Nutrition and health

Objectives:
Epidemiological studies that focus on the relationship between dietary isoflavone intake and the risk of breast cancer still lead to inconsistent conclusions. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Does a high isoflavone dietary intake reduce risk of breast cancer among women?

Study design:
This review article included 7 cohort studies and 17 case-control studies with a total of 902,438 females.
The verification of breast cancer in these studies was based on either a cancer registry record or a histological diagnosis.
The exposure assessment of all included studies was based on a food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) via either face-to-face interviews or self-administrative questionnaires.

The publication biases were evaluated using Begg’s test and Egger’s test. The shape of the funnel plots showed asymmetry [p = 0.001] and the Egger’s test found virtual publication bias [p 0.001]. However, the trim-and-fill method failed to identify any potentially missing studies, indicating the publication bias did not affect the results.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found in the meta-analysis a significantly reduced risk of 29% for breast cancer [summary OR = 0.71, 95% CI = 0.72 to 0.81, I2 = 82.6%] when comparing the highest to the lowest isoflavone dietary intake.
The result remained the same in sensitivity analysis.

The investigators found in subgroup analysis a statistically significant protective effect of 38% for isoflavone dietary intake on breast cancer in the case-control studies [OR = 0.62, 95% CI = 0.50 to 0.76], while no such effect was observed in the cohort studies [OR = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.86 to 1.02].

The investigators found in subgroup analysis a statistically significant protective effect of 38% for isoflavone dietary intake on breast cancer in Asian women [OR = 0.62, 95% CI = 0.52 to 0.74], while no such effect was observed in non-Asian women [OR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.88 to 1.06].

The investigators found when the highest isoflavone dietary intake was lower than 10 mg/d, the negative relationship between isoflavone dietary intake and breast cancer disappeared [OR = 1.01, 95% CI = 0.94 to 1.08], whereas a statistically significant protective effect of 37% [OR = 0.63, 95% CI = 0.53 to 0.75] was found, when the highest isoflavone dietary intake was above 10 mg/d.
However, a statistically significant difference in the protective effect of isoflavone dietary intake on breast cancer was observed regardless of whether the women were pre- or postmenopausal and regardless of whether they were ER positive or negative.

The investigators concluded at least 10 mg/d isoflavone dietary intake is helpful in reducing breast cancer risk, particularly among Asian women.

Original title:
Isoflavone Consumption and Risk of Breast Cancer: An Updated Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies by Yang J, Shen H,  […], Qin Y.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10224089/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on isoflavone and breast cancer right here.

Objectives:
Findings on the association of dietary intake and tissue biomarkers of linoleic acid (LA) with the risk of prostate cancer are conflicting. Also, no meta-analysis summarized available findings in this regard. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Do higher tissue levels or higher dietary intakes of linoleic acid reduce prostate cancer risk in men?

Study design:
This review article included 15 prospective cohort studies with 511,622 participants with an age range of ≥18 years.

During the follow-up periods ranging from 5 to 21 years, 39,993 cases of prostate cancer, 5,929 cases of advanced prostate cancer and 1,661 cases of fatal prostate cancer were detected.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found higher tissue levels of linoleic acid were significantly associated with a reduced risk of 14% for prostate cancer [RR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.77 to 0.96].   
However, a significant association was not seen for advanced prostate cancer [RR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.65 to 1.13].

The investigators found in dose-response analysis, each 5% increase in tissue levels of linoleic acid was significantly associated with a 14% lower risk of prostate cancer.

The investigators found no significant association between dietary intake of linoleic acid and risk of total [RR = 1.00, 95% CI = 0.97 to 1.04], advanced [RR = 0.98, 95% CI = 0.90 to 1.07] and fatal prostate cancer [RR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.83 to 1.13].
Not significant because RR of 1 was found in the 95% CI of 0.83 to 1.13. RR of 1 means no risk/association.

The investigators concluded higher tissue levels of linoleic acid reduce prostate cancer in men.

Original title:
Dietary intake and biomarkers of linoleic acid and risk of prostate cancer in men: A systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies by Yousefi M, Eshaghian N, […], Sadeghi O.

