Nutrition and health

Objectives:
Does high waist circumference increase liver cancer?

Study design:
This review article included  5 prospective cohort studies with 2,547,188 participants.
Participants were aged 46-58 years, with a mean age of 51 years.
The mean follow-up of participants in the studies was 7.8 years.
The mean quality (NOS scores) of the studies included was 7 (ranging from 5 to 9).

Funnel plots did not show significant asymmetry between the studies included.
Furthermore, Begg's and Egger's regression test did not show any significant publication bias (p = 0.62 and p = 0.60, respectively).

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found combined results of the studies included with random-effects model showed that the highest waist circumference category was significantly associated with an increased risk of 59% for liver cancer [HR = 1.59, 95% CI = 1.38-1.83, I2 = 0%, p = 0.42] compared to the lowest waist circumference category.

The investigators concluded that waist circumference is a significant risk factor related to the incidence of liver cancer.

Original title:
Waist Circumference and Risk of Liver Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of over 2 Million Cohort Study Participants by Rahmani J, Kord Varkaneh H, [...], Zhang Y.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7024879/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on cancer and obesity/overweight right here.

Objectives:
Epidemiologic studies have investigated the association between nut intake and risk for multiple cancers. However, current findings are inconsistent and no definite conclusion has been drawn from prospective studies. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Does nut consumption reduce cancer risk?

Study design:
This review article included 33 cohort studies with more than 50,000 cancer cases.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found when comparing the highest with the lowest category of nut consumption, high consumption of nuts significantly decreased risk of overall cancer with 10% [RR = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.85-0.95].
Significant association was only obtained for intake of tree nuts.

The investigators found when comparing the highest with the lowest category of nut consumption, high consumption of nuts significantly decreased risk of cancer from the digestive system with 17% [RR = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.77-0.89].

The investigators found per 20 g/day increase in nut consumption was related to a 10% [RR = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.82-0.99] decrease in cancer risk.

The investigators concluded that consumption of 20 grams of tree nuts per day reduces cancer of the digestive system.

Original title:
Nut Consumption and Risk of Cancer: A Meta-analysis of Prospective Studies by Long J, Ji Z, […], Cheng L.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32041895

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on nut consumption and cancer right here.

Objectives:
Which factors are associated with the risk of stomach cancer?

Study design:
This review article included 232 observational studies involving 33,831,063 participants.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found H. pylori infection significantly increased risk of stomach cancer with 156% [OR = 2.56, 95% CI = 2.18 to 3.00].

The investigators found formerly smoked significantly increased risk of stomach cancer with 43% [OR = 1.43, 95% CI = 1.29 to 1.59].

The investigators found currently smoking significantly increased risk of stomach cancer with 61% [OR = 1.61, 95% CI = 1.49 to 1.75].

The investigators found currently drinking significantly increased risk of stomach cancer with 19% [OR = 1.19, 95% CI = 1.10 to 1.29].

The investigators found formerly drank significantly increased risk of stomach cancer with 73% [OR = 1.73, 95% CI = 1.17 to 2.56].

The investigators found intake of fruits ≥3 times/week significantly decreased risk of stomach cancer with 52% [OR = 0.48, 95% CI = 0.37 to 0.63].

The investigators found intake of vegetables ≥3 times/week significantly decreased risk of stomach cancer with 38% [OR = 0.62, 95% CI = 0.49 to 0.79].

The investigators found using pickled vegetables significantly increased risk of stomach cancer with 28% [OR = 1.28, 95% CI = 1.09 to 1.51].

The investigators found green tea significantly decreased risk of stomach cancer with 12% [OR = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.80 to 0.97].

The investigators concluded that both smoking, drinking and H. pylori infection increase the risk of stomach cancer, while both ≥3 times/week fruit and vegetables and green tea reduce the risk of developing stomach cancer.

Original title:
Risk factors for stomach cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis by Poorolajal J, Moradi L, [...], Gohari-Ensaf F.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32023777

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on alcohol, tea, vegetable and fruit and cancer right here.

Objectives:
Genistein (4',5,7-trihydroxyisoflavone) is a phytoestrogen with potential health benefits in the prevention of cardiovascular disease. However, the evidence regarding its effects on hypertension has not been conclusive. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Do genistein supplements reduce blood pressure?

Study design:
This review article included 4 RCTs (4 treatment arms).

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found genistein supplements did not show any significant reduction of systolic blood pressure [WMD = -5.32 mmHg, 95% CI = -14.59 to 3.96] and diastolic blood pressure [WMD = -2.06 mmHg, 95% CI = -6.41 to 2.28] compared to that of the placebo group.

The investigators found, however, subgroup analysis by intervention duration showed that more than 6 months genistein supplementation in metabolic syndrome patients significantly decreased systolic blood pressure [WMD = -13.73 mmHg, 95% CI = -18.10 to -9.37] and diastolic blood pressure [WMD = -5.18 mmHg, 95% CI = -6.62 to -3.74].

The investigators concluded genistein supplementation of more than 6 months reduces blood pressure among metabolic syndrome patients.

Original title:
Effects of genistein on blood pressure: A systematic review and meta-analysis by Hemati N, Asis M, […], Abdollahi M.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31955737

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on genistein and overweight right here.

Objectives:
Does dietary intake of fiber reduce risk of endometrial cancer?

Study design:
This review article included 16 studies, involving 6,563 cases (persons with endometrial cancer).

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found dietary fiber intake significantly reduced risk of endometrial cancer with 14% [RR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.78 to 0.93].
In stratified analysis, this trend was more pronounced in the case-control studies and in studies conducted in the Americas and Asia.

The investigators found dietary fiber intake significantly reduced risk of endometrial cancer with 26% after adjusting for education level [RR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.60 to 0.88].

The investigators found dietary fiber intake significantly reduced risk of endometrial cancer with 30% after adjusting for age [RR = 0.70, 95% CI = 0.57 to 0.83].

The investigators found dietary fiber intake significantly reduced risk of endometrial cancer with 19% in studies with NOS scores of 6 (the higher the NOS scores, the more reliable the studies are) [RR = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.67 to 0.95].

The investigators found dietary fiber intake significantly reduced risk of endometrial cancer with 25% in studies with NOS scores of 7 [RR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.62 to 0.88].

The investigators concluded dietary fiber intake reduces risk of endometrial cancer. Further efforts should be made to confirm these findings.

Original title:
Association between dietary fiber and endometrial cancer: a meta-analysis by Li H, Mao H, [...], Nan Y.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31584301

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on fiber, significantly/review article and cancer right here

Objectives:
Does dietary intake of garlic reduce risk of colorectal cancer?

Study design:
This review article included 11 studies involving 12,558 cases (persons with colorectal cancer).

There was no notable evidence of publication bias.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found for the highest versus the lowest garlic consumption categories, a significantly reduced risk of 20% [integrated relative risk = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.69 to 0.91] for colorectal cancer.
The sensitivity analysis revealed no notable alterations of the integrated results.
Significant means that there is an association with a 95% confidence.

The investigators found in case-control studies for the highest versus the lowest garlic consumption categories, a significantly reduced risk of 29% [relative risk = 0.71, 95% CI = 0.60 to 0.84] for colorectal cancer.
Significant because relative risk of 1 was not found in the 95% CI of 0.60 to 0.84. Relative risk of 1 means no risk/association.

The investigators found in cohort studies for the highest versus the lowest garlic consumption categories, a non-significantly reduced risk of 1% [relative risk = 0.99, 95% CI = 0.80 to 1.23] for colorectal cancer.
Non-significantly because relative risk of 1 was found in the 95% CI of 0.80 to 1.23. Relative risk of 1 means no risk/association.

The investigators concluded that dietary intake of garlic could reduce risk of colorectal cancer. Could reduce because the risk was not significant in cohort studies.

Original title:
Garlic intake and the risk of colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis by Zhou X, Qian H, […], Zeng L.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31895803

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on significantly/cohort studies, garlic consumption and colorectal cancer right here.

Objectives:
Some evidence indicates that carotenoids may reduce the risk of bladder cancer (BC), but the association is unclear. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Do carotenoids (β-cryptoxanthin, α-carotene, β-carotene and lutein and zeaxanthin) reduce risk of bladder cancer?

Study design:
This review article included a total of 22 studies (case-control and cohort studies) involving 516,740 adults.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found for the highest compared with the lowest category of carotenoid dietary intake a non-significantly reduced risk of 12% [RR = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.76 to 1.03] for bladder cancer.
Non-significantly because RR of 1 was found in the 95% CI of 0.76 to 1.03. RR of 1 means no risk/association.

The investigators found for the highest compared with the lowest category of circulating carotenoid concentrations a non-significantly reduced risk of 64% [RR = 0.36, 95% CI = 0.12 to 1.07] for bladder cancer.

The investigators found for the highest compared with the lowest category of circulating lutein and zeaxanthin concentrations a significantly reduced risk of 47% [RR = 0.53, 95% CI = 0.33 to 0.84] for bladder cancer.
Significantly because RR of 1 was not found in the 95% CI of 0.33 to 0.84. RR of 1 means no risk/association.

The investigators found dose-response analysis showed that bladder cancer risk significantly decreased by 42% [RR = 0.58, 95% CI = 0.36 to 0.94] for every 1 mg increase in daily dietary β-cryptoxanthin intake.

The investigators found dose-response analysis showed that bladder cancer risk significantly decreased by 76% [RR = 0.24, 95% CI = 0.08 to 0.67] for every 1 μmol/L increase in circulating concentration of α-carotene.

The investigators found dose-response analysis showed that bladder cancer risk significantly decreased by 27% [RR = 0.73, 95% CI = 0.57 to 0.94] for every 1 μmol/L increase in circulating concentration of β-carotene.

The investigators found dose-response analysis showed that bladder cancer risk significantly decreased by 56% [RR = 0.44, 95% CI = 0.28 to 0.67] for every 1 μmol/L increase in circulating concentrations of lutein and zeaxanthin.

The investigators concluded dietary β-cryptoxanthin intake and circulating concentrations of α-carotene, β-carotene and lutein and zeaxanthin reduce risk of bladder cancer.

Original title:
Carotenoid Intake and Circulating Carotenoids Are Inversely Associated with the Risk of Bladder Cancer: A Dose-Response Meta-analysis by Wu S, Liu Y, […], Ramirez AG.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31800007

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on carotenoid consumption and cancer right here.

 

Objectives:
The relationship between serum copper (Cu) level and overweight/obesity remains controversial. Therefore, this review article (meta-analysis) has been conducted.

Does a high serum copper level increase overweight/obesity risk?

Study design:
This review article included 21 articles.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found compared with controls, serum copper level was significantly higher in obese children [SMD = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.16 to 1.32] and in obese adults [SMD = 0.39, 95% CI = 0.02 to 0.76].

The investigators found no significant difference in serum copper level between overweight and control groups in children [SMD = 1.52, 95% CI = -0.07 to 3.12] and in adults [SMD = 0.16, 95% CI = -0.06 to 0.38].

The investigators found subgroup analysis revealed a higher serum copper level in obese children [SMD = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.36 to 1.45] and obese adults [SMD = 0.47, 95% CI = 0.05 to 0.88] compared with healthy weight controls.

The investigators found the SMD differed significantly between obese children diagnosed by weight-for-height and controls [SMD = 1.56, 95% CI = 0.57 to 2.55] and there was a significant difference of serum copper level between obese adults diagnosed by BMI (WHO) and controls [SMD = 0.54, 95% CI = 0.08 to 1.01].

The investigators concluded that a higher serum copper level increases risk of obesity in children and adults and these findings need to be further confirmed.

Original title:
The Relationship Between Serum Copper and Overweight/Obesity: a Meta-analysis by Gu K, Li X, […], Jiang X.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31300957

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on copper and obesity/overweight right here.

Objectives:
Is there an association between dietary fat intake and the risk of three major types of skin cancer including basal cell carcinoma (BCC), squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and cutaneous malignant melanoma (CMM)?

Study design:
This review article included 3 prospective cohort studies (175,675 participants and 30,915 basal cell carcinoma cases, 4,106 squamous cell carcinoma cases and 1,638 cutaneous malignant melanoma cases) and 9 case-control studies (328 basal cell carcinoma cases, 493 squamous cell carcinoma cases, 1,547 cutaneous malignant melanoma cases and 2,660 controls).

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found pooled results indicated that dietary consumption of total fat and saturated fat were not associated with 3 major types of skin cancer.

The investigators found high consumption of monounsaturated fat was significantly associated with a decreased risk of 10% for basal cell carcinoma [RR = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.85 to 0.96]. 

The investigators found high consumption of polyunsaturated fat was significantly associated with an increased risk of 19% for squamous cell carcinoma [RR = 1.19, 95% CI = 1.06 to 1.33]. 

The investigators concluded high consumption of monounsaturated fat decreases risk of basal cell carcinoma while high consumption of polyunsaturated fat increases risk of squamous cell carcinoma. However, these findings should be confirmed by further evidence from well-designed and large-scale prospective cohort studies.

Original title:
Dietary Fat Intake and the Risk of Skin Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies by Ruan L, Cheng SP and Zhu QX.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31298947

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on fat consumption and cancer right here.
 

Objectives:
Does consumption of fruit or vegetables reduce risk of metabolic syndrome (MetS)?

Study design:
This review article included 9 observational studies (7 cross-sectional studies and 2 cohort studies).

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found in a dose-response analysis of 2 cohort studies and 7 cross-sectional studies, that an increase of 100 g/d in fruit consumption significantly reduced risk of metabolic syndrome with 3% [OR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.95 to 0.99, I2 = 26.7%], whereas an increase of 100 g/d in vegetable consumption (9 studies) was not associated with a reduction in the metabolic syndrome [OR = 0.98, 95% CI = 0.96 to 1.01, I2 = 54.6%].

The investigators concluded 100 g/d fruit consumption reduces risk of metabolic syndrome. However, prospective studies or randomised clinical trials are needed to identify the effects of fruits by variety on the risk of the metabolic syndrome.

Original title:
Fruit and vegetable consumption and the metabolic syndrome: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis by Lee M, Lim M and Kim J.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31514758

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on fruit and vegetable consumption and obesity/overweight right here.

Objectives:
The results of epidemiological studies on the relationship between fruit and vegetable intake and lung cancer risk were inconsistent among participants with different smoking status. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Do dietary intakes of fruit and vegetables reduce risk of lung cancer?

Study design:
This review article included a total of 12 prospective cohort studies.
The duration of follow-up ranged from 4 to 12.9 years.
No publication bias was found.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found for dietary consumption of fruit a significantly reduced risk of 14% [summary RR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.78 to 0.94, I2 = 0.0%, p = 0.642] for lung cancer among current smokers.

Significant means that there is an association with a 95% confidence.

The investigators found for dietary consumption of fruit a significantly reduced risk of 9% [summary RR = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.84 to 0.99, I2 = 0.0%, p = 0.653] for lung cancer among former smokers.
Significant because RR of 1 was not found in the 95% CI of 0.84 to 0.99. RR of 1 means no risk/association.

The investigators found stratified analysis showed that dietary consumption of fruit significantly reduced risk of lung cancer with 23% [RR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.62 to 0.96] in current smoking subjects from Europe.

The investigators found in linear dose-response analysis that an increase of 100 grams of fruit intake per day was associated with a 5% reduction [RR = 0.95, 95% CI = 0.93 to 0.97, p for trend 0.001] in current smokers.

The investigators found in linear dose-response analysis that an increase of 100 grams of fruit intake per day was associated with a 5% reduction [RR = 0.95, 95% CI = 0.93 to 0.99, p for trend = 0.001] in former smokers.

The investigators found for dietary consumption of vegetables a significantly reduced risk of 13% [summary RR = 0.87, 95% CI = 0.78 to 0.97, I2 = 25.4%, p = 0.226] for lung cancer among current smokers.

The investigators found in linear dose-response analysis that an increase of 100 grams of vegetable intake per day was associated with a 3% lower risk of lung cancer in current smokers [95% CI = 0.96 to 1.00, p for trend = 0.057]. 

The investigators concluded that fruit consumption, at least 100g per day decreases lung cancer risk among current smokers and former smokers, while vegetables consumption, at least 100g per day decreases lung cancer risk of current smokers. These findings may have considerable public health significance for the prevention of lung cancer through dietary interventions.

Original title:
The Associations of Fruit and Vegetable Intake with Lung Cancer Risk in Participants with Different Smoking Status: A Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies by Wang C, Yang T, [...], Li D.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6723574/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on fruit and vegetables consumption and cancer right here.

 

Objectives:
Findings of epidemiological studies regarding the association between carrot consumption and lung cancer risk remain inconsistent. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Do dietary intakes of carrot reduce risk of lung cancer?

Study design:
This review article included a total of 17 case-control studies and 1 prospective cohort study, involving 202,969 individuals and 5,517 patients with lung cancer.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found in 18 studies a significantly reduced risk of 42% [pooled OR = 0.58, 95% CI = 0.45 to 0.74] for lung cancer by comparing the highest category with the lowest category of carrot consumption.
Exclusion of any single study did not materially alter the pooled OR.

The investigators found based on subgroup analyses for the types of lung cancer a significantly reduced risk of 66% [pooled OR = 0.34, 95% CI = 0.15 to 0.79] for the lung cancer adenocarcinoma by comparing the highest category with the lowest category of carrot consumption.

The investigators found based on subgroup analyses for the types of lung cancer a significantly reduced risk of 39% [OR = 0.61, 95% CI = 0.46 to 0.81] for mixed types of lung cancer by comparing the highest category with the lowest category of carrot consumption.

The investigators concluded that carrot consumption decreases the risk of lung cancer, especially for adenocarcinoma.

Original title:
Is carrot consumption associated with a decreased risk of lung cancer? A meta-analysis of observational studies by Xu H, Jiang H, […], Lu Z.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31552816

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on carrot consumption and cancer right here.

 

Objectives:
The lipid distribution in people who are overweight and obese is directly related to metabolic diseases. Quercetin supplementation may be an appropriate approach for reducing the risk factors of metabolic diseases in people who are obese. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Does quercetin supplementation reduce risk factors of metabolic diseases in people who are obese?

Study design:
This review article included 5 RCTs.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found ≥150 mg/day quercetin supplementation during >6 weeks significantly reduced LDL-cholesterol (bad cholesterol) levels in people who are obese [SMD = -0.8, 95% CI = -1.21 to -0.39, p 0.00001].

The investigators concluded ≥150 mg/day quercetin supplementation during >6 weeks reduces LDL-cholesterol levels in people who are obese.

Original title:
Quercetin Actions on Lipid Profiles in Overweight and Obese Individuals: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis by Guo W, Gong X and Li M.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31465275

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on quercetin, cholesterol and obesity/overweight right here.

Objectives:
L-carnitine plays a fundamental biological role in the metabolism of lipids and may positively affect blood pressure by decreasing insulin resistance, although the latter remains less clear. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Does L-carnitine supplementation reduce blood pressure?

Study design:
This review article included 10 RCTs using a random-effects model to estimate the pooled effect sizes of L-carnitine supplementation on systolic (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP).

Results were expressed as weighted mean difference (WMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).

No evidence of publication bias was observed about the effects of L-carnitine supplementation on systolic blood pressure [p = 0.307] and diastolic blood pressure [p = 0.729], as evidenced by the results of the Egger's test.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found L-carnitine supplementation decreased diastolic blood pressure [WMD = -1.162 mmHg, 95% CI = -2.020 to -0.303, p = 0.008] without changing systolic blood pressure levels [WMD = -0.085 mmHg, 95% CI = -1.455 to 1.285, p = 0.903].

The investigators found results of subgroup analyses revealed L-carnitine supplementation decreased diastolic blood pressure levels in participants with overweight and obesity [WMD = -1.232 mmHg, 95% CI = -2.297 to -0.167, p = 0.023] and with doses of 2 g/d [WMD = -1.639 mmHg, 95% CI = -3.038 to -0.240, p = 0.022].

The investigators concluded that 2 g/d L-carnitine supplementation decreases diastolic blood pressure in participants with overweight and obesity. However, more research is required to determine the molecular mechanism underlying the relationship between of L-carnitine on blood pressure.

Original title:
Effects of L-carnitine supplementation on blood pressure: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials by Askarpour M, Hadi A, […], Ghaedi E.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31481697

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on L-carnitine and cardiovascular diseases right here.
 

Objectives:
Epidemiological investigations evaluating the association of dietary calcium intake with metabolic syndrome (MetS) risk have yielded controversial results. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Does dietary calcium intake reduce risk of metabolic syndrome?

Study design:
This review article included a total 15 cross-sectional studies for dietary calcium intake.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found for the highest versus lowest category of dietary calcium intake, a significantly reduced risk of 20% [combined OR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.70 to 0.91] for metabolic syndrome.

The investigators found in dose-response analysis, a non-linear relationship between dietary intake of calcium and risk of metabolic syndrome [p non-linearity > 0.001].

The investigators found 280 mg/d dietary calcium intake significantly reduced risk of metabolic syndrome with 13% [OR = 0.87, 95% CI = 0.82 to 0.93].

The investigators concluded 280 mg/d dietary calcium intake may reduce risk of metabolic syndrome. May reduce because this review article only included cross-sectional studies and no cohort studies. Therefore, these findings should need to be further confirmed by larger prospective cohort studies.

Original title:
Dietary calcium intake and the risk of metabolic syndrome: evidence from observational studies by Cheng L, Hu D and Jiang W.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30846011

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on calcium and obesity/overweight right here.

Objectives:
Observational studies have reported controversial evidence of the association between dietary fat intake and ovarian cancer. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.
Does dietary fat intake increase risk of ovarian cancer among women?

Study design:
This review article included 21 observational studies involved approximately 900,000 women.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found a significant nonlinear association between dietary total fat intake with the risk of ovarian cancer, with a relatively steep slope at dietary total fat intake higher than 30 g/day [p non-linearity 0.01].

The investigators found, moreover, the risk of ovarian cancer was increased in non-linear form for both saturated and monounsaturated fat from 25 g/day [p non-linearity 0.05].

The investigators found in linear meta-analysis a 2% greater risk of ovarian cancer per 10 g/day increase in total dietary fat intake.

The investigators found in linear meta-analysis a 2% greater risk of ovarian cancer per 0.5 g/day increase in dietary trans fat intake.

The investigators found in linear meta-analysis a 1% greater risk of ovarian cancer per 2.5 g/day increase in dietary monounsaturated fat intake.
However, this association for monounsaturated fat was marginally significant [p = 0.052].

The investigators found in linear meta-analysis a 1% greater risk of ovarian cancer per 50 mg/day increase in dietary cholesterol intake.

The investigators concluded that dietary total, trans, saturated and partially monounsaturated fat as well as cholesterol intake increase risk of ovarian cancer among women.

Original title:
Dietary Fat Intake and Risk of Ovarian Cancer: A Systematic Review and Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies by Sadeghi A, Shab-Bidar S, […], Djafarian K.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31058552

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on fat consumption and cancer right here.
 

Objectives:
Iron has been shown to promote breast carcinogenesis in animal models through generation of oxidative stress and interaction with estrogen. Heme iron, which is found exclusively in animal-sourced foods, is suggested to have a more detrimental effect. Epidemiological evidence of the association between iron and breast cancer risk remains inconclusive and has not been comprehensively summarized. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Does dietary iron consumption increase breast cancer risk?

Study design:
This review article included 15 case-control studies and 12 prospective cohort studies.

Of the 17 studies assessing iron intake, 7 were cohort studies with study size ranging from 4,646 to 193,742 participants, follow-up ranging from 5.5 to 20 years and number of breast cancer cases ranging from 188 to 9,305. The remaining 10 studies were case-control studies, of which 4 were hospital-based, 3 were population-based and 3 were nested within existing cohorts, with case numbers ranging from 220 to 3,452.

Of the 11 studies assessing body iron status, 5 were cohort studies with study size ranging from 1,795 to 164,355 participants, follow-up ranging from 7.1 to 17.6 years and number of cases ranging from 80 to 3,238. The remaining 6 studies used a nested case-control or case-cohort design, with follow-up (where reported) ranging from 4 to 15.7 years and case numbers ranging from 107 to 795.

Overall, NOS scores ranged from 4 to 9 (mean = 7.0).

No publication bias was found.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found compared to lowest category, highest dietary heme iron intake significantly increased risk of breast cancer with 12% [pooled RR = 1.12, 95% CI = 1.04-1.22, I2 = 39%, p heterogeneity = 0.15].

The investigators found each 1 mg/day increase in dietary heme iron intake, was associated with a statistically significant 8% increase in breast cancer risk [pooled RR = 1.08, 95% CI = 1.002–1.17].

The investigators found compared to lowest levels, highest serum iron levels significantly increased risk of breast cancer with 22% [pooled RR = 1.22, 95% CI = 1.01-1.47, I2 = 61%, p heterogeneity = 0.04].

The investigators found serum iron levels exhibited a J-shaped dose-response relationship with breast cancer risk, with strong evidence of a nonlinear effect [p nonlinearity  0.001].

Specifically, a steady increase in risk was noted for serum iron levels above ~ 100 μg/dL, with the association becoming statistically significant at just beyond ~ 125 μg/dL.

The investigators concluded that higher dietary heme iron intake and higher serum iron levels increase breast cancer risk. Further research is needed to better elucidate the association between iron intake/status and risk of breast cancer.

Original title:
Iron intake, body iron status, and risk of breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis by Chang VC, Cotterchio M and Khoo E.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6555759/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on iron consumption, review article/significantly and breast cancer right here.
 

Objectives:
Is there an association between poultry and egg consumption and brain cancer risk?

Study design:
This review article included a total of 10 articles (6 articles for poultry consumption and 5 articles for egg consumption).

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found no association between poultry consumption and reduced risk of brain cancer [summarized relative risk = 0.901, 95% CI = 0.703-1.154, I2 = 60.7%, p = 0.018].
No association because RR of 1 was found in the 95% CI of 0.703 to 1.154. RR of 1 means no risk/association.

The investigators found in 4 studies no association between poultry consumption and reduced risk of brain cancer glioma [summarized relative risk = 0.873, 95% CI = 0.737-1.034, I2 = 0.0%, p = 0.838].

The investigators found no association between egg consumption and reduced risk of brain cancer [summarized relative risk = 0.998, 95% CI = 0.552-1.805, I2 = 82.6%, p = 0.001].

The investigators found no association between egg consumption and increased risk of brain cancer glioma [summarized relative risk = 1.472, 95% CI = 0.935-2.316].

The investigators concluded that poultry and egg consumption are not associated with the risk of brain cancer. Due to the limited quality of evidence currently available, more studies related to poultry and egg consumption for brain cancer is necessary.

Original title:
A meta-analysis of the association between poultry and egg consumption and the risk of brain cancer by Luo H, Sun P, [...], Guo Y.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30782302

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on poultry and egg consumption, review article/significantly and cancer right here.

Objectives:
Previous studies had demonstrated some associations between coffee and tea consumption and brain cancer risk resulted in an inconsistent relationship. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Does coffee or tea consumption reduce brain cancer risk?

Study design:
This review article included 8 cohort studies and 3 case-control studies, involving 2,583 cases (persons with brain cancer) among 1,684,262 participants.

Based on Egger’s test and funnel plot, there existed no publication bias.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found highest category of coffee consumption significantly reduced risk of brain cancer with 21.5% [RR = 0.785, 95% CI = 0.580-0.984, I2 = 65.6%, p for heterogeneity = 0.001], when compared with the lowest category.

The investigators found in supgroup analysis highest category of coffee consumption significantly reduced risk of glioma with 24% [RR = 0.760, 95% CI = 0.548-0.972], when compared with the lowest category.

The investigators found in cohort studies highest category of coffee consumption significantly reduced risk of brain cancer with 14.2% [RR = 0.858, 95% CI = 0.700-0.992], when compared with the lowest category. However, this reduced risk was not significant in case-control studies.

The investigators found highest category of coffee consumption significantly reduced risk of brain cancer with 88.3% in Asian populations [RR = 0.217, 95% CI = 0.042-0.896], when compared with the lowest category. However, this reduced risk was not significant in other populations.

The investigators found sensitivity analysis showed pooled RR of coffee consumption ranged from 0.738 [95% CI = 0.542-0.961) to 0.905 [95% CI = 0.754-1.088].

The investigators found highest category of tea consumption significantly reduced risk of brain cancer with 20.2% in American populations [RR = 0.798, 95% CI = 0.646-0.986], when compared with the lowest category.

The investigators found sensitivity analysis showed pooled RR of tea consumption ranged from 0.863 [95% CI = 0.699-1.067] to 0.947 [95% CI = 0.763-1.176].

The investigators found highest category of coffee plus tea consumption significantly reduced risk of brain cancer with 31.6% [RR = 0.684, 95% CI = 0.481-0.975], when compared with the lowest category.

The investigators concluded higher consumption of coffee reduces risk of brain cancer in Asian populations and higher consumption of tea reduces risk of brain cancer in American population. However, future studies with detailed information about sex, lifestyle and some other related factors are warranted to further explore the association between coffee or tea consumption and risk of brain cancer.

Original title:
Association between tea and coffee consumption and brain cancer risk: an updated meta-analysis by Song Y, Wang Z, [....], Guo J.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6419842/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on coffee and tea consumption, review article/significantly and cancer right here.
 

Objectives:
Results from earlier publications on the association of coffee and caffeine and risk of ovarian cancer are inconsistent. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Is there an association between coffee and caffeine consumption and risk of ovarian cancer among women?

Study design:
This review article included 22 case-control studies with a total of 40,140 participants, of which 8,568 patients with ovarian cancer. The participants were ≥ 17 years.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found combining 21 effect sizes from 18 studies, no significant association was observed between total coffee consumption and risk of ovarian cancer [OR = 1.09, 95% CI = 0.94 to 1.26].

The investigators found no significant association between total caffeine intake and ovarian cancer risk [OR = 0.89, 95% CI = 0.55 to 1.45].

The investigators found, in addition, caffeinated coffee intake was not significantly associated with ovarian cancer risk [OR = 1.05, 95% CI = 0.87 to 1.28].

The investigators found, however, combining effect sizes from 5 studies, an inverse significant association between decaffeinated coffee intake and risk of ovarian cancer [OR = 0.72, 95% CI = 0.58 to 0.90].

The investigators concluded decaffeinated coffee consumption could reduce risk of ovarian cancer among women. Could reduce because this review article only included case-control studies and no cohort studies.

Original title:
Coffee and caffeine intake and risk of ovarian cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis by Shafiei F, Salari-Moghaddam A , […], Esmaillzadeh A.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30833443

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on coffee consumption, review article/significantly and cancer right here.
 

Objectives:
Is there a relationship between the intake of foods (whole grains, refined grains, vegetables, fruit, nuts, legumes, eggs, dairy, fish, red meat, processed meat and sugar-sweetened beverages) and risk of general overweight/obesity, abdominal obesity and weight gain?

Study design:
This review article included 25 prospective cohort studies until August 2018.
In detail, 6 prospective cohort studies were included in the meta-analysis for consumption of whole grains, 4 studies for refined grains, 7 for vegetables, 6 for fruit, 4 for nuts, 2 for legumes, 2 for eggs, 11 for dairy products, 4 for fish, 4 for red meat, 2 for processed meat and 9 for sugar-sweetened beverages.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found in the dose-response meta-analysis a significantly reduced risk of 7% per each increase of 30g/d whole-grain products [RR overweight/obesity = 0.93, 95% CI = 0.89 to 0.96, I2 = 0%].
There was no indication for a nonlinear association between whole-grain intake and risk of overweight/obesity [p-nonlinearity = 0.16].

The investigators found in the dose-response meta-analysis a significantly reduced risk of 7-9% per each increase of 100g/d fruit consumption [RR overweight/obesity = 0.93, 95% CI = 0.86 to 1.00, I2 = 89% and RR weight gain = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.86 to 0.97, I2 =7%].
There was no indication of a nonlinear relation [p-nonlinearity = 0.17, p-nonlinearity = 0.14, respectively].

The investigators found in the dose-response meta-analysis a significantly reduced risk of 58% per each increase of 28g/d nut consumption [RR abdominal obesity = 0.42, 95% CI = 0.31 to 0.57].

The investigators found in the dose-response meta-analysis a significantly reduced risk of 12% per each increase of 50g/d legume consumption [RR overweight/obesity = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.84 to 0.93].

The investigators found in the dose-response meta-analysis a significantly reduced risk of 17% per each increase of 100g/d fish consumption [RR abdominal obesity = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.71 to 0.97, I2 = 0%].
There was no indication of nonlinearity [p-nonlinearity = 0.07], but the graph indicated a stronger risk reduction at lower levels of fish intake and the curve reached a plateau at ∼40 g/d.

The investigators found in the dose-response meta-analysis a significantly increased risk of 5% per each increase of 30g/d refined grains consumption [RR overweight/obesity = 1.05, 95% CI = 1.00 to 1.10, I2 = 61%].
However, the nonlinear dose-response meta-analysis indicated that the association had a J-shape curve and a higher risk of overweight/obesity was identified for an intake of refined grains >90 g/d [p-nonlinearity 0.001].

The investigators found in the dose-response meta-analysis a significantly increased risk of 10-14% per each increase of 30g/d red meat consumption [RR abdominal obesity = 1.10, 95% CI = 1.04 to 1.16, I2 = 0% and RR weight gain = 1.14, 95% CI = 1.03 to 1.26].

The investigators found in the dose-response meta-analysis a significantly increased risk of 5-12% with each increase of 250 mL sugar-sweetened beverages per day consumption [RR overweight/obesity = 1.05, 95% CI = 1.00 to 1.11 and RR abdominal obesity = 1.12, 95% CI = 1.04 to 1.20, I2 = 38%].  
The increase in risk was stronger at lower amounts of sugar-sweetened beverages intake (until ∼300 mL/d), but an increase at higher intakes was still present [p-nonlinearity = 0.03].

The investigators found the intake of 5 servings of whole grains/d, 3 servings of vegetables/d and 3 servings of fruit/d significantly resulted in a 38% reduction in risk of overweight/obesity compared with non-consumption of these food groups.

The investigators found the intake of 5 servings of refined grains/d and 3 servings of sugar-sweetened beverages/d significantly resulted in a 59% increased risk of overweight/obesity.

The investigators concluded that high intakes of whole grains, vegetables, fruit and probably fish as well as a low intake of refined grains, red meat and sugar-sweetened beverages are associated with a reduced risk of measures of adiposity, including overweight/obesity, abdominal obesity or weight gain, respectively. These findings are in line with current public health recommendations regarding a health-promoting diet. However, with the current evidence rated as very low to low, findings should be interpreted with caution and better-designed observational studies, more evidence from intervention trials and use of novel statistical methods (e.g., substitution analyses or network meta-analyses) are needed.

Original title:
Food Groups and Risk of Overweight, Obesity, and Weight Gain: A Systematic Review and Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Studies by Schlesinger S, Neuenschwander M, […], Schwingshackl BH.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6416048/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on different food groups and overweight right here.

Objectives:
Do omega-3 fatty acids in fish consumption reduce risk of breast cancer in Asian patients?

Study design:
This review article included 4 cohort studies and 7 case-control studies with a total of 130,365 Asian patients.

There was not any study with significant publication bias included.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found omega-3 fatty acids in fish consumption significantly reduced risk of  breast cancer in Asian patients with 20% [OR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.73-0.87, p 0.00001].
Significant because OR of 1 was not found in the 95% CI of 0.73 to 0.87. OR of 1 means no risk/association.

The investigators concluded omega-3 fatty acids in fish consumption reduce breast cancer risk in Asian patients.

Original title:
Protective Effect of Omega-3 Fatty Acids in Fish Consumption Against Breast Cancer in Asian Patients: A Meta-Analysis by Nindrea RD, Aryandono T, […], Dwiprahasto I.

Link:
http://journal.waocp.org/?sid=Entrez:PubMed&id=pmid:30803190&key=2019.20.2.327

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on fish consumption, review article/significantly and breastcancer right here.

Fish containing omega-3 fatty acids are salmon, mackerel, herring, lake trout, bluefin tuna, sturgeon, sablefish, anchovy, albacore tuna, whitefish, arctic char, sardines, bluefish, mullet, halibut, striped bass, mahi mahi, pollock, rockfish, rainbow trout, shark, catfish, carp, cod, flounder, grouper, haddock, ocean perch, red snapper, swordfish, pike, sole and tilapia.

Objectives:
Although the relationship between dietary intake and serum levels of trans fatty acids and risk of breast cancer has been investigated extensively, findings are inconsistent. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Do dietary intake and serum levels of trans fatty acids increase risk of breast cancer?

Study design:
This review article included 6 cohort studies and 1 nested case-control study on total dietary trans fat intake and 1 cohort study and 4 nested case-control studies on serum trans fatty acids.

Participants were apparently healthy aged 26 years or older.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found no significant relationship between dietary intake of total trans fatty acids and risk of breast cancer [pooled effect size = 1.02, 95% CI = 0.95-1.10, p = 0.403].

The investigators found in 3 effect sizes from 2 cohort studies and 1 nested case-control study, no significant relation between dietary intake of conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) and risk of breast cancer [pooled effect size = 1.05, 95% CI = 0.95-1.17, p = 0.513].

The investigators found based on 5 effect sizes, each additional 1 g/day dietary intake of total trans fats was not significantly associated with risk of breast cancer [RR = 1.00, 95% CI = 0.99-1.01].

The investigators found high serum levels of trans fats were associated with an increased risk of 37% of breast cancer among postmenopausal women [pooled effect size = 1.37, 95% CI = 1.04-1.81, p = 0.02].

The investigators concluded dietary intake of trans fatty acids (also called trans fats) is not associated with risk of breast cancer. However, a significant positive association is seen between serum trans fats and risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women.

Original title:
Dietary intake and serum levels of trans fatty acids and risk of breast cancer: A systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective studies by Anjom-Shoae J, Sadeghi O, […], Esmaillzadeh A.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30954361

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on trans fatty acids consumption, review article/significantly and breastcancer right here.

Objectives:
Is there a relationship between nut consumption and metabolic syndrome (MetS)?

Study design:
This review article included a total of 11 observational studies (6 cross-sectional and 5 prospective cohort studies), which involved a total of 89,224 participants.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found nut consumption significantly reduced risk of metabolic syndrome with 16% [overall multivariable adjusted RR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.76-0.92, p  0.001].

The investigators found in subgroup analysis tree nut consumption significantly reduced risk of metabolic syndrome with 3% [RR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.94-1.00, p =0.04]. However, this reduced risk was not significant in peanuts [RR = 1.01, 95% CI = 0.96-1.06, p = 0.68].

The investigators concluded nut consumption reduces risk of metabolic syndrome. However, this reduced risk is only found in tree nuts, not in peanuts. More well-designed studies with detailed specifications of nut varieties are needed to further elaborate the issues examined in this meta-analysis.

Original title:
Relationship Between Nut Consumption and Metabolic Syndrome: A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies by Zhang Y and Zhang DZ.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30716015

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on nut consumption and overweight right here.

Objectives:
Epidemiological studies focusing on the association between folate and breast cancer risk reported inconsistent findings. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Does dietary folate intake reduce breast cancer risk?

Study design:
This review article included a total of 23 prospective cohort studies involving 41,516 cases (=women with breast cancer) among 1,171,048 individuals.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found dietary folate intake significantly reduced risk of oestrogen-receptor-negative breast cancer with 12% [pooled risk ratio = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.78-1.00].

The investigators found dietary folate intake significantly reduced risk of oestrogen-receptor-negative/progesterone-receptor-negative breast cancer with 18% [pooled risk ratio = 0.82, 95% CI = 0.68-0.97].

The investigators found an increment of dietary folate intake of 100 μg per day was associated with a deceased risk of oestrogen-receptor-negative breast cancer with 6% [RR = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.88-0.99].

The investigators found an increment of dietary folate intake of 100 μg per day was associated with a deceased risk of oestrogen-receptor-negative/progesterone-receptor-negative breast cancer with 10% [RR = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.85-0.97].

The investigators found high dietary folate intake significantly reduced breast cancer risk in premenopausal women with 6% [RR = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.88-1.00].

The investigators found high dietary folate intake significantly reduced breast cancer risk in women with moderate or high levels of alcohol consumption with 18% [RR = 0.82, 95% CI = 0.72-0.94].

The investigators concluded that at least 100 μg per day dietary folate intake, reduce both oestrogen-receptor-negative and oestrogen-receptor-negative/progesterone-receptor-negative breast cancer, particularly among premenopausal women and women with moderate or high levels of alcohol consumption.

Original title:
Folate intake and the risk of breast cancer: an up-to-date meta-analysis of prospective studies by Zeng J, Wang K, [...], Chang H.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30647438

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on folate consumption, review article/significantly and breast cancer right here.