intake significantly increased risk of colorectal cancer with 23% in men populations [summary RR = 1.23, 95% CI = 1.01-1.57], but not in women populations.

The investigators concluded that higher dietary carbohydrate intake increases colorectal cancer risk in men populations. Further studies are wanted to confirm this relationship.

Original title:
A meta-analysis between dietary carbohydrate intake and colorectal cancer risk: Evidence from 17 observational studies by Huang J, Pan G, [...], Zhu Z.

Link:
http://www.bioscirep.org/content/ppbioscirep/early/2017/03/15/BSR20160553.full.pdf

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on carbohydrates and colorectal cancer right here.
 

Objectives:
Previous observational studies regarding the existence of an association between folate intake and the risk of breast cancer have been inconsistent. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Does a higher dietary folate intake reduce breast cancer risk?

Study design:
This review article included 14 prospective cohort studies that reported data on 677,858 individuals.
The participant follow-up period ranged 4.7-17.4 years and the number of individuals per study ranged 11,699-88,818.
There was no publication bias.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found no association between dietary folate intake and breast cancer risk for highest versus lowest category  [RR =  0.97, 95% CI = 0.90-1.05, p  = 0.451, I2 =  57.5%, p = 0.004].

The investigators found dose-response meta-analysis findings showed no association between the risk of breast cancer and a 100 µg/day increase in dietary folate intake [RR = 0.99, 95% CI = 0.98-1.01, p = 0.361, I2 = 66.2%, p 0.001].

The investigators found evidence of a nonlinear relationship between dietary folate intake and the risk of breast cancer.

A daily dietary folate intake of 200-320 µg was associated with a reduced risk of breast cancer. However, daily folate intake levels >400 µg was associated with a increased risk of breast cancer.

The investigators found overall folate intake level was associated with a reduced breast cancer risk of 36% if the patients had a daily alcohol intake >10 g [RR for highest versus lowest category = 0.64, 95% CI = 0.43-0.97].

The investigators concluded there are no effects of increased dietary folate intake on the incidence of breast cancer. But, a daily dietary folate intake of 200-320 µg was associated with a reduced risk of breast cancer. However, daily folate intake levels >400 µg was associated with a increased risk of breast cancer. Future studies should focus on specific populations in order to analyze primary breast cancer prevention.

Original title:
Folate Intake and the Risk of Breast Cancer: A Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Studies by Zhang YF, Shi WW, […], Zhou YH.

Link:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4059748/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more studies/information on folate intake and breast cancer right here.
 

Objectives:
Does magnesium supplementation reduce risk of cardiovascular disease among diabetic subjects?

Study design:
This review article included RCTs.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found magnesium supplementation significantly improved fasting plasma glucose with 4.641 mg/dL [WMD = -4.641 mg/dL, 95% CI = -7.602 to -1.680, p = 0.002]. A more beneficial effect of magnesium supplementation was observed in diabetic subjects with hypomagnesaemia.

The investigators found magnesium supplementation significantly improved high-density lipoprotein (HDL or good cholesterol) with 3.197 mg/dL [WMD = 3.197 mg/dL, 95% CI = 1.455 to 4.938, p 0.001]. A more beneficial effect of magnesium supplementation was observed in diabetic subjects with hypomagnesaemia.

The investigators found magnesium supplementation significantly improved low-density lipoprotein (LDL or bad cholesterol) with 10.668 mg/dL [WMD = -10.668 mg/dL, 95% CI = -19.108 to -2.228, p = 0.013]. A more beneficial effect of magnesium supplementation was observed in diabetic subjects with hypomagnesaemia.

The investigators found magnesium supplementation significantly improved plasma triglycerides with 15.323 mg/dL [WMD = -15.323 mg/dL, 95% CI = -28.821 to -1.826, p = 0.026]. A more beneficial effect of magnesium supplementation was observed in diabetic subjects with hypomagnesaemia.

The investigators found magnesium supplementation significantly improved systolic blood pressure with 3.056 mmHg [WMD = 3.056 mmHg, 95% CI = -5.509 to -0.603, p = 0.015]. A more beneficial effect of magnesium supplementation was observed in diabetic subjects with hypomagnesaemia.

The investigators concluded magnesium supplementation has a favourable effect on risk factors of cardiovascular diseases. Although future large RCTs are needed for making robust guidelines for clinical practice.

Original title:
Effect of magnesium supplementation on type 2 diabetes associated cardiovascular risk factors: a systematic review and meta-analysis by Verma H and Garg R.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28150351

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on cardiovascular diseases, cholesterol and magnesium right here.

Objectives:
There is no published systematic review and meta-analysis regarding the effect of olive oil consumption on cancer occurrence. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Does olive oil consumption reduce cancer risk?

