Nutrition and health

Objectives:
Previous studies suggest that dietary vitamin C is inversely associated with gastric cancer (GC), but most of them did not consider intake of fruit and vegetables. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Do higher dietary vitamin C intakes reduce gastric cancer risk after adjusting for intake of fruit and vegetables?

Study design:
This review article included 14 case-control studies with in total 5,362 cases (persons with gastric cancer) and 11,497 controls (persons without gastric cancer).

More cases were male (61.88% vs. 54.64%), older than 60 years (63.37% vs. 57.87%) and had low socioeconomic status (57.29% vs. 45.66%) compared with controls. 
In addition, a higher proportion of cases than controls were obese (21.34% vs. 19.06%), current smokers (26.58% vs. 24.14%) and ever drinkers (64.85 vs. 63.29%). 
Similarly, H. pylori seropositivity (63.82% vs. 61.86%) was more common among cases than among controls when considering only participants from the 7 studies with available information. 
A larger proportion of controls reported high intake of fruit and vegetables compared with cases. 
Most cases were of noncardia (57.03%) and intestinal type gastric cancer (33.01%). 
Cases had a lower median intake of vitamin C and fewer of them were in the highest quartiles of intake compared with controls.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found individuals in the highest quartile of dietary vitamin C intake had a significantly reduced risk of 36% for gastric cancer compared with those in the lowest quartile [OR = 0.64, 95% CI = 0.58 to 0.72]. 

The investigators found, however, when additionally adjusting for BMI and intake of fruit and vegetables, the observed association was attenuated and the OR for the highest versus lowest quartile of dietary vitamin C was 0.85 [95% CI = 0.73 to 0.98].

The investigators found a significant inverse association for noncardia gastric cancer, as well as for both intestinal and diffuse types of the disease. 

The investigators found dose-response analysis showed decreasing ORs of gastric cancer up to 150-200 mg/day of vitamin C [OR = 0.54, 95% CI = 0.41 to 0.71], whereas ORs for higher intakes were close to 1.0. 

The investigators concluded that consumption of 150-200 mg/day of vitamin C reduce gastric cancer risk. However, further well-designed prospective studies, aimed at disentangling the complex relationships between intake of fruit and vegetables, vitamins and other antioxidants and gastric cancer, are warranted to prove causality of the observed relationship between vitamin C and gastric cancer.

Original title: 
Dietary intake of vitamin C and gastric cancer: a pooled analysis within the Stomach cancer Pooling (StoP) Project by Sassano M, Seyyedsalehi  MS, […], Boffetta P. 

 

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11016516/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on cohort studies/significantly, viamin C and cancer right here. 

Objectives:
The association between soy product consumption and cancer risk varies among studies. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Do higher soy product consumption reduce cancer risk?

Study design:
This review article included 17 cohort studies and 35 case-control studies with a total of 861,372 participants and 44,932 cases (persons with cancer). 

Regarding quality assessment, the case-control studies achieved an average score of 6.7. The mean score of the cohort study was 7.2, which satisfied the criterion of high quality. 
All analyses adjusted for age and most studies adjusted for smoking status (n = 38), drinking status (n = 29), total energy intake (n = 27), BMI (n = 26) and education level (n = 26). 

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found in pooled analysis of cohort studies and case-control studies that higher consumption of total soy products significantly reduced risk of cancer with 31% [RR = 0.69, 95% CI = 0.60 to 0.80, I2 = 82.7%, p < 0.001]. 
However, this reduced risk was not significant in cohort studies (RR = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.80 to 1.01].

The investigators found higher tofu consumption significantly reduced cancer risk in both men and women.

The investigators found higher consumption of total soy products significantly reduced risk of cancer amond women with 24% [RR = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.65 to 0.89].

The investigators found in subgroup analysis that higher consumption of total soy products was significantly associated with a reduced risk for gastrointestinal cancer [RR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.61 to 0.89], prostate cancer [RR = 0.47, 95% CI = 0.31 to 0.71], lung cancer [RR = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.52 to 0.86], upper aerodigestive tract cancer [RR = 0.33, 95% CI = 0.22 to 0.49] and multiple myeloma [RR = 0.10, 95% CI = 0.01 to 0.97], but not in bladder or liver cancer.

The investigators found in pooled analysis of cohort studies and case-control studies that higher consumption of tofu significantly reduced risk of cancer with 22% [RR = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.70 to 0.86, I2 = 47.9%, p = 0.004]. 
However, this reduced risk was not significant in cohort studies [RR = 0.89, 95% CI = 0.78 to 1.01, p = 0.186].

The investigators found in pooled analysis of cohort studies and case-control studies that higher consumption of soymilk significantly reduced risk of cancer with 25% [RR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.60 to 0.86, I2 = 47.9%, p = 0.004]. 
However, this reduced risk was not significant in cohort studies [RR = 1.10, 95% CI = 0.76 to 1.58].

