Nutrition and health

Objectives:
The purpose of this review article is to review previously published meta-analyses on the effectiveness of dietary fiber on type 2 diabetes.

Study design:
This umbrella review article included 16 meta-analyses.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found in the meta-analyses when comparing highest versus lowest dietary fiber intake, a statistically significant reduced risk of 15 to 19% [RR = 0.81-0.85] for type 2 diabetes. However, statistically significant heterogeneity was observed in all of these meta-analyses.

The investigators found in the meta-analyses when comparing highest versus lowest dietary cereal fibers, a statistically significant reduced risk of 13 to 33% [RR = 0.67-0.87] for type 2 diabetes. However, statistically significant heterogeneity was observed in all of these meta-analyses.

The investigators found in the meta-analyses of supplementation studies using β-glucan or psyllium fibers on type 2 diabetic participants, statistically significant reductions were identified in both fasting blood glucose concentrations and glycosylated hemoglobin percentages.

The investigators concluded that those consuming the highest amounts of dietary fiber, especially cereal fiber, may benefit from a reduction in the incidence of developing type 2 diabetes. May benefit because statistically significant heterogeneity was observed in all of these meta-analyses.
There also appears to be a small reduction in fasting blood glucose concentration, as well as a small reduction in glycosylated hemoglobin percentage for individuals with type 2 diabetes who add β-glucan or psyllium to their daily dietary intake.

Original title:
Dietary Fiber Intake and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: An Umbrella Review of Meta-analyses by McRae MP.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29628808

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on diabetes, meta-analyses/heterogeneity and dietary fiber right here.

 

Objectives:
The association between dietary protein intake and type 2 diabetes risk has been inconsistent in the previous epidemiological studies. Therefore, this review article (meta-analysis) has been conducted.

Is there an association between dietary protein intake and type 2 diabetes risk?

Study design:
This review article included 10 prospective cohort studies with a total of 34,221 type 2 diabetes cases.
No publication bias was detected.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found after adjustment of potential confounders, a 5% of energy (5 En%) increment from dietary total protein intake was related to a significantly 9% [95 CI = 1.04-1.13, I2 = 42.0%] higher risk of type 2 diabetes. The results were robust in sensitivity analysis.

The investigators found after adjustment of potential confounders, a 5% of energy (5 En%) increment from dietary animal protein intake was related to a significantly 12% [95 CI = 1.08-1.17, I2 = 14.0%] higher risk of type 2 diabetes. The results were robust in sensitivity analysis.

The investigators found after adjustment of potential confounders, a significant U-shaped curve was observed for plant protein intake with the most risk reduction at about 6% of energy from plant protein intake [p nonlinearity = 0.001]. The results were robust in sensitivity analysis.

The investigators concluded that the consumption of protein, particularly animal protein increases risk of type 2 diabetes.

Original title:
Dietary protein intake and risk of type 2 diabetes: a dose-response meta-analysis of prospective studies by Zhao LG, Zhang QL, [...], Xiang YB.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29858629

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on diabetes and protein right here.

 

Objectives:
The association between coffee consumption and the level of C-reactive protein (CRP) has been evaluated in several epidemiological studies with conflicting results. Therefore, this meta-analysis (systematic review) has been conducted.

Does coffee consumption reduce level of C-reactive protein in humans?

Study design:
This review article included a total of 9 cross-sectional studies.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found according to the combined standard mean difference (SMD) between the highest and the lowest coffee intake category, coffee consumption was associated with a significantly lower level of serum CRP level [SMD = -0.34, 95% CI = -0.62 to -0.06, p = 0.016].

The investigators found subgroup analysis for CRP marker showed that coffee consumption was associated with a significantly lower level of serum high-sensitivity CRP (hsCRP) [SMD = -0.51, 95% CI = -0.88 to -0.14, p = 0.007], but not standard CRP [SMD = 0.02, 95% CI = -0.28 to 0.32, p = 0.913].

The investigators concluded that coffee consumption is associated with a lower level of serum CRP, particularly serum high-sensitivity CRP. However, more well-designed prospective cohort studies are needed to elaborate the concerned issues further.

Original title:
Is coffee consumption associated with a lower level of serum C-reactive protein? A meta-analysis of observational studies by Zhang Y and Zhang DZ.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29405789

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on coffee and chronic disease right here.

 

Objectives:
Epidemiological studies exploring the role of flavonoids intake in preventing type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) showed inconsistent results. Therefore, this review article (meta-analysis) has been conducted.

Does flavonoids intake decrease risk of developing type 2 diabetes?

Study design:
This review article included 10 independent cohorts published between 2002 and 2017 with a total of 312,015 participants, of which 19,953 type 2 diabetes cases were identified during the follow-up periods from 4 to 28 years.
All participants were free of type 2 diabetes at baseline (at the beginning of the study), with age ranging from 28 to 75 years.
Dietary flavonoids intake was evaluated using food-frequency questionnaire and type 2 diabetes was frequently ascertained through medical records.
In the original studies, the median intake level of total flavonoids was 8.9 to 501.8 mg/day for the lowest categories and 33.2 to 1452.3 mg/day for the highest categories.
The most commonly adjusted variables included age, sex, total energy intake, body mass index, smoking, alcohol consumption and physical activity.
All included studies had a NOS score of ≥7, with an average score of 7.9, indicating the presence of high methodological quality.

There was no indication of publication bias from visual inspection of the funnel plot, which was further confirmed by Egger test [p = 0.253].

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found when compared with the lowest intake, the highest intake of total flavonoids was associated with a significantly 9% decreased risk of type 2 diabetes [RR = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.86-0.96, I2  =  21%, p =  0.257].
In stratified analyses, the pooled RR for total flavonoids intake was not modified by sample size, sex, follow-up duration and study location.
Leave-one-out sensitivity analysis showed that no individual study had a significant influence on the final result.

The investigators found in subgroup analyses when compared with the lowest intake, the highest intake of anthocyanidins significantly decreased risk of type 2 diabetes with 11% [RR = 0.89, 95% CI = 0.82-0.95].

The investigators found in subgroup analyses when compared with the lowest intake, the highest intake of flavan-3-ols significantly decreased risk of type 2 diabetes with 14% [RR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.78-0.95].

The investigators found in subgroup analyses when compared with the lowest intake, the highest intake of flavonols significantly decreased risk of type 2 diabetes with 14% [RR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.80-0.94].