Study design:
This review article included 19 case-control studies (13800 cancer patients and 23340 controls).

Random effects meta-analysis was applied in order to evaluate the research hypothesis.
Heterogeneity of the effect-size measures was observed in studies performed in the Mediterranean region (n = 15, p = 0.0002), whereas no heterogeneity was observed in non-Mediterranean studies (n = 4, p = 0.12).

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found when comparing with the lowest, the highest category of olive oil consumption was significantly associated with lower odds of having any type of cancer [log odds ratio = -0.41, 95% CI = -0.53 to -0.29, Cohran's Q = 47.52, p = 0.0002, I2 = 62%].

The investigators found both Mediterranean and non-Mediterranean people reported olive oil intake were less likely to have developed any type of cancer.

The investigators found olive oil consumption was significantly associated with lower odds of developing breast cancer [logOR = -0.4,  95% CI = -0.78 to -0.12] and a cancer of the digestive system [logOR = -0.36, 95% CI = -0.50 to -0.21] compared with the lowest intake.

The investigators concluded olive oil consumption probably reduces risk of any type of cancer, especially breast cancer and cancer of the digestive system. Probably, because this review article only included case-control studies and there was heterogeneity.
The reduced risk is similar to studies performed in Mediterranean as well as non-Mediterranean countries. However, it is still unclear whether olive oil's monounsaturated fatty acid content or its antioxidant components are responsible for its beneficial effects.

Original title:
Olive oil intake is inversely related to cancer prevalence: a systematic review and a meta-analysis of 13800 patients and 23340 controls in 19 observational studies by Psaltopoulou T, Kosti RI, […], Panagiotakos DB.

Link:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3199852/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more studies on olive oil consumption and fat.

Objectives:
The conclusions from epidemiological studies are controversial between apple and pear consumption and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) risk. Therefore, this meta-analysis (systematic review) has been conducted.

Study design:
This review article included a total of 5 independent prospective cohort studies with 14,120 T2DM incident cases among 228,315 participants.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found consumption of apples and pears was associated with 18% reduction in type 2 diabetes mellitus risk [multivariate-adjusted relative risk = 0.82, 95% CI = 0.75-0.88, I2 = 0.00%] when comparing the highest versus lowest category.

The investigators found dose-response analysis showed that one serving per week increment of apple and pear consumption was associated with a 3% [95% CI = 0.96-0.98, p for trend 0.001] reduction in type 2 diabetes mellitus risk.

The investigators concluded a higher consumption of apples and pears; at least one serving per week reduces type 2 diabetes mellitus risk.

Original title:
Apple and pear consumption and type 2 diabetes mellitus risk: a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies by Guo XF, Yang B, […], Li D.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28186516

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on fruit consumption and diabetes right here.

The standard serving size is a 1/2 cup of sliced fruit. A medium pear produces approximately 1 cup of fruit; so an average medium pear equals two fruit servings.
1 small apple = 1 serving.
 

Objectives:
Does niacine supplementation reduce blood lipids levels in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus?

Study design:
This review article included randomized controlled trials.

The meta-analysis showed the absence of publication bias and any dose-response relations between niacin and effect size.

There was a significant heterogeneity for the impact of niacin on LDL cholesterol and fasting plasma glucose.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found niacin supplementation significantly increased HDL cholesterol with 0.27 mmol/L [95% CI = 0.24 to 0.30, p 0.001] in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

The investigators found niacin supplementation significantly reduced LDL cholesterol with 0.250 mmol/L [95% CI = -0.47 to -0.03, p 0.05] in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

The investigators found niacin supplementation significantly reduced triglycerides with 0.39 mmol/L [95% CI = -0.43 to -0.34, p 0.001] in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

The investigators found niacin supplementation significantly increased fasting plasma glucose with 0.085 mmol/L [95% CI = 0.029 to 0.141, p 0.05] compared with controls in patients with long term treatment.

The investigators concluded niacin alone or in combination improves lipid abnormalities in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, but requires monitoring of glucose in long term treatment.

Original title:
Effect of niacin on lipids and glucose in patients with type 2 diabetes: A meta-analysis of randomized, controlled clinical trials by Ding Y, Li Y and Wen A.

Link:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25306426

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information on niacin (vitamin B3) and diabetes.

Objectives:
Observational studies suggest an association between dietary fiber intake and risk of type 2 diabetes, but the results are inconclusive. Therefore, this review article (meta-analysis) has been conducted.

Does dietary fiber intake reduce risk of type 2 diabetes?

Study design:
This review article included 17 prospective cohort studies of dietary fiber intake and risk of type 2 diabetes involving 19,033 cases and 488,293 participants.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found total dietary fiber intake significantly reduced risk of type 2 diabetes with 19% [combined RR = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.73-0.90].

