Nutrition and health

Objetivos:
¿Reduce el consumo de frutas y verduras el riesgo de cáncer del conducto biliar?

Diseño del estudio:
Este artículo de revisión incluyó 14 estudios.

No hubo sesgo de publicación entre los estudios [p Begg = 0.53, p Egger = 0.84 para hortalizas y p Begg = 0.95, p Egger = 0.64 para frutas].

Resultados y conclusiones:
Los investigadores encontraron para el consumo más alto en comparación con más bajo, un riesgo significativamente reducido del 52% para el cáncer del conducto biliar [RR resumido = 0.48, 95% IC = 0.22 a 0.74, I2 = 86.8%, p 0.001, n = 10] para el consumo de verduras.

Los investigadores encontraron para el consumo más alto en comparación con más bajo, un riesgo significativamente reducido del 53% para el cáncer del conducto biliar [RR resumido = 0.47, 95% IC = 0.32 a 0.61, I2 = 63.3%, p = 0.001, n = 13] para el consumo de fruta.

Los investigadores encontraron por cada incremento de 100 gramos/día de consumo de verduras, un riesgo significativamente reducido del 69% para el cáncer del conducto biliar [RR = 0.31, 95% IC = 0.20 a 0.47, I2 = 63.3, n = 8].

Los investigadores concluyeron que el consumo de frutas y verduras reduce el riesgo de cáncer del conducto biliar. Se necesitan más estudios prospectivos bien diseñados para confirmar estos hallazgos.

Título original:
Vegetable, Fruit Consumption and Risk of Biliary Cancer: Evidence from a Meta-Analysis by Huai J and Xiaohua Ye X.

Enlace:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32731775/

Información adicional de El Mondo:
Encontrar aquí más información/estudios sobre significativamente/estudios de cohorte, el consumo de frutas y verduras y el cáncer.

Objectives:
Data on the association of nut intake with risk of cancer and its mortality are conflicting. Although previous meta-analyses summarized available findings in this regard, some limitations may distort their findings. Moreover, none of these meta-analyses examined the dose-response associations of total nut intake with the risk of specific cancers as well as associations between specific types of nuts and cancer mortality. Therefore, this review article (meta-analysis) has been conducted.

Do higher nut dietary intakes reduce risk of cancer incidence and mortality?

Study design:
This review article included in total 43 articles (observational studies) on cancer risk and 9 articles (observational studies) on cancer mortality.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found when comparing the highest with lowest intakes of total nuts, the highest intakes of total nuts (tree nuts and peanuts), significantly reduced risk of cancer with 16% [summary effect size = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.81 to 0.92, p 0.001, I2 = 58.1%, p 0.01].

The investigators found when comparing the highest with lowest intakes of tree nuts, the highest intakes of tree nuts significantly reduced risk of cancer with 13% [pooled effect size = 0.87, 95% CI = 0.78 to 0.96, p 0.01, I2 = 15.8%, p = 0.28].

The investigators found based on the dose-response analysis, a 5-g/d increase in total nut intake was associated with 3%, 6% and 25% lower risks of overall, pancreatic and colon cancers, respectively.  

The investigators found in terms of cancer mortality, 13%, 18% and 8% risk reductions with higher intakes of total nuts, tree nuts and peanuts, respectively.

The investigators found, in addition, a 5-g/d increase in total nut intake was associated with a 4% lower risk of cancer mortality.

The investigators concluded there is a protective association between total nut and tree nut intake and the risk of cancer and its mortality.

Original title:
Association of Total Nut, Tree Nut, Peanut, and Peanut Butter Consumption with Cancer Incidence and Mortality: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies by Naghshi S, Sadeghian M, […], Sadeghi O.

Link:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33307550/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on significant/cohort studies, nuts consumption and cancer right here.

Tree nuts in this review article are walnuts, pistachios, macadamia nuts, pecans, cashews, almonds, hazelnuts and Brazil nuts.

Objectives:
Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) causes the irreversible destruction of pancreatic beta cells. The Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) vaccine can modulate the immune response and decelerate disease progression. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Do patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus benefit from the Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) vaccine?

Study design:
This review article included 4 RCTs. The sample sizes ranged from 6 to 94, with a total of 198 subjects. The mean age of the examinees ranged from 10.1 to 36.0 years and the follow-up duration ranged from 1 to 8 years.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found the pooled meta-analysis demonstrated no significant difference in HbA1c levels [MD = -0.12, 95% CI = -0.53 to 0.30, I2 = 56%] or fasting C-peptide levels [MD = -0.15, 95% CI = -0.35 to 0.06, I2 = 0%] in the BCG intervention group as compared with that in the placebo group.
The results remained unchanged after removing each study in the sensitivity analysis.

The investigators concluded there is no robust evidence to support the use of the Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) vaccine for the treatment of type 1 diabetes mellitus although the HbA1c levels tend to improve. Additional RCTs to assess the long-term effects of the Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) vaccine on glycemic control are warranted.

Original title:
Therapeutic Effects of BCG Vaccination on Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials by Chang YC, Lin CJ, […], Hsu HY.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7139880/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on vaccination, diabetes mellitus and malnutrition right here.

Objectives:
Epidemiological studies showing the correlation between folate (folic acid) and the breast cancer risk have revealed inconsistent results. Therefore, this review article (meta-analysis) has been conducted.

Do higher folate dietary intakes or plasma folate levels reduce risk of breast cancer?

Study design:
This review article included 39 studies on folate dietary intake (19 were prospective cohort studies, which included 37,917 cases (persons with breast cancer) and 20 were case-control studies, which included 13,074 cases and 17,497 controls (persons without breast cancer)) and 12 studies on plasma folate level (10 were case-control studies, consisting of 7,850 cases and 8,898 controls and 2 cohort studies, consisting of 815 incident cases).

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found when compared to the lowest folate dietary intake, the highest folate dietary intake significantly reduced risk of breast cancer with 15% [combined OR = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.79 to 0.92, I2 = 75.2%, p 0.001].
This reduced risk was not significant for cohort studies [OR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.91 to 1.03, I2 = 53.3%, p = 0.316].