The investigators found in subgroup analyses when compared with the lowest intake, the highest intake of isoflavones significantly decreased risk of type 2 diabetes with 9% [RR = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.84-0.98].

The investigators found in 9 cohort studies a curvilinear relationship between total flavonoids intake and type 2 diabetes risk [p for nonlinearity = 0.042] with a significant risk reduction at an intake of ≥550 mg/day.

The investigators found when assuming a linear association, the risk of type 2 diabetes was reduced by 5% [RR = 0.95, 95% CI = 0.93-0.97] for each 300-mg/day increment in total flavonoids intake.

The investigators concluded that intakes of total flavonoids, particularly ≥550 mg/day, anthocyanidins, flavan-3-ols, flavonols and isoflavones are associated with significantly decreased risks of type 2 diabetes in the highest versus lowest analyses. Additionally, the dose-response analysis suggest a curvilinear relationship of total flavonoids intake with type 2 diabetes risk; when assuming a linear manner, the risk of type 2 diabetes is reduced by 5% for an increment of 300 mg/day in total flavonoids intake.

Original title:
Flavonoids intake and risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus: A meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies by Xu H, Luo J, [...], Wen Q.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5959406/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on diabetes and flavonoids right here.

Objectives:
There is an increasing trend in the consumption of poor-quality diets worldwide, contributing to the increase of non-communicable diseases. Diet directly influences physiological composition and subsequently physical health. Studies have shown that dietary macronutrient and energy content can influence the proportion of intramuscular fat (IMF), which mediates various metabolic and endocrine dysfunction. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Do different types of dietary macronutrient intake increase the proportion of intramuscular fat?

Study design:
This review article included 13 trials (RCTs, quasi-RCTs, controlled trials, randomized controlled crossover trials or controlled crossover trials).

High-fat diets were diets with a proportion of fat between 38 and 85 En%. Participants in high-fat diets were all young to middle aged adults with ages varying between 18 and 50 years.

Participants in starvation diets (a decrease of 25% calorie from weight maintenance energy requirements) and hypocaloric diets (890 calories per day, until 15% weight reduction) followed the diet for 8 days with a 3-week washout period in between.

Cohen’s criteria were used to determine the effect size of SMDs, where a SMD between 0.2 and 0.5 is small, a SMD between 0.5 and 0.8 is moderate and a SMD above 0.8 is large. SMDs below 0.2 were considered unsubstantial.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found in 6 studies with in a total of 134 participants receiving a high-fat intervention and 135 people receiving a control intervention, that high-fat diets (38 and 85 En% fat) significantly increased the proportion of intramuscular fat [SMD = 1.24, 95% CI = 0.43-2.05, p  = 0.003, I2 = 87%].  
Sensitivity analysis (excluding studies with a quality value 20, smallest sample size 8 and those that do not specify participant characteristics) showed a significantly SMD of 1.26 [95% CI = 0.23-2.28, p = 0.02]. 

The investigators found diets with an increased proportion of carbohydrates decreased the proportion of intramuscular fat.
However, increasing caloric intake with carbohydrates compared to a standardized diet (55 En% carbohydrates, 30 En% fat and 15 En% protein) increased the proportion of intramuscular fat.

The investigators found starvation diets (a decrease of 25% calorie from weight maintenance energy requirements) increased intramuscular fat stores and hypocaloric diets (890 calories per day, until 15% weight reduction) did not result in any intramuscular fat proportion changes.

The investigators concluded that high-fat diets (38 y 85 En%), excessive caloric intake in the form of carbohydrates and short-term starvation diets are associated with increases in the proportion of intramuscular fat. However, further studies are needed to assess the effects of macronutrient combinations on intramuscular fat and the influence of diet-induced intramuscular fat alterations on health outcomes. In addition, intramuscular fat poses a possibly effective clinical marker of health.

Original title:
The Effects of Diet on the Proportion of Intramuscular Fat in Human Muscle: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis by Ahmed S, Singh D, [...], Kumbhare D.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5826234/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on fat and carbohydrates consumption and diabetes right here.

Higher intramuscular fat levels are positively associated with insulin resistance and an increased risk of developing type 2 diabetes.

Objectives:
Observationally, homocysteine is associated with higher risk of diabetes. Folate, which reduces homocysteine, is promising for the prevention and treatment of diabetes. Previous meta-analysis (review) of 3 trials suggested folate might lower hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c). Therefore, this review article (meta-analysis) has been conducted.

Have folic acid supplementation positive effects on insulin resistance and glycemic control, like HbA1c level and fasting glucose level?

Study design:
This review article included 18 RCTs with in total of 21,081 people with/without diabetes.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found that folic acid (folate) supplementation significantly reduced fasting glucose level with 0.15 mmol/L [95% CI = -0.29 to -0.01]. Significant means that there is an association with a 95% confidence.

The investigators found that folic acid (folate) supplementation significantly reduced homeostatic model assessment-insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) with 0.83 [95% CI = -1.31 to -0.34].

The investigators found that folic acid (folate) supplementation significantly reduced fasting insulin level with 1.94 μIU/mL [95% CI = -3.28 to -0.61].

The investigators found that folic acid (folate) supplementation had no clear effect on diabetes or HbA1c level.

The investigators concluded that folic acid (folate) supplementation reduces both fasting glucose level, fasting insulin level and homeostatic model assessment-insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) but it has no effect on diabetes or HbA1c level.

Original title:
The effects of folate supplementation on glucose metabolism and risk of type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials by Zhao JV, Schooling CM and Zhao JX.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29501221

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on diabetes and folic acid right here.

Patients with diabetes often have both an increased fasting glucose level, HOMA-IR value and fasting insulin level.

Objectives:
The increasing prevalence of diabetes in the United Kingdom and worldwide calls for new approaches to its management and diets with low glycaemic index have been proposed as a useful means for managing glucose response. However, there are conflicting reports and differences in the results of studies in terms of their effectiveness. Furthermore, the impact of low-glycaemic index diets (low GI-diets) and their long-term use in patients with type 2 diabetes remains unclear. Therefore, this review article (meta-analysis) has been conducted.

Do patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus benefit from low-GI diets?