The investigators found dietary cereal fiber intake significantly reduced risk of type 2 diabetes with 23% [combined RR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.69-0.85].

The investigators found dietary fruit fiber intake significantly reduced risk of type 2 diabetes with 6% [combined RR = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.88-0.99].

The investigators found dietary insoluble fiber intake significantly reduced risk of type 2 diabetes with 25% [combined RR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.63-0.89].

The investigators found a nonlinear relationship of total dietary fiber intake with risk of type 2 diabetes [p for nonlinearity 0.01].

The investigators found dietary fiber intake of 15g per day non-significantly reduced risk of type 2 diabetes with 2% [combined RR = 0.98, 95% CI = 0.90-1.06].

The investigators found dietary fiber intake of 20g per day non-significantly reduced risk of type 2 diabetes with 3% [combined RR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.87-1.07].

The investigators found dietary fiber intake of 25g per day significantly reduced risk of type 2 diabetes with 11% [combined RR = 0.89, 95% CI = 0.80-0.99].

The investigators found dietary fiber intake of 30g per day significantly reduced risk of type 2 diabetes with 24% [combined RR = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.65-0.88].

The investigators found dietary fiber intake of 35g per day significantly reduced risk of type 2 diabetes with 34% [combined RR = 0.66, 95% CI = 0.53-0.82].

The investigators found that the risk of type 2 diabetes decreased by 6% [combined RR = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.93-0.96] for 2 g/day increment in cereal fiber intake.

The investigators concluded that the intakes of dietary fiber, at least 25g total dietary fiber intake per day reduce risk of type 2 diabetes.

Original title:
Dietary fiber intake and risk of type 2 diabetes: a dose–response analysis of prospective studies by Yao B, Fang H, […], Zhao Y.

Link:
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10654-013-9876-x

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information on fiber and type 2 diabetes right here.

Objectives:
Many studies suggest that high-fat diets are linked to the etiology of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). However, the findings are inconsistent and therefore the association between fat and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma remains unclear. Therefore, this review article (meta-analysis) has been conducted.

Does a high fat dietary intake increase non-Hodgkin's lymphoma risk?

Study design:
This review article included two cohort studies and eight case-control studies.

The funnel plot revealed no evidence for publication bias.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found a significant higher risk of 26% for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma for total fat consumption [RR = 1.26, 95% CI = 1.12-1.42]. Significant because RR of 1 was not found in the 95% CI of 1.12 to 1.42. RR of 1 means no risk/association.

The investigators found subgroup analysis showed a significant higher risk of 41% for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma for total fat consumption [RR = 1.41, 95% CI = 1.08-1.84]. However, there was no significant association between total fat consumption and increase risk of follicular lymphoma [RR = 1.21, 95% CI = 0.97-1.52], small lymphocytic lymphoma/chronic lymphocytic leukemia [RR = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.68-1.23] nor with T cell lymphoma [RR = 1.12, 95% CI = 0.60-2.09].
No significant because RR of 1 was found in the 95% CI of 0.60 to 2.09. RR of 1 means no risk/association.

The investigators concluded that total fat consumption increases non-Hodgkin's lymphoma; especially diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

Original title:
Dietary Fat Consumption and Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Risk: A Meta-analysis by Han TJ, Li JS, [...], Xu HZ.

Link:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28094569

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on fat and cancer right here.

Lymphoma is the most common blood cancer. The two main forms of lymphoma are Hodgkin lymphoma and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). The human body has two main types of lymphocytes that can develop into lymphomas:

1. B lymphocytes (B cells) and;
2. T lymphocytes (T cells).

B-cell lymphomas are much more common than T-cell lymphomas and account for approximately 85 percent of all non-Hodgkin lymphomas. Diffuse large B cell lymphomas (DLBCLs) are the commonest subtype of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. They constitute about 30 to 40% of adult non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

A high total fat consumption corresponds to a diet with >35 En% fat and/or >10 En% saturated fat. A diet with >35 En% fat is a diet with a lot of products/meals providing >35 En% fat.
 

Objectives:
Several epidemiological studies investigating the association between dietary vitamin E intake and the risk of lung cancer have demonstrated inconsistent results. Therefore, this review article (meta-analysis) has been conducted.

Does dietary vitamin E intake reduce lung cancer risk?

Study design:
This review article included 9 cohort studies with 4,164 lung cancer cases among 435,532 participants.

The Egger’s test showed no evidence of publication bias [t = 1.24, p = 0.246].

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found for the highest versus lowest categories of dietary vitamin E intake a reduced risk of 16% for lung cancer [pooled RR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.76-0.93, I2 = 41.1%].

The investigators found in subgroup analysis by geographic location a significant inverse association of dietary vitamin E intake with lung cancer for the European and American populations [pooled RR = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.75-0.95), but not for the Asian population. Significant means that there is an association with a 95% confidence.