The investigators found for every 100-μg/day increase in folate dieatary intake, a significantly reduced risk of 2% for breast cancer [combined OR = 0.98, 95% CI = 0.97 to 0.99, I2 = 72.8%, p = 0.002].
This reduced risk was also significantly in cohort studies [summary OR = 0.99, 95% CI = 0.98 to 1.00]. 
Significant means that there is an association with a 95% confidence.

The investigators found stratification by menopausal status showed that a higher folate dietary intake significantly reduced risk of breast cancer in premenopausal women with 20% [OR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.66 to 0.97, p = 0.022] but not in postmenopausal women [OR = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.83 to 1.06, p = 0.320].
Significant because OR of 1 was not found in the 95% CI of 0.66 to 0.97. OR of 1 means no risk.

The investigators found the highest versus lowest plasma folate levels had no correlation with the risk of breast cancer [combined OR = 0.98, 95% CI = 0.82 to 1.17, I2 = 63.0%, p = 0.822].

The investigators concluded there is a negative correlation between folate dieatary intake, at least 100-μg/day and the risk of breast cancer. However, plasma folate levels have no correlation with the risk of breast cancer. Therefore, whether folate dietary intake has practical clinical significance requires further study and the use of additional folate supplements should be carefully considered.

Original title:
Association of folate intake and plasma folate level with the risk of breast cancer: a dose-response meta-analysis of observational studies by Ren X, Xu P, [...], Dai Z.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7695428/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on significant/cohot studies, folate (folic acid) consumption and breast cancer right here.

The plasma folate level can be increased by taking folate-rich foods and/or folate supplements.

Objectives:
Does fish consumption reduce risk of coronary heart disease (CHD), stroke and all-cause mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D)?

Study design:
This review article included 9 prospective cohort studies with 57,394 diabetic patients.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found for the highest compared with the lowest category of fish consumption, a significantly reduced risk of 14% [relative risk = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.76 to 0.96, I2 = 50%, n = 8] for all-cause mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes.

The investigators found for the highest compared with the lowest category of fish consumption, a significantly reduced risk of 39% [relative risk = 0.61, 95% CI = 0.29 to 0.93, I2 = 68%, n = 3] for coronary heart disease in patients with type 2 diabetes.

The investigators found there was a monotonic inverse association, with a nadir at fish consumption of approximately 2-3 servings/week, in both analyses.

The investigators concluded 2-3 servings/week of fish consumption reduce risk of all-cause mortality and coronary heart disease in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Original title:
Fish consumption and the risk of cardiovascular disease and mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes: a dose-response meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies by Jayedi A, Soltani S, […], Shab-Bidar S.

Link:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32410513/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on fish consumption, cardiovascular disease and diabetes right here.
 

Objectives:
The association between vitamin C intake and breast cancer is unclear. Therefore, this review article (meta-analysis) has been conducted.

Does a higher vitamin C intake reduce risk of breast cancer incidence, mortality and recurrence?

Study design:
This review article included 24 cohort studies and 30 case-control studies.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found pooled results suggested that the highest versus lowest vitamin C intake was significantly associated with a 14% lower risk of breast cancer incidence [relative risk = 0.86, 95% = 0.81 to 0.92, I2 = 78.7%, p 0.00].
Sensitivity analysis indicated that the overall results remained consistent even after excluding studies individually.

The investigators found the use of random-effects model indicated that a 100-mg/day increment in vitamin C intake had no significant effect on breast cancer risk.

The investigators found stratification by study design showed a 26% lower risk of breast cancer incidence for vitamin C intake in case-control studies [RR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.65 to 0.84, p 0.001]. However, a non-significant inverse association was found in cohort studies [RR = 0.96, 95% CI = 0.89 to 1.04, p = 0.295].

The investigators found when the studies were stratified by the source of vitamin C, a 11% lower risk of breast cancer incidence with dietary intake [RR = 0.89, 95% CI = 0.82 to 0.96, p = 0.004] but not with supplements [RR = 1.02, 95% CI = 0.94 to 1.10, p = 0.678].

The investigators found that the highest versus lowest vitamin C intake was significantly associated with a 22% lower risk of breast cancer mortality [HR = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.69 to 0.88, I2 = 2.6%].

The investigators found that the highest versus lowest vitamin C intake was significantly associated with a 19% lower risk of breast cancer recurrence [HR = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.67 to 0.99, p = 0.043, I2 = 0.0%].

The investigators concluded that higher vitamin C dietary intake is significantly associated with a reduced risk of breast cancer incidence, mortality and recurrence.

Original title:
Association of vitamin C intake with breast cancer risk and mortality: a meta-analysis of observational studies by Zhang D, Xu P, [...], Dai Z.

Link:
https://www.aging-us.com/article/103769/text

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on significant/cohot studies, vitamin C consumption and cancer right here.
 

Objectives:
Heated debates have been on-going about tea consumption and the incidence of cancer, especially in head and neck cancer types. Therefore, this review article (meta-analysis) has been conducted.

Does habitual tea consumption reduce risk of nasopharyngeal cancer?

Study design:
This review article included 6 articles.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found that habitual tea consumption significantly reduced risk of nasopharyngeal cancer with 13.5% [OR = 0.865, 95% CI = 0.806 to 0.929].

The investigators concluded that habitual tea consumption is associated with prevention of nasopharyngeal cancer development. Additional studies are needed to further understand the molecular role of bioactive compound and potential health benefit of tea consumption in nasopharyngeal cancer prevention.

Original title:
The Association between Tea Consumption and Nasopharyngeal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis by Okekpa SI, Basria R, […], Musa MY.

Link:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32856842/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on tea consumption and cancer right here.