The investigators found a 54g per day increment of total soy products significantly reduced cancer risk by 11%, a 61g per day increment of tofu significantly reduced cancer risk by 12%, and a 23g per day increment of soymilk significantly reduced cancer risk by 28%, while none of the other soy products were associated with cancer risk. 

The investigators concluded that daily consumption of 54g total soy products, 61g tofu or 23g soymilk is associated with a lower cancer risk. More prospective cohort studies are still needed to confirm the causal relationship between soy product consumption and cancer risk.

Original title: 
Soy Product Consumption and the Risk of Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies by Wang C, Ding K, […], Hong H. 

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11013307/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on cohort studies/significantly, soy and cancer right here. 

Objectives:
Carotenoids appear to have anticancer effects. Prospective evidence for the relation between serum carotenoids and breast cancer is controversial. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Do higher carotenoids levels (likes, α-carotene, β-carotene, β-cryptoxanthin, lycopene, zeaxanthin and lutein) reduce breast cancer risk among women?

Study design:
This review article included 17 nested case-control studies and 1 cohort study, published between 1984 and 2016 with a total of 20,188 participants. 
Median follow-up ranged from 8 months to 21 years during which 7,608 breast cancer cases were reported. 
All studies assessed circulating carotenoids using high-performance liquid chromatography. The majority of studies carried out on circulating carotenoids and the risk of breast cancer were adjusted for the following variables: BMI (n = 9), dietary variables (n = 8), age (n = 9), alcohol (n = 6), age at menarche (n = 6) and age at first birth (n = 8). 
According to the quality assessment, except for 2 studies, other publications had high quality. 

There was no publication bias. 

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found that the highest levels of total carotenoids compared to the lowest were significantly related to a 24% lower risk of breast cancer [relative risk (RR) = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.62 to 0.93, I2 = 45.6%, p = 0.075]. 
According to the sensitivity analysis, no study affected the overall RR. 

The investigators found according to linear dose-response analysis, the risk of breast cancer decreased by 2% for every 10 μg/dL of total carotenoids [RR = 0.98, 95% CI = 0.97 to 0.99]. A steady drop in the risk of breast cancer was observed for total carotenoid concentrations <1200 μg/dL followed by a plateau. The level of evidence was graded as low.

The investigators found that the highest levels of α-carotene compared to the lowest were significantly related to a 23% lower risk of breast cancer [relative risk (RR) = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.68 to 0.87, I2 = 0.0%, p = 0.48]. 
According to the sensitivity analysis, no study affected the overall RR. 

The investigators found according to linear dose-response analysis, the risk of breast cancer decreased by 22% for every 10 μg/dL of α-carotene [RR = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.66 to 0.93]. 
No evidence for nonlinear association was found. The level of evidence was graded as low. 

The investigators found that the highest levels of β-carotene compared to the lowest were significantly related to a 20% lower risk of breast cancer [relative risk (RR) = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.65 to 0.98, I2 = 56.5%, p = 0.004]. 
According to the sensitivity analysis, no study affected the overall RR. 

The investigators found according to linear dose-response analysis, the risk of breast cancer decreased by 4% for every 10 μg/dL of β-carotene [RR = 0.96, 95% CI = 0.93 to 0.99]. No evidence for nonlinear association was found. The level of evidence was graded as low. 

The investigators found that the highest levels of β-cryptoxanthin compared to the lowest were significantly related to a 15% lower risk of breast cancer [relative risk (RR) = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.74 to 0.96, I2 = 0.0%, p = 0.80]. 
According to the sensitivity analysis, no study affected the overall RR. 

The investigators found according to linear dose-response analysis, the risk of breast cancer decreased by 10% for every 10 μg/dL of β-cryptoxanthin [RR = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.82 to 0.99]. 

The investigators found that the highest levels of lycopene compared to the lowest were significantly related to a 14% lower risk of breast cancer [relative risk (RR) = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.76 to 0.98, I2 = 0.0%, p = 0.46]. 
According to the sensitivity analysis, no study affected the overall RR. 

The investigators found that the highest levels of lutein compared to the lowest were significantly related to a 30% lower risk of breast cancer [relative risk (RR) = 0.70, 95% CI = 0.52 to 0.93, I2 = 17.1%, p = 0.30]. 
According to the sensitivity analysis, no study affected the overall RR. 

The investigators concluded that higher levels of carotenoids, α-carotene, β-carotene, β-cryptoxanthin, lycopene and lutein are related to a decreased risk of breast cancer. Additionally, each 10 μg/dL of total carotenoids, α-carotene, β-carotene and β-cryptoxanthin reduce breast cancer risk with 2%, 22%, 4% and 10%, respectively. 

Original title: 
The Association between Circulating Carotenoids and Risk of Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Studies by Dehnavi MK, Ebrahimpour-Koujan S, […], Azadbakht L.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10694674/ 

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on cohort studies/significantly, carotenoids and breast cancer right here. 

Objectives:
Lung cancer is the most common cause of cancer death. Fruits and vegetables containing carotenoids and other antioxidants have been hypothesized to decrease lung cancer risk. Therefore, this meta-analysis (systematic review) has been conducted.

Do fruits and vegetables reduce lung cancer risk?

Study design:
This review article included prospective cohort studies up to December 2014.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found in 18 studies, when comparing the highest fruits and vegetables with the lowest intakes, a significantly reduced risk of 14% for lung cancer [summary RR = 0.86 [95% CI = 0.78-0.94].

The investigators found in 25 studies, when comparing the highest vegetables with the lowest intakes, a significantly reduced risk of 8% for lung cancer [summary RR = 0.92 [95% CI = 0.87-0.97].

The investigators found in 29 studies, when comparing the highest fruits with the lowest intakes, a significantly reduced risk of 18% for lung cancer [summary RR = 0.82, 95% CI = 0.76-0.89].

The investigators found the association with fruit and vegetable intake was marginally significant in current smokers and inverse but not significant in former or never smokers.

The investigators found in 4 studies for each 100 g/day increase of fruits and vegetables, a significantly reduced risk of 4% for lung cancer [RR = 0.96, 95% CI = 0.94-0.98, I2 = 64%, n (cases) = 9,609].

The investigators found in 20 studies for each 100 g/day increase of vegetables, a significantly reduced risk of 6% for lung cancer [RR = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.89-0.98, I2 = 48%, n (cases) = 12,563].

The investigators found in 23 studies for each 100 g/day increase of fruits, a significantly reduced risk of 8% for lung cancer [RR = 0.92, 95% CI = 0.89-0.95, I2 = 57%, n (cases) = 14,506].

The investigators found the results were consistent among the different types of fruits and vegetables. However, the strength of the association differed across locations.

The investigators found evidence of a non-linear relationship [p 0.01] between fruit and vegetable intake and lung cancer risk showing that no further benefit is obtained when increasing consumption above ∼400g per day.

The investigators concluded fruits and/or vegetables intakes reduce risk of lung cancer with no further benefit when increasing consumption of fruits and vegetables above ∼400g per day.

Original title:
Fruits, vegetables and lung cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis by Vieira AR, Abar L, […], Norat T.

Link:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26371287

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on fruits and vegetables consumption and cancer right here.

Objectives:
Does allium vegetable consumption reduce gastric cancer risk?

Study design:
This review article included 22 case-control and 4 cohort studies with more than 10,000 cases.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found in 10 case-control and 4 cohort studies for the highest versus lowest allium vegetables intake category a significant reduced risk of 22% for gastric cancer [OR = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.67-0.91].

The investigators found in 12 case-control studies for the highest versus lowest garlic intake category a significant reduced risk of 40% for gastric cancer [OR = 0.60, 95% CI = 0.47-0.76].

The investigators found in 13 case-control studies for the highest versus lowest onion intake category a significant reduced risk of 45% for gastric cancer [OR = 0.55, 95% CI = 0.41-0.73].

The investigators found in 4 cohort studies for the highest versus lowest allium vegetables intake category a non-significant increased risk of 2% for gastric cancer [RR = 1.02, 95% CI = 0.88-1.18]. Non-significant means no association with 95% confidence.

The investigators concluded high allium vegetable consumption, like garlic and onion is likely to reduce gastric cancer risk. Likely because this evidence is derived mainly from case-control studies. Therefore, further data from large cohorts are desirable for conclusive confirmation.

Original title:
Allium vegetable intake and gastric cancer: a case-control study and meta-analysis by Turati F, Pelucchi C, […], Galeone C.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25215621

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more studies/information on allium vegetable consumption and cancer right here.

Objectives:
There are conflicting reports on the correlation between manganese (Mn) levels and breast cancer. Therefore, this review article (meta-analysis) has been conducted.

Does manganese deficiency increase risk of breast cancer?

Study design:
This review article included 11 case-control studies involving 1302 subjects.

There was no evidence of publication bias. Sensitivity analysis showed that excluding any one study from the pooled analysis did not vary the results substantially.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found the random-effects meta-analysis results indicated that subjects with breast cancer had lower manganese levels in serum and hair than healthy controls [SMD = -1.51, 95% CI = -2.47 to -0.56, I2 = 97.8%, p 0.001].

The investigators found in subgroup analysis that subjects with breast cancer had lower manganese levels than healthy controls in China [SMD = -1.32, 95% CI = -2.33 to -0.32] and Korea [SMD = -4.08, 95% CI = -4.63 to -3.54], but not in Turkey [SMD = -0.96, 95% CI = -3.19 to 1.27].

The investigators found in subgroup analysis that the differences of manganese levels between patients with breast cancer and healthy controls were similar in different sample specimens:
serum [SMD = -1.24, 95% CI = -2.31 to -0.16];
hair [SMD = -1.99, 95% CI = -3.91 to -0.06] and;
different types of manganese measurement:

ICP-AAS [SMD = -1.14, 95% CI = -2.24 to -0.04];
GFAAS [SMD = -1.94, 95% CI = -2.38 to -1.49];
ICP-AES [SMD = -3.77, 95% CI = -4.70 to -2.85]. These findings can well explain that  the between-study variability was the main source of heterogeneity.

The investigators concluded there is an association between deficient manganese concentration and breast cancer. However, the subgroup analysis found that there was contradiction regarding races and geography, like China and Turkey. Thus this finding needs further confirmation by trans-regional multicenter, long-term observation in a cohort design to obtain better understanding of causal relationships between manganese levels and breast cancer, through measuring manganese at baseline to investigate whether the highest manganese category versus lowest was associated with breast cancer risk.

Original title:
The association between deficient manganese levels and breast cancer: a meta-analysis by Shen F, Cai WS, [...],Xu B.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4443096/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more studies/information on manganese and breast cancer right here.

Objectives:
Is there an association of intake of different vitamins and multiple-vitamin supplements and the incidence of colorectal cancer?

Study design:
This review article included 47 articles (cohort studies).

There was unacceptable heterogeneity for studies of multiple-vitamin supplements, so findings were inconclusive.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found a significant reduced risk of 12% [multivariable-adjusted RR = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.81-0.95] for colorectal cancer when comparing the highest versus lowest dietary vitamin B9 (folate) intake. Significant means that there is an association with a 95% confidence.

The investigators found a significant reduced risk of 13% [multivariable-adjusted RR = 0.87, 95% CI = 0.77-0.99] for colorectal cancer when comparing the highest versus lowest dietary vitamin D intake. Significant because RR of 1 was not found in the 95% CI of 0.77 to 0.99. RR of 1 means no risk/association.

The investigators found a significant reduced risk of 12% [multivariable-adjusted RR = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.79-0.99] for colorectal cancer when comparing the highest versus lowest dietary vitamin B6 intake.

The investigators found a significant reduced risk of 14% [multivariable-adjusted RR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.76-0.97] for colorectal cancer when comparing the highest versus lowest dietary vitamin B2 intake.

The investigators found, however, no association between both dietary vitamine A, C, E, B3 and B12 and the risk of colorectal cancer.

The investigators concluded high dietary vitamin B9 (folate), D, B6 and B2 intake reduces risk of colorectal cancer, but further study is needed.

Original title:
Vitamin and multiple-vitamin supplement intake and incidence of colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis of cohort studies by Liu Y, Yu Q, […], Li K.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25491145

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more studies/information on vitamines and colorectal cancer right here.

Objectives:
Red meat intake has been associated with risk of colorectal cancer, potentially mediated through heterocyclic amines. The metabolic efficiency of N-acetyltransferase 2 (NAT2) required for the metabolic activation of such amines is influenced by genetic variation. The interaction between red meat intake, NAT2 genotype and colorectal cancer has been inconsistently reported. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Is there an interaction between red meat intake, NAT2 genotype and colorectal cancer?

Study design:
This review article included 11 retrospective case-control studies with 8,290 colorectal cancer cases and 9,115 controls (subjects without colorectal cancer).

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found the highest quartile of red meat intake was associated with a 41% increased risk of colorectal cancer compared with the lowest quartile [OR = 1.41, 95% CI = 1.29-1.55].
However, a significant association was observed only for studies with retrospective diet data, not for studies with diet prospectively assessed before cancer diagnosis.

The investigators found when combining all studies, high red meat intake was similarly associated with colorectal cancer in those with a rapid/intermediate NAT2 genotype [OR = 1.38, 95% CI = 1.20-1.59] as with a slow genotype [OR = 1.43, 95% CI = 1.28-1.61, p interaction = 0.9].

The investigators concluded high red meat intake was associated with increased risk of colorectal cancer only from retrospective case-control studies and not modified by NAT2 enzyme activity.

Original title:
Red Meat Intake, NAT2, and Risk of Colorectal Cancer: A Pooled Analysis of 11 Studies by Ananthakrishnan AN, Du M, […], Chan AT.

Link:
http://cebp.aacrjournals.org/content/cebp/24/1/198.full.pdf

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more studies/information on red meat consumption and colorectal cancer right here.