Link:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37077161/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on linoleic acid and prostate cancer right here.

Tissue levels of linoleic acid can be increased by eating foods that are high in linoleic acid and/or taking linoleic acid supplements.
 

Sunflower oil, corn oil, soybean oil, rice bran oil, canola (rapeseed) oil are high in linoleic acid.

Objectives:
Does a high dietary intake of vitamin B6 or a high blood PLP levels (vitamin B6 level in blood) reduce the risk of colorectal cancer?

Study design:
This review article included 20 cohort studies and 8 case-control studies.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found higher dietary intake of vitamin B6 significantly reduced the risk of colorectal cancer with 20% [combined OR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.68 to 0.94].

The investigators found higher blood PLP level significantly reduced the risk of colorectal cancer with 46% [combined OR = 0.54, 95% CI = 0.35 to 0.84].

The investigators found subgroup analysis revealed that higher dietary intake of vitamin B6 significantly reduced the risk of colorectal cancer in women with 21% [combined OR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.65 to 0.96].

The investigators found subgroup analysis revealed that higher blood PLP level significantly reduced the risk of colorectal cancer in women with 59% [combined OR = 0.41, 95% CI = 0.30 to 0.57].

The investigators found subgroup analysis revealed that higher dietary intake of vitamin B6 significantly reduced the risk of colon cancer in men and women with 24% [combined OR = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.64 to 0.91].

The investigators found subgroup analysis revealed that higher blood PLP level significantly reduced the risk of colon cancer in men and women with 44% [combined OR = 0.56, 95% CI = 0.42 to 0.73].

The investigators concluded that higher dietary intake of vitamin B6 and higher blood PLP level (vitamin B6 level in blood) reduce colorectal cancer risk, particularly colon cancer.

Original title:
Association Between Vitamin B6 and the Risk of Colorectal Cancer: A Meta-analysis of Observational Studies by Lai J, Guo M, […], Li J.

Link:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36961108/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on vitamin B6 and colorectal cancer right here.

Circulating concentration of vitamin B6 in blood can be increased by eating foods that are high in vitamin B6 and/or taking vitamin B6 supplements.
 

Objectives:
The associations between dietary intakes and circulating blood levels of methionine, choline or betaine and breast cancer risk remain currently unclear. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Do higher dietary intakes and circulating blood levels of methionine, choline or betaine reduce breast cancer risk?

Study design:
This review article included 8 prospective cohort studies and 10 case-control studies.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found in case-control studies that higher dietary choline intake significantly reduced breast cancer risk with 62% [OR = 0.38, 95% CI = 0.16 to 0.86].
However, this reduced risk was not significant in prospective cohort studies [HR = 1.01, 95% CI = 0.92 to 1.12].

The investigators concluded that higher choline dietary intake may reduce breast cancer risk. May reduce because this reduced risk is not found in cohort studies.

Original title:
The association between dietary intakes of methionine, choline and betaine and breast cancer risk: A systematic review and meta-analysis by Van Puyvelde H, Dimou N, […], De Bacquer D.

Link:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36701983/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on cohort studies/significantly, choline and breast cancer right here.

Objectives:
Lung cancer is the most common cause of cancer death. Fruits and vegetables containing carotenoids and other antioxidants have been hypothesized to decrease lung cancer risk. Therefore, this meta-analysis (systematic review) has been conducted.

Do fruits and vegetables reduce lung cancer risk?

Study design:
This review article included prospective cohort studies up to December 2014.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found in 18 studies, when comparing the highest fruits and vegetables with the lowest intakes, a significantly reduced risk of 14% for lung cancer [summary RR = 0.86 [95% CI = 0.78-0.94].

The investigators found in 25 studies, when comparing the highest vegetables with the lowest intakes, a significantly reduced risk of 8% for lung cancer [summary RR = 0.92 [95% CI = 0.87-0.97].

The investigators found in 29 studies, when comparing the highest fruits with the lowest intakes, a significantly reduced risk of 18% for lung cancer [summary RR = 0.82, 95% CI = 0.76-0.89].