Objectives:
The number of cancer survivors is growing rapidly worldwide, especially long-term survivors. Although a healthy diet with a high vegetable and fruit consumption is a key factor in primary cancer prevention, there is a lack of specific dietary recommendations for cancer survivors, except in the case of breast cancer [World Cancer Research Fund (WCRF)/American Institute for Cancer Research (AICR) report]. Therefore, this review article (meta-analysis) has been conducted.

Does the general recommendation to consume ≥5 servings of vegetables and fruit per day (400 g/d) meet the needs of cancer survivors?

Study design:
This review article included 28 cohort studies.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found a high vegetable intake before diagnosis significantly reduced overall mortality in survivors of head and neck cancer with 25% [HR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.65 to 0.87].  

The investigators found a high vegetable intake before diagnosis significantly reduced overall mortality in survivors of ovarian cancer with 22% [HR = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.66 to 0.91].  

The investigators found a high fruit intake before diagnosis significantly reduced overall mortality in survivors of ovarian cancer with 18% [HR = 0.82, 95% CI = 0.70 to 0.96].  

The investigators found the evidence was insufficient for survivors of other cancers, although these associations generally tended to be protective. Therefore, more studies are needed to clarify the association between vegetable and fruit consumption and the prognosis of these different types of cancer.

The investigators concluded the general recommendation to consume ≥5 servings of vegetables and fruit per day (400 g/d) could underestimate the needs of cancer survivors, particularly those with ovarian tumors, in which the recommendation could increase to 600 g/d (i.e., 300 g/d of vegetables and 300 g/d of fruit).

Original title:
Vegetable and Fruit Consumption and Prognosis Among Cancer Survivors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies by Hurtado-Barroso S, Trius-Soler M, […], Zamora-Ros R.

Link:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32717747/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on vegetables and fruit and cancer right here.

Objectives:
Does niacin (vitamin B3) supplementation improve lipid profiles and glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus?

Study design:
This review article included 8 RCTs comprised a total of 2,110 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Studies published ranged from 1990 to 2016 and 15 to 1,053 patients were included in each individual trial.

The follow-up duration ranged from 8.0 weeks to 12.0 months.

The study quality was assessed using the Jadad scale. 4 studies had 3 scores and the remaining 4 studies had 2 scores.

There was no significant publication bias.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found patients’ niacin supplementation was associated with lower levels of total cholesterol [WMD = -0.28, 95% CI = -0.44 to -0.12, p =  0.001], triglyceride [WMD = -0.37, 95% CI = -0.52 to -0.21, p   0 .001] and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (bad cholesterol) [WMD = -0.42, 95% CI = -0.50 to -0.34, p    0.001].

The investigators found, moreover, the level of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (good cholesterol) was significantly increased when niacin supplementation [WMD = 0.33, 95% CI = 0.21 to 0.44, p 0 .001] was provided.

The investigators found, however, niacin supplementation produced no significant effects on plasma glucose [WMD = 0.18, 95% CI = -0.14 to 0.50, p = 0 .275] and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels [WMD = 0.39, 95% CI = -0.15 to 0.94, p = 0 .158].

The investigators concluded that niacin (vitamin B3) supplementation improves lipid profiles, including total cholesterol, LDL and HDL cholesterol without affecting the glycemic levels for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Additional large-scale RCTs should be conducted to evaluate the long-term effectiveness of niacin supplementation.

Original title:
Effectiveness of niacin supplementation for patients with type 2 diabetes: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials by Xiang D, Zhang Q and Wang YT.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7373507/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on cholesterol, vitamin B3 and diabetes right here.
 

Objectives:
Type 2 diabetes mellitus is a chronic disease that occurs among the general population. The insulin-lowering and homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance-improving effects of inulin are unconfirmed. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Do inulin supplements improve HOMA-IR, fasting plasma glucose and HbA1c in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus?

Study design:
This review article included 9 RCTs with a total of 661 participants.

The duration of the interventions ranged from 6 weeks to 12 weeks and the dosage of inulin supplementation ranged from 8.4 g to 10 g per day.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found inulin supplementation significantly improved fasting plasma glucose [SMD = -0.55, 95% CI = -0.73 to -0.36, p = 0.0], HOMA-IR [SMD = -0.81, 95% CI = -1.59 to -0.03, p = 0.042] and HbA1c [SMD = -0.69, 95% CI = -0.92 to -0.46, p = 0.0] in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

The investigators found, further subgroup analyses revealed a significant role of inulin supplementation for treatment durations ≥8 weeks [p = 0.038 for insulin, p = 0.002 for HOMA-IR, p = 0.032 for fasting plasma glucose, p = 0 for HbA1c] in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

The investigators concluded that daily 8.4-10 grams of inulin supplements for at least 8 weeks improve HOMA-IR, fasting plasma glucose and HbA1c in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Original title:
Efficacy of inulin supplementation in improving insulin control, HbA1c and HOMA-IR in patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials by Zhang W, Tang Y, […], Hu H.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7263925/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on fiber and diabetes right here.

Inulin is a type of fiber that's found in certain plant foods. Chicory root is the main source of inulin in supplement form.

Objectives:
It is unclear how dietary intake influences the ovarian cancer. Therefore, this review article (meta-analysis) has been conducted.

Is there a relationship between dietary intake of different nutrients/food groups and ovarian cancer risk?

Study design:
This review article included 97 cohort studies.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found no significant association between dietary intake and risk of ovarian cancer.

The investigators found in subgroup analyses that dietary intake of green leafy vegetables significantly reduced risk of ovarian cancer with 9% [RR = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.85 to 0.98].

The investigators found in subgroup analyses that dietary intake of allium vegetables significantly reduced risk of ovarian cancer with 21% [RR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.64 to 0.96].

The investigators found in subgroup analyses that dietary intake of fiber significantly reduced risk of ovarian cancer with 11% [RR = 0.89, 95% CI = 0.81 to 0.98].

The investigators found in subgroup analyses that dietary intake of flavonoids significantly reduced risk of ovarian cancer with 17% [RR = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.78 to 0.89].

The investigators found in subgroup analyses that dietary intake of green tea significantly reduced risk of ovarian cancer with 39% [RR = 0.61, 95% CI = 0.49 to 0.76].

The investigators found in subgroup analyses that dietary intake of tota fat significantly increased risk of ovarian cancer with 10% [RR = 1.10, 95% CI = 1.02 to 1.18].

The investigators found in subgroup analyses that dietary intake of saturated fat significantly increased risk of ovarian cancer with 11% [RR = 1.11, 95% CI = 1.01 to 1.22].

The investigators found in subgroup analyses that dietary intake of saturated fatty acid significantly increased risk of ovarian cancer with 19% [RR = 1.19, 95% CI = 1.04 to 1.36].

The investigators found in subgroup analyses that dietary intake of cholesterol significantly increased risk of ovarian cancer with 13% [RR = 1.13, 95% CI = 1.04 to 1.22].

The investigators found in subgroup analyses that dietary intake of retinol (vitamin A) significantly increased risk of ovarian cancer with 14% [RR = 1.14, 95% CI = 1.00 to 1.30].

The investigators found, in addition, acrylamide, nitrate, water disinfectants and polychlorinated biphenyls were significantly associated with an increased risk of ovarian cancer.

The investigators concluded that dietary intakes of green leafy vegetables, allium vegetables, fiber, flavonoids and green tea reduce ovarian cancer.

Original title:
Association between dietary intake and risk of ovarian cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis by Khodavandi A, Alizadeh F and Razis AFA.

Link:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32661683/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on different food groups and cancer right here.

Objectives:
Antioxidant status is considered as important factor in the pathogenesis (the manner of development of a disease) of vitiligo. However, there are controversial findings about serum status of antioxidants in vitiligo patients. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Is there a relationship between serum antioxidant level (e.g. vitamin C, E, zinc and selenium) and risk of vitiligo?

Study design:
This review article included 11 studies including 570 vitiligo cases and 580 controls (people without vitiligo).

Serum vitamin A and copper level in vitiligo patients were only evaluated in single studies and not included in meta-analysis.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found based on fixed effect model, there were no statistical difference between two groups regarding serum vitamin C levels [OR = 1.17, 95% CI = 0.74 to 1.84, p = 0.495] and serum vitamin E levels [OR = 0.61, 95% CI = 0.30 to 1.25, p = 0.180].

The investigators found in sensitivity analysis, higher serum zinc levels significantly decreased risk of vitiligo with 71% [OR = 0.29, 95% CI = 0.15 to 0.54, p 0.001].

The investigators found in sensitivity analysis, higher serum selenium level significantly increased risk of vitiligo with 331% [OR = 4.31, 95% CI = 2.72 to 6.81, p 0.001].

The investigators concluded that higher serum selenium and lower zinc level increase risk of vitiligo. Potential mechanism associated with preventive effects of zinc and the depigmentation effect of selenium should be more elucidated in further studies.

Original title:
Serum Level of Antioxidant Vitamins and Minerals in Patients With Vitiligo, a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis by Huo J, Liu T, [...], Wang R.

Link:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32593085/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find here more information/studies about antioxidants, selenium and zinc.

Vitiligo is a long-term condition where pale white patches develop on the skin. It's caused by the lack of melanin, which is the pigment in skin. Vitiligo can affect any area of skin, but it commonly happens on the face, neck and hands and in skin creases.

Objectives:
Some evidence indicates that carotenoids may reduce the risk of bladder cancer (BC), but the association is unclear. Therefore, this review article (meta-analysis) has been conducted.

Do dietary carotenoid (β-cryptoxanthin, α-carotene, β-carotene and lutein and zeaxanthin) intakes or circulating carotenoid concentrations reduce bladder cancer risk in men and women?

Study design:
This review article included 22 studies (case-control and cohort studies), involving 516,740 adults.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found no association for the highest compared with the lowest category of carotenoid dietary intake and reduced risk of bladder cancer [RR = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.76 to 1.03].
No association because RR of 1 was found in the 95% CI of 0.76 to 1.03. RR of 1 means no risk/association.

The investigators found no association for the highest compared with the lowest category of circulating carotenoid concentrations and reduced risk of bladder cancer [RR = 0.36, 95% CI = 0.12 to 1.07].

The investigators found for the highest compared with the lowest category of circulating lutein and zeaxanthin concentrations a significantly reduced risk of 47% for bladder cancer [RR = 0.53, 95% CI = 0.33 to 0.84].
Significant because RR of 1 was not found in the 95% CI of 0.33 to 0.84. RR of 1 means no risk/association.

The investigators found dose-response analysis showed that bladder cancer risk significantly decreased by 42% [RR = 0.58, 95% CI = 0.36 to 0.94] for every 1 mg increase in daily dietary β-cryptoxanthin intake.

The investigators found dose-response analysis showed that bladder cancer risk significantly decreased by 76% [RR = 0.24, 95% CI = 0.08 to 0.67] for every 1 μmol/L increase in circulating concentration of α-carotene.

The investigators found dose-response analysis showed that bladder cancer risk significantly decreased by 27% [RR = 0.73, 95% CI = 0.57 to 0.94] for every 1 μmol/L increase in circulating concentration of β-carotene.

The investigators found dose-response analysis showed that bladder cancer risk significantly decreased by 56% [RR = 0.44, 95% CI = 0.28 to 0.67] for every 1 μmol/L increase in circulating concentrations of lutein and zeaxanthin.

The investigators concluded dietary β-cryptoxanthin intake and circulating concentrations of α-carotene, β-carotene and lutein and zeaxanthin reduce risk of bladder cancer.

Original title:
Carotenoid Intake and Circulating Carotenoids Are Inversely Associated With the Risk of Bladder Cancer: A Dose-Response Meta-analysis by Wu S, Liu Y, […], Ramirez AG.

Link:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31800007/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on carotenoids and cancer right here.

Objectives:
A growing number of epidemiological studies have suggested a possible association between long-chain omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) intake and the risk of cancers, but the results have been inconsistent. Therefore, this review article (meta-analysis) has been conducted.

Does dietary intake of omega-3 PUFAs reduce digestive system cancers?

Study design:
This review article included 8 case-control studies and 17 cohort studies, involving 1,247,271 participants and 23,173 patients with digestive system cancers.

Visual inspection of funnel plots and the Begg's and Egger's tests revealed no evidence of publication bias.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found the risk of digestive system cancers significantly decreased by 17% in individuals who consumed omega-3 PUFAs [RR = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.76 to 0.91].

The investigators found the risk estimates of digestive system cancers varied by cancer sites, study location, study design, type of omega-3 PUFAs and other confounders (smoking, alcohol consumption, body mass index and physical activity).

The investigators concluded omega-3 PUFA is a healthy dietary component for the prevention of digestive system cancers. Cancer incidence decreases with increasing omega-3 PUFAs intake for most digestive system cancer sites. The relation between omega-3 PUFAs and digestive system cancers RR is similar among different populations.

Original title:
Omega-3 PUFA Intake and the Risk of Digestive System Cancers: A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies by Jian J, Zhang and Zhao L.

Link:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32384489/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on omega-3 PUFAs and cancer right here.

Objectives:
Does barberry (Berberis vulgaris L.) supplementation improve glycemic markers including fasting blood sugar (FBS) concentrations, insulin levels, homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) and glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) percentage?

Study design:
This review article included 7 RCTs, comprising 452 participants.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found the meta-analysis revealed that barberry supplementation significantly reduced insulin levels [Hedges’s = -0.67, 95% CI = -1.31 to -0.03, p = 0.04, I2 = 73.3%].
However, no significant positive effect was observed for fasting blood sugar levels [WMD = -8.06 mg/dL, 95% CI = -20.46 to 4.33, p = 0.23, I2 = 96.1%], HbA1c percentage [WMD = -0.83%, 95% CI = -2.33 to 0.67, p = 0.27, I2 = 88.3%] and HOMA-IR index [WMD = -0.55, 95% CI = -1.60 to 0.50, p = 0.30, I2 = 99.4%].

The investigators concluded barberry supplementation improves insulin levels.

Original title:
The Effect of Barberry (Berberis Vulgaris L.) on Glycemic Indices: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials by Safari Z, Farrokhzad A, […], Askari G.

Link:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0965229920302235?via%3Dihub

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on diabetes and fruit right here.

Objectives:
A low insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) level is known to be associated with many disorders. Several studies have shown that soy consumption may influence IGF-1, but the findings remain inconclusive. Therefore, this review article (meta-analysis) has been conducted.

Does soy consumption increase insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) level?

Study design:
This review article included 8 clinical trials.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found, overall, a significant increment in plasma IGF-1 was observed following soy intervention [WMD = 13.5 ng/mL, 95% CI = 5.2 to 21.8, I2 = 97%].

The investigators found, subgroup analyses demonstrated a significantly greater increase in IGF-1, when soy was administered at a dosage of ≤40 g/day [WMD = 11.7 ng/mL, 95% CI = 10.9 to 12.6, I2 = 98%] and when the intervention duration was 12 weeks [WMD = 26.6 ng/mL, 95% CI = 9.1 to 44.1, I2 = 0.0%].

The investigators found, in addition, soy intervention resulted in a greater increase in IGF-1 among non-healthy subjects [WMD = 36 ng/mL, 95% CI = 32.7 to 39.4, I2 = 84%] than healthy subjects [WMD = 9.8 ng/mL, 95% CI = 8.9 to 10.7, I2 = 90%].

The investigators concluded ≤40 grams of soy consumption per day during 12 weeks increase the IGF-1 level.

Original title:
The Effect of Soy Intervention on Insulin-Like Growth Factor 1 Levels: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials by Jiawei Zeng J, Feng Y, […], Chen X.

Link:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32072706/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on subgroup analysis/significant and soja consumption right here.

Objectives:
An increased risk of gastric cancer for pickled vegetable and salted fish intake has been suggested, yet the lack of a dose-response association warrants a quantitative analysis. Therefore, this review article (meta-analysis) has been conducted.

Do pickled vegetable and salted fish intakes increase risk of gastric cancer?

Study design:
This review article included 21 cohort studies with a total of 195,624 participants for the analysis of pickled vegetable intake and 16 cohort studies with a total of

196,384 participants for the analysis of salted fish intake.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found in a dose-response meta-analysis of 6 studies, a significantly increased risk of 15% [combined RR = 1.15, 95% CI = 1.07 to 1.23, p for heterogeneity = 0.14] for gastric cancer incidence for a 40 g/day increment in pickled vegetable intake.

The investigators found in the categorical meta-analysis of 6 studies, a marginally significant increase in the risk of gastric cancer incidence, comparing the highest to the lowest intake of salted fish [RR = 1.17, 95% CI = 0.99 to 1.38, p for heterogeneity = 0.26].

The investigators concluded intake of 40 g/day of pickled vegetable increases risk of gastric cancer incidence.

Original title:
Pickled Vegetable and Salted Fish Intake and the Risk of Gastric Cancer: Two Prospective Cohort Studies and a Meta-Analysis by Yoo JY, Cho HJ, […], Park SK.

Link:
https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/12/4/996/htm

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on vegetables and cancer right here

Objectives:
Epidemiologic studies focusing on the association between 1-carbon metabolism-related vitamins (ie, folate, vitamin B6, vitamin B2, vitamin B12) and breast cancer risk have reported inconsistent findings. Therefore, this review article (meta-analysis) has been conducted.

Does higher dietary intake of folate (folic acid), vitamin B2, B6 or B12 reduce breast cancer risk?

Study design:
This review article included 27 studies (case-control and cohort studies) with a total of 49,707 cases (persons with breast cancer) among 1,274,060 individuals.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found for the highest folate dietary intake compared with the lowest, a significantly reduced risk of 7% [pooled relative risk = 0.93, 95% CI = 0.88 to 0.99, p = 0.018] for breast cancer.

