Nutritional Advice El Mondo

Nutritional advice

Diabetes

Scientific studies (review articles) on the relationship between diet/nutrients and diabetes prevention:
One swallow does not make a summer. A famous Dutch saying that could not be any more obvious. Just because one single scientific study about a certain topic makes certain claims, it does not necessarily mean it is true. On the other hand, a review article (a collection of scientific studies on a certain topic) of randomized, placebo-controlled double blind clinical trials (RCTs) will answer the following question:
"Do taking dietary supplements make sense?" Yes for a positive conclusion and no for a negative conclusion.

One swallow does not make a summer. A famous Dutch saying that could not be any more obvious. Just because one single scientific study about a certain topic makes certain claims, it does not necessarily mean it is true. On the other hand, a review article (a collection of scientific studies on a certain topic) of cohort studies or case-control studies will answer the following question:
"Should I change my diet?".

2022:

  1. 500 mg/d dietary flavonoid intake reduces cardiovascular disease, diabetes and hypertension
  2. Vitamin D deficiency increases blindness in people with diabetes
  3. 50 g/d almond decreases causally bad cholesterol in patients with type 2 diabetes
  4. Ginger supplementation reduces blood pressure in patients with type 2 diabetes

2021:

  1. Higher concentrations of carotenoids reduce type 2 diabetes
  2. Dietary sodium restriction causally reduces blood pressure in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus
  3. Daily 80g potato increase type 2 diabetes among Western populations
  4. Vitamin C supplements improve triglyceride and cholesterol levels in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus
  5. Spirulina supplementation reduces bad cholesterol among type 2 diabetes patients
  6. Grapes/grape products supplementation reduces HOMA-IR values in adults
  7. Intensive glucose control slows down cognitive decline in persons with type 2 diabetes
  8. Chromium supplementation improves lipid profile in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus
  9. Patients with diabetes mellitus should be vaccinated against herpes zoster
  10. L-arginine supplements do not reduce diabetes in adults
  11. 1.5 g/day garlic supplementation reduces adiponectin level among participants ˂30 years
  12. Mortality is more frequently in COVID-19 patients with chronic kidney diseases and cardiovascular disease
  13. Peanut butter consumption may reduce type 2 diabetes
  14. Patients older than 60 years, with hypertension, diabetes and D-dimer values above 3.17 µg/mL have higher thrombotic events due to COVID-19
  15. Diet with <30 En% carbohydrates causally increases adiponectin concentration in adults
  16. 1.5 g/day EPA + DHA improve insulin sensitivity in children
  17. Oral vitamin C supplementation may improve glycemic control and blood pressure in people with type 2 diabetes
  18. Type 1 diabetes mellitus decreases bone mineral density in children and adolescents

2020:

  1. BCG vaccine should not be used in treatment of type 1 diabetes mellitus
  2. 2-3 servings/week fish reduce all-cause mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes
  3. Most prevalent comorbidities among COVID-19 are hypertension, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, liver disease, lung disease, malignancy, cerebrovascular disease, COPD and asthma
  4. Vitamin B3 supplementation increases good cholesterol in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus
  5. Patients with diabetes should be advised to continue taking metformin drugs despite COVID-19 infection status
  6. Daily 8.4-10 grams of inulin supplements for at least 8 weeks improve risk factors of type 2 diabetes
  7. Male, age, cardiovascular disease, hypertension and diabetes mellitus increase mortality in patients with COVID-19
  8. Diabetes mellitus is associated with severe infection and mortality in patients with COVID-19
  9. Barberry supplementation improves insulin levels
  10. Diabetes increases in-hospital mortality in patients with COVID-19
  11. Daily 40g soy consumption for <12 weeks increase IGF-1 level
  12. 100 mg/day magnesium dietary intake reduce type 2 diabetes
  13. 50g/day processed meat increase type 2 diabetes
  14. Yogurt intake is associated with a reduced risk of type 2 diabetes
  15. Hypertension, diabetes, COPD, cardiovascular disease and cerebrovascular disease are major risk factors for patients with COVID-19
  16. Hypertension, cardiovascular diseases, diabetes mellitus, smoking, COPD, malignancy and chronic kidney disease are risk factors for COVID-19 infection
  17. Omega-3 fatty acids + vitamin E or D reduce gestational diabetes
  18. Psyllium consumption improves risk factors of diabetes
  19. Soy protein dietary intake reduces type 2 diabetes

2019:

  1. Elevated serum/plasma zinc concentration increases risk of type 2 diabetes
  2. 100mg magnesium dietary intake reduce type 2 diabetes
  3. Consumption of tree nuts decreases HOMA-IR and fasting insulin levels
  4. Low-fat dairy products have a beneficial effect on HOMA-IR, waist circumference and body weight
  5. Whole grain and cereal fiber dietary intake reduce type 2 diabetes
  6. Dietary low-ratio n-6/n-3 PUFA supplementation improves insulin resistance in diabetic patients
  7. Zinc supplementation reduces diabetes mellitus
  8. Moderate plant protein decreases type 2 diabetes mellitus
  9. Probiotic and synbiotic supplementation reduce inflammation in diabetic patients
  10. Folate supplementation lowers HOMA-IR
  11. 13.1 g/day viscous fiber supplements improve glycemic control

2018:

  1. 1 serving/day potato increases risk type 2 diabetes
  2. 150 g/day French-fries consumption increases risk of hypertension
  3. Garlic increases good cholesterol in diabetic patients
  4. High intake of cereal fiber may reduce type 2 diabetes
  5. Ginger intake reduces body weight and fasting glucose among overweight and obese subjects
  6. Animal protein increases risk of type 2 diabetes
  7. ≥550 mg/day flavonoids intake reduce type 2 diabetes
  8. High-fat diets increase risk of type 2 diabetes
  9. Folic acid supplementation reduces both fasting glucose level, fasting insulin level and HOMA-IR
  10. Low-GI diet is good for patients with type 2 diabetes
  11. Vitamin K supplementation has no effect on glycemic control
  12. Daily 3 mg L-carnitine during 12 weeks reduce serum leptin concentrations in diabetic patients

2017:

  1. Each 1 mmol/L increase in serum potassium reduces type 2 diabetes mellitus by 17%
  2. Fish oil supplementation during <12 weeks improves insulin sensitivity among people with metabolic disorders
  3. Atrial fibrillation, previous stroke, myocardial infarction, hypertension, diabetes and previous TIA increase risk of post-stroke dementia
  4. Pomegranate supplementation has no favourable effect on improvements in glucose and insulin metabolism
  5. Low carbohydrate diet decreases type 2 diabetes
  6. A diet with 4.4 g/day alpha-linolenic acid during 3 months does not reduce level of HbA1c, FBG or FBI in patients with type 2 diabetes
  7. Vegetarian diet has a protective effect against diabetes risk
  8. Weekly 30-180 gram chocolate consumption reduces risk of coronary heart disease, stroke and diabetes
  9. Probiotics supplementation improves HbA1c and fasting insulin in type 2 diabetes patients
  10. Vitamin K supplementation does not reduce diabetes
  11. A higher consumption of whole grains, fruits and dairy products reduces type 2 diabetes risk
  12. A diet of below 45 En% carbohydrate during 3 to 6 months reduces HbA1c level of patients with type 2 diabetes
  13. Vitamin C supplementation for at least 30 days reduces glucose concentrations in patients with type 2 diabetes
  14. Magnesium supplementation reduces risk of cardiovascular disease among type 2 diabetes
  15. Weekly one serving of apple and pear reduces type 2 diabetes mellitus risk
  16. Reduced serum levels of folate and vitamin B12 increase peripheral neuropathy risk among patients with type 2 diabetes
  17. Vitamin C and D reduce blood pressure in patients with type 2 diabetes

2016:

  1. A higher intake of plant protein decreases risk of type 2 diabetes among women

2015:

  1. Garlic supplementation during 12 weeks reduces fasting blood glucose

2014:

  1. Exercise lowers the risk for diabetes conferred by insulin resistance
  2. 1-6 cups/day caffeinated or decaffeinated coffee is associated with reduced type 2 diabetes risk
  3. Exercise training helps to prevent and to treat type 2 diabetes in youth
  4. At least 25g dietary fiber intake per day reduces risk of type 2 diabetes
  5. Niacin supplementation reduces LDL cholesterol levels in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

2012:

Diabetes increases risk of dementia and mild cognitive impairment

XXXXXXXXXX

The human body wants the blood glucose (blood sugar) level maintained in a very narrow range of 4 to 8 mmol/l. Insulin and glucagon are the hormones which make this happen. Both insulin and glucagon are secreted from the pancreas.

When the blood glucose level drops below 4 mmol/l (after physical exercise or on awakening) the alpha cells of the pancreas release glucagon. Glucagon converts glycogen into glucose. The glucose is released into the bloodstream, increasing blood sugar levels.
On the other hand, when the blood glucose level rises above 8 mmol/l, whether as a result of glycogen conversion or from digestion of a meal, insulin is released from beta cells of the pancreas. This hormone causes the liver to convert more glucose into glycogen and to force about 2/3 of body cells to take up glucose from the bloodstream through the GLUT4 transporter, thus decreasing blood sugar levels.

Diabetes mellitus describes a group of chronic metabolic diseases in which the person has a high blood glucose level, either because insulin production is inadequate or because the body's cells do not respond properly to insulin (also called insulin resistance) or both. Diabetes can be divided into two types: type 1 and type 2.

Type 1 diabetes:
The human body does not produce insulin. This type of diabetes is also called insulin-dependent diabetes, juvenile diabetes or early-onset diabetes. People usually develop type 1 diabetes before their 40th year, often in early adulthood or teenage years.

Patients with type 1 diabetes will need to take insulin injections for the rest of their life. They must also ensure proper blood-glucose levels by carrying out regular blood tests and following a special diet. Type 1 diabetes is not curable and is generally a form which is less common than type 2.

Type 2 diabetes:
In type 2 diabetes the body does not respond properly to insulin. Type 2 diabetes occurs mainly in the elderly and in people who are overweight (BMI>25). The treatment of type 2 diabetes is the first of dietary advice in conjunction with achieving a healthy weight (BMI = 18.5-25). Unlike type 1, type 2 is curable. Type 2 diabetes is also referred to as non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.

Approximately 90% of all cases of diabetes worldwide are of this type.

These are the consequences that many diabetics may experience:

  • Amputation of limbs
  • Depression
  • Heart diseases
  • Skin problems
  • Gastrointestinal problems
  • Kidney disease
  • Eye problems
  • Problems of the joints
  • Problems with brains
  • Sexual problems
  • Foot problems
  • Nerves disorders

Dietary guidelines for diabetes prevention:

  • Choose products with minimum 1.5 grams of fiber per 100 kcal, products with maximum 30 En% fat, products with maximum 7 En% saturated fat, products with 10-20 En% protein, products with maximum 10 En% sugars and products with a low GI value (55 or lower) or in other words, your daily diet (=all meals/products that you eat on a daily basis) should on average contain minimum 1.5 grams of fiber per 100 kcal, maximum 30 En% fat, maximum 7 En% saturated fat, 10-20 En% protein and maximum 10 En% sugars.
  • Aim for a healthy weight. A healthy weight has a BMI of 18.5-25. BMI is weight divided by height squared (weight (kg)/height2 (m)).
  • Spend at least 60-90 minutes of physical activities per day or at least 10000 steps per day.
  • Eat at least 3 times (100-150 g fish per time) a week oily fish. Oily fishes are sardines, herring, salmon, anchovies, eel and mackerel. Oily fish contains more EPA and DHA than non-oily fish.
  • Eat 300 grams of vegetables and five servings of fruit a day or 30-40 grams of fiber per day.
    40 grams of fiber per dag corresponds to a daily diet of minimum 2 grams of fiber per 100 kcal.
  • Eat plenty of whole grains, such as brown bread and oatmeal and legumes.
  • Limit to 2-3 glasses of alcohol for men and 1-2 glasses for women a day or <30 g alcohol per day.

Cancer

Scientific studies (review articles) on the relationship between diet/nutrients and cancer prevention:
One swallow does not make a summer. A famous Dutch saying that could not be any more obvious. Just because one single scientific study about a certain topic makes certain claims, it does not necessarily mean it is true. On the other hand, a review article (a collection of scientific studies on a certain topic) of randomized, placebo-controlled double blind clinical trials (RCTs) will answer the following question:
"Do taking dietary supplements make sense?" Yes for a positive conclusion and no for a negative conclusion.

One swallow does not make a summer. A famous Dutch saying that could not be any more obvious. Just because one single scientific study about a certain topic makes certain claims, it does not necessarily mean it is true. On the other hand, a review article (a collection of scientific studies on a certain topic) of cohort studies or case-control studies will answer the following question:
"Should I change my diet?".

 

2024:

  1. Higher carotenoids levels reduce breast cancer

2023:

  1. 10 mg/d isoflavone dietary intake reduce breast cancer
  2. Higher tissue levels of linoleic acid reduce prostate cancer
  3. High blood vitamin B6 levels reduce colorectal cancer
  4. Higher choline dietary intake may reduce breast cancer

2022:

  1. Fruits and vegetables reduce endometrial cancer
  2. Higher blood levels of alpha-linolenic acid reduce colorectal cancer
  3. High folate dietary intake reduces colon cancer in people with medium or high alcohol consumption
  4. Higher dietary intake of processed meat increases hepatocellular carcinoma
  5. Dietary intake of vegetables and vitamin C could reduce renal cell carcinoma
  6. A high olive oil consumption reduces cancer risk
  7. Postoperative coffee or caffeine consumption causally reduces postoperative ileus

2021:

  1. 600 mg/d vitamin E supplementation decreases chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy
  2. Dendritic cell vaccine provides no benefits for newly diagnosed glioblastoma
  3. Breastfeeding reduces ovarian cancer in women with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation
  4. No association between consumption of carrot and bladder cancer
  5. Omega-3 PUFA supplementation may reduce chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy
  6. High consumption of cruciferous vegetables, citrus fruits, garlic and tomatoes may reduce colorectal cancer
  7. Obesity increases colorectal cancer in men with Lynch Syndrome
  8. Dietary calcium intake reduces colorectal adenomas
  9. High consumption of dietary trans fat increases prostate cancer and colorectal cancer
  10. Hyperlipidemia, obesity and high alcohol consumption are risk factors of early-onset colorectal cancer
  11. Guarana supplementation does not reduce cancer-related fatigue
  12. CoQ10 supplementation reduces markers of inflammation and MMPs in patients with breast cancer
  13. Obesity is a risk factor for mortality from primary liver cancer
  14. Branched-chain amino acids supplementation during oncological surgical period may reduce post-operative morbidity from infections and ascites
  15. High saturated fat increases liver cancer
  16. Coffee and tea consumption reduce glioma
  17. Higher mushroom consumption reduces breast cancer
  18. 1 cup/d green tea reduces esophageal cancer among women
  19. Malignancy increases severe/critical COVID-19
  20. Anti-cancer therapy have no adverse effects on severity and mortality in cancer patients with COVID-19
  21. No association between potato consumption and cancers
  22. 100 mg/d dietary magnesium intakes reduce cancer mortality
  23. Daily 60 to 80 grams citrus fruit reduce lung cancer
  24. A low selenium level increases breast cancer
  25. No association between fish intake and pancreatic cancer
  26. No association between dietary acrylamide intake and breast, endometrial and ovarian cancer

2020:

  1. Vegetable and fruit consumption reduce biliary cancer
  2. Tree nuts reduce cancer mortality
  3. A high plasma folate level does not reduce breast cancer
  4. Higher intakes of total protein reduce all-cause mortality
  5. Higher vitamin C dietary intake reduces breast cancer
  6. Habitual tea consumption reduces nasopharyngeal cancer
  7. Ovarian cancer survivors should consume 300 g/d vegetables and 300 g/d fruit
  8. Fat, cholesterol and vitamin A increase ovarian cancer
  9. Circulating concentrations of α-carotene, β-carotene and lutein and zeaxanthin reduce bladder cancer
  10. Dietary omega-3 PUFAs intake reduce digestive system cancers
  11. 40 g/day of pickled vegetable increase gastric cancer
  12. Higher vitamin B2 and B6 dietary intake decreases ER-/PR- breast cancer
  13. 30 min/day light-intensity physical activity reduce cancer mortality
  14. 100-g/d fish consumption decreases liver cancer
  15. Dietary intake of vitamin A reduces ovarian cancer among North Americans
  16. Nitrite dietary intake increases non-Hodgkin lymphoma in females
  17. Carbohydrate dietary intake may decrease esophageal cancer
  18. Hepatitis C increases pancreatic cancer
  19. Higher linoleic acid blood concentration reduces cancer mortality
  20. Waist circumference is a significant risk factor of liver cancer
  21. Tea consumption may reduce colorectal cancer in female
  22. Daily 20 grams tree nuts reduces cancer of the digestive system
  23. Green tea reduces stomach cancer
  24. Dietary salt intake increases risk of esophageal cancer
  25. Garlic could reduce risk of colorectal cancer

2019:

  1. Dietary fiber intake reduces endometrial cancer
  2. High β-carotene concentration reduces bladder cancer
  3. High consumption of polyunsaturated fat increases skin cancer
  4. 100g fruit per day decrease lung cancer in former smokers
  5. Carrot consumption decreases the lung cancer adenocarcinoma
  6. 0.5 g/day dietary trans fat intake increases ovarian cancer
  7. High serum iron levels increase breast cancer risk
  8. Egg consumption is not associated with brain cancer risk
  9. Tea reduces brain cancer in American population
  10. Decaffeinated coffee consumption could reduce ovarian cancer
  11. Diet with high total antioxidant capacity decreases cancer mortality
  12. Omega-3 fatty acids in fish consumption reduce breast cancer in Asian patients
  13. Physical activity reduces lung cancer among smokers
  14. Trans fatty acids are not associated with risk of breast cancer
  15. Daily 100 μg dietary folate intake reduce oestrogen-receptor-negative breast cancer
  16. 100-300 g/day fruit or vegetables reduce all-cause mortality

2018:

  1. 10g dietary fiber intake per day may reduce ovarian cancer risk
  2. 1 μg/day dietary B12 intake increases esophageal cancer
  3. Protein intake does not increase prostate cancer
  4. No association between vitamin A, C, D, E and lycopene and risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma
  5. Wine consumption is not associated with colorectal cancer
  6. Dietary carrot intake reduces breast cancer
  7. High intake of dietary flavonols, flavones and anthocyanidins may decrease colorectal cancer
  8. Calcium intake of <750 mg per day could be a risk factor for prostate cancer
  9. No association between carbohydrate intake and prostate cancer risk
  10. 5 mg/day vitamin B2 intake reduces colorectal cancer risk
  11. Moderate consumption of white wine increases the risk of prostate cancer
  12. Citrus fruit intake reduces risk of esophageal cancer
  13. Daily 10 mcg dietary intake of vitamin D decreases risk of pancreatic cancer
  14. Every 5 kg/m2 increase in BMI corresponds to a 2% increase in breast cancer risk in women
  15. A high dietary cholesterol intake might increase lung cancer risk
  16. Daily higher cooked tomatoes and sauces consumption reduces prostate cancer risk

2017:

  1. Saturated fat increases breast cancer mortality among women
  2. Daily dietary intake of 100g red meat and 50g processed meat increase risk of colorectal cancer
  3. Daily 2-4 g carnitine does not reduce cancer-related fatigue
  4. At least 28 g/d whole grain intake reduce risk of total, cardiovascular and cancer mortality
  5. High intake of cooked carrot might be associated with a low incidence of urothelial cancer
  6. Breastfeeding during 6-9 months reduces risk of endometrial cancer
  7. N-3 PUFA supplementation improves immune function and reduces the level of inflammation in gastrointestinal cancer patients postoperatively
  8. Plant-based dietary patterns decrease cancer risk
  9. Up to 12g/day nut consumption is associated with reduced all-cause and coronary heart disease mortality
  10. A high intake of red meat increases risk of lung cancer among non-smokers
  11. High serum selenium levels reduce risk of cervical cancer among women
  12. Both high vitamin E intake and circulating vitamin E levels could reduce cervical neoplasia risk
  13. High intakes of saturated fat increase risk of lung cancer
  14. Vitamin and antioxidant supplements have no overall preventive effect against bladder cancer
  15. At least 1600 mg/day calcium may reduce the recurrence of colorectal adenomas
  16. High levels of physical activity reduce risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women with a BMI until 30
  17. Daily 100g processed and red meat intake increase esophageal cancer risk
  18. No more than 175 mg/d dietary DHA intake reduces endometrial cancer
  19. Daily 621 mg dietary calcium has protective effect against esophageal cancer in Asian populations
  20. 1-3 servings/d vegetables may lower risk of renal cell carcinoma
  21. Daily 20 grams legume reduces risk of prostate cancer
  22. Daily 300 mcg dietary iodine may decrease risk of thyroid cancer
  23. Daily 2 mg dietary lycopene consumption reduces prostate cancer risk
  24. At least 7 cups/day green tea intake reduce prostate cancer
  25. 1 mg/day dietary vitamin B2 intake reduces risk of breast cancer
  26. Higher dietary carbohydrate intake increases colorectal cancer risk in men
  27. A high total fat consumption increases non-Hodgkin's lymphoma
  28. Daily 2 mg dietary vitamin E intake reduces lung cancer risk
  29. 20 mg/d isoflavones dieatary intake reduces risk of colorectal neoplasms in Asians
  30. Elevated serum selenium levels may decrease high-grade prostate cancer among current and former smokers

2015:

  1. 100-400g/day fruits and vegetables reduce risk of lung cancer
  2. High garlic and onion consumption are likely to reduce gastric cancer risk
  3. Manganese deficiency may increase breast cancer
  4. High dietary vitamin B9, D, B6 and B2 intake reduces risk of colorectal cancer
  5. Red meat induced colorectal cancer is not modified by NAT2 enzyme activity

2014:

  1. Low-fat diet reduces recurrence of breast cancer
  2. Cruciferous vegetable intake protects against cancer of the colon
  3. Recreational physical activity reduces risk of gastric cancer
  4. Daily 200-320 micrograms dietary folate intake reduce breast cancer risk
  5. 100 g/day red meat intake may increase gastric cancer risk
  6. Red meat consumption increases esophageal cancer risk
  7. White meat and fish consumption reduce risk of hepatocellular carcinoma

2012:

  1. High salt intake increases gastric cancer
  2. High intake of vegetables and fruit decreases risk of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

2011:

  1. Olive oil consumption probably reduces breast cancer and cancer of the digestive system

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

The human body consists of organs like liver, lungs and heart. Organs consist of tissues and tissue consists of cells. Under normal circumstances cells only divide when needed, e.g. at recovery, growth and wound healing. This process is also called controlled cell division. Controlled cell division is necessary and innocent. However, it becomes dangerous when cell division within a particular organ is no longer under control. In that case, is called cancer. Cancer is a disorder, characterized by uncontrolled cell division in a particular organ. Cancer is often deadly when there is metastasis.

The oxidative DNA damage is a major risk factor for developing cancer. Antioxidants can protect the DNA against oxidative damage. Oxidative damages can be caused by free radicals.

The word "cancer" is derived from the Latin word "cancer", which means "lobster". There are several types of cancer.

Cancer mortality can be reduced if cases are detected and treated early. There are 2 components of early detection efforts:

  • early diagnosis
  • screening

Cancer is a leading cause of death worldwide.
The most common in 2020 (in terms of new cases of cancer) were:

  • breast
  • lung
  • colon and rectum
  • prostate
  • skin (non-melanoma)
  • stomach

The most common causes of cancer death in 2020 were:

  • lung
  • colon and rectum
  • liver
  • stomach
  • breast

Between 30 and 50% of cancers can currently be prevented by avoiding risk factors and implementing existing evidence-based prevention strategies.

Dietary guidelines for cancer prevention:

  • 7-points nutritional profile of cancer prevention is a diet with:
    1. maximum 30 En% fat
    2. maximum 7 En% saturated fat
    3. maximum 0.2 grams salt per 100 kcal
    4. minimum 1.5 grams fiber per 100 kcal
    5. maximum 70 En% carbohydrates
    6. maximum 25 En% sugar
    7. maximum 35 En% protein
  • The easiest way to follow this diet is to choose only products/meals with:
    1. maximum 30 En% fat
    2. maximum 7 En% saturated fat
    3. maximum 0.2 grams salt per 100 kcal
    4. minimum 1.5 grams fiber per 100 kcal
    5. maximum 70 En% carbohydrates
    6. maximum 25 En% sugar
    7. maximum 35 En% protein
  • However, the most practical way to follow this diet is, all your daily consumed products/meals should contain on average:
    1. maximum 30 En% fat
    2. maximum 7 En% saturated fat
    3. maximum 0.2 grams salt per 100 kcal
    4. minimum 1.5 grams fiber per 100 kcal
    5. maximum 70 En% carbohydrates
    6. maximum 25 En% sugar
    7. maximum 35 En% protein
  • Use the 7-points nutritional profile app to see if your daily diet contains:
    1. maximum 30 En% fat
    2. maximum 7 En% saturated fat
    3. maximum 0.2 grams salt per 100 kcal
    4. minimum 1.5 grams fiber per 100 kcal
    5. maximum 70 En% carbohydrates
    6. maximum 25 En% sugar
    7. maximum 35 En% protein
  • Eat fish that provides at least 250 mg EPA and DHA per day.
  • Aim for a healthy weight. A healthy weight has a BMI of 18.5-25. BMI is weight divided by height squared (weight (kg)/height2 (m)).
  • Spend at least 60-90 minutes per day on physical exercises or at least 10,000 steps per day.
  • Eat 25-30 grams of vegetables and 2-5 servings of fruit a day or at least 25 grams of fiber per day.
    25grams of fiber per day corresponds to a daily diet of 1.3 grams of fiber per 100 kcal.
  • Eat plenty of whole grains, such as brown bread, oatmeal and legumes.
  • Limit to 2 glasses of alcohol for men and 1 glass for women a day or <20 g alcohol per day.
  • Eat no more than 6 grams of salt per day, corresponding to 2400 mg of sodium.
    6 grams salt per day corresponds to a daily diet of <0.3 g salt per 100 kcal.
  • Do not take antioxidant supplements. They do more harm than good!
  • Eat no more than 500g of red meat per week. Red meat increases the risk of developing colorectal cancer.

Different types of cancer:

Cancer

The human body consists of organs like liver, lungs and heart. Organs consists of tissues, and tissue consists of cells. Under normal circumstances cells only divide when needed, e.g. at recovery, growth and wound healing. This process is also called controlled cell division. Controlled cell division is necessary and innocent. However, it becomes dangerous when cell division within a particular organ is no longer under control. In that case, is called cancer. Cancer is a disorder, characterized by uncontrolled cell division in a particular organ. Cancer is often deadly when there is metastasis.

The oxidative DNA damage is a major risk factor for developing cancer. Antioxidants can protect the DNA against oxidative damage. Oxidative damages can be caused by free radicals.

The word "cancer" is derived from the Latin word "cancer", which means "lobster". There are several types of cancer.

Cancer mortality can be reduced if cases are detected and treated early. There are two components of early detection efforts:

  • Early diagnosis
  • Screening

Cancer is a leading cause of death worldwide. The main types of cancer are lung, stomach, liver, colorectal, breast and cervical cancer.
Cancer of the lung is the most common cancer in the world.
Lung, stomach, liver, colon and breast cancer cause the most cancer deaths each year.

35% of cancer cases is due to a wrong diet, such as high fat, high salt and/or less fruit and vegetables diet.

Dietary guidelines for cancer prevention:

  • Choose products with maximum 35 En% fat, products with maximum 10 En% saturated fat, products with maximum 0.5 g of sodium per 100 g (100 ml) product, products with minimum 1.3 grams of fiber per 100 kcal and fish providing at least 250 mg EPA and DHA per day.
  • Aim for a healthy weight. A healthy weight has a BMI of 18.5-25. BMI is weight divided by height squared (weight (kg)/height2 (m)).
  • Spend at least 60-90 minutes per day on physical exercises or at least 10000 steps per day.
  • Eat 25-30 grams of vegetables and 2-5 servings of fruit a day or 25-30 grams of fiber per day.
    30 grams of fiber per dag corresponds to a daily diet of minimum 1.5 grams of fiber per 100 kcal.
  • Eat plenty of whole grains, such as brown bread, oatmeal and legumes.
  • Limit to 2-3 glasses of alcohol for men, and 1-2 glasses for women a day or <30 g alcohol per day.
  • Eat no more than 6 grams of salt per day, corresponding to 2400 mg of sodium.
    6 grams salt per day corresponds to a daily diet of <0.3 g salt per 100 kcal.
  • Do not take antioxidant supplements. They do more harm than good!
  • Eat no more than 500 g of red meat per week. Red meat increases the risk of developing colorectal cancer.

Scientific studies on the relationship between diet/nutrients and cancer.
Review articles of randomized, placebo-controlled double-blind clinical trials (RCTs) will answer the following question:
"Is taking dietary supplements make sense?". Yes at a positive conclusion and no at a negative conclusion.

Review articles of cohort studies or case-control studies will answer the following question:
"Should I change my diet?".

  1. Elevated serum selenium levels may decrease high-grade prostate cancer among current and former smokers

Higher carotenoids levels reduce breast cancer

Objectives:
Carotenoids appear to have anticancer effects. Prospective evidence for the relation between serum carotenoids and breast cancer is controversial. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Do higher carotenoids levels (likes, α-carotene, β-carotene, β-cryptoxanthin, lycopene, zeaxanthin and lutein) reduce breast cancer risk among women?

Study design:
This review article included 17 nested case-control studies and 1 cohort study, published between 1984 and 2016 with a total of 20,188 participants. 
Median follow-up ranged from 8 months to 21 years during which 7,608 breast cancer cases were reported. 
All studies assessed circulating carotenoids using high-performance liquid chromatography. The majority of studies carried out on circulating carotenoids and the risk of breast cancer were adjusted for the following variables: BMI (n = 9), dietary variables (n = 8), age (n = 9), alcohol (n = 6), age at menarche (n = 6) and age at first birth (n = 8). 
According to the quality assessment, except for 2 studies, other publications had high quality. 

There was no publication bias. 

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found that the highest levels of total carotenoids compared to the lowest were significantly related to a 24% lower risk of breast cancer [relative risk (RR) = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.62 to 0.93, I2 = 45.6%, p = 0.075]. 
According to the sensitivity analysis, no study affected the overall RR. 

The investigators found according to linear dose-response analysis, the risk of breast cancer decreased by 2% for every 10 μg/dL of total carotenoids [RR = 0.98, 95% CI = 0.97 to 0.99]. A steady drop in the risk of breast cancer was observed for total carotenoid concentrations <1200 μg/dL followed by a plateau. The level of evidence was graded as low.

The investigators found that the highest levels of α-carotene compared to the lowest were significantly related to a 23% lower risk of breast cancer [relative risk (RR) = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.68 to 0.87, I2 = 0.0%, p = 0.48]. 
According to the sensitivity analysis, no study affected the overall RR. 

The investigators found according to linear dose-response analysis, the risk of breast cancer decreased by 22% for every 10 μg/dL of α-carotene [RR = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.66 to 0.93]. 
No evidence for nonlinear association was found. The level of evidence was graded as low. 

The investigators found that the highest levels of β-carotene compared to the lowest were significantly related to a 20% lower risk of breast cancer [relative risk (RR) = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.65 to 0.98, I2 = 56.5%, p = 0.004]. 
According to the sensitivity analysis, no study affected the overall RR. 

The investigators found according to linear dose-response analysis, the risk of breast cancer decreased by 4% for every 10 μg/dL of β-carotene [RR = 0.96, 95% CI = 0.93 to 0.99]. No evidence for nonlinear association was found. The level of evidence was graded as low. 

The investigators found that the highest levels of β-cryptoxanthin compared to the lowest were significantly related to a 15% lower risk of breast cancer [relative risk (RR) = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.74 to 0.96, I2 = 0.0%, p = 0.80]. 
According to the sensitivity analysis, no study affected the overall RR. 

The investigators found according to linear dose-response analysis, the risk of breast cancer decreased by 10% for every 10 μg/dL of β-cryptoxanthin [RR = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.82 to 0.99]. 

The investigators found that the highest levels of lycopene compared to the lowest were significantly related to a 14% lower risk of breast cancer [relative risk (RR) = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.76 to 0.98, I2 = 0.0%, p = 0.46]. 
According to the sensitivity analysis, no study affected the overall RR. 

The investigators found that the highest levels of lutein compared to the lowest were significantly related to a 30% lower risk of breast cancer [relative risk (RR) = 0.70, 95% CI = 0.52 to 0.93, I2 = 17.1%, p = 0.30]. 
According to the sensitivity analysis, no study affected the overall RR. 

The investigators concluded that higher levels of carotenoids, α-carotene, β-carotene, β-cryptoxanthin, lycopene and lutein are related to a decreased risk of breast cancer. Additionally, each 10 μg/dL of total carotenoids, α-carotene, β-carotene and β-cryptoxanthin reduce breast cancer risk with 2%, 22%, 4% and 10%, respectively. 

Original title: 
The Association between Circulating Carotenoids and Risk of Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Studies by Dehnavi MK, Ebrahimpour-Koujan S, […], Azadbakht L.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10694674/ 

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on cohort studies/significantly, carotenoids and breast cancer right here. 

10 mg/d isoflavone dietary intake reduce breast cancer

Objectives:
Epidemiological studies that focus on the relationship between dietary isoflavone intake and the risk of breast cancer still lead to inconsistent conclusions. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Does a high isoflavone dietary intake reduce risk of breast cancer among women?

Study design:
This review article included 7 cohort studies and 17 case-control studies with a total of 902,438 females.
The verification of breast cancer in these studies was based on either a cancer registry record or a histological diagnosis.
The exposure assessment of all included studies was based on a food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) via either face-to-face interviews or self-administrative questionnaires.

The publication biases were evaluated using Begg’s test and Egger’s test. The shape of the funnel plots showed asymmetry [p = 0.001] and the Egger’s test found virtual publication bias [p 0.001]. However, the trim-and-fill method failed to identify any potentially missing studies, indicating the publication bias did not affect the results.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found in the meta-analysis a significantly reduced risk of 29% for breast cancer [summary OR = 0.71, 95% CI = 0.72 to 0.81, I2 = 82.6%] when comparing the highest to the lowest isoflavone dietary intake.
The result remained the same in sensitivity analysis.

The investigators found in subgroup analysis a statistically significant protective effect of 38% for isoflavone dietary intake on breast cancer in the case-control studies [OR = 0.62, 95% CI = 0.50 to 0.76], while no such effect was observed in the cohort studies [OR = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.86 to 1.02].

The investigators found in subgroup analysis a statistically significant protective effect of 38% for isoflavone dietary intake on breast cancer in Asian women [OR = 0.62, 95% CI = 0.52 to 0.74], while no such effect was observed in non-Asian women [OR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.88 to 1.06].

The investigators found when the highest isoflavone dietary intake was lower than 10 mg/d, the negative relationship between isoflavone dietary intake and breast cancer disappeared [OR = 1.01, 95% CI = 0.94 to 1.08], whereas a statistically significant protective effect of 37% [OR = 0.63, 95% CI = 0.53 to 0.75] was found, when the highest isoflavone dietary intake was above 10 mg/d.
However, a statistically significant difference in the protective effect of isoflavone dietary intake on breast cancer was observed regardless of whether the women were pre- or postmenopausal and regardless of whether they were ER positive or negative.

The investigators concluded at least 10 mg/d isoflavone dietary intake is helpful in reducing breast cancer risk, particularly among Asian women.

Original title:
Isoflavone Consumption and Risk of Breast Cancer: An Updated Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies by Yang J, Shen H,  […], Qin Y.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10224089/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on isoflavone and breast cancer right here.

Higher tissue levels of linoleic acid reduce prostate cancer

Objectives:
Findings on the association of dietary intake and tissue biomarkers of linoleic acid (LA) with the risk of prostate cancer are conflicting. Also, no meta-analysis summarized available findings in this regard. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Do higher tissue levels or higher dietary intakes of linoleic acid reduce prostate cancer risk in men?

Study design:
This review article included 15 prospective cohort studies with 511,622 participants with an age range of ≥18 years.

During the follow-up periods ranging from 5 to 21 years, 39,993 cases of prostate cancer, 5,929 cases of advanced prostate cancer and 1,661 cases of fatal prostate cancer were detected.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found higher tissue levels of linoleic acid were significantly associated with a reduced risk of 14% for prostate cancer [RR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.77 to 0.96].   
However, a significant association was not seen for advanced prostate cancer [RR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.65 to 1.13].

The investigators found in dose-response analysis, each 5% increase in tissue levels of linoleic acid was significantly associated with a 14% lower risk of prostate cancer.

The investigators found no significant association between dietary intake of linoleic acid and risk of total [RR = 1.00, 95% CI = 0.97 to 1.04], advanced [RR = 0.98, 95% CI = 0.90 to 1.07] and fatal prostate cancer [RR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.83 to 1.13].
Not significant because RR of 1 was found in the 95% CI of 0.83 to 1.13. RR of 1 means no risk/association.

The investigators concluded higher tissue levels of linoleic acid reduce prostate cancer in men.

Original title:
Dietary intake and biomarkers of linoleic acid and risk of prostate cancer in men: A systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies by Yousefi M, Eshaghian N, […], Sadeghi O.

Link:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37077161/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on linoleic acid and prostate cancer right here.

Tissue levels of linoleic acid can be increased by eating foods that are high in linoleic acid and/or taking linoleic acid supplements.
 

Sunflower oil, corn oil, soybean oil, rice bran oil, canola (rapeseed) oil are high in linoleic acid.

 

 

High blood vitamin B6 levels reduce colorectal cancer

Objectives:
Does a high dietary intake of vitamin B6 or a high blood PLP levels (vitamin B6 level in blood) reduce the risk of colorectal cancer?

Study design:
This review article included 20 cohort studies and 8 case-control studies.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found higher dietary intake of vitamin B6 significantly reduced the risk of colorectal cancer with 20% [combined OR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.68 to 0.94].

The investigators found higher blood PLP level significantly reduced the risk of colorectal cancer with 46% [combined OR = 0.54, 95% CI = 0.35 to 0.84].

The investigators found subgroup analysis revealed that higher dietary intake of vitamin B6 significantly reduced the risk of colorectal cancer in women with 21% [combined OR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.65 to 0.96].

The investigators found subgroup analysis revealed that higher blood PLP level significantly reduced the risk of colorectal cancer in women with 59% [combined OR = 0.41, 95% CI = 0.30 to 0.57].

The investigators found subgroup analysis revealed that higher dietary intake of vitamin B6 significantly reduced the risk of colon cancer in men and women with 24% [combined OR = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.64 to 0.91].

The investigators found subgroup analysis revealed that higher blood PLP level significantly reduced the risk of colon cancer in men and women with 44% [combined OR = 0.56, 95% CI = 0.42 to 0.73].

The investigators concluded that higher dietary intake of vitamin B6 and higher blood PLP level (vitamin B6 level in blood) reduce colorectal cancer risk, particularly colon cancer.

Original title:
Association Between Vitamin B6 and the Risk of Colorectal Cancer: A Meta-analysis of Observational Studies by Lai J, Guo M, […], Li J.

Link:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36961108/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on vitamin B6 and colorectal cancer right here.

Circulating concentration of vitamin B6 in blood can be increased by eating foods that are high in vitamin B6 and/or taking vitamin B6 supplements.
 

Higher choline dietary intake may reduce breast cancer

Objectives:
The associations between dietary intakes and circulating blood levels of methionine, choline or betaine and breast cancer risk remain currently unclear. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Do higher dietary intakes and circulating blood levels of methionine, choline or betaine reduce breast cancer risk?

Study design:
This review article included 8 prospective cohort studies and 10 case-control studies.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found in case-control studies that higher dietary choline intake significantly reduced breast cancer risk with 62% [OR = 0.38, 95% CI = 0.16 to 0.86].
However, this reduced risk was not significant in prospective cohort studies [HR = 1.01, 95% CI = 0.92 to 1.12].

The investigators concluded that higher choline dietary intake may reduce breast cancer risk. May reduce because this reduced risk is not found in cohort studies.

Original title:
The association between dietary intakes of methionine, choline and betaine and breast cancer risk: A systematic review and meta-analysis by Van Puyvelde H, Dimou N, […], De Bacquer D.

Link:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36701983/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on cohort studies/significantly, choline and breast cancer right here.

Fruits and vegetables reduce endometrial cancer

Objectives:
Does consumption of fruits and vegetables reduce risk of endometrial cancer?

Study design:
This review article included  of 21 case-control studies and 6 cohort studies.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found that vegetables consumption significantly reduced risk of endometrial cancer with 24% [pooled odds ratio [OR], relative risk [RR], hazard ratio [HR] = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.63 to 0.91].

The investigators found that cruciferous vegetables consumption significantly reduced risk of endometrial cancer with 19% [pooled OR = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.70 to 0.94].

The investigators found that dark green and yellow/orange combined vegetables consumption significantly reduced risk of endometrial cancer with 36% [pooled OR = 0.64, 95% CI = 0.42 to 0.97].

The investigators found that fruits consumption significantly reduced risk of endometrial cancer with 19% [pooled OR = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.70 to 0.92].

The investigators found these results were primarily based on studies of high quality and exhibited either by case-control only or a combination of case-control and cohort studies. Additionally, the results varied by geographic location, such as Western areas, the US and Italy.

The investigators concluded that consumption of fruits and vegetables has beneficial effects on endometrial cancer risk and that specific kinds of fruits and vegetables should be recommended differently due to their outstanding bioactive components.

Original title:
The influence of dietary vegetables and fruits on endometrial cancer risk: a meta-analysis of observational studies by Lu YT, Gunathilake M and Kim J.

Link:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36151331/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on cancer and fruit and vegetable consumption right here.

Higher blood levels of alpha-linolenic acid reduce colorectal cancer

Objectives:
There is keen interest in better understanding the impacts of alpha-linolenic acid (ALA), a plant-derived n-3 fatty acid, in ameliorating the development of cancer. However, results of several prospective cohort studies present an inconsistent association between ALA intake and the incident colorectal cancer (CRC). Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Does a high dietary intake of alpha-linolenic acid or a high level of alpha-linolenic acid in blood reduce risk of colorectal cancer (colon and rectal cancer)?

Study design:
This review article included 15 cohort studies (11 studies on diet and 5 studies on biomarkers including 4 on blood and 1 on adipose tissue) with 12,239 colorectal cancer cases occurred among 861,725 participants.
The mean follow-up was 9.3 years (ranging from 1 to 28 years).
Among all of the included studies, quality scores assessed by the 9-star NOS ranged from 7 to 9, with a median quality (≤7 stars) in 2 studies and high quality (≥ 8 stars) in 13 studies.

There was no publication bias.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found higher level of alpha-linolenic acid in blood significantly reduced risk of colorectal cancer with 17% [summary RR = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.69 to 0.99, I2 = 0.0%].

The investigators found each 0.1% increase in the level of alpha-linolenic acid in blood was significantly associated with a 10% reduction in colorectal cancer risk [summary RR = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.80 to 0.99, I2 = 38.6%].

The investigators no significant dose-response association between dietary intake of alpha-linolenic acid and the incident colorectal cancer [p for non-linearity = 0.18; p for linearity = 0.24].

The investigators concluded that higher blood levels of alpha-linolenic acid reduce risk of colorectal cancer while higher dietary intake of alpha-linolenic acid does not reduce risk of colorectal cancer. Encouraging the consumption of foods rich in alpha-linolenic acid to improve its levels in the blood may potentially decrease the risk of colorectal cancer. Nevertheless, well-designed and large-scale cohort studies with biomarkers are still needed for better reconfirming the potential impacts of alpha-linolenic acid intake in the primary prevention of colorectal cancer.

Original title:
Association of Dietary Intake and Biomarker of α-Linolenic Acid With Incident Colorectal Cancer: A Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies by Dai ZB, Ren XL, […], Xu L.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9301188/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on colorectal cancer and alpha-linolenic acid consumption right here.

Vitamin D deficiency increases blindness in people with diabetes

Objectives:
Vitamin D levels have been shown to be associated with diabetic retinopathy, however to date, no review has examined the relationship between vitamin D and sight threatening diabetic retinopathy (STDR) and non-sight threatening diabetic retinopathy (NSTDR). Therefore, this review article has been conducted. 

Does vitamin D deficiency (defined as 25(OH)D levels of 20 ng/mL) increase risk of diabetic retinopathy in patients with diabetes?

Study design:
This review article included 11 cross-sectional studies and 1 case-control study with a total of  9,057 participants.
There was no publication bias.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found vitamin D deficiency significantly increased risk of sight threatening diabetic retinopathy with 80% [OR = 1.80, 95% CI = 1.40 to 2.30, p ≤ 0.001, I2 = 39.39%].
However, this increased risk was not found for non-sight threatening diabetic retinopathy [OR = 1.10, 95% CI = 0.90 to 1.27, p = 0.48, I2 = 30.21%].

The investigators concluded that vitamin D deficiency (defined as 25(OH)D levels of 20 ng/mL)  increases risk of sight threatening diabetic retinopathy but not non-sight threatening diabetic retinopathy. Given the well-reported associations between vitamin D deficiency and other unfavourable outcomes, it is important that vitamin D deficiency is managed appropriately and in a timely manner to reduce the risk of blindness in people with diabetes.

Original title:
Associations between vitamin D status and sight threatening and non-sight threatening diabetic retinopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis by Trott M, Driscoll R, […], Pardhan S.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9167360/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on vitamin D and diabetes right here.

Diabetic retinopathy, also known as diabetic eye disease (DED), is a complication of diabetes, caused by high blood sugar levels damaging the back of the eye (retina). It can cause blindness if left undiagnosed and untreated.

 

High folate dietary intake reduces colon cancer in people with medium or high alcohol consumption

Objectives:
Colorectal cancer is one of the most commonly diagnosed and deadly cancers worldwide. Epidemiological studies on the relationship between folate intake and the risk of colorectal cancer have reported inconsistent findings since folate fortification in the USA. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Does a high folate (folic acid) ietary intake reduce risk of colorectal cancer (colon and rectal cancer)?

Study design:
This review article included 24 cohort studies involving 6,165,894 individuals, of which 37,280 persons with colorectal cancer.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found compared with the lowest dietary intake, the highest folate dietary intake significantly reduced risk of colorectal cancer with 12% [combined relative risk (RR) = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.83 to 0.92, p = 0.0004].
Significantly means that there is an association with a 95% confidence.

The investigators found compared with the lowest dietary intake, the highest folate dietary intake significantly reduced risk of colorectal cancer with 3% among persons witih medium alcohol consumption [RR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.96 to 0.99, p = 0.008].
Significantly because RR of 1 was not found in the 95% CI of 0.96 to 0.99. RR of 1 means no risk/association.

The investigators found compared with the lowest dietary intake, the highest folate dietary intake significantly reduced risk of colorectal cancer with 5% among persons witih high alcohol consumption [RR = 0.95, 95% CI = 0.92 to 0.97, p = 0.003].

The investigators found compared with the lowest dietary intake, the highest folate dietary intake did not reduce risk of colorectal cancer among non-drinkers [RR = 1.00, 95% CI = 0.98 to 1.02, p = 0.827].

The investigators found compared with the lowest dietary intake, the highest folate dietary intake significantly reduced risk of colon cancer with 14% [RR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.81 to 0.92, p = 0.0004].
Significantly because the calculated p-value of 0.0004 was less than the p-value of 0.05.

The investigators found compared with the lowest dietary intake, the highest folate dietary intake did not reduce risk of rectal cancer [RR = 0.92, 95% CI = 0.84 to 1.02, p = 0.112].

The investigators found compared with the lowest dietary intake, the highest folate dietary intake significantly reduced risk of colorectal cancer in USA and Europe but not in other regions.

The investigators concluded that high folate dietary intake reduces risk of colon cancer, particularly in people with medium or high alcohol consumption, but it still needs to be further confirmed.

Original title:
Folate intake and risk of colorectal cancer: a systematic review and up-to-date meta-analysis of prospective studies by Fu H, He J, […], Chang H.

Link:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35579178/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on colorectal cancer and folic acid consumption right here.

Colorectal cancer starts in the colon or the rectum. These cancers can also be called colon cancer or rectal cancer, depending on where they start.

Higher dietary intake of processed meat increases hepatocellular carcinoma

Objectives:
The association between meat intake and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) risk is still unclear. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Does a higher dietary intake of meat increases the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma?

Study design:
This review article included 17 observational studies involving 2,915,680 participants, of which 4,953 cases of hepatocellular carcinoma.

10 studies reported red meat intake, 9 reported white meat intake, 9 reported fish intake, 7 reported processed meat intake and 5 reported total meat intake.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found results showed that the consumption of red meat [relative risk = 1.04, 95% CI = 0.91 to 1.18, I2 = 50.50%, p = 0.033] and total meat intake [relative risk = 1.01, 95% CI =  0.90 to 1.13, I2 = 15.50%, p = 0.316] were not significantly associated with risk of hepatocellular carcinoma.

The investigators found, however, a higher dietary intake of processed meat significantly increased the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma with 20% [relative risk = 1.20, 95% CI = 1.02 to 1.41, I2 = 26.30%, p = 0.228].
Significant because relative risk of 1 was not found in the 95% CI of 1.02 to 1.41. Relative risk of 1 means no risk/association.

The investigators found, in contrast, a higher dietary intake of white meat significantly decreased the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma with 24% [relative risk = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.63 to 0.92, I2 = 68.30%, p = 0.001].

The investigators found, in contrast, a higher dietary intake of fish significantly decreased the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma with 9% [relative risk = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.86 to 0.96, I2 = 40.90%, p = 0.095].

The investigators concluded that a higher dietary intake of processed meat increases the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma, while a higher dietary intake of both white meat and fish decrease the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma. Therefore, these findings suggest that dietary intervention may be an effective approach to preventing hepatocellular carcinoma. These need to be verified with further well-designed observational studies and experimental clinical research.  

Original title:
Meat Intake and the Risk of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies by Yu J, Liu Z, […], Chen W.

Link:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35583453/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on cancer and meat consumption right here.

Processed meats are meats that have been preserved by smoking or salting, curing or adding chemical preservatives. They include deli meats, bacon and hot dogs.

50 g/d almond decreases causally bad cholesterol in patients with type 2 diabetes

Objectives:
An enhanced risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD) still exists even when patients with type 2 diabetes have tight control on blood sugar. Thus, identification of treatment approaches that address CVD risk factors may be useful for patients beyond the blood sugar management. Although emerging evidence suggests that nuts consumption have beneficial effects on cardiometabolic health, the effects of almond intake in patients with type 2 diabetes are still controversial. Therefore, this review article has been conducted. 

Does almond consumption improve risk factors (cholesterol, triglycerides, fasting plasma glucose, insulin, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), body mass index, weight, body fat, systolic and diastolic blood pressure and CRP) of cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes?

Study design:
This review article included 9 RCTs.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found there was a causal relationship between almond dietary intake and a  significant reduction in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL cholesterol or bad cholesterol) [WMD = -5.28 mg/dL, 95% CI = -9.92 to -0.64, p = 0.026] in patients with type 2 diabetes compared with the control group.
This lowering effect of LDL cholesterol was robust in subgroups with almond consumption >50 g/day and baseline LDL cholesterol level 130 mg/dL.

The investigators found, however, the effect of almond on total cholesterol, triglycerides, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL cholesterol or good cholesterol), fasting plasma glucose, insulin, HbA1c, body mass index, weight, body fat, systolic and diastolic blood pressure and CRP was not significant compared with the control group.

The investigators concluded that a dietary intake of at least 50 g/d almond decreases causally LDL cholesterol (bad cholesterol) but has no favourable effect on other cardiometabolic outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes. Further high-quality studies are needed to firmly establish the clinical efficacy of the almond.

Original title:
Effects of almond on cardiometabolic outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials by Moosavian SP, Rahimlou M, […], Jalili C.

Link:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35443097/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on almond consumption and diabetes right here.
 

Dietary intake of vegetables and vitamin C could reduce renal cell carcinoma

Objectives:
Evidence associating diet with the incidence of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is inconclusive. Therefore, this umbrella review article has been conducted.

What is the association between diet and renal cell carcinoma incidence?

Study design:
This umbrella review article included 22 meta-analyses with a total of 502 individual studies and 64 summary hazard ratios (HRs) for renal cell carcinoma incidence: dietary patterns or dietary quality indices (n = 6), foods (n = 13), beverages (n = 4), alcohol (n = 7), macronutrients (n =15) and micronutrients (n =19).

No meta-analyses had high methodological quality.

59% of these 502 individual studies were cohort studies (n = 298), 39% were case-control studies (n = 196) and 2% were pooled studies (n = 8).

Sixty (94%) exposures in the included meta-analyses had more than 1,000 cases or 20,000 participants.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found no dietary factors showed convincing or highly suggestive evidence of association with renal cell carcinoma incidence in the overall analysis.

The investigators found in the overall analysis that dietary intake of vegetables significantly reduced risk of renal cell carcinoma with 26% [summary HR = 0.74, 95% = 0.63 to 0.86, suggestive evidence].

The investigators found in the overall analysis that dietary intake of vitamin C significantly reduced risk of renal cell carcinoma with 23% [summary HR = 0.77, 95% = 0.66 to 0.90, suggestive evidence].

The investigators found in the overall analysis that moderate drinking significantly reduced risk of renal cell carcinoma with 23% [summary HR = 0.77, 95% = 0.70 to 0.84, convincing evidence] in Europe and North America.

The investigators found in the overall analysis that dietary intake cruciferous vegetables significantly reduced risk of renal cell carcinoma with 22% [summary HR = 0.78, 95% = 0.70 to 0.86, highly suggestive evidence] in North America.

The investigators concluded dietary intake of vegetables and vitamin C could reduce renal cell carcinoma risk. Moderate drinking might be beneficial for Europeans and North Americans and cruciferous vegetables might be beneficial to North Americans, but the results should be interpreted with caution because no meta-analyses had high methodological quality. More researches are needed in the future.

Original title:
The role of diet in renal cell carcinoma incidence: an umbrella review of meta-analyses of observational studies by Liao Z, Fang Z, […], Luo Z.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8812002/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on cancer, vegetables, vitamin C right here.

An umbrella review article is a scientific article which only includes meta-analyses (also called review articles). The results found in an umbrella review article are more reliable than found in an individual review article.

One swallow does not make a summer. A famous Dutch saying that could not be any more obvious. Just because one single scientific study about a certain topic makes certain claims, it does not necessarily mean it is true. On the other hand, a review article (a collection of scientific studies on a certain topic) of randomized, placebo-controlled double blind clinical trials (RCTs) will answer the following question:
"Do taking dietary supplements make sense?" Yes for a positive conclusion and no for a negative conclusion.

One swallow does not make a summer. A famous Dutch saying that could not be any more obvious. Just because one single scientific study about a certain topic makes certain claims, it does not necessarily mean it is true. On the other hand, a review article (a collection of scientific studies on a certain topic) of (prospective) cohort studies or case-control studies will answer the following question:
"Should I change my diet?".

Ginger supplementation reduces blood pressure in patients with type 2 diabetes

Objectives:
There is some evidence regarding the positive effects of ginger supplementation on metabolic profile in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM). However, they are conflicting and therefore, this review article has been conducted. 

Does ginger supplementation improve metabolic profile (FBS, HbA1c, TC, TG, LDL, HDL, SBP and DBP) in patients with type 2 diabetes?

Study design:
This review article included 10 RCTs.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found pooled meta-analysis showed a significant reduction in fasting blood sugar (FBS) level following ginger supplementation by polling 8 effect sizes [WMD = -18.81, 95% CI = -28.70 to -8.92, I2 = 77.4%].

The investigators found pooled meta-analysis showed a significant reduction in HbA1c level following ginger supplementation by polling 7 effect sizes [WMD = -0.57, 95% CI = -0.93 to -0.20, I2 = 88.6%].

The investigators found pooled meta-analysis showed a significant reduction in systolic blood pressure (SBP) following ginger supplementation by polling 5 effect sizes [WMD = -4.20, 95% CI = -7.64 to -0.77, I2 = 97%].

The investigators found pooled meta-analysis showed a significant reduction in diastolic blood pressure (DBP) following ginger supplementation by polling 5 effect sizes [WMD = -1.61, 95% CI = -3.04 to -0.18, I2 = 93.2%].

The investigators found pooled meta-analysis showed ginger supplementation had no significant influence on lipid profile involving triglyceride (TG), total cholesterol (TC), LDL cholesterol and HDL cholesterol.

The investigators concluded supplementation with ginger reduces fasting blood sugar, HbA1c, systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure in patients with type 2 diabetes. Further large RCTs are required to shed light on this issue.

Original title:
The effect of ginger supplementation on metabolic profiles in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials by Ebrahimzadeh A, Ebrahimzadeh A, […], Milajerdi A.

Link:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35031435/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on lowering blood pressure and diabetes right here.
 

A high olive oil consumption reduces cancer risk

Objectives:
Does a high olive oil consumption reduce cancer risk?

Study design:
This review article included 37 case-control studies with 17,369 cases (persons with cancer) and 28,294 controls (persons without cancer) and 8 cohort studies with 12,461 incident cases among 929,771 subjects (participants).

Significant publication bias was detected via Egger’s test in the analysis on overall cancer risk [p 0.001], breast cancer [p = 0.013] and gastrointestinal cancer risk [p = 0.048].

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found in pooled analysis of case-control and cohort studies that highest olive oil consumption was significantly associated with a 31% lower risk of any cancer [pooled RR = 0.69, 95% CI = 0.62 to 0.77].  
Significantly means that there is an association with a 95% confidence.

The investigators found subgroup analyses showed that the protective effect of high olive oil consumption in terms of cancer risk was also significant in case-control studies [37 study arms, RR = 0.65, 95% CI = 0.57 to 0.74] but not in cohort studies [8 study arms, RR = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.77 to 1.05].
Furthermore, the protective association was also found in a multivariate analysis [32 study arms, RR = 0.72, 95% CI = 0.65 to 0.81], a high study quality analysis [RR = 0.72, 95% CI = 0.64 to 0.81], Mediterranean participants [RR = 0.69, 95% CI = 0.60 to 0.79] and non-Mediterranean participants [RR = 0.49, 95% CI = 0.34 to 0.71].

The investigators found in pooled analysis of case-control and cohort studies that highest olive oil consumption was significantly associated with a 33% lower risk of breast cancer [pooled RR = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.52 to 0.86].  
Significantly because RR of 1 was not found in the 95% CI of 0.52 to 0.86. RR of 1 means no risk/association.

The investigators found subgroup analyses showed that the beneficial effect was reproducible in case-control studies [RR = 0.63, 95% CI = 0.45 to 0.87] but not in cohort studies.
Furthermore, high olive oil consumption was linked to a reduced breast cancer risk in Mediterranean [RR = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.49 to 0.92] and non-Mediterranean populations [RR = 0.25, 95% CI = 0.07 to 0.89].

The investigators found in pooled analysis of case-control and cohort studies that highest olive oil consumption was significantly associated with a 23% lower risk of gastrointestinal cancer [pooled RR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.66 to 0.89].  
Subgroup analyses showed an inverse relationship between highest olive oil consumption and risk for esophageal cancer [RR = 0.47, 95%CI = 0.24 to 0.93] and pancreatic cancer [RR = 0.58, 95% CI = 0.35 to 0.97].
Furthermore, significant effects were also found in case-control studies [RR = 0.72, 95% CI = 0.61 to 0.85), studies within the Mediterranean area [RR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.67 to 0.88], multivariate analyses [RR = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.63 to 0.90] and high quality studies [RR = 0.73, 95% CI = 0.62 to 0.86].

The investigators found in pooled analysis of case-control and cohort studies that highest olive oil consumption was significantly associated with a 26% lower risk of upper aerodigestive cancer [pooled RR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.60 to 0.91].  
Subgroup analyses showed results remained significant for case-control studies [RR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.60 to 0.91], multivariate analyses [RR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.66 to 0.86] and studies of high quality [RR = 0.68, 95% CI = 0.52 to 0.89].

The investigators found in pooled analysis of case-control studies that highest olive oil consumption was significantly associated with a 54% lower risk of urinary tract cancer [pooled RR = 0.46, 95% CI = 0.29 to 0.72].  
Subgroup analyses showed results remained significant for studies of high quality [RR = 0.46, 95% CI = 0.32 to 0.66].

The investigators concluded highest versus lowest olive oil consumption is associated with 31% lower cancer risk, especially for breast, overall gastrointestinal, upper aerodigestive and urinary tract cancer. Additional prospective cohort studies on various cancer types, especially in non-Mediterranean regions, as well as large randomized trials, seem desirable in order to provide further insight into the role of olive oil in preventing cancer.

Original title:
Olive oil intake and cancer risk: A systematic review and meta-analysis by Markellos C, Ourailidou ME, […], Psaltopoulout T.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8751986/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on cancer, olive oil consumption right here.

The conclusions in scientific studies are even more reliable when they are also found in cohort studies, multivariate analyzes (studies where adjustments were made for multiple confounding factors) and high-quality studies.
 

Postoperative coffee or caffeine consumption causally reduces postoperative ileus

Objectives:
Does postoperative coffee or caffeine consumption causally reduce risk of postoperative ileus (POI) in patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery?

Study design:
This review article included 4 RCTs with 312 subjects.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found postoperative coffee or caffeine consumption significantly decreased the time to first bowel movement [MD = -10.36 h, 95% CI = -14.61 to -6.11], shortened the length of hospital stay [MD = -0.95 days, 95% CI = -1.57 to -0.34] and was significantly  associated with a 36%-decreased risk of the use of any laxatives after the procedure [RR = 0.64, 95% CI = 0.44 to 0.92].

The investigators found the time to first flatus, time to tolerance of solid food, risk of any postoperative complication, postoperative reinsertion of a nasogastric (NG) tube and anastomotic leakage showed no statistical differences between groups.

The investigators concluded postoperative coffee or caffeine consumption causally improves bowel movement and decreases the duration of hospital stay in patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery. This method is safe and can prevent or treat postoperative ileus (POI).

Original title:
The effect of coffee/caffeine on postoperative ileus following elective colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials by Yang TW, Wang CT, […], Tsai MC.

Link:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34993568/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on caffeine and cancer right here.

Postoperative ileus is a prolonged absence of bowel function after surgical procedures, usually abdominal surgery.

600 mg/d vitamin E supplementation decreases chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy

Objectives:
Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a common symptom, but prophylactic measures cannot still be carried out effectively. In addition, the efficacy of vitamin E in preventing peripheral neurotoxicity caused by chemotherapy is inconclusive. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Does vitamin E supplementation decrease risk of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy?

Study design:
This review article included 8 RCTs with a total of 488 patients.
The number of participants in each arm ranged from 13 to 96.
The experimental intervention was vitamin E supplementation as an adjuvant to cisplatin, paclitaxel and other chemotherapies.
There was no publication bias.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found patients who received vitamin E supplementation of 600 mg/day had a significantly lower incidence of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy of 69% [risk ratio = 0.31, 95% CI = 0.14 to 0.65, p = 0.002, I2 = 0%] than the placebo group (group without vitamin E).

The investigators found patients in the cisplatin chemotherapy group who received vitamin E supplementation had a significantly lower incidence of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy of 72% [risk ratio = 0.28, 95% CI = 0.14 to 0.54, p = 0.0001, I2 = 0%]  than the placebo group.

The investigators found, moreover, vitamin E supplementation significantly decreased patients’ sural amplitude after 3 rounds of chemotherapy [MD = -2.66, 95% CI = -5.09 to -0.24, p = 0.03, I2 = 0%] in contrast with that of placebo supplementation, while no significant difference was observed when patients were treated with vitamin E after 6 rounds of chemotherapy [MD = -1.28, 95% CI = -3.11 to 0.54, p = 0.17, I2 = 40%].

The investigators found, in addition, the vitamin E-supplemented group had better improvement in the neurotoxicity score and lower incidence of reflexes and distal paraesthesias than the control group.

The investigators concluded that vitamin E supplementation of 600 mg/day decreases risk of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy, particularly in the cisplatin chemotherapy group. More high-quality trials with standardized reporting of clinical outcomes about peripheral neuropathy are needed to explore the exact role of vitamin E in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy.

Original title:
Protective Effects of Vitamin E on Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials by Miao H, Li R [...], Wen Z.

Link:
https://www.karger.com/Article/FullText/515620

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on vitamin E and cancer right here.

Dendritic cell vaccine provides no benefits for newly diagnosed glioblastoma

Objectives:
The efficacy of dendritic cell vaccine for newly diagnosed glioblastoma remains controversial. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Does dendritic cell vaccine provide benefits for the newly diagnosed glioblastoma?

Study design:
This review article included 3 randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found overall, compared with control group for newly diagnosed glioblastoma, dendritic cell vaccine showed no substantial effect on:
-median overall survival [SMD = 0.11, 95% CI = -0.18 to 0.41, p = 0.45];
-median progression-free survival [SMD = 0.12, 95% CI = -0.24 to 0.48, p = 0.50];
-progression-free survival rate [risk ratio = 1.29, 95% CI = 0.82 to 2.04, p = 0.27];
-overall survival rate [risk ratio = 1.29, 95% CI = 0.61 to 2.72, p = 0.50] or;
-nervous system disorders [risk ratio = 0.80, 95% CI= 0.59 to 1.08, p = 0.14].

The investigators concluded dendritic cell vaccine provides no obvious benefits for the newly diagnosed glioblastoma.

Original title:
The Efficacy of Dendritic Cell Vaccine for Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Studies by Tan L, Peng J, […], Wu Q.

Link:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34767325/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on RCTs/cohort/significantly/review article and cancer right here.

Dendritic cells (DCs) are professional antigen-presenting cells that link innate and adaptive immunity and are critical for the induction of protective immune responses against pathogens.

Glioblastoma is an aggressive type of cancer that can occur in the brain or spinal cord.

Higher concentrations of carotenoids reduce type 2 diabetes

Objectives:
Previous meta-analysis studies have indicated inverse associations between some carotenoids and risks of metabolic syndrome, cardiovascular disease, cancer and all-cause mortality. However, the results for associations between carotenoids and type 2 diabetes (T2D) remain inconsistent and no systematic assessment has been done on this topic. Therefore, this review article (meta-analysis) has been conducted.

Do higher dietary intakes and circulating concentrations of carotenoids reduce risk of type 2 diabetes?

Study design:
This review article included 13 studies.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found for the the highest versus the lowest categories of dietary intake of β-carotene a significantly reduced risk of 22% for type 2 diabetes [pooled RR = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.70 to 0.87, I2 = 13.7%, n = 6].
This significantly reduced risk was also found for total carotenoids (n = 2), α-carotene (n = 4), and lutein/zeaxanthin (n = 4), with pooled RRs ranging from 0.80 to 0.91, whereas no significant associations were observed for β-cryptoxanthin and lycopene.

The investigators found for the the highest versus the lowest categories of circulating concentration of β-carotene a significantly reduced risk of 40% for type 2 diabetes [pooled RR = 0.60, 95% CI = 0.46 to 0.78, I2 = 56.2%, n = 7].
This significantly reduced risk was also found for total carotenoids (n = 3), lycopene (n = 4), and lutein (n = 2), with pooled RRs ranging from 0.63 to 0.85, whereas no significant association was found for circulating concentrations of α-carotene and zeaxanthin when comparing extreme categories.

The investigators found dose-response analysis indicated that nonlinear relations were observed for circulating concentrations of α-carotene, β-carotene, lutein and total carotenoids [all p-nonlinearity 0.05], but not for other carotenoids or dietary exposures.

The investigators concluded that higher dietary intakes and circulating concentrations of total carotenoids, especially β-carotene, are associated with a lower risk of type 2 diabetes. More studies are needed to confirm the causality and explore the role of foods rich in carotenoids in prevention of type 2 diabetes.

Original title:
Dietary Intake and Circulating Concentrations of Carotenoids and Risk of Type 2 Diabetes: A Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Observational Studies by Jiang YW, Sun ZH, [...], Pan A.

Link:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33979433/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on carotenoids and diabetes right here.

 

Breastfeeding reduces ovarian cancer in women with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation

Objectives:
Does breastfeeding reduce risk of ovarian cancer in women with BRCA1 mutation or BRCA2 mutation?

Study design:
This review article included 1 cohort study and 4 case-control studies with a total of 14,601 women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation.

There was no publication bias.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found ever having performed breastfeeding significantly reduced risk of ovarian cancer with 23.3% [pooled OR = 0.767, 95% CI = 0.688 to 0.856, I2 = 0%] in women with BRCA1 mutation.

The investigators found ever having performed breastfeeding non-significantly reduced risk of ovarian cancer with 18.3% [pooled OR = 0.817, 95% CI = 0.650 to1.028, I2 = 0%] in women with BRCA2 mutation.

The investigators found breastfeeding for >1 year significantly reduced risk of ovarian cancer with 21.3% [pooled OR = 0.787, 95% CI = 0.682 to 0.907, I2 = 0%] in women with BRCA1 mutation.

The investigators found breastfeeding for >1 year significantly reduced risk of ovarian cancer with 43.3% [pooled OR = 0.567, 95% CI = 0.400 to 0.802, I2 = 0%] in women with BRCA2 mutation.

The investigators concluded that ever having performed breastfeeding reduces risk of ovarian cancer in women with BRCA1 mutation and breastfeeding for >1 year reduces risk of ovarian cancer in women with BRCA2 mutation.

Original title:
The preventive effect of breastfeeding against ovarian cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: A systematic review and meta-analysis by Eoh KJ, Park EY, […], Lim MC.

Link:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34304906/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on breastfeeding and cancer right here.

No association between consumption of carrot and bladder cancer

Objectives:
Previous studies have provided limited evidence for the effect of carrot intake on bladder cancer incidence. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Is there a relationship between dietary carrot intake and bladder cancer incidence?

Study design:
This review article included 3 cohort studies.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found in a meta-analyse of 3 cohort studies no significant association between dietary carrot intake and bladder cancer risk [summary HR = 1.02, 95% CI = 0.95 to 1.10, I2 = 0.0%, p = 0.859].

The investigators concluded that there is no association between dietary consumption of carrot and the risk of bladder cancer.

Original title:
Association of Dietary Carrot Intake With Bladder Cancer Risk in a Prospective Cohort of 99,650 Individuals With 12.5 Years of Follow-Up by Xu X, Zhu Y, […], Xia D.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8349976/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on carrot consumption and cancer right here.

Dietary sodium restriction causally reduces blood pressure in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Objectives:
Although current guidelines recommend reduction of salt intake in patients with diabetes, the benefits of reducing salt intake in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) lack clear evidence. Therefore, this review articles has been conducted.

Does dietary sodium restriction causally reduce blood pressure in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM)?

Study design:
This review article included 8 RCTs with 10 trials (7 cross-over and 3 parallel designs).
No publication bias was found from Begg's and Egger's tests.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found compared with ordinary sodium intake, dietary sodium restriction significantly decreased 24-hour urine sodium level [WMD = -38.430 mmol/24h, 95% CI = -41.665 mmol/24h to -35.194 mmol/24h].

The investigators found dietary sodium restriction significantly lowered systolic blood pressure [WMD = -5.574 mm Hg, 95% CI = -8.314 to -2.834 mm Hg, I2 = 0.0%] and diastolic blood pressure [WMD = -1.675 mm Hg, 95% CI = -3.199 to -0.150 mm Hg, I2 = 0.0%].

The investigators concluded that dietary sodium restriction causally reduces systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

Original title:
Effect of dietary sodium restriction on blood pressure in type 2 diabetes: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials by Ren Y, Liqiang Qin L, […], Ma Y.

Link:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33838996/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on sodium and diabetes right here.

Salt consists of sodium and chloride. So a dietary sodium restriction means a reduction in dietary salt intake.

A diet with dietary salt restriction is a diet with maximum 0.2 grams of salt per 100 kcal.

The easiest way to follow this diet is to choose only products/meals with maximum 0.2 grams of salt per 100 kcal. These products from the supermarket contain maximum 0.2 grams of salt per 100 kcal.

However, the most practical way to follow this diet is, all your daily consumed products/meals should contain on average maximum 0.2 grams of salt per 100 kcal.
To do this, use the 7-points nutritional profile app to see if your daily diet contains maximum 0.2 grams of salt per 100 kcal.

Daily 80g potato increase type 2 diabetes among Western populations

Objectives:
Evidence regarding associations between potato consumption and type 2 diabetes (T2D) and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) risks is accumulating. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Does a high potato intake increase type 2 diabetes and gestational diabetes mellitus (diabetes mellitus during pregnancy) risk?

Study design:
This review article included 19 studies (13 for type 2 diabetes and 6 for gestational diabetes mellitus) with a total of 21,357 type 2 diabetes cases among 323,475 participants and 1,516 gestational diabetes mellitus cases among 29,288 pregnancies.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found meta-analysis showed a significantly increased risk of 19% [RR = 1.19, 95% CI = 1.06 to 1.34] for type 2 diabetes for total potato intakes among Western populations.

The investigators found meta-analysis showed a significantly increased risk of 8% [RR = 1.08, 95% CI = 1.00 to 1.16] for type 2 diabetes for baked/boiled/mashed potato intakes among Western populations.

The investigators found meta-analysis showed a significantly increased risk of 33% [RR = 1.33, 95% CI = 1.03 to 1.70] for type 2 diabetes for French fries/fried potato intakes among Western populations.

The investigators found dose-response meta-analysis demonstrated a significantly increased type 2 diabetes risk by 10% [95% CI = 1.07 to 1.14, p for trend 0.001], 2% [95% CI = 1.00 to 1.04, p for trend = 0.02] and 34% [95% CI = 1.24 to 1.46, p for trend 0.001] among Western populations for each 80 g/day (serving) increment in total potato, unfried potato and fried potato intakes, respectively.

The investigators found dose-response meta-analysis demonstrated a significantly increased gestational diabetes mellitus risk by 22% [95% CI = 1.06 to 1.42, p for trend 0.007] among Western populations for each 80 g/day (serving) increment in total potato intakes.

The investigators found dose-response meta-analysis demonstrated a significantly increased gestational diabetes mellitus risk by 26% [95% CI = 1.07 to 1.48, p for trend = 0.006] among Western populations for each 80 g/day (serving) increment in unfried potato intakes.

The investigators concluded that higher potato intake (at least 80g per day) is associated with higher type 2 diabetes risk among Western populations. The positive relationship presents a significant dose-response manner. Wisely controlled potato consumption may confer potential glucometabolic benefits.

Original title:
Dietary potato intake and risks of type 2 diabetes and gestational diabetes mellitus by Guo F, Zhang Q, [...], Ma L.

Link:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34130021/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on potato intakes and diabetes right here.