Study design:
This review article included 6 RCTs.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found in 2 RCTs that low-glycaemic index (low-GI) diet resulted in a significant improvement in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) [0.05]:
low-GI diet Δ = -0.5% [95% CI = -0.61% to -0.39%] vs. high-cereal fibre diet Δ = -0.18% [95% CI = -0.29% to -0.07%] and;
low-GI legume diet Δ = -0.5% [95% = -0.6% to -0.4%] vs. high-wheat fibre diet Δ = -0.3% [95% Cl = -0.4 to -0.2%].

The investigators found in 4 RCTs significant improvements in fasting blood glucose in low-GI diets compared to higher-GI diets or control:
low-GI diet = [150.8 ± 8.7] vs. higher-GI diet = [157.8 ± 10.4 mg/dL, mean ± SD, p = 0.43];
low-GI diet = [127.7] vs. high-cereal fibre diet = [136.8 mg/dL, p = 0.02];
low-GI diet = [6.5 (5.6-8.4)] vs. standard diabetic diet = [6.7 (6.1-7.5 mmol/L), median and interquartile range p > 0.05] and;
low-GI diet = [7.3 ± 0.3] vs. conventional carbohydrate exchange diet = [7.7 ± 0.4 mmol/L, mean ± SEM (Standard Error of Mean), p 0.05].

The investigators concluded that the low-GI diet is more effective in controlling glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) and fasting blood glucose compared with a higher-GI diet or control in patients with type 2 diabetes. It will useful to evaluate the long-term effectiveness of low-glycaemic index diet in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Original title:
The Effect of Dietary Glycaemic Index on Glycaemia in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials by Ojo O, Ojo OO, [...], Wang XH.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5872791/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on diabetes and GI-diets right here.

A low-GI diet is a diet with a lot of products/meals with a low GI.
Products/meals with a low GI are products/meals with a GI-number of 55 or less.
In daily life, products/meals with a low GI contain at least 1.5 grams fiber per 100 kcal. These products and meals contain at least 1.5 grams fiber per 100 kcal.
 

Objectives:
Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is one of the most important public health issues. Vitamin K supplementation might have favorable effect on risk factors of T2DM. Therefore, this review article (meta-analysis) has been conducted.

Have vitamin K supplementation favorable effects on risk factors of type 2 diabetes mellitus?

Study design:
This review article included 5 RCTs with in total of 533 participants.

There was no evidence of publication bias.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found overall, meta-analysis did not show any beneficial effect of vitamin K supplementation on both:
-fasting blood sugar levels [-0.91 mg/dL, 95% CI = -2.57 to 0.76, p = 0.28];
-fasting insulin levels [-0.35 μIU/mL, 95% CI = -1.70 to 1.00, p = 0.61];
-HOMA-IR [-0.06, 95% CI = -0.32 to -0.19, p = 0.63] and
-2-h oral glucose tolerance test [-4.00 mg/dL, 95% CI = -20.00 to 11.99, p = 0.62].

The investigators found sensitivity analysis showed that overall estimates were not affected by elimination of any study.

The investigators concluded that vitamin K supplementation has no significant effect on glycemic control in healthy subjects. However, further studies should be performed on diabetic and pre-diabetic patients to determine the effect of vitamin K supplementation on impaired glycemic control.

Original title:
Effect of Vitamin K Supplementation on Glycemic Control: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials by Shahdadian F, Mohammadi H and Rouhani M.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29523009

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on diabetes and vitamin K right here.
 

Objectives:
The actual effects of L-carnitine administration on leptin serum level is inconsistent. Therefore, this review article (meta-analysis) has been conducted.

Does L-carnitine supplementation reduce leptin serum level?

Study design:
This review article included 7 RCTs with 325 cases (group with L-carnitine administration) and 330 controls (group without L-carnitine administration).

Subgroup analysis to find the sources of heterogeneity showed that L-carnitine dosage [ 2 g: I2 = 00.0%, p = 0.408] and study population [diabetes: I2 = 46.7%, p = 0.153 and non-diabetes: I2 = 15.1%, p = 0.317] were the potential sources of heterogeneity.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found that L-carnitine supplementation had no significant effect on serum leptin concentrations [WMD = -0.565 ng/mL, 95% CI = -2.417 to 1.287, p = 0.550, I2 = 84.3%, p  0.0001].

The investigators found in subgroup analysis that  ≥ 2 mg L-carnitine supplementation significantly reduced serum leptin concentrations [WMD = -2.742 ng/mL, 95% CI = -3.039 to -2.444, p  0.001].

The investigators found in subgroup analysis that L-carnitine supplementation significantly reduced serum leptin concentrations in diabetic patients [WMD = -2.946 ng/mL, 95% CI = -3.254 to -2.638, p  0.001].

The investigators found in subgroup analysis that L-carnitine supplementation during 12 weeks significantly reduced serum leptin concentrations [WMD = -2.772 ng/mL, 95% CI = -3.073 to -2.471, p  0.001].

The investigators concluded that at least 3 mg L-carnitine per day in the course of 12 weeks reduce serum leptin concentrations, especially in diabetic patients.

Original title:
The effect of L-carnitine supplementation on serum leptin concentrations: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials by Nazary-Vannani A, Ghaedi E, […], Varkaneh HK.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29453657

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on diabetes and L-carnitine and diabetes right here.

L-carnitine is a non-essential amino acid, which is also found in foods.

Objectives:
Does vegetable and/or fruit consumption reduce metabolic syndrome (MetS)?

Study design:
This review article included 20 cross-sectional studies, 1 case-control study and 5 cohort studies.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found in 16 studies when comparing the highest versus the lowest category of vegetable consumption a significantly reduced risk of 11% [overall multivariable-adjusted RR = 0.89, 95% CI = 0.85-0.93, p 0.001] for metabolic syndrome.

The investigators found in 16 studies when comparing the highest versus the lowest category of fruit consumption a significantly reduced risk of 19% [overall multivariable-adjusted RR = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.75-0.88, p 0.001] for metabolic syndrome.

The investigators found in 8 studies when comparing the highest versus the lowest category of vegetable and fruit consumption a significantly reduced risk of 25% [overall multivariable-adjusted RR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.63-0.90, p = 0.002] for metabolic syndrome.

The investigators concluded that vegetable and/or fruit consumption is negatively associated with metabolic syndrome. However, more well-designed prospective cohort studies are needed to elaborate the concerned issues further.

Original title:
Associations of vegetable and fruit consumption with metabolic syndrome. A meta-analysis of observational studies by Zhang Y and Zhang DZ.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29506604

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on overweight and fruit and vegetable consumption right here.

