Nutrition and health

Objectives:
Due to the high incidence of liver disease and the severity of adverse outcomes, liver disease has become a serious public health problem, bringing a huge disease burden to individuals, families and society. Most studies have shown significant differences in serum carotenoid content and dietary carotenoid intake between liver disease patients and non-liver disease patients, but some studies have reported contrary results.Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Do higher serum concentrations of carotenoids (such as, α-carotene, β-carotene, lycopene, cryptoxanthin and lutein/zeaxanthin) or higher dietary intakes of carotenoids reduces the risk of liver disease?

Study design:
This review article included 3 RCT studies, 6 cohort studies, 11 case-control studies, 9 cross-sectional studies and 1 RCT-combined cross-sectional study.

The Egger test showed no publication bias.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found pooled meta-analysis showed that higher serum α-carotene [SMD = -0.58, 95% CI = -0.83 to -0.32, p < 0.001], β-carotene [SMD = -0.81, 95% CI = -1.13 to -0.49, p < 0.001] and lycopene [SMD = -1.06, 95% CI = -1.74 to -0.38, p < 0.001] significantly reduced the risk and severity of liver disease. 

The investigators found, however, no significant difference was observed between serum β-cryptoxanthin [SMD = 0.02, 95% CI = -0.41 to 0.45, p = 0.92] and lutein/zeaxanthin [SMD = 0.62, 95% CI = -1.20 to 2.45, p = 0.502] and the risk and severity of liver disease. 

The investigators found dietary β-carotene intake [SMD = -0.22, 95% CI = -0.31 to -0.13, p < 0.001] significantly reduced the risk of liver disease. 

The investigators found an intake of more than 6 mg of carotenoids on an energy-restricted diet can effectively alleviate the symptoms of NAFLD. 

The investigators concluded that higher serum concentrations of α-carotene, β-carotene and lycopene reduce risk of liver disease. Meanwhile, dietary intake of β-carotene reduces the incidence of liver disease. 

Original title: 
A systematic review of dietary and circulating carotenoids and liver disease by Hu B, Sui J, […], Xia H. 

 

Link:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39229651/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on cohort studies/significantly, carotenoids and chronic disease right here. 

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is one of the most common causes of chronic liver disease worldwide.

Objectives:
Omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (n-3 PUFA) have been suggested as a cognitive enhancing agent, though their effect is doubtful. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Does supplementation of n-3 PUFA improve cognitive functions of non-demented individuals exclusively of middle age or older? 

Study design:
This review article included 24 RCTs with a total of 9,660 participants.
The length of intervention ranged from 3 to 36 months and the daily dose of n-3 PUFA ranged from 230 to 4000 mg/day. 
6  studies were conducted in countries where the nationwide blood levels of DHA + EPA were notably low, measuring ≤ 4% in erythrocyte equivalents. 

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found that the beneficial effect on executive function demonstrated an upward trend within the initial 12 months of intervention. 
This effect was prominently observed with a daily intake surpassing 500 mg of n-3 PUFA and up to 420 mg of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA). 

The investigators found a descending curve following 12 months of n-3 PUFA intervention and when the dosage of EPA exceeded 420 mg/d.  

The investigators found, furthermore, these trends exhibit heightened significance in regions where the levels of blood docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) + EPA are not very low.

The investigators concluded supplementation of n-3 PUFA (a daily intake surpassing 500mg n-3 PUFA or up to 420mg of EPA during 12 months) has potential benefits to executive function in non-demented individuals exclusively of middle age or older, particularly in individuals whose dietary DHA + EPA level is not substantially diminished. 

Original title: 
The influence of n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids on cognitive function in individuals without dementia: a systematic review and dose–response meta-analysis by Suh SW, Lim E, […], Kim KW. 

Link: 
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10929146/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on EPA and DHA and elderly right here. 

Objectives:
Do dietary choline and betaine increase mortality risk?

Study design:
This review article included 6 cohort studies comprising 482,778 total participants, 57,235 all-cause, 9,351 cardiovascular disease and 4,400 stroke deaths.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found linear dose-response analysis showed that each 100 mg/day increase in dietary choline intake was significantly associated with 6% increases in risk of all-cause mortality [RR = 1.06, 95% CI = 1.03 to 1.10, I2 = 83.7%, p < 0.001].

The investigators found linear dose-response analysis showed that each 100 mg/day increase in dietary choline intake was significantly associated with 11% increases in risk of cardiovascular diseases mortality [RR = 1.11, 95% CI = 1.06 to 1.16, I2 = 54.3%, p = 0.02].

The investigators found the result of the nonlinear dose-response analysis showed a significant relationship between dietary betaine intake and stroke mortality at the dosages of 50 to 250 mg/day [p non-linearity= 0.0017]. 

The investigators concluded 100 mg/day of choline consumption is associated with a 6% and 11% higher risk of all-cause and cardiovascular disease mortality, respectively. In addition, a positive relationship between betaine dietary intake and stroke mortality at doses of 50 to 250 mg/day is observed. Due to the small number of the included studies and heterogeneity among them more well-designed prospective observational studies considering potential confounding variables are required. 

Original title: 
Higher dietary choline intake is associated with increased risk of all-cause and cause-specific mortality: A systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of cohort studies by Sharifi-Zahabi E, Soltani S, […], Shidfar F. 
 