The investigators found the association with fruit and vegetable intake was marginally significant in current smokers and inverse but not significant in former or never smokers.

The investigators found in 4 studies for each 100 g/day increase of fruits and vegetables, a significantly reduced risk of 4% for lung cancer [RR = 0.96, 95% CI = 0.94-0.98, I2 = 64%, n (cases) = 9,609].

The investigators found in 20 studies for each 100 g/day increase of vegetables, a significantly reduced risk of 6% for lung cancer [RR = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.89-0.98, I2 = 48%, n (cases) = 12,563].

The investigators found in 23 studies for each 100 g/day increase of fruits, a significantly reduced risk of 8% for lung cancer [RR = 0.92, 95% CI = 0.89-0.95, I2 = 57%, n (cases) = 14,506].

The investigators found the results were consistent among the different types of fruits and vegetables. However, the strength of the association differed across locations.

The investigators found evidence of a non-linear relationship [p 0.01] between fruit and vegetable intake and lung cancer risk showing that no further benefit is obtained when increasing consumption above ∼400g per day.

The investigators concluded fruits and/or vegetables intakes reduce risk of lung cancer with no further benefit when increasing consumption of fruits and vegetables above ∼400g per day.

Original title:
Fruits, vegetables and lung cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis by Vieira AR, Abar L, […], Norat T.

Link:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26371287

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on fruits and vegetables consumption and cancer right here.

Objectives:
Does allium vegetable consumption reduce gastric cancer risk?

Study design:
This review article included 22 case-control and 4 cohort studies with more than 10,000 cases.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found in 10 case-control and 4 cohort studies for the highest versus lowest allium vegetables intake category a significant reduced risk of 22% for gastric cancer [OR = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.67-0.91].

The investigators found in 12 case-control studies for the highest versus lowest garlic intake category a significant reduced risk of 40% for gastric cancer [OR = 0.60, 95% CI = 0.47-0.76].

The investigators found in 13 case-control studies for the highest versus lowest onion intake category a significant reduced risk of 45% for gastric cancer [OR = 0.55, 95% CI = 0.41-0.73].

The investigators found in 4 cohort studies for the highest versus lowest allium vegetables intake category a non-significant increased risk of 2% for gastric cancer [RR = 1.02, 95% CI = 0.88-1.18]. Non-significant means no association with 95% confidence.

The investigators concluded high allium vegetable consumption, like garlic and onion is likely to reduce gastric cancer risk. Likely because this evidence is derived mainly from case-control studies. Therefore, further data from large cohorts are desirable for conclusive confirmation.

Original title:
Allium vegetable intake and gastric cancer: a case-control study and meta-analysis by Turati F, Pelucchi C, […], Galeone C.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25215621

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more studies/information on allium vegetable consumption and cancer right here.

Objectives:
There are conflicting reports on the correlation between manganese (Mn) levels and breast cancer. Therefore, this review article (meta-analysis) has been conducted.

Does manganese deficiency increase risk of breast cancer?

Study design:
This review article included 11 case-control studies involving 1302 subjects.

There was no evidence of publication bias. Sensitivity analysis showed that excluding any one study from the pooled analysis did not vary the results substantially.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found the random-effects meta-analysis results indicated that subjects with breast cancer had lower manganese levels in serum and hair than healthy controls [SMD = -1.51, 95% CI = -2.47 to -0.56, I2 = 97.8%, p 0.001].

The investigators found in subgroup analysis that subjects with breast cancer had lower manganese levels than healthy controls in China [SMD = -1.32, 95% CI = -2.33 to -0.32] and Korea [SMD = -4.08, 95% CI = -4.63 to -3.54], but not in Turkey [SMD = -0.96, 95% CI = -3.19 to 1.27].

The investigators found in subgroup analysis that the differences of manganese levels between patients with breast cancer and healthy controls were similar in different sample specimens:
serum [SMD = -1.24, 95% CI = -2.31 to -0.16];
hair [SMD = -1.99, 95% CI = -3.91 to -0.06] and;
different types of manganese measurement:

ICP-AAS [SMD = -1.14, 95% CI = -2.24 to -0.04];
GFAAS [SMD = -1.94, 95% CI = -2.38 to -1.49];
ICP-AES [SMD = -3.77, 95% CI = -4.70 to -2.85]. These findings can well explain that  the between-study variability was the main source of heterogeneity.