The investigators found every 2 mg/d increase in dietary vitamin E intake statistically decreased the risk of lung cancer by 5% [RR = 0.95, 95% CI = 0.91-0.99, p linearity = 0.0237].

The investigators concluded that higher dietary vitamin E intake; at least 2 mg per day exerts a protective effect against lung cancer.

Original title:
Association of dietary vitamin E intake with risk of lung cancer: a dose-response meta-analysis by Zhu YJ, Bo YC, [...], Qiu CG.

Link:
http://apjcn.nhri.org.tw/server/APJCN/26/2/271.pdf

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on vitamin E and cancer right here.
 

Objectives:
Epidemiological studies suggest that soya consumption as a source of phyto-oestrogens and isoflavones may be associated with a reduced risk of colorectal cancer. However, findings have not yet been synthesised for all groups of phyto-oestrogens. Therefore, this review article (meta-analysis) has been conducted.

Does soya consumption reduce colorectal cancer risk?

Study design:
This review article included 16 studies (case-control studies and cohort studies).

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found in case-controle studies a significant reduced risk of 24% [pooled RR = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.69-0. 84] for colorectal cancer when comparing the highest phyto-oestrogens with the lowest intake category. However, the reduced risk for colorectal cancer was not significant in cohort studies [pooled RR = 0.95, 95% CI = 0.85-1.06].

The investigators found in case-controle studies a significant reduced risk of 23% [pooled RR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.69-0. 85] for colorectal cancer when comparing the highest isoflavones with the lowest intake category. However, the reduced risk for colorectal cancer was not significant in cohort studies [pooled RR = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.84-1.05].

The investigators found in case-controle studies a significant reduced risk of 30% [pooled RR = 0.70, 95% CI = 0.56-0. 89] for colorectal cancer when comparing the highest lignans with the lowest intake category. However, the reduced risk for colorectal cancer was not significant in cohort studies [pooled RR = 1.00, 95% CI = 0.64-1.57].

The investigators found dose-response analysis yielded an 8% reduced risk of colorectal neoplasms for every 20 mg/d increase in isoflavones intake in Asians [pooled RR = 0.92, 95% CI = 0.86-0.97].

The investigators found dose-response analysis showed a non-linear inverse association with colorectal cancer risk for lignans intake, but no association for circulating enterolactone concentrations was observed.

The investigators concluded every 20 mg/d increase in isoflavones dietary intake reduces risk of colorectal neoplasms with 8% in Asians.

Original title:
Phyto-oestrogens and colorectal cancer risk: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of observational studies by Jiang R, Botma A, […], Chang-Claude J.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28091359

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on isoflavones, colorectal cancer and cohort study/review article right here.

Objectives:
The association between serum folate and vitamin B12 levels and the risk of diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) remains unclear. Therefore, this review article (meta-analysis) has been conducted.

Do reduced serum levels of folate and vitamin B12 increase peripheral neuropathy risk among patients with type 2 diabetes?

Study design:
This review article included 16 studies of serum folate levels (1190 patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy and 1501 patients without diabetic peripheral neuropathy) and 18 studies of serum vitamin B12 levels (1239 patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy and 1562 patients without diabetic peripheral neuropathy) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found reduced serum levels of folate in patients with type 2 diabetes and diabetic peripheral neuropathy compared with patients with type 2 diabetes but without diabetic peripheral neuropathy [WMD = -1.64, 95% CI = -2.46 to -0.81].
A subgroup analysis confirmed this association in the Chinese population, but not in the Caucasian and mixed populations.

The investigators found reduced serum levels of vitamin B12 in patients with type 2 diabetes and diabetic peripheral neuropathy compared with patients with type 2 diabetes but without diabetic peripheral neuropathy [WMD = -70.86, 95% CI = -101.55 to -40.17].
A subgroup analysis confirmed this association in the Chinese population, but not in the Caucasian and mixed populations.

The investigators concluded reduced serum levels of folate and vitamin B12 increase peripheral neuropathy risk among patients with type 2 diabetes. These findings support the need for further controlled studies in defined patient populations and the importance of monitoring serum folate and vitamin B12 levels in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Original title:
Serum folate, vitamin B12 levels and diabetic peripheral neuropathy in type 2 diabetes: A meta-analysis by Wang D, Zhai JX and Liu DW.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28081987

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on diabetes, folate and vitamin B12 right here.

Diabetic peripheral neuropathy is a long-term complication of diabetes. Exposure to high blood glucose levels over an extended period of time causes damage to the peripheral nerves; the nerves that go to the arms, hands, legs and feet. It is one of many complications associated with diabetes, with nearly 60 percent of diabetics having some form of nerve damage.