The investigators found for the highest vitamin B6 dietary intake compared with the lowest, a significantly reduced risk of 6% [pooled relative risk = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.89 to 1.00, p = 0.037] for breast cancer.

The investigators found for the highest vitamin B2 dietary intake compared with the lowest, a significantly reduced risk of 10% [pooled relative risk = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.82 to 0.99, p = 0.026] for breast cancer.

The investigators found no significant association between vitamin B12 and breast cancer risk [RR = 0.99, 95% CI = 0.94 to 1.04, p = 0.604].

The investigators found folate and vitamin B6 dietary intake significantly decreased the risk of estrogen receptor-negative (ER-)/progesterone receptor-negative (PR-) breast cancer but not ER+/PR+ breast cancer.

The investigators found an increment of 100 μg/d folate dietary intake corresponded to a 7% [RR = 0.93, 95% CI = 0.89 to 0.98, p = 9.007] deceased risk of ER-/PR- breast cancer.

The investigators concluded both higher folate, vitamin B2 and B6 dietary intake decreases risk of breast cancer, especially ER-/PR- breast cancer.

Original title:
Association Between One-carbon Metabolism-related Vitamins and Risk of Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Prospective Studies by Zeng J, Gu Y, […], Chang H.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32241696

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on folate, vitamin B2 and B6 intake and breast cancer right here.

If breast cancer cells have estrogen receptors, the cancer is called ER-positive breast cancer. If breast cancer cells have progesterone receptors, the cancer is called PR-positive breast cancer. If the cells do not have either of these 2 receptors, the cancer is called ER/PR-negative.

Objectives:
Does high magnesium dietary intake reduce risk of type 2 diabetes and stroke?

Study design:
This review article included 53 prospective cohort studies with a total of 1,912,634 participants and 76,678 cases (persons with type 2 diabetes or stroke).

Participants were predominately middle aged at baseline (at the beginning of the studies), with a mean magnesium intake of 370 mg/day for the highest category and 232 mg/day for the lowest category.

The mean duration of all eligible studies was 10.7 years.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found, when comparing the highest category of magnesium dietary intake (370 mg/day) to the lowest (232 mg/day), a significantly reduced risk of 22% [RR = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.75 to 0.81, p 0.001, I2 = 35.6%, p = 0.021] for type 2 diabetes.

The investigators found, when comparing the highest category of magnesium dietary intake (370 mg/day) to the lowest (232 mg/day), a significantly reduced risk of 11% [RR = 0.89, 95% CI = 0.83 to 0.94, p 0.001, I2 = 0%, p = 0.529] for total stroke.

The investigators found, when comparing the highest category of magnesium dietary intake (370 mg/day) to the lowest (232 mg/day), a significantly reduced risk of 12% [RR = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.81 to 0.95, p = 0.001, I2 = 16.9%, p = 0.265] for ischaemic stroke.

The investigators found in studies adjusted for cereal fiber dietary intake, a significantly reduced risk of 21% [RR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.73 to 0.85, p 0.001] for type 2 diabetes.

The investigators found in studies adjusted for calcium dietary intake, a significantly reduced risk of 11% [RR = 0.89, 95% CI = 0.80 to 0.99, p = 0.040] for total stroke.

The investigators found in stratified analyses by characteristics of the population and study design, a significantly reduced risk of 9% [RR = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.83 to 0.99] for total stroke among female.

The investigators found in stratified analyses by characteristics of the population and study design, a significantly reduced risk of 11% [RR = 0.89, 95% CI = 0.79 to 1.00] for ischaemic stroke among female.

The investigators found in stratified analyses by characteristics of the population and study design, a significantly reduced risk of 11% [RR = 0.89, 95% CI = 0.82 to 0.96] for total stroke among individuals with BMI ≥25 kg/m².

The investigators found in stratified analyses by characteristics of the population and study design, a significantly reduced risk of 12% [RR = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.81 to 0.96] for ischaemic stroke among individuals with BMI ≥25 kg/m².

The investigators found in stratified analyses by characteristics of the population and study design, a significantly reduced risk of 11% [RR = 0.89, 95% CI = 0.83 to 0.95] for total stroke among studies wtith ≥12-year follow-up.

The investigators found in stratified analyses by characteristics of the population and study design, a significantly reduced risk of 12% [RR = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.81 to 0.95] for ischaemic stroke among studies wtith ≥12-year follow-up.

The investigators found for every 100 mg/day increment of magnesium dietary intake, a significantly reduced risk of 6% [RR = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.93 to 0.95] for type 2 diabetes.

The investigators found for every 100 mg/day increment of magnesium dietary intake, a significantly reduced risk of 2% [RR = 0.98, 95% CI = 0.97 to 0.99] for total stroke.

The investigators found for every 100 mg/day increment of magnesium dietary intake, a significantly reduced risk of 2% [RR = 0.98, 95% CI = 0.97 to 0.99] for ischaemic stroke.

The investigators concluded magnesium dietary intake has a substantial inverse association with type 2 diabetes and (total/ ischaemic) stroke. Furthermore, female, participants with obesity (BMI ≥ 25 kg/m²) and with a longer follow-up period (≥12 years) obtain greater benefit from magnesium intake with a lower risk of total and ischaemic stroke incidence. Overall, these findings support the guidelines to address the role of magnesium dietary intake in early prevention strategies to combat type 2 diabetes and stroke. However, additional RCTs are needed in the future to validate the causality.

Original title:
Association of magnesium intake with type 2 diabetes and total stroke: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis by Zhao B, Zeng L, [...], Zhang W.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7103847/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies magnesium consumption, stroke and diabetes right here.

Objectives:
The impact of light-intensity physical activity (LPA) in preventing cancer mortality has been questioned. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Does light-intensity physical activity reduce cancer mortality?

Study design:
This review article included 5 prospective cohort studies, in which the definition of light-intensity physical activity based on accelerometer readings was mainly set within 100 to 2,100 counts/min.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found 30 min/day of light-intensity physical activity significantly reduced cancer mortality with 14% [summary HR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.79 to 0.95, I2 1%] and the association between light-intensity physical activity and risk reduction in cancer mortality was linearly shaped [p nonlinearity = 0.72].

The investigators found light-intensity physical activity exhibited a comparable magnitude of risk reduction in cancer mortality of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity regardless of equal time-length [0.87 per 30 min/day vs. 0.94 per 30 min/day, p interaction = 0.46] or equal amount [0.74 vs. 0.94 per 150 metabolic equivalents-min/day, p interaction = 0.11].

The investigators found, furthermore, replacing sedentary time by light-intensity physical activity of 30 min/day significantly decreased the risk of cancer mortality by 9%.

The investigators concluded 30 min/day of light-intensity physical activity reduce cancer mortality.

Original title:
Objectively-Measured Light-Intensity Physical Activity and Risk of Cancer Mortality: A Meta-analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies by Qiu S, Cai X, […], Schumann U.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32303534

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find here more information/studies about sport nutrition and cancer.

Light intensity physical activity is an activity that is classified as 3 METS.

Objectives:
Is there an association between total meat, red meat, processed meat, poultry and fish intake and risk of type 2 diabetes (T2D)?

Study design:
This review article included 28 prospective cohort studies.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found when compared with the lowest category, the highest category of total meat intake, significantly increased risk of type 2 diabetes with 33% [summary relative risk = 1.33, 95% CI = 1.16 to 1.52].
Significantly means that there is an association with a 95% confidence.

The investigators found when compared with the lowest category, the highest category of red meat intake, significantly increased risk of type 2 diabetes with 22% [summary relative risk = 1.22, 95% CI = 1.16 to 1.28].
Significantly because summary relative risk of 1 was not found in the 95% CI of 1.16 to 1.28. Summary relative risk of 1 means no risk/association.

The investigators found when compared with the lowest category, the highest category of processed meat intake, significantly increased risk of type 2 diabetes with 25% [summary relative risk = 1.25, 95% CI = 1.13 to 1.37].
Significantly means it can be said with a 95% confidence that the highest category of processed meat intake really increased risk of type 2 diabetes with 25%.

The investigators found no association between highest category of poultry intake and risk of type 2 diabetes [summary relative risk = 1.00, 95% CI = 0.93 to 1.07].
No association because summary relative risk of 1 was found in the 95% CI of 0.93 to 1.07. Summary relative risk of 1 means no risk/association.

The investigators found no association between highest category of fish intake and risk of type 2 diabetes [summary relative risk = 1.01, 95% CI = 0.93 to 1.10].

The investigators found in the dose-response analysis, each additional 100g/day of total and red meat and 50g/day of processed meat, were found to be associated with a 36% [95% CI = 1.23 to 1.49], 31% [95% CI = 1.19 to 1.45] and 46% [95% CI = 1.26 to 1.69] increased risk of type 2 diabetes, respectively.

The investigators found, in addition, there was evidence of a non-linear dose-response association between processed meat and type 2 diabetes [p = 0.004], with the risk increasing by 30% with increasing intakes up to 30g/day.

The investigators concluded 100g/day of total meat, 100g/day red meat and 50g/day of processed meat, increase risk of type 2 diabetes.

Original title:
Meat and fish intake and type 2 diabetes: dose-response meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies by Yang X, Li Y, […], Li L.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32302686

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on fish and meat consumption and diabetes right here.

Objectives:
Previous studies have demonstrated some associations between dietary vitamin A intake and ovarian cancer risk with an inconsistent relationship. Therefore, this review article (meta-analysis) has been conducted.

Does higher dietary intake of vitamin A reduce ovarian cancer risk?

Study design:
This review article included 10 case-control studies and 5 cohort studies, involving 4,882 cases (persons with ovarian cancer) among 443,179 participants.

There was no publication bias.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found higher dietary vitamin A intake significantly reduced ovarian cancer risk with 18.4% [RR = 0.816, 95% CI = 0.723 to 0.920, I2 = 48.4%, p for heterogeneity = 0.019].
Sensitivity analysis showed that no single study had a potential impact on the pooled RR.

The investigators found higher dietary vitamin A intake significantly reduced ovarian cancer risk with 23.1% [RR = 0.769, 95% CI = 0.655 to 0.902] in case-controle studies.
However, this reduced risk was not significant in cohort studies.

The investigators found higher dietary vitamin A intake significantly reduced ovarian cancer risk with 17.5% [RR = 0.825, 95% CI = 0.720 to 0.946] in North American populations.

The investigators concluded that higher dietary intake of vitamin A reduces ovarian cancer risk, especially among North Americans. As some limitations existed in this analysis, large scale studies with detailed amount of dietary vitamin A intake are needed to verify the results.

Original title:
Dietary vitamin A intake and the risk of ovarian cancer: A meta-analysis by Wang Q and He C.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7138903/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on vitamin A intake and cancer right here.

Objectives:
Epidemiologic studies of the relationship between nitrite or nitrate consumption and risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) remain controversial. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Does dietary intake of nitrite or nitrate increase risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma?

Study design:
This review article included 8 case-control and 4 cohort studies with a total of 8,067 cases of non-Hodgkin lymphoma that reported the correlation between nitrate or nitrite consumption and risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma published between 1996 and 2013.

NOS scores ranged from 4 to 8 with a mean value of 6.
Information on nitrate and nitrite intake was obtained by personal interview, telephone interview or mailed questionnaires.

There was no evidence of publication bias.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found that high levels of nitrite dietary intake was linked to a significantly elevated risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma of 55% [OR = 1.55, 95% CI = 1.27-1.88, I2 = 41.8%, p = 0.161]. 

The investigators found, however, no connection between the risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma and high levels of nitrate dietary intake [OR = 1.02, 95% CI = 0.94-1.10, I2 = 14.2%, p = 0.308].

The investigators found that the risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma increased by 26% for each additional microgram of nitrite consumed in the diet per day [OR = 1.26, 95% CI = 1.09-1.42].

The investigators found data from the high-quality studies indicated that nitrite consumption was positively associated with carcinogenicity, leading to non-Hodgkin lymphoma [OR = 1.44, 95% CI = 1.17-1.77] and positively correlated with the development of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma [OR = 1.55, 95% CI = 1.07-2.26], but not other non-Hodgkin lymphoma subtypes.

The investigators found, in addition, high levels of nitrite dietary intake was linked to a significantly elevated risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma of 50% [OR = 1.50, 95% CI = 1.15-1.95] in females.
However, this increased risk was not significant in males [OR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.52-1.36].

The investigators concluded that nitrite dietary intake, but not that of nitrate, raises the risk of developing non-Hodgkin lymphoma, particularly diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in females. In the future, better designed prospective research studies should be conducted to confirm these findings, clarify potential biological mechanisms and instruct clinicians about non-Hodgkin lymphoma prophylaxis.

Original title:
The relationship between consumption of nitrite or nitrate and risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma by Yu M, Li C, [...], Jin J.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6969097/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on significantly/cohort studies and cancer right here.

The preservative sodium nitrite fights harmful bacteria in ham, salami and other processed and cured meats and also lends them their pink coloration.
 

Objectives:
Previous studies had been published to explore the association about carbohydrate intake on esophageal cancer risk, with inconsistent results. Therefore, this review article (meta-analysis) has been conducted.

Does dietary intake of carbohydrate reduce esophageal cancer risk?

Study design:
This review article included 13 case-control studies that assessed a total of 3,033 patients.
The quality evaluation scores of each study ranged from 6 to 9 and the methodological quality was higher.

In the publication bias assessment, the results from funnel plots and Egger’s test detected no publication bias.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found in overall analysis for the highest category versus lowest category of dietary carbohydrate a significantly reduced risk of 37.3% [summarized OR = 0.627, 95% CI = 0.505 to 0.778, I2 = 59.9%, p for heterogeneity = 0.001] for esophageal cancer.
Sensitivity analyses showed no single study had essential effect on the overall result.

The investigators found for the highest category versus lowest category of dietary carbohydrate a significantly reduced risk of 43.1% [summarized OR = 0.569, 95% CI = 0.417 to 0.777] for esophageal adenocarcinoma.

The investigators found for the highest category versus lowest category of dietary carbohydrate a significantly reduced risk of 33.5% [summarized OR = 0.665, 95% CI = 0.453 to 0.975] for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

The investigators found in subgroup analysis by study design that the association was significant in population-based case-control studies, but not in the hospital-based case-control studies.

The investigators concluded that dietary intake of carbohydrate may contribute to the lower development of esophageal cancer. May contribute because this review article only included case-control studies and no cohort studies. As some limitations existed in tbjs meta-analysis, large scale prospective studies with detailed type of dietary carbohydrate intake are needed to verify these results.

Original title:
Dietary carbohydrate intake and the risk of esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis by Xuan F, Li W, […], Liu C.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7042123/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on carbohydrate intake and cancer right here.

The 2 main subtypes of esophageal cancer are esophageal squamous-cell carcinoma (often abbreviated to ESCC) and esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC).
 

Objectives:
Does post-diagnosis dietary supplement use decrease total mortality, cancer mortality and recurrence among cancer survivors?

Study design:
This review article included observational studies and randomized clinical trials (RCT).

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found in 4 observational studies, compared to no supplementation, calcium supplementation significantly reduced total mortality with 12% [RR = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.77 to 1.00, I2 = 0%] among all cancer survivors.

The investigators found in 3 observational studies, compared to no supplementation, calcium supplementation significantly reduced cancer mortality with 29% [RR = 0.71, 95% CI = 0.53 to 0.95, I2 = 0%] among all cancer survivors.

The investigators found in 2 observational studies, compared to no supplementation, calcium supplementation significantly reduced cancer mortality with 34% [RR = 0.66, 95% CI = 0.47 to 0.94, I2 = 0%] among colorectal cancer survivors.

The investigators found in 2 observational studies and 2 RCT’s, compared to no supplementation, vitamin D supplementation significantly reduced total mortality with 14% [RR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.76 to 0.99, I2 = 0%] among all cancer survivors.

The investigators found in 4 observational studies, compared to no supplementation, vitamin C supplementation significantly reduced total mortality with 21% [RR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.68 to 0.92, I2 = 0%] among breast cancer survivors.

The investigators found in 2 observational studies, compared to no supplementation, vitamin D supplementation significantly reduced total mortality with 15% [RR = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.72 to 0.99, I2 = 0%] among breast cancer survivors.

The investigators found in 3 observational studies, compared to no supplementation, vitamin E supplementation significantly reduced total mortality with 24% [RR = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.64 tot 0.90, I2 = 0%] among breast cancer survivors.

The investigators found in 2 observational studies, compared to no supplementation, multivitamins supplementation significantly reduced cancer recurrence with 21% [RR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.64 to 0.97, I2 = 0%] among breast cancer survivors.

The investigators found in 2 observational studies, compared to no supplementation, vitamin C supplementation significantly reduced cancer recurrence with 24% [RR = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.64 to 0.91, I2 = 0%] among breast cancer survivors.

The investigators found in 2 observational studies, compared to no supplementation, vitamin E supplementation significantly reduced cancer recurrence with 31% [RR = 0.69, 95% CI = 0.55 to 0.85, I2 = 0%] among breast cancer survivors.

The investigators concluded post-diagnosis dietary supplement use (particularly calcium, vitamin C, D and E) decreases total mortality, cancer mortality and recurrence among cancer survivors.

Original title:
Dietary Supplement Use after Cancer Diagnosis in Relation to Total Mortality, Cancer Mortality and Recurrence: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis by Kanellopoulou A, Riza E, […], Benetou V.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32148118

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on calcium, vitamin C, D, E, breast cancer and colorectal cancer right here.