The investigators concluded there is an association between deficient manganese concentration and breast cancer. However, the subgroup analysis found that there was contradiction regarding races and geography, like China and Turkey. Thus this finding needs further confirmation by trans-regional multicenter, long-term observation in a cohort design to obtain better understanding of causal relationships between manganese levels and breast cancer, through measuring manganese at baseline to investigate whether the highest manganese category versus lowest was associated with breast cancer risk.

Original title:
The association between deficient manganese levels and breast cancer: a meta-analysis by Shen F, Cai WS, [...],Xu B.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4443096/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more studies/information on manganese and breast cancer right here.

Objectives:
Is there an association of intake of different vitamins and multiple-vitamin supplements and the incidence of colorectal cancer?

Study design:
This review article included 47 articles (cohort studies).

There was unacceptable heterogeneity for studies of multiple-vitamin supplements, so findings were inconclusive.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found a significant reduced risk of 12% [multivariable-adjusted RR = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.81-0.95] for colorectal cancer when comparing the highest versus lowest dietary vitamin B9 (folate) intake. Significant means that there is an association with a 95% confidence.

The investigators found a significant reduced risk of 13% [multivariable-adjusted RR = 0.87, 95% CI = 0.77-0.99] for colorectal cancer when comparing the highest versus lowest dietary vitamin D intake. Significant because RR of 1 was not found in the 95% CI of 0.77 to 0.99. RR of 1 means no risk/association.

The investigators found a significant reduced risk of 12% [multivariable-adjusted RR = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.79-0.99] for colorectal cancer when comparing the highest versus lowest dietary vitamin B6 intake.

The investigators found a significant reduced risk of 14% [multivariable-adjusted RR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.76-0.97] for colorectal cancer when comparing the highest versus lowest dietary vitamin B2 intake.

The investigators found, however, no association between both dietary vitamine A, C, E, B3 and B12 and the risk of colorectal cancer.

The investigators concluded high dietary vitamin B9 (folate), D, B6 and B2 intake reduces risk of colorectal cancer, but further study is needed.

Original title:
Vitamin and multiple-vitamin supplement intake and incidence of colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis of cohort studies by Liu Y, Yu Q, […], Li K.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25491145

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more studies/information on vitamines and colorectal cancer right here.

Objectives:
Red meat intake has been associated with risk of colorectal cancer, potentially mediated through heterocyclic amines. The metabolic efficiency of N-acetyltransferase 2 (NAT2) required for the metabolic activation of such amines is influenced by genetic variation. The interaction between red meat intake, NAT2 genotype and colorectal cancer has been inconsistently reported. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Is there an interaction between red meat intake, NAT2 genotype and colorectal cancer?

Study design:
This review article included 11 retrospective case-control studies with 8,290 colorectal cancer cases and 9,115 controls (subjects without colorectal cancer).

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found the highest quartile of red meat intake was associated with a 41% increased risk of colorectal cancer compared with the lowest quartile [OR = 1.41, 95% CI = 1.29-1.55].
However, a significant association was observed only for studies with retrospective diet data, not for studies with diet prospectively assessed before cancer diagnosis.

The investigators found when combining all studies, high red meat intake was similarly associated with colorectal cancer in those with a rapid/intermediate NAT2 genotype [OR = 1.38, 95% CI = 1.20-1.59] as with a slow genotype [OR = 1.43, 95% CI = 1.28-1.61, p interaction = 0.9].

The investigators concluded high red meat intake was associated with increased risk of colorectal cancer only from retrospective case-control studies and not modified by NAT2 enzyme activity.

Original title:
Red Meat Intake, NAT2, and Risk of Colorectal Cancer: A Pooled Analysis of 11 Studies by Ananthakrishnan AN, Du M, […], Chan AT.

Link:
http://cebp.aacrjournals.org/content/cebp/24/1/198.full.pdf

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more studies/information on red meat consumption and colorectal cancer right here.