Link:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39341000/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find here more information/studies about RCTs/significant, choline, and stroke. 

Betaine-rich foods are

• American Indian/Alaska native foods
• Baked products
• Beef products
• Cereal grains and pasta
• Restaurant foods
• Snacks
• Vegetables and vegetable products

Objectives:
The relationship between beverage consumption and risk of cardiovascular disease has been extensively examined in cross-sectional studies. However, limited studies have investigated beverage consumption as a longer-term habitual behavior, which is important owing to potential cumulative harmful or beneficial cardiovascular effects. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

What is the relationship between sex-specific long-term consumption of beverages [sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) or artificial-sweetened beverages (ASBs), tea, coffee, fruit juices, energy drinks and alcohol] and cardiovascular disease-related mortality? 

Study design:
This review article included 20 prospective cohort studies. The length of follow-up ranged from 5.5 years to 40 years. 
There was no publication bias. 

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found long-term coffee consumption of 2-6 cups per day significantly reduced cardiovascular disease-related mortality with 37% in males [pooled HR = 0.63, 95% CI = 0.46 to 0.87, p = 0.005, I2 = 0%] but not in females [HR = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.60 to 1.02, p = 0.07]. 

The investigators found long-term higher intake of tea was significantly associated with a 19% lower risk of cardiovascular disease-related mortality in all adults [pooled HR = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.72 to 0.92, p ≤ 0.001]. 

The investigators found higher alcohol intake was significantly associated with a 44% higher stroke in males [pooled HR = 1.44, 95% CI = 1.06 to 1.94, p = 0.02] and a 126% higher stroke in females [pooled HR = 2.26, 95% CI = 1.34 to 3.81, p = 0.002]. 

The investigators found higher sugar-sweetened beverage was significantly associated with a 31% higher risk in cardiovascular disease-related mortality [pooled HR = 1.31, 95% CI = 1.16 to 1.46, p ≤ 0.0001]. 
However, no effect was found between artificial-sweetened beverages and cardiovascular disease-related mortality while comparing the highest intake with lowest intake [pooled HR = 1.05, 95% CI = 0.87 to 1.26, p = 0.61, I2 = 61%].
 
The investigators concluded long-term habitual coffee consumption (2-6 cups per day) is beneficial for males and tea consumption is beneficial for all adults. Long-term high alcohol and sugar-sweetened beverage consumption increased risk of cardiovascular disease-related mortality for both males and females. However, it is not possible to draw conclusions on the potential benefit or harm of the long-term consumption of fruit juice and energy drinks on cardiovascular disease-related mortality owing to the limited number of studies available.

Original title: 
Long-Term Consumption of 6 Different Beverages and Cardiovascular Disease-Related Mortality: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies by Bhandari B, Zeng L, […], Xu X. 

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10904171/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on RCT’s/sensitivity analysis, coffee, alcohol and cardiovascular diseases right here. 

Objectives:
Previous studies suggest that dietary vitamin C is inversely associated with gastric cancer (GC), but most of them did not consider intake of fruit and vegetables. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Do higher dietary vitamin C intakes reduce gastric cancer risk after adjusting for intake of fruit and vegetables?

Study design:
This review article included 14 case-control studies with in total 5,362 cases (persons with gastric cancer) and 11,497 controls (persons without gastric cancer).

More cases were male (61.88% vs. 54.64%), older than 60 years (63.37% vs. 57.87%) and had low socioeconomic status (57.29% vs. 45.66%) compared with controls. 
In addition, a higher proportion of cases than controls were obese (21.34% vs. 19.06%), current smokers (26.58% vs. 24.14%) and ever drinkers (64.85 vs. 63.29%). 
Similarly, H. pylori seropositivity (63.82% vs. 61.86%) was more common among cases than among controls when considering only participants from the 7 studies with available information. 
A larger proportion of controls reported high intake of fruit and vegetables compared with cases. 
Most cases were of noncardia (57.03%) and intestinal type gastric cancer (33.01%). 
Cases had a lower median intake of vitamin C and fewer of them were in the highest quartiles of intake compared with controls.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found individuals in the highest quartile of dietary vitamin C intake had a significantly reduced risk of 36% for gastric cancer compared with those in the lowest quartile [OR = 0.64, 95% CI = 0.58 to 0.72]. 

The investigators found, however, when additionally adjusting for BMI and intake of fruit and vegetables, the observed association was attenuated and the OR for the highest versus lowest quartile of dietary vitamin C was 0.85 [95% CI = 0.73 to 0.98].

The investigators found a significant inverse association for noncardia gastric cancer, as well as for both intestinal and diffuse types of the disease. 

The investigators found dose-response analysis showed decreasing ORs of gastric cancer up to 150-200 mg/day of vitamin C [OR = 0.54, 95% CI = 0.41 to 0.71], whereas ORs for higher intakes were close to 1.0. 

The investigators concluded that consumption of 150-200 mg/day of vitamin C reduce gastric cancer risk. However, further well-designed prospective studies, aimed at disentangling the complex relationships between intake of fruit and vegetables, vitamins and other antioxidants and gastric cancer, are warranted to prove causality of the observed relationship between vitamin C and gastric cancer.

Original title: 
Dietary intake of vitamin C and gastric cancer: a pooled analysis within the Stomach cancer Pