Nutrition and health

Objectives:
Does dietary intake of fiber reduce risk of endometrial cancer?

Study design:
This review article included 16 studies, involving 6,563 cases (persons with endometrial cancer).

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found dietary fiber intake significantly reduced risk of endometrial cancer with 14% [RR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.78 to 0.93].
In stratified analysis, this trend was more pronounced in the case-control studies and in studies conducted in the Americas and Asia.

The investigators found dietary fiber intake significantly reduced risk of endometrial cancer with 26% after adjusting for education level [RR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.60 to 0.88].

The investigators found dietary fiber intake significantly reduced risk of endometrial cancer with 30% after adjusting for age [RR = 0.70, 95% CI = 0.57 to 0.83].

The investigators found dietary fiber intake significantly reduced risk of endometrial cancer with 19% in studies with NOS scores of 6 (the higher the NOS scores, the more reliable the studies are) [RR = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.67 to 0.95].

The investigators found dietary fiber intake significantly reduced risk of endometrial cancer with 25% in studies with NOS scores of 7 [RR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.62 to 0.88].

The investigators concluded dietary fiber intake reduces risk of endometrial cancer. Further efforts should be made to confirm these findings.

Original title:
Association between dietary fiber and endometrial cancer: a meta-analysis by Li H, Mao H, [...], Nan Y.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31584301

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on fiber, significantly/review article and cancer right here

Objectives:
Some evidence indicates that carotenoids may reduce the risk of bladder cancer (BC), but the association is unclear. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Do carotenoids (β-cryptoxanthin, α-carotene, β-carotene and lutein and zeaxanthin) reduce risk of bladder cancer?

Study design:
This review article included a total of 22 studies (case-control and cohort studies) involving 516,740 adults.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found for the highest compared with the lowest category of carotenoid dietary intake a non-significantly reduced risk of 12% [RR = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.76 to 1.03] for bladder cancer.
Non-significantly because RR of 1 was found in the 95% CI of 0.76 to 1.03. RR of 1 means no risk/association.

The investigators found for the highest compared with the lowest category of circulating carotenoid concentrations a non-significantly reduced risk of 64% [RR = 0.36, 95% CI = 0.12 to 1.07] for bladder cancer.

The investigators found for the highest compared with the lowest category of circulating lutein and zeaxanthin concentrations a significantly reduced risk of 47% [RR = 0.53, 95% CI = 0.33 to 0.84] for bladder cancer.
Significantly because RR of 1 was not found in the 95% CI of 0.33 to 0.84. RR of 1 means no risk/association.

The investigators found dose-response analysis showed that bladder cancer risk significantly decreased by 42% [RR = 0.58, 95% CI = 0.36 to 0.94] for every 1 mg increase in daily dietary β-cryptoxanthin intake.

The investigators found dose-response analysis showed that bladder cancer risk significantly decreased by 76% [RR = 0.24, 95% CI = 0.08 to 0.67] for every 1 μmol/L increase in circulating concentration of α-carotene.

The investigators found dose-response analysis showed that bladder cancer risk significantly decreased by 27% [RR = 0.73, 95% CI = 0.57 to 0.94] for every 1 μmol/L increase in circulating concentration of β-carotene.

The investigators found dose-response analysis showed that bladder cancer risk significantly decreased by 56% [RR = 0.44, 95% CI = 0.28 to 0.67] for every 1 μmol/L increase in circulating concentrations of lutein and zeaxanthin.

The investigators concluded dietary β-cryptoxanthin intake and circulating concentrations of α-carotene, β-carotene and lutein and zeaxanthin reduce risk of bladder cancer.

Original title:
Carotenoid Intake and Circulating Carotenoids Are Inversely Associated with the Risk of Bladder Cancer: A Dose-Response Meta-analysis by Wu S, Liu Y, […], Ramirez AG.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31800007

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on carotenoid consumption and cancer right here.

 

Objectives:
The role of zinc in the etiology of type 2 diabetes has been widely reported in recent decades. However, much remains uncertain concerning the effect of zinc on the risk of developing type 2 diabetes. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Does zinc reduce risk of type 2 diabetes?

Study design:
This review article included 16 studies.
There was no publication bias.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found in 7 prospective cohort studies and 1 cross-sectional study (146,027 participants aged between 18 and 84 years and of both genders, belonging to different ethnic groups. Of which, 11,511 type 2 diabetes cases) when comparing the highest versus lowest dietary zinc intakes, a significantly reduced risk of 13% [OR = 0.87, 95% CI = 0.78-0.98, I2 = 64.5%, p = 0.003] for type 2 diabetes.
This relationship was stronger and more evident in rural compared to urban areas [rural areas: OR = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.48-0.73, I2 = 0.0%, p = 0.843 versus urban areas: OR = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.86-1.02, I2 = 43.9%, p = 0.113].

The investigators found no association between supplementary [OR = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.75-1.19, I2 = 85.4%, p = 0.009] or total zinc intake from both diet and supplementation [OR = 0.95, 95% CI = 0.82-1.11, I2 = 56.5%, p = 0.129] and type 2 diabetes risk.

The investigators found in population-based studies that high serum/plasma zinc levels significantly increased risk of type 2 diabetes with 64% [OR = 1.64, 95% CI = 1.25-2.14, I2 > 22.5%, p = 0.275].

The investigators concluded high dietary zinc intake reduces risk of type 2 diabetes. This relationship is stronger and more evident in rural compared to urban areas. However, an elevated serum/plasma zinc concentration is associated with an increased risk of type 2 diabetes in the general population.

Link:
Zinc Intake and Status and Risk of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis by Fernández-Cao JC, Warthon-Medina M, […], Lowe NM.

Link:
https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/11/5/1027/htm

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on diabetes and zinc consumption right here.

Serum/plasma zinc levels can be increased by eating products that contain a lot of zinc and/or taking zinc supplements.
 

Objectives:
Is there an association between dietary fat intake and the risk of three major types of skin cancer including basal cell carcinoma (BCC), squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and cutaneous malignant melanoma (CMM)?

Study design:
This review article included 3 prospective cohort studies (175,675 participants and 30,915 basal cell carcinoma cases, 4,106 squamous cell carcinoma cases and 1,638 cutaneous malignant melanoma cases) and 9 case-control studies (328 basal cell carcinoma cases, 493 squamous cell carcinoma cases, 1,547 cutaneous malignant melanoma cases and 2,660 controls).

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found pooled results indicated that dietary consumption of total fat and saturated fat were not associated with 3 major types of skin cancer.

The investigators found high consumption of monounsaturated fat was significantly associated with a decreased risk of 10% for basal cell carcinoma [RR = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.85 to 0.96]. 

The investigators found high consumption of polyunsaturated fat was significantly associated with an increased risk of 19% for squamous cell carcinoma [RR = 1.19, 95% CI = 1.06 to 1.33]. 

The investigators concluded high consumption of monounsaturated fat decreases risk of basal cell carcinoma while high consumption of polyunsaturated fat increases risk of squamous cell carcinoma. However, these findings should be confirmed by further evidence from well-designed and large-scale prospective cohort studies.

Original title:
Dietary Fat Intake and the Risk of Skin Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies by Ruan L, Cheng SP and Zhu QX.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31298947

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on fat consumption and cancer right here.
 

Objectives:
Does magnesium reduce risk of type 2 diabetes?

Study design:
This review article included 35 cohort studies and 26 RCTs (1,168 participants).

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found compared to the lowest magnesium dietary intake, the highest level was associated with a 22% lower risk for type 2 diabetes.

The investigators found the risk for type 2 diabetes was reduced by 6% for each 100mg increment in daily magnesium dietary intake.

The investigators found in 26 RCTs (1,168 participants) that magnesium supplementation significantly reduced:
-the fasting plasma glucose (FPG) level [SMD = -0.32, 95% CI = -0.59 to -0.05];
-2-h oral glucose tolerance test (2-h OGTT) result [SMD = -0.30, 95% CI = -0.58 to -0.02];
-fasting insulin level [SMD = -0.17, 95% CI = -0.30 to -0.04];
-homeostatic model assessment-insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) score [SMD = -0.41, 95% CI = -0.71 to -0.11];
-triglyceride (TG) level;
-systolic blood pressure (SBP) and;
-diastolic blood pressure (DBP).

The investigators found trial sequential analysis (TSA) showed an inverse association, with most benefits of magnesium supplementation on glucose metabolism being stable.

The investigators concluded magnesium dietary intake has an inverse dose-response association with type 2 diabetes incidence and supplementation appears to be advisable in terms of glucose parameters in type 2 diabetes/high-risk individuals.

Original title:
Association of Magnesium Consumption with Type 2 Diabetes and Glucose Metabolism: a Systematic Literature Review and Pooled Study with Trial Sequential Analysis by Zhao B, Deng H, [...], Zhang W.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31758631

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on diabetes and magnesium consumption right here.

Objectives:
Observational evidence suggests higher nut consumption is associated with better glycemic control. However, it is unclear if this association is causal. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Is there a causal relationship between consumption of tree nuts or peanuts and reduced risk of type 2 diabetes?

Study design:
This review article included a total of 40 RCTs with 2,832 unique participants, with a median duration of 3 months (range: 1-12 months).

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found overall consumption of tree nuts or peanuts had a favourable effect on HOMA-IR values [WMD = -0.23, 95% CI = -0.40 to -0.06, I2 = 51.7%] and fasting insulin levels [WMD = -0.40 μIU/mL, 95% CI = -0.73 to -0.07 μIU/mL, I2 = 49.4%].

The investigators found, however, there was no significant effect of nut consumption on fasting blood glucose levels [WMD = -0.52 mg/dL, 95% CI = -1.43 to 0.38 mg/dL, I2 = 53.4%] or HbA1c [WMD = 0.02%, 95% CI = -0.01% to 0.04%, I2 = 51.0%].

The investigators concluded consumption of peanuts or tree nuts decreases HOMA-IR and fasting insulin levels. These findings suggest that nut consumption may improve insulin sensitivity. In the future, well-designed clinical trials are required to elucidate the mechanisms that account for these observed effects.

Original title:
The effect of nuts on markers of glycemic control: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials by Tindall AM, Johnston EA, […], Petersen KS.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30722007

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on diabetes and nut consumption right here.

Objectives:
The incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) has increased in the US over the last several years. The consumption of low-fat dairy foods has been linked with decreasing the risk of diabetes mellitus but studies have yet to show a clear correlation. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Is there a causal relationship between consumption of low-fat dairy foods and reduced risk of type 2 diabetes?

Study design:
This review article included 30 RCTs.
The total sample size was 2,900 with >50% female participants, but the distribution varied greatly across different studies.
The mean age of subjects ranged from 18-63 years.
The funnel plots for all 3 outcomes (HOMA-IR, waist circumference and body weight) did not suggest significant publication bias.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found (794 individuals) comparing high intake to the control group, consumption of low-fat dairy foods significantly reduced the HOMA-IR values [MD = -1.21, 95% CI = -1.74 to -0.67, p 0.00001, I2 = 92%].

The investigators found (1,348 individuals) comparing high intake to the control group, consumption of low-fat dairy foods significantly reduced waist circumference [MD = -1.09 cm, 95% CI = -1.68 to -0.58, p 0.00001, I2 = 94%].

The investigators found for body weight (2,362 individuals), the low-fat dairy foods intervention group weighed 0.42 kg less than the control group [p 0.00001, I2 = 92%].

The investigators found limiting to studies that were assessed to have low risk of bias did not significantly change the point estimates or heterogeneity statistics (Q or I2) for all 3 outcomes.
Similarly excluding studies with a physical activity component did not significantly alter point estimates or heterogeneity statistics for all 3 outcomes.

The investigators concluded low-fat dairy products have a beneficial effect on HOMA-IR, waist circumference and body weight. This could impact dietary recommendations to reduce type 2 diabetes risk.

Original title:
The Effects of Dairy Intake on Insulin Resistance: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials by Sochol KM, Johns TS, […], Melamed ML.

Link:
https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/11/9/2237/htm

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on diabetes and dairy products intake right here.

Objectives:
In recent years, cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) have become a focus topic and global concern. There have been mixed reports on the relationship between whole grain or cereal fiber intake and the risk of type 2 diabetes. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Does grain or cereal fiber dietary intake reduce risk of type 2 diabetes?

Study design:
This review article included 7 cohort studies and 1 case-control study with a total of 434,903 participants and 14,728 cases of type 2 diabetes.
The average follow-up was 12.6 years.
There was no publication bias.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found whole grain or cereal fiber dietary intake was associated with a reduced risk of 26% [combined RR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.67 to 0.82, I2 = 56.8%, p = 0.06] for type 2 diabetes.
This reduced risk was 38% [pooled RR = 0.68, 95% CI = 0.64-0.73, I2 = 0.0%, p = 0.452] in sensitivity analysis.

The investigators found whole grain or cereal fiber dietary intake was associated with a reduced risk of 32% [combined RR = 0.68, 95% CI = 0.49 to 0.88] for type 2 diabetes among males.

The investigators found whole grain or cereal fiber dietary intake was associated with a reduced risk of 26% [combined RR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.64 to 0.77] for type 2 diabetes among females.

The investigators concluded that increased whole grain and cereal fiber dietary intake reduce risk of type 2 diabetes.

Original title:
Whole grain and cereal fiber intake and the risk of type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis by Wang Y, Duan Y, […], Jin Y.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6627783/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on diabetes and fiber intake right here.

Objectives:
The results of epidemiological studies on the relationship between fruit and vegetable intake and lung cancer risk were inconsistent among participants with different smoking status. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Do dietary intakes of fruit and vegetables reduce risk of lung cancer?

Study design:
This review article included a total of 12 prospective cohort studies.
The duration of follow-up ranged from 4 to 12.9 years.
No publication bias was found.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found for dietary consumption of fruit a significantly reduced risk of 14% [summary RR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.78 to 0.94, I2 = 0.0%, p = 0.642] for lung cancer among current smokers.

Significant means that there is an association with a 95% confidence.

The investigators found for dietary consumption of fruit a significantly reduced risk of 9% [summary RR = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.84 to 0.99, I2 = 0.0%, p = 0.653] for lung cancer among former smokers.
Significant because RR of 1 was not found in the 95% CI of 0.84 to 0.99. RR of 1 means no risk/association.

The investigators found stratified analysis showed that dietary consumption of fruit significantly reduced risk of lung cancer with 23% [RR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.62 to 0.96] in current smoking subjects from Europe.

The investigators found in linear dose-response analysis that an increase of 100 grams of fruit intake per day was associated with a 5% reduction [RR = 0.95, 95% CI = 0.93 to 0.97, p for trend 0.001] in current smokers.

The investigators found in linear dose-response analysis that an increase of 100 grams of fruit intake per day was associated with a 5% reduction [RR = 0.95, 95% CI = 0.93 to 0.99, p for trend = 0.001] in former smokers.

The investigators found for dietary consumption of vegetables a significantly reduced risk of 13% [summary RR = 0.87, 95% CI = 0.78 to 0.97, I2 = 25.4%, p = 0.226] for lung cancer among current smokers.

The investigators found in linear dose-response analysis that an increase of 100 grams of vegetable intake per day was associated with a 3% lower risk of lung cancer in current smokers [95% CI = 0.96 to 1.00, p for trend = 0.057]. 

The investigators concluded that fruit consumption, at least 100g per day decreases lung cancer risk among current smokers and former smokers, while vegetables consumption, at least 100g per day decreases lung cancer risk of current smokers. These findings may have considerable public health significance for the prevention of lung cancer through dietary interventions.

Original title:
The Associations of Fruit and Vegetable Intake with Lung Cancer Risk in Participants with Different Smoking Status: A Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies by Wang C, Yang T, [...], Li D.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6723574/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on fruit and vegetables consumption and cancer right here.

 

Objectives:
Findings of epidemiological studies regarding the association between carrot consumption and lung cancer risk remain inconsistent. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Do dietary intakes of carrot reduce risk of lung cancer?

Study design:
This review article included a total of 17 case-control studies and 1 prospective cohort study, involving 202,969 individuals and 5,517 patients with lung cancer.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found in 18 studies a significantly reduced risk of 42% [pooled OR = 0.58, 95% CI = 0.45 to 0.74] for lung cancer by comparing the highest category with the lowest category of carrot consumption.
Exclusion of any single study did not materially alter the pooled OR.

The investigators found based on subgroup analyses for the types of lung cancer a significantly reduced risk of 66% [pooled OR = 0.34, 95% CI = 0.15 to 0.79] for the lung cancer adenocarcinoma by comparing the highest category with the lowest category of carrot consumption.

The investigators found based on subgroup analyses for the types of lung cancer a significantly reduced risk of 39% [OR = 0.61, 95% CI = 0.46 to 0.81] for mixed types of lung cancer by comparing the highest category with the lowest category of carrot consumption.

The investigators concluded that carrot consumption decreases the risk of lung cancer, especially for adenocarcinoma.

Original title:
Is carrot consumption associated with a decreased risk of lung cancer? A meta-analysis of observational studies by Xu H, Jiang H, […], Lu Z.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31552816

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on carrot consumption and cancer right here.

 

Objectives:
Observational studies have reported controversial evidence of the association between dietary fat intake and ovarian cancer. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.
Does dietary fat intake increase risk of ovarian cancer among women?

Study design:
This review article included 21 observational studies involved approximately 900,000 women.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found a significant nonlinear association between dietary total fat intake with the risk of ovarian cancer, with a relatively steep slope at dietary total fat intake higher than 30 g/day [p non-linearity 0.01].

The investigators found, moreover, the risk of ovarian cancer was increased in non-linear form for both saturated and monounsaturated fat from 25 g/day [p non-linearity 0.05].

The investigators found in linear meta-analysis a 2% greater risk of ovarian cancer per 10 g/day increase in total dietary fat intake.

The investigators found in linear meta-analysis a 2% greater risk of ovarian cancer per 0.5 g/day increase in dietary trans fat intake.

The investigators found in linear meta-analysis a 1% greater risk of ovarian cancer per 2.5 g/day increase in dietary monounsaturated fat intake.
However, this association for monounsaturated fat was marginally significant [p = 0.052].

The investigators found in linear meta-analysis a 1% greater risk of ovarian cancer per 50 mg/day increase in dietary cholesterol intake.

The investigators concluded that dietary total, trans, saturated and partially monounsaturated fat as well as cholesterol intake increase risk of ovarian cancer among women.

Original title:
Dietary Fat Intake and Risk of Ovarian Cancer: A Systematic Review and Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies by Sadeghi A, Shab-Bidar S, […], Djafarian K.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31058552

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on fat consumption and cancer right here.
 

Objectives:
Although many studies have shown that low zinc status is associated with diabetes, the putative effects of zinc supplementation on glycemic control are inconclusive. Therefore, this review article (meta-analysis) has been conducted.

Does zinc supplementation reduce risk of diabetes mellitus?

Study design:
This review article included 32 RCTs, involving a total of 1,700 participants in 14 countries.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found overall, compared with their respective control groups, the subjects in the zinc supplementation group had a statistically significant reduction in concentrations of :
-fasting glucose [WMD = -14.15 mg/dL, 95% CI = -17.36 to -10.93 mg/dL];
-2-h postprandial glucose [WMD = -36.85 mg/dL, 95% CI = -62.05 to -11.65 mg/dL];
-fasting insulin [WMD = -1.82 mU/L, 95% CI = -3.10 to -0.54 mU/L];
-homeostasis model assessment for insulin resistance [WMD = -0.73, 95% CI = -1.22 to -0.24]:
-glycated hemoglobin [WMD = -0.55%, 95% CI = -0.84 to -0.27%] and;
-high-sensitivity C-reactive protein [WMD = -1.31 mg/L, 95% CI = -2.05 to -0.56 mg/L].

The investigators found, moreover, subgroup analyses revealed that the effects of zinc supplementation on fasting glucose were significantly influenced by diabetic status and the formulation of the zinc supplement.

The investigators concluded several key glycemic indicators are significantly reduced by zinc supplementation, particularly the fasting glucose in subjects with diabetes and in subjects who received an inorganic zinc supplement. Together, these findings support the notion that zinc supplementation may have clinical potential as an adjunct therapy for preventing or managing diabetes.

Original title:
Zinc supplementation improves glycemic control for diabetes prevention and management: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials by Wang X, Wu W, [...], Wang F.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31161192

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on diabetes and zinc right here.

Objectives:
Iron has been shown to promote breast carcinogenesis in animal models through generation of oxidative stress and interaction with estrogen. Heme iron, which is found exclusively in animal-sourced foods, is suggested to have a more detrimental effect. Epidemiological evidence of the association between iron and breast cancer risk remains inconclusive and has not been comprehensively summarized. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Does dietary iron consumption increase breast cancer risk?

Study design:
This review article included 15 case-control studies and 12 prospective cohort studies.

Of the 17 studies assessing iron intake, 7 were cohort studies with study size ranging from 4,646 to 193,742 participants, follow-up ranging from 5.5 to 20 years and number of breast cancer cases ranging from 188 to 9,305. The remaining 10 studies were case-control studies, of which 4 were hospital-based, 3 were population-based and 3 were nested within existing cohorts, with case numbers ranging from 220 to 3,452.

Of the 11 studies assessing body iron status, 5 were cohort studies with study size ranging from 1,795 to 164,355 participants, follow-up ranging from 7.1 to 17.6 years and number of cases ranging from 80 to 3,238. The remaining 6 studies used a nested case-control or case-cohort design, with follow-up (where reported) ranging from 4 to 15.7 years and case numbers ranging from 107 to 795.

Overall, NOS scores ranged from 4 to 9 (mean = 7.0).

No publication bias was found.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found compared to lowest category, highest dietary heme iron intake significantly increased risk of breast cancer with 12% [pooled RR = 1.12, 95% CI = 1.04-1.22, I2 = 39%, p heterogeneity = 0.15].

The investigators found each 1 mg/day increase in dietary heme iron intake, was associated with a statistically significant 8% increase in breast cancer risk [pooled RR = 1.08, 95% CI = 1.002–1.17].

The investigators found compared to lowest levels, highest serum iron levels significantly increased risk of breast cancer with 22% [pooled RR = 1.22, 95% CI = 1.01-1.47, I2 = 61%, p heterogeneity = 0.04].

The investigators found serum iron levels exhibited a J-shaped dose-response relationship with breast cancer risk, with strong evidence of a nonlinear effect [p nonlinearity  0.001].

Specifically, a steady increase in risk was noted for serum iron levels above ~ 100 μg/dL, with the association becoming statistically significant at just beyond ~ 125 μg/dL.

The investigators concluded that higher dietary heme iron intake and higher serum iron levels increase breast cancer risk. Further research is needed to better elucidate the association between iron intake/status and risk of breast cancer.

Original title:
Iron intake, body iron status, and risk of breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis by Chang VC, Cotterchio M and Khoo E.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6555759/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on iron consumption, review article/significantly and breast cancer right here.
 

Objectives:
Dietary proteins, including those obtained from animal and plant sources, have inconsistently been correlated with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) risk. Therefore, this review article (meta-analysis) has been conducted.

Does dietary protein intake increase risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus?

Study design:
This review article included 21 cohort studies with a total of 487,956 individuals and 38,350 T2DM cases (persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus).

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found high total dietary protein intake was associated with an increased risk of 10% for type 2 diabetes mellitus [RR = 1.10, p = 0.006] whereas moderate total dietary protein intake was not significantly associated with type 2 diabetes mellitus risk [RR = 1.00,  p = 0.917].  
Not significantly because the calculated p-value of 0.917 was larger than the p-value of 0.05.

The investigators found, moreover, an increased risk of 13% [RR = 1.13, p = 0.013] for type 2 diabetes mellitus was observed with high  dietary animal protein intake whereas moderate animal protein intake had little or no effect on type 2 diabetes mellitus risk [RR = 1.06, p = 0.058].

The investigators found, high dietary intake of plant protein did not affect type 2 diabetes mellitus risk [RR = 0.93, p = 0.074], whereas moderate intake was associated with a reduced risk of 6% for type 2 diabetes mellitus [RR = 0.94, p  0.001].

The investigators concluded high dietary total protein and dietary animal protein intakes are associated with an increased risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus, whereas moderate plant protein intake is associated with a decreased risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Original title:
Dietary protein intake and subsequent risk of type 2 diabetes: a dose-response meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies by Ye J, Yu Q, [...], Wang Y.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30929078

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on diabetes and protein right here.

A diet with high protein intake is a diet with a minimum of 35 En% protein (En% = energy percentage). These products from the supermarket contain at least 35 En% protein.
35 En% protein means that the amounts of protein contribute 35% to the total calories (kcal) of the diet.
If the diet contains 2000 kcal, 175 grams of protein contribute 35% to this 2000 kcal.
1 gram of protein gives 4 kcal. Thus, 175 grams of protein provide 700 kcal and 700 kcal is 35% of 2000 kcal.

A diet with moderate protein consumption is a diet with 20-25 En% protein. The easiest way to follow a diet with moderate protein consumption is to choose only products/meals that also contain 20-25 En% protein. These products from the supermarket contain 20-25 En% protein.

 

Objectives:
Is there an association between poultry and egg consumption and brain cancer risk?

Study design:
This review article included a total of 10 articles (6 articles for poultry consumption and 5 articles for egg consumption).

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found no association between poultry consumption and reduced risk of brain cancer [summarized relative risk = 0.901, 95% CI = 0.703-1.154, I2 = 60.7%, p = 0.018].
No association because RR of 1 was found in the 95% CI of 0.703 to 1.154. RR of 1 means no risk/association.

The investigators found in 4 studies no association between poultry consumption and reduced risk of brain cancer glioma [summarized relative risk = 0.873, 95% CI = 0.737-1.034, I2 = 0.0%, p = 0.838].

The investigators found no association between egg consumption and reduced risk of brain cancer [summarized relative risk = 0.998, 95% CI = 0.552-1.805, I2 = 82.6%, p = 0.001].

The investigators found no association between egg consumption and increased risk of brain cancer glioma [summarized relative risk = 1.472, 95% CI = 0.935-2.316].

The investigators concluded that poultry and egg consumption are not associated with the risk of brain cancer. Due to the limited quality of evidence currently available, more studies related to poultry and egg consumption for brain cancer is necessary.

Original title:
A meta-analysis of the association between poultry and egg consumption and the risk of brain cancer by Luo H, Sun P, [...], Guo Y.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30782302

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on poultry and egg consumption, review article/significantly and cancer right here.

Objectives:
Previous studies had demonstrated some associations between coffee and tea consumption and brain cancer risk resulted in an inconsistent relationship. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Does coffee or tea consumption reduce brain cancer risk?

Study design:
This review article included 8 cohort studies and 3 case-control studies, involving 2,583 cases (persons with brain cancer) among 1,684,262 participants.

Based on Egger’s test and funnel plot, there existed no publication bias.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found highest category of coffee consumption significantly reduced risk of brain cancer with 21.5% [RR = 0.785, 95% CI = 0.580-0.984, I2 = 65.6%, p for heterogeneity = 0.001], when compared with the lowest category.

The investigators found in supgroup analysis highest category of coffee consumption significantly reduced risk of glioma with 24% [RR = 0.760, 95% CI = 0.548-0.972], when compared with the lowest category.

The investigators found in cohort studies highest category of coffee consumption significantly reduced risk of brain cancer with 14.2% [RR = 0.858, 95% CI = 0.700-0.992], when compared with the lowest category. However, this reduced risk was not significant in case-control studies.

The investigators found highest category of coffee consumption significantly reduced risk of brain cancer with 88.3% in Asian populations [RR = 0.217, 95% CI = 0.042-0.896], when compared with the lowest category. However, this reduced risk was not significant in other populations.

The investigators found sensitivity analysis showed pooled RR of coffee consumption ranged from 0.738 [95% CI = 0.542-0.961) to 0.905 [95% CI = 0.754-1.088].

The investigators found highest category of tea consumption significantly reduced risk of brain cancer with 20.2% in American populations [RR = 0.798, 95% CI = 0.646-0.986], when compared with the lowest category.

The investigators found sensitivity analysis showed pooled RR of tea consumption ranged from 0.863 [95% CI = 0.699-1.067] to 0.947 [95% CI = 0.763-1.176].

The investigators found highest category of coffee plus tea consumption significantly reduced risk of brain cancer with 31.6% [RR = 0.684, 95% CI = 0.481-0.975], when compared with the lowest category.

The investigators concluded higher consumption of coffee reduces risk of brain cancer in Asian populations and higher consumption of tea reduces risk of brain cancer in American population. However, future studies with detailed information about sex, lifestyle and some other related factors are warranted to further explore the association between coffee or tea consumption and risk of brain cancer.

Original title:
Association between tea and coffee consumption and brain cancer risk: an updated meta-analysis by Song Y, Wang Z, [....], Guo J.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6419842/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on coffee and tea consumption, review article/significantly and cancer right here.
 

Objectives:
The role of gut microbiota in the management of diabetes has been shown. Several current trials are investigating the effect of probiotics and prebiotics, which are widely used to modulate intestinal microbiota, on inflammatory factors and biomarkers of oxidative stress in diabetic patient. However, their findings are controversial. Therefore, this review article (meta-analysis) has been conducted.

Do probiotic and synbiotic supplementation improve biomarkers of inflammation and oxidative stress in diabetic patients?

Study design:
This review article included 16 RCTs (n = 1,060).

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reported the effect of probiotics or synbiotics on circulating (serum and plasma) inflammatory marker (hs-CRP) and oxidative stress indicators (malondialdehyde [MDA], glutathione [GSH], nitric oxide [NO] and total antioxidant capacity [TAC]) among patients with diabetes.

The methodological quality varied across these trials.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found probiotic and synbiotic supplementation significantly decreased hs-CRP level [SMD = -0.38, 95% CI = -0.51 to -0.24, p = 0.000] and the oxidative stress indicator malondialdehyde [SMD = -0.61, 95% CI = -0.89 to -0.32, p = 0.000] in diabetic patients compared to those in subjects receiving placebos.

The investigators found, in addition, probiotic and synbiotic supplementation significantly increased total antioxidant capacity [SMD = 0.31, 95% CI = 0.09 to 0.52, p = 0.006], nitric oxide [SMD = 0.62, 95% CI = 0.25 to 0.99, p = 0.001] and glutathione [SMD = 0.41, 95% CI = 0.26, 0.55, p = 0.000] levels.

The investigators concluded that probiotic and synbiotic supplementation improve biomarkers of inflammation and oxidative stress in diabetic patients. Further studies are needed to develop clinical practice guidelines for the management of inflammation and oxidative stress in these patients.

Original title:
The effect of probiotic and synbiotic supplementation on biomarkers of inflammation and oxidative stress in diabetic patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials by Zheng HJ, Guo J, [...], Wang Y.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30794924

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on diabetes and probiotic and synbiotic supplementation right here.

Oxidative stress is an imbalance between free radicals and antioxidants in your body. Antioxidants can reduce oxidative stress.
 

Objectives:
Results from earlier publications on the association of coffee and caffeine and risk of ovarian cancer are inconsistent. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Is there an association between coffee and caffeine consumption and risk of ovarian cancer among women?

Study design:
This review article included 22 case-control studies with a total of 40,140 participants, of which 8,568 patients with ovarian cancer. The participants were ≥ 17 years.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found combining 21 effect sizes from 18 studies, no significant association was observed between total coffee consumption and risk of ovarian cancer [OR = 1.09, 95% CI = 0.94 to 1.26].

The investigators found no significant association between total caffeine intake and ovarian cancer risk [OR = 0.89, 95% CI = 0.55 to 1.45].

The investigators found, in addition, caffeinated coffee intake was not significantly associated with ovarian cancer risk [OR = 1.05, 95% CI = 0.87 to 1.28].

The investigators found, however, combining effect sizes from 5 studies, an inverse significant association between decaffeinated coffee intake and risk of ovarian cancer [OR = 0.72, 95% CI = 0.58 to 0.90].

The investigators concluded decaffeinated coffee consumption could reduce risk of ovarian cancer among women. Could reduce because this review article only included case-control studies and no cohort studies.

Original title:
Coffee and caffeine intake and risk of ovarian cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis by Shafiei F, Salari-Moghaddam A , […], Esmaillzadeh A.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30833443

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on coffee consumption, review article/significantly and cancer right here.
 

Objectives:
Various mechanisms link higher total homocysteine to higher insulin resistance and risk of type 2 diabetes (T2D). Folate supplementation is recognized as a way to lower homocysteine. However, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) show inconsistent results on insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes outcomes. Therefore, this review article (meta-analysis) has been conducted.

Does folate supplementation improve insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes outcomes?

Study design:
This review article included 29 RCTs (22,250 participants) that assessed the effect of placebo-controlled folate supplementation alone or in combination with other B vitamins on fasting glucose, insulin, homeostasis model assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) or risk of type 2 diabetes.

The meta-analysis was conducted using both random- and fixed-effects models to calculate weighted mean differences (WMDs) or risk ratios with 95% CIs.
Heterogeneity was low in all meta-analyses.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found when compared with placebo, folate supplementation significantly lowered fasting insulin [WMD = -13.47 pmol/L, 95% CI = -21.41 to -5.53 pmol/L, p 0.001] and HOMA-IR [WMD = -0.57 units, 95% CI = -0.76 to -0.37 units, p 0.0001], but no overall effects were observed for fasting glucose or HbA1c.

The investigators found subgroup analysis showed no signs of effect modification except for change in homocysteine, with the most pronounced effects in trials with a change of >2.5 µmol/L.
Changes in homocysteine after folate supplementation correlated with changes in fasting glucose [β = 0.07, 95% CI = 0.01 to 0.14, p = 0.025] and HbA1c [β = 0.46, 95% CI = 0.06 to 0.85, p = 0.02].

The investigators found only 2 studies examined folate supplementation on risk of type 2 diabetes and they found no change in RR [pooled RR = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.80 to 1.04, p = 0.16].

The investigators concluded that folate supplementation lowers fasting insulin and HOMA-IR. However, folate supplementation does not reduce risk of type 2 diabetes.

Original title:
Effect of folate supplementation on insulin sensitivity and type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials by Lind MV, Lauritzen L, [...], Eriksen JN.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30615110

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on diabetes and folate (also called folic acid) right here.
 

Objectives:
Do omega-3 fatty acids in fish consumption reduce risk of breast cancer in Asian patients?

Study design:
This review article included 4 cohort studies and 7 case-control studies with a total of 130,365 Asian patients.

There was not any study with significant publication bias included.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found omega-3 fatty acids in fish consumption significantly reduced risk of  breast cancer in Asian patients with 20% [OR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.73-0.87, p 0.00001].
Significant because OR of 1 was not found in the 95% CI of 0.73 to 0.87. OR of 1 means no risk/association.

The investigators concluded omega-3 fatty acids in fish consumption reduce breast cancer risk in Asian patients.

Original title:
Protective Effect of Omega-3 Fatty Acids in Fish Consumption Against Breast Cancer in Asian Patients: A Meta-Analysis by Nindrea RD, Aryandono T, […], Dwiprahasto I.

Link:
http://journal.waocp.org/?sid=Entrez:PubMed&id=pmid:30803190&key=2019.20.2.327

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on fish consumption, review article/significantly and breastcancer right here.

Fish containing omega-3 fatty acids are salmon, mackerel, herring, lake trout, bluefin tuna, sturgeon, sablefish, anchovy, albacore tuna, whitefish, arctic char, sardines, bluefish, mullet, halibut, striped bass, mahi mahi, pollock, rockfish, rainbow trout, shark, catfish, carp, cod, flounder, grouper, haddock, ocean perch, red snapper, swordfish, pike, sole and tilapia.

Objectives:
Although the relationship between dietary intake and serum levels of trans fatty acids and risk of breast cancer has been investigated extensively, findings are inconsistent. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Do dietary intake and serum levels of trans fatty acids increase risk of breast cancer?

Study design:
This review article included 6 cohort studies and 1 nested case-control study on total dietary trans fat intake and 1 cohort study and 4 nested case-control studies on serum trans fatty acids.

Participants were apparently healthy aged 26 years or older.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found no significant relationship between dietary intake of total trans fatty acids and risk of breast cancer [pooled effect size = 1.02, 95% CI = 0.95-1.10, p = 0.403].

The investigators found in 3 effect sizes from 2 cohort studies and 1 nested case-control study, no significant relation between dietary intake of conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) and risk of breast cancer [pooled effect size = 1.05, 95% CI = 0.95-1.17, p = 0.513].

The investigators found based on 5 effect sizes, each additional 1 g/day dietary intake of total trans fats was not significantly associated with risk of breast cancer [RR = 1.00, 95% CI = 0.99-1.01].

The investigators found high serum levels of trans fats were associated with an increased risk of 37% of breast cancer among postmenopausal women [pooled effect size = 1.37, 95% CI = 1.04-1.81, p = 0.02].

The investigators concluded dietary intake of trans fatty acids (also called trans fats) is not associated with risk of breast cancer. However, a significant positive association is seen between serum trans fats and risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women.

Original title:
Dietary intake and serum levels of trans fatty acids and risk of breast cancer: A systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective studies by Anjom-Shoae J, Sadeghi O, […], Esmaillzadeh A.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30954361

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on trans fatty acids consumption, review article/significantly and breastcancer right here.

Objectives:
Epidemiological studies focusing on the association between folate and breast cancer risk reported inconsistent findings. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Does dietary folate intake reduce breast cancer risk?

Study design:
This review article included a total of 23 prospective cohort studies involving 41,516 cases (=women with breast cancer) among 1,171,048 individuals.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found dietary folate intake significantly reduced risk of oestrogen-receptor-negative breast cancer with 12% [pooled risk ratio = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.78-1.00].

The investigators found dietary folate intake significantly reduced risk of oestrogen-receptor-negative/progesterone-receptor-negative breast cancer with 18% [pooled risk ratio = 0.82, 95% CI = 0.68-0.97].

The investigators found an increment of dietary folate intake of 100 μg per day was associated with a deceased risk of oestrogen-receptor-negative breast cancer with 6% [RR = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.88-0.99].

The investigators found an increment of dietary folate intake of 100 μg per day was associated with a deceased risk of oestrogen-receptor-negative/progesterone-receptor-negative breast cancer with 10% [RR = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.85-0.97].

The investigators found high dietary folate intake significantly reduced breast cancer risk in premenopausal women with 6% [RR = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.88-1.00].

The investigators found high dietary folate intake significantly reduced breast cancer risk in women with moderate or high levels of alcohol consumption with 18% [RR = 0.82, 95% CI = 0.72-0.94].

The investigators concluded that at least 100 μg per day dietary folate intake, reduce both oestrogen-receptor-negative and oestrogen-receptor-negative/progesterone-receptor-negative breast cancer, particularly among premenopausal women and women with moderate or high levels of alcohol consumption.

Original title:
Folate intake and the risk of breast cancer: an up-to-date meta-analysis of prospective studies by Zeng J, Wang K, [...], Chang H.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30647438

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on folate consumption, review article/significantly and breast cancer right here.

Objectives:
Evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) suggests that viscous dietary fiber may offer beneficial effects on glycemic control and, thus, an improved cardiovascular disease risk profile. Therefore, this review article (meta-analysis) has been conducted.

Does viscous dietary fiber supplementation improve glycemic control in type 2 diabetes?

Study design:
This review article included 28 RCTs of ≥3 weeks in duration that assessed the effects of viscous fiber on markers of glycemic control in type 2 diabetes with a total of 1,394 participants.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found that viscous fiber at a median dose of ∼13.1 g/day significantly reduced HbA1c in type 2 diabetes [MD = -0.58%, 95% CI = -0.88 to -0.28, p = 0.0002] compared with control and in addition to standard of care.

The investigators found that viscous fiber at a median dose of ∼13.1 g/day significantly reduced fasting blood glucose in type 2 diabetes [MD = -0.82 mmol/L, 95% CI = -1.32 to -0.31, p = 0.001] compared with control and in addition to standard of care. 

The investigators found that viscous fiber at a median dose of ∼13.1 g/day significantly reduced HOMA-insulin resistance in type 2 diabetes [MD = -1.89, 95% CI = -3.45 to -0.33, p = 0.02] compared with control and in addition to standard of care.

The investigators found the certainty of evidence was graded moderate for HbA1c, fasting glucose, fasting insulin and HOMA-IR and low for fructosamine.

The investigators concluded that 13.1 g/day viscous fiber supplements improve conventional markers of glycemic control beyond usual care and should be considered in the management of type 2 diabetes.

Original title:
Should Viscous Fiber Supplements Be Considered in Diabetes Control? Results From a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials by Jovanovski E, Khayyat R, […], Vuksan V.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30617143

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on diabetes and dietary fiber right here.

Objectives:
Low fruit and vegetable intakes are recognized risk factors for noncommunicable diseases. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Do fruit or vegetables intakes reduce noncommunicable diseases, likes cancer, coronary heart disease and all-cause mortality?

Study design:
This review article included 64 reports investigating 98 risk-disease pairs. 56 pairs from 39 reports were assessed as statistically significant, involving 29 burden of diseases.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found in linear dose analysis for each 100 g/day increase in fruit intakes a significantly reduced risk of 44% [RR = 0.56, 95% CI = 0.42 to 0.74] for esophageal cancer.
Significant means that there is an association with a 95% confidence.

The investigators found in linear dose analysis for each 100 g/day increase in fruit intakes a significantly reduced risk of 28% [RR = 0.72, 95% CI = 0.59 to 0.87] for mouth, pharynx and larynx cancer.

The investigators found in nonlinear dose analysis for the first 100 g/day increase in fruit intakes a significantly reduced risk of 14% [RR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.84 to 0.88] for stroke.

The investigators found in nonlinear dose analysis for the first 100 g/day increase in fruit intakes a significantly reduced risk of 11% [RR = 0.89, 95% CI = 0.88 to 0.90] for all-cause mortality.

The investigators found in linear dose analysis for each 100 g/day increase in vegetable intakes a significantly reduced risk of 12% [RR = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.80 to 0.95] for renal cell cancer.

The investigators found in linear dose analysis for each 100 g/day increase in vegetable intakes a significantly reduced risk of 11% [RR = 0.89, 95% CI = 0.84 to 0.95] for non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

The investigators found in nonlinear dose analysis for the first 100 g/day increase in vegetable intakes a significantly reduced risk of 14% [RR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.84 to 0.89] for coronary heart disease.

The investigators found in nonlinear dose analysis for the first 100 g/day increase in vegetable intakes a significantly reduced risk of 13% [RR = 0.87, 95% CI = 0.84 to 0.90] for all-cause mortality.

The investigators found in nonlinear dose analysis clear increases in protective associations were observed with the first 200 g/day of fruit or vegetable intakes, whereas little further increase or even decrease in protective associations were reported beyond 300 g/day intakes.

The investigators found canned fruit intakes were positively associated with all-cause and cardiovascular disease mortality.

The investigators found pickled vegetable intakes were positively associated with stomach cancer.

The investigators concluded that 100-300 g/day of fruit or vegetables intakes reduce certain cancers, coronary heart disease and all-cause mortality. These findings support existing recommendations for fruit and vegetable intakes. Current comparative risk assessments might significantly underestimate the protective associations of fruit and vegetable intakes.

Original title:
The Associations of Fruit and Vegetable Intakes with Burden of Diseases: A Systematic Review of Meta-Analyses by Yip CSC, Chan W and Fielding R.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30639206

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on fruit and vegetable consumption, coronary heart disease and cancer right here.