Objectives:
Fish oil supplementation has been shown to be associated with a lower risk of metabolic syndrome and benefit a wide range of chronic diseases, such as cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes and several types of cancers. However, the evidence of fish oil supplementation on glucose metabolism and insulin sensitivity is still controversial. Therefore, this review article (meta-analysis) has been conducted.

Does fish oil supplementation improve insulin sensitivity in humans?

Study design:
This review article included a total of 17 RCTs with 672 participants. One of the 17 studies was crossover design and others were parallel design.
The doses of active ingredients of fish oil (n-3 fatty acids) ranged from 1 g/d to 4 g/d. Duration of the interventions was ranged from 4 weeks to 24 weeks.
There was no suggestion of small study effect based on visual inspection of the funnel plot. Results of the Egger’s (p = 0.78) and Begg’s (p = 0.43) tests showed that there was no potential publication bias.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found pooled analysis showed that fish oil supplementation had no effects on insulin sensitivity overall [SMD = 0.17, 95% CI = -0.15 to 0.48, p = 0.292, I2 = 58.1%, p = 0.001].

The investigators found subgroup analysis showed that fish oil supplementation significantly improved insulin sensitivity among people who were experiencing at least one symptom of metabolic disorders [SMD = 0.53, 95% CI = 0.17 to 0.88, p 0.001].

The investigators found subgroup analysis showed a positive effect of fish oil on insulin sensitivity among the short-term intervention group (12 weeks) rather than the long-term intervention group [SMD = 0.31, 95% CI = 0.01-0.61, p = 0.04].

The investigators found subgroup analysis showed that fish oil had no effects on insulin sensitivity among the healthy people or people with T2DM.

The investigators found there were no significant differences between subgroups of methods of insulin sensitivity and doses of omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (n-3 PUFA) of fish oil supplementation.

The investigators found in sensitivity analysis that summary results did not differ significantly when omitting studies one at a time.

The investigators concluded that fish oil supplementation during 12 weeks improves insulin sensitivity among people who were experiencing at least one symptom of metabolic disorders.

Original title:
Fish oil supplementation and insulin sensitivity: a systematic review and meta-analysis by Gao H, Geng T, [...], Zhao Q.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5496233/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on fish oil supplements and diabetes right here.

 

Objectives:
Randomised controlled trials comparing low- versus high-fat diets on cardiometabolic risk factors in people with overweight or obesity have shown inconsistent results, which may be due to the mixed metabolic status of people with excess adiposity. The role of dietary fat manipulation in modifying cardiometabolic indicators in people with overweight or obese without metabolic disturbance is unclear. Therefore, this review article (meta-analysis) has been conducted.

Does a low-fat diet modify cardiometabolic indicators in people who are overweight (BMI>25) or obese (BMI>30) without metabolic disturbance?

Study design:
This review article included 20 RCTs with 2,106 participants.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found total cholesterol levels in people who are overweight or obese without metabolic disturbance were significantly lower following low-fat diet compared with high-fat diet [WMD = -7.05 mg/dL, 95% CI = -11.30 to -2.80, p = 0.001].  

The investigators found LDL-cholesterol levels (bad cholesterol) in people who are overweight or obese without metabolic disturbance were significantly lower following low-fat diet compared with high-fat diet [WMD = -4.41 mg/dL, 95% CI = -7.81 to -1.00, p = 0.011].  

The investigators found HDL-cholesterol levels (good cholesterol) in people who are overweight or obese without metabolic disturbance were significantly lower following low-fat diet compared with high-fat diet [WMD = -2.57 mg/dL, 95% CI = -3.85 to -1.28, p 0.001].  

The investigators found TAG levels (blood fat levels) in people who are overweight or obese without metabolic disturbance were significantly higher following low-fat diet compared with high-fat diet [WMD = -11.68 mg/dL, 95% CI = 5.90 to 17.45, p 0.001].  

The investigators concluded a low-fat diet reduces cholesterol and TAG levels in people with overweight or obesity without metabolic disturbances.

Original title:
Effects of low-fat compared with high-fat diet on cardiometabolic indicators in people with overweight and obesity without overt metabolic disturbance: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials by Lu M, Wan Y, [...], Li D.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29212558

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on fat, cholesterol and overweight right here.

A triglyceride (TG, triacylglycerol, TAG or triacylglyceride) is an ester derived from glycerol and three fatty acids. Triglycerides are the main constituents of body fat in humans.

Those with overweight or obesity are advised to follow a diet with maximum 30 En% fat, of which maximum 7 En% saturated fat and minimum 1.5 grams fiber per 100 kcal.
The most easy way to follow a diet with maximum 30 En% fat, of which maximum 7 En% saturated fat and minimum 1.5 grams fiber per 100 kcal is to choose meals/products with maximum 30 En% fat, of which maximum 7 En% saturated fat and minimum 1.5 grams fiber per 100 kcal.
However, the most practical way to follow a diet with maximum 30 En% fat, of which maximum 7 En% saturated fat and minimum 1.5 grams fiber per 100 kcal is all meals/products that you eat on a daily basis should on average contain maximum 30 En% fat, of which maximum 7 En% saturated fat and minimum 1.5 grams fiber per 100 kcal.

Objectives:
Dietary fiber intake may provide beneficial effects on the components of metabolic syndrome (MetS); however, observational studies reported inconsistent results for the relationship between dietary fiber intake and metabolic syndrome risk. Therefore, this review article (meta-analysis) has been conducted.

Does dietary fiber intake reduce risk of metabolic syndrome?

Study design:
This review article included 11 cross-sectional studies and 3 cohort studies.
There was evidence of publication bias in cross-sectional studies.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found in cross-sectional studies when comparing the highest with lowest categories of dietary fiber intake, a significantly reduced risk of 33% [OR = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.58-0.78, I2 = 32.4%, p = 0.181] for metabolic syndrome. However, this reduced risk was not significant in cohort studies [pooled RR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.70-1.06]. Not significant because RR of 1 was found in the 95% CI of 0.70 to 1.06. RR of 1 means no risk/association.

The investigators concluded that a high dietary intake of fiber may reduce risk of metabolic syndrome. May reduce because there was evidence of publication bias in cross-sectional studies and the reduced risk was not significant in cohort studies. Therefore, more prospective cohort studies are needed to further verify the association between dietary fiber intake and the risk of metabolic syndrome.

Original title:
Fruit and vegetable consumption and risk of the metabolic syndrome: a meta-analysis by Tian Y, Su L, [...], Jiang X.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29151369

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on publication bias/cohort studies/significant, fiber consumption and overweight right here.  

Find out whether you are overweight or not right here.

Those with metabolic syndrome are advised to follow a diet with maximum 30 En% fat, of which maximum 7 En% saturated fat and minimum 1.5 grams fiber per 100 kcal.
The most easy way to follow a diet with maximum 30 En% fat, of which maximum 7 En% saturated fat and minimum 1.5 grams fiber per 100 kcal is to choose meals/products with maximum 30 En% fat, of which maximum 7 En% saturated fat and minimum 1.5 grams fiber per 100 kcal.
However, the most practical way to follow a diet with maximum 30 En% fat, of which maximum 7 En% saturated fat and minimum 1.5 grams fiber per 100 kcal is all meals/products that you eat on a daily basis should on average contain maximum 30 En% fat, of which maximum 7 En% saturated fat and minimum 1.5 grams fiber per 100 kcal.

Objectives:
Several epidemiological studies have been performed to evaluate the association of fruit and vegetable consumption with risk of the metabolic syndrome (MetS), but the results remain controversial. Therefore, this review article (meta-analysis) has been conducted.

Does consumption of vegetables or fruit reduce risk of metabolic syndrome?

Study design:
This review article included a total of 9 studies for fruit consumption, 9 studies for vegetable consumption and 7 studies for fruit and vegetable consumption.

There was no evidence of small-study effect (publication bias)

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found a significantly reduced risk of 13% [pooled RR = 0.87, 95% CI = 0.82-0.92, I2 = 46.7%] for metabolic syndrome when comparing the highest fruit consumption versus the lowest consumption.

The investigators found a significantly reduced risk of 15% [pooled RR = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.80-0.91, I2 = 0.0%] for metabolic syndrome when comparing the highest vegetable consumption versus the lowest consumption.

The investigators found a significantly reduced risk of 24% [pooled RR = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.62-0.93, I2 = 83.5%] for metabolic syndrome when comparing the highest fruit and vegetable consumption versus the lowest consumption.

The investigators found in subgroup analyses stratified by continent, the inverse association of fruit consumption [RR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.77-0.96] and vegetable consumption [RR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.80-0.92] with risk of metabolic syndrome remained significant in Asia.

The investigators concluded that a high fruit or/and vegetable consumption reduce risk of metabolic syndrome, particularly among Asian. Therefore, people should consume more fruits and vegetables to reduce risk of metabolic syndrome.

Original title:
Fruit and vegetable consumption and risk of the metabolic syndrome: a meta-analysis by Tian Y, Su L, [...], Jiang X.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29151369

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on fruit and vegetables consumption and overweight right here.  

Find out whether you are overweight or not right here.

Those with metabolic syndrome are advised to follow a diet with maximum 30 En% fat, of which maximum 7 En% saturated fat and minimum 1.5 grams fiber per 100 kcal.
The most easy way to follow a diet with maximum 30 En% fat, of which maximum 7 En% saturated fat and minimum 1.5 grams fiber per 100 kcal is to choose meals/products with maximum 30 En% fat, of which maximum 7 En% saturated fat and minimum 1.5 grams fiber per 100 kcal.
However, the most practical way to follow a diet with maximum 30 En% fat, of which maximum 7 En% saturated fat and minimum 1.5 grams fiber per 100 kcal is all meals/products that you eat on a daily basis should on average contain maximum 30 En% fat, of which maximum 7 En% saturated fat and minimum 1.5 grams fiber per 100 kcal.

Objectives:
The scientific literature shows conflicting evidence about the relationship between adiposity and bone mass in overweight and obese populations. Therefore, this review article (meta-analysis) has been conducted.

Does a high adipose mass reduce bone mineral density in overweight and obese populations?

Study design:
This review article included a total of 16 studies, comprising 2587 participants and 75 correlation coefficients.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found strong evidence supported a negative relationship between relative (%) adipose mass and bone mineral density (BMD) in men [R = -0.37, 95% CI = -0.57 to -0.12] and in those aged less than 25 years [R = -0.28, 95% CI = -0.45 to -0.08].

The investigators concluded that a high relative (%) adipose mass reduces bone mineral density in overweight (BMI = 25-30) and obese populations (BMI > 30), particularly in men and those aged less than 25 years. Therefore, to prevent bone loss in overweight and obese populations, nutrition- and exercise-based interventions that focus on a controlled reduction of adipose mass with concomitant preservation of lean mass are recommended.

Original title:
Influence of adipose tissue mass on bone mass in an overweight or obese population: systematic review and meta-analysis by Dolan E, Swinton PA, […], O'Reilly J.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29028271

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on overweight right here. 

Find out whether you are overweight or not right here.

Those with overweight (BMI = 25-30) or obesity (BMI > 30) are advised to follow a diet with maximum 30 En% fat, of which maximum 7 En% saturated fat and minimum 1.5 grams fiber per 100 kcal.
The most easy way to follow a diet with maximum 30 En% fat, of which maximum 7 En% saturated fat and minimum 1.5 grams fiber per 100 kcal is to choose meals/products with maximum 30 En% fat, of which maximum 7 En% saturated fat and minimum 1.5 grams fiber per 100 kcal.
However, the most practical way to follow a diet with maximum 30 En% fat, of which maximum 7 En% saturated fat and minimum 1.5 grams fiber per 100 kcal is all meals/products that you eat on a daily basis should on average contain maximum 30 En% fat, of which maximum 7 En% saturated fat and minimum 1.5 grams fiber per 100 kcal.

Strength exercise is the best way to reduce adipose mass while preserving lean mass.

Objectives:
The potential glucose-lowering effects of pomegranate have been reported in animal and observational studies, but intervention studies in humans have generated mixed results. Therefore, this review article (meta-analysis) has been conducted.

What are the effects of pomegranate supplementation on measures of glucose control, insulin levels and insulin sensitivity in humans?

Study design:
This review article included 16 RCTs with 538 subjects. 14 trials adopted parallel study designs and the 2 remaining trials used crossover designs.
The total number of subjects included in each study ranged from 14 to 74 subjects.
The mean age of participants in each trial ranged from 30 to 70 years, with differing age ranges in most studies.
11 studies used pomegranate juice as a supplement (the dosage ranged from 120 to 500 ml/day).
2 studies used pomegranate seed oil as treatments (the dosage ranged from 400 to 2000 mg/day).
3 studies utilized pomegranate extract as the intervention (the dosage ranged from 710 to 1420 mg/day).  
The duration of the pomegranate intervention varied from 1 to 12 weeks (median: 5.5 weeks).

Overall, significant heterogeneity was detected for FBI and HOMA-IR, but subgroup analysis could not identify factors significantly influencing these parameters.
No significant publication bias was found.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found that pomegranate did not significantly affect the measures of:
-FBG (fasting blood glucose) [WMD = -0.6 mg/dL, 95% CI = -2.79 to 1.58, p = 0.59, I2 = 0%];
-FBI (fasting blood insulin) [WMD = 0.29 μIU/mL, 95% CI = -1.16 to 1.75, p = 0.70, I2 = 60.4%];
-HOMA-IR (homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance) [WMD = -0.04, 95% CI = -0.53 to 0.46, p = 0.88, I2 = 59.8%] or;
-HbA1c (glycated haemoglobin) [WMD = -0.11%, 95% CI = -0.39 to 0.18, p = 0.46, I2 = 0%].
These results were robust in sensitivity analysis.

The investigators found meta-regression analysis showed that the factor (dose of pomegranate juice supplementation) was not associated with the treatment effects on FBG level [coefficient = -0.006, 95% CI = -0.023 to 0.011, p = 0.46].

The investigators found no significant difference in the FBG-lowering effect between trials that were conducted in subjects with cardiovascular disease risk [WMD = 0.30 mg/dL, 95% CI = -2.36 to 2.97, p = 0.82] and those that were conducted in healthy individuals [WMD = -2.53 mg/dL, 95% CI = -6.36 to 1.30, p = 0.19].

The investigators found no statistically significant differences in the pooled effects of pomegranate on FBG in the subgroups stratified by study designs, intervention durations, types of intervention, baseline BMI and baseline FBG levels (FBG levels at the beginning of the studie).

The investigators concluded pomegranate supplements have no favourable effect on improvements in glucose and insulin metabolism. The current evidence suggests that daily pomegranate supplementation is not recommended as a potential therapeutic strategy in glycemic management. Further large-scale RCTs with longer duration are required to confirm these results.

Original title:
Lack of efficacy of pomegranate supplementation for glucose management, insulin levels and sensitivity: evidence from a systematic review and meta-analysis by Huang H, Liao D, […], Zhu Y.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5629805/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on fruit consumption and diabetes right here.
 

Objectives:
The prevalence of metabolic syndrome (MetS) has been greatly increased, worldwide. In recent years, investigators have proposed that sodium might contribute to the development of metabolic syndrome; however, the published data were conflicting. Therefore, this review article (meta-analysis) has been conducted.

Does sodium contribute to the development of metabolic syndrome?

Study design:
This review article included 17 observational studies with 66,274 participants.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found that subjects with metabolic syndrome had significantly higher levels of sodium compared to healthy controls [Hedges' g = 0.21, 95% CI = 0.12-0.29, I2 = 68.6%]. Subgroup analyses revealed that the difference was significant when the sodium status was assessed using urinary sodium levels.

The investigators found that random effects meta-regression analysis also revealed that body sodium level increases with the number of metabolic syndrome components.

The investigators found that participants with highest dietary/urinary or serum sodium levels had a significantly 37% higher chance of developing metabolic syndrome when compared with participants with the lowest sodium levels [OR = 1.37, 95% CI = 1.31-1.42, I2 = 86.9%].

The investigators concluded that higher sodium input into the body is directly associated with the likelihood of metabolic syndrome. Prospective cohort studies and well-designed randomized clinical trials considering the effect of sodium restricted diets on the risk of metabolic syndrome as an outcome are necessary to represent the causal association.

Original title:
Sodium status and the metabolic syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies by Soltani S, Kolahdouz Mohammadi R, […], Salehi-Abargouei A.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28846446

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on overweight and sodium right here. 

Find out whether you are overweight or not right here.

Those with metabolic syndrome are advised to select the following food items.

Sodium is part of table salt or sodium choride.

High-sodium or high-salt products are products with more than 0.3 gram salt per 100 kcal. These products are rich in salt.
A high-salt diet is a diet with many products with more than 0.3 gram salt per 100 kcal.

Objectives:
Do patients with type 2 diabetes benefit from a low carbohydrate diet?

Study design:
This review article included a total of 9 RCTs with 734 patients with type 2 diabetes.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found that low carbohydrate diet significantly reduced HbA1c level [WMD = -0.44, 95% CI = -0.61 to -0.26, p= 0.00] of patients with type 2 diabetes.

The investigators found that low carbohydrate diet significantly reduced triglycerides concentration [WMD = -0.33, 95% CI = -0.45 to -0.21, p = 0.00] of patients with type 2 diabetes.

The investigators found that low carbohydrate diet significantly increased HDL cholesterol concentration (WMD = 0.07, 95% CI = 0.03 to 0.11, p = 0.00] of patients with type 2 diabetes.

The investigators found that low carbohydrate diet was not associated with decreased level of total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol.

The investigators found subgroup analyses showed that short term intervention of low carbohydrate diet was effective for weight loss [WMD = -1.18, 95% CI = -2.32 to -0.04, p = 0.04] in patients with type 2 diabetes.

The investigators concluded there is a beneficial effect of low carbohydrate diet intervention on glucose control in patients with type 2 diabetes. The low carbohydrate diet intervention also has a positive effect on triglycerides and HDL cholesterol concentrations, but without significant effect on long term weight loss.

Original title:
Efficacy of low carbohydrate diet for type 2 diabetes mellitus management: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials by Meng Y, Bai H, […], Chen L.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28750216

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on carbohydrates and diabetes right here.

A low carbohydrate diet is a diet that is largely made up of meals/products with 20-40 En% carbohydrate. Practically, this means that all meals/products that you eat on a daily basis should on average contain 20-40 En% carbohydrate.
20-40 En% carbohydrate means that the total amounts of carbohydrate make up for a 20-40% of the total kcal of the diet. Check here which products contain 20-40 En% carbohydrate.

Objectives:
The relationships between metabolic syndrome (MetS) and risk of incident stroke are inconsistent. Therefore, this review article (meta-analysis) has been conducted.

Does metabolic syndrome increase risk of stroke?

Study design:
This review article included a total of 16 prospective cohort studies, including 116,496 participants who were initially free of cardiovascular diseases.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found comparing the persons without metabolic syndrome, those with metabolic syndrome had a significantly higher risk of 70% for incident stroke [pooled relative risk (RR) = 1.70, 95% CI = 1.49-1.95]. Significant means that there is an association with a 95% confidence.

The investigators found in subgroup analyses that women with metabolic syndrome had a significantly higher risk of 83% for incident stroke [pooled relative risk (RR) = 1.83, 95% CI = 1.31-2.56]. Significant because RR of 1 was not found in the 95% CI of 1.31 to 2.56. RR of 1 means no risk/association.

The investigators found in subgroup analyses that men with metabolic syndrome had a significantly higher risk of 47% for incident stroke [pooled relative risk (RR) = 1.47, 95% CI = 1.22-1.78].

The investigators found in subgroup analyses that those with metabolic syndrome had a significantly higher risk of 112% for ischemic stroke [pooled relative risk (RR) = 2.12, 95% CI = 1.46-3.08].

The investigators found in subgroup analyses that those with metabolic syndrome had a non-significantly higher risk of 48% for hemorrhagic stroke [pooled relative risk (RR) = 1.48, 95% CI = 0.98-2.24].

The investigators concluded metabolic syndrome increases risk of stroke, particularly among women and those with ischemic stroke.

Original title:
Metabolic syndrome and stroke: A meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies by Li X, Li X, […], Gao Q.

Link:
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967586816311079

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on overweight and cardiovascular disease right here. 

Find out whether you are overweight or not right here.

Those with metabolic syndrome are advised to select the following food items.

Objectives:
Polyunsaturated fats (PUFAs) have been shown to reduce type 2 diabetes (T2DM) risk and improve insulin responsiveness in T2DM subjects, but whether the plant sources of omega-3 PUFA (alpha-linolenic acid [ALA]) have an effect on glycemic control requires further investigation. Therefore, this review article (meta-analysis) has been conducted.

Does alpha-linolenic acid dietary intake reduce diabetes risk?

Study design:
This review article included a total of 8 RCTs involving 212 participants with type 2 diabetes.
5 trials (62.5%) were parallel designs and 3 (37.5%) were crossover designs.
Participants were generally middle-aged (median age  =  54 years, range  =  47-64 years) and overweight or obese (median BMI  =  30.7, range  =  28.0-33.2).
Overall, participants had controlled diabetes (median HbA1c = 6.8%, median FBG = 7.95 mmol/L) and the majority of studies indicated the use of hypoglycemic drugs or other medications, although all studies excluded the use of insulin therapy.
The dose of ALA ranged from 1.5 to 7.4 g/day with a median assigned dose of 4.4, 5.4 and 5.4 g/day of ALA for trials that reported HbA1c, FBG and FBI, respectively.
The median duration of the treatment was 3 months, ranging from 2 to 12 months.
7 studies (87.5%) were considered high quality (MQS ≥8).

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found compared to a control diet, a median dose of 4.4 g/day of alpha-linolenic acid intake for a median duration of 3 months did not affect HbA1c (%) of patients with type 2 diabetes [MD =  -0.01, 95% = -0.32 to 0.31, p  =  0.96].

The investigators found compared to a control diet, a median alpha-linolenic acid dose of 5.4 g/day did not lower fasting blood glucose (FBG) of patients with type 2 diabetes [MD  = 0 .07, 95% CI = -0.61 to 0.76, p  = 0 .84] or fasting blood insulin (FBI) of patients with type 2 diabetes [MD  =  7.03, 95% CI = -5.84 to 19.89, p  = 0 .28].

The investigators found summary effect estimates were generally compromised by considerable and unexplained heterogeneity [I2 ≥ 75%].

The investigators found in the subgroup analysis of continuous predictors, a reduction in HbA1c (%) and FBG (mmol/L) was significantly associated with an increased intake of ALA.

The investigators found further adjustment for publication bias using Duval and Tweedie's trim-and-fill analysis provided an adjusted, significant MD of 0.25 [95% CI = -0.38 to -0.12, 0.001) for HbA1c (%).

The investigators concluded alpha-linolenic acid-enriched diet with a median alpha-linolenic acid dose of 4.4 g/day during 3 months has no effects on HbA1c, FBG or FBI in patients with type 2 diabetes. The scarce number of existing RCTs and the presence of heterogeneity in the meta-analysis limit the ability to make firm conclusions about alpha-linolenic acid in type 2 diabetes management. The potential for alpha-linolenic acid to have dose-dependent effects warrants further research in this area.

Original title:
The effect of alpha-linolenic acid on glycemic control in individuals with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials by Jovanovski E1, Li D, […], Vuksan V.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5457843/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on PUFA and diabetes right here.

4.4 g/day alpha-linolenic acid can be achieved by taking 1 to 2 tablespoons of flax or salba-chia seeds or about 12 whole walnuts per day.

 

Objectives:
The associations between n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) and metabolic syndrome (MetS) risk have demonstrated inconsistent results. Therefore, this review article (meta-analysis) has been conducted.

Do higher circulating n-3 PUFA levels associate with a lower metabolic syndrome risk?

Study design:
This review article included a total of 7 case-control studies and 20 cross-sectional studies.
There was no publication bias.
Results and conclusions:
The investigators found a higher plasma/serum n-3 PUFAs was associated with a lower metabolic syndrome risk of 37% [pooled OR = 0.63, 95% CI = 0.49-0.81, I2 = 72.4%].

The investigators found the plasma/serum n-3 PUFAs in controls was significantly higher than cases [WMD = 0.24, 95% CI = 0.04-0.43], especially docosapentaenoic acid (DPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA).

The investigators found, however, no significant association between dietary intake of n-3 PUFAs or fish and metabolic syndrome risk.

The investigators found in sensitivity analysis by omitting one study at a time and re-calculated the remaining data, that exclusion of anyone study did not substantially influence the pooled effects.

The investigators concluded a higher circulating n-3 PUFAs is associated with a lower metabolic syndrome risk. The circulating n-3 PUFAs can be regarded as biomarkers indicating metabolic syndrome risk, especially DPA and DHA. The evidence of this review article will have important public implications in preventing metabolic syndrome through supplemental long-chain n-3 PUFAs of marine-origin. Furthermore, added RCTs and epidemiological studies with large sample-size are warranted to confirm these findings.

Original title:
n-3 Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids and Metabolic Syndrome Risk: A Meta-Analysis by Guo XF, Li X, […], Li D.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5537818/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on overweight and n-3 PUFA right here.  
Docosapentaenoic acid (DPA) is a dietary omega-3 fatty acid mainly found in fish, fish oil, seal oil and red meat.

Find out whether you are overweight or not right here.

Objectives:
Have flaxseed supplementation positive effects on body composition?

Study design:
This review article included a total of 45 RCTs.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found a significant reduction in body weight [WMD = -0.99 kg, 95% CI = -1.67 to -0.31, p = 0.004], BMI [WMD = -0.30 kg m², 95% CI = -0.53 to -0.08, p = 0.008] and waist circumference [WMD = -0.80 cm, 95% CI = -1.40 to -0.20, p = 0.008] following flaxseed supplementation.

The investigators found subgroup analyses showed that using whole flaxseed in doses ≥30 g/d, longer-term interventions (≥12 weeks) and studies including participants with higher BMI (≥ 27 kg/m²) had positive effects on body composition.

The investigators concluded whole flaxseed supplementation in doses ≥30 g/d during ≥12 weeks has positive effects on body composition in overweight and obese participants (=participants with BMI ≥ 25 kg/m²).

Original title:
The effect of flaxseed supplementation on body weight and body composition: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 45 randomized placebo-controlled trials by Mohammadi-Sartang M, Mazloom Z, […], Totosy de Zepetnek JO.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28635182

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on overweight right here. 

Find out whether you are overweight or not right here.

Objectives:
Have flaxseed supplementation positive effects on body composition?

Study design:
This review article included a total of 45 RCTs.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found a significant reduction in body weight [WMD = -0.99 kg, 95% CI = -1.67 to -0.31, p = 0.004], BMI [WMD = -0.30 kg m², 95% CI = -0.53 to -0.08, p = 0.008] and waist circumference [WMD = -0.80 cm, 95% CI = -1.40 to -0.20, p = 0.008] following flaxseed supplementation.

The investigators found subgroup analyses showed that using whole flaxseed in doses ≥30 g/d, longer-term interventions (≥12 weeks) and studies including participants with higher BMI (≥ 27 kg/m²) had positive effects on body composition.

The investigators concluded whole flaxseed supplementation in doses ≥30 g/d during ≥12 weeks has positive effects on body composition in overweight and obese participants (=participants with BMI ≥ 25 kg/m²).

Original title:
The effect of flaxseed supplementation on body weight and body composition: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 45 randomized placebo-controlled trials by Mohammadi-Sartang M, Mazloom Z, […], Totosy de Zepetnek JO.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28635182

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on nuts&seeds and overweight right here. 

Find out whether you are overweight or not right here.

Objectives:
It has been unclear whether supplemental probiotics therapy improves clinical outcomes in type 2 diabetic patients. Therefore, this meta-analysis (systematic review) has been conducted.

Do probiotics supplements improve clinical outcomes in type 2 diabetic patients?

Study design:
This review article included 12 RCTs involving 684 type 2 diabetic patients.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found a significant decreased glucose level in the probiotics group [pooled standardized mean difference = -0.18 mg/dL, 95% CI = -0.35 to -0.01, p = 0.04, I2 = 64%, p = 0.004] compared to the control group.

The investigators found a significant reduction in HbA1c in the probiotics group [pooled standardized mean difference = -0.38%, 95% CI = -0.62 to -0.14, p = 0.002, I2 = 0%, p = 0.72] compared to the control group.

The investigators found a significant reduction in fasting insulin level in the probiotics group [pooled standardized mean difference = -0.38, 95% CI = -0.59 to -0.18, p = 0.003, I2 = 0%, p = 0.81] compared to the control group.

The investigators found a significant reduced HOMA-IR level in the probiotics group [pooled standardized mean difference = -0.99, 95% CI = -1.52 to -0.4, p = 0.0002, I2 = 86%, p 0.00001] compared to the control group.

The investigators found a significant reduced CRP level in the probiotics group [pooled standardized mean difference = -1.34 mg/L, 95% CI = -1.76 to -0.92, p 0.00001, I2 = 90%, p 0.00001] compared to the control group.

The investigators found a non-significant reduction in both triglyceride levels [SMD = -0.23, 95% CI = -0.48 to 0.02, p = 0.07, I2 = 52%, p = 0.03] and cholesterol levels [total cholesterol: SMD = -0.18, 95% CI = -0.42 to 0.06, p = 0.14, I2 = 47%, p = 0.05 and LDL-cholesterol: SMD = -0.03, 95% CI = -0.20 to 0.14, p = 0.73, I2 = 3%, p = 0.41] in the probiotics group compared to the control group.

The investigators concluded that probiotics supplementation is associated with significant improvement in HbA1c and fasting insulin in type 2 diabetes patients. These results may provide evidence for encouraging use of probiotics in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. However, more randomized placebo-controlled trials with larger sample sizes are warranted to confirm these findings.

Original title:
Effect of Probiotics on Glucose and Lipid Metabolism in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Meta-Analysis of 12 Randomized Controlled Trials by Yao K, Zeng L, [...], Zou X.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5491138/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on probiotics and diabetes right here.

Objectives:
Do overweight and obese adults benefit from n-3 PUFA supplements?

Study design:
This review article included a total of 11 RCTs involving 617 participants.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found a statistically non-significant difference in weight loss between n-3 PUFA supplements and placebo [WMD = 0.00, 95% CI = -0.42 to 0.43, p = 0.99].

The investigators found n-3 PUFA supplements was superior to placebo in reducing serum triglyceride levels [Std MD = -0.59, 95% CI = -0.93 to -0.25, p = 0.0007].

The investigators found a significant reduction in waist circumference for n-3 PUFA group [WMD = -0.53, 95% CI = -0.90 to -0.16, p = 0.005].

The investigators found no significant differences in body mass index, total serum levels of cholesterol, low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol and fasting glucose levels between n-3 PUFA supplements and placebo.

The investigators concluded that n-3 PUFA supplements reduce waist circumference and triglyceride levels in overweight and obese adults. However, large-scale, well-designed RCTs are needed to further address this issue.

Original title:
Efficacy of Omega-3 Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids Supplementation in Managing Overweight and Obesity: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials by Zhang YY, Liu W, […], Tian HM.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28112774

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on overweight, n-3 PUFA and cholesterol right here.  

Click here to find out whether you are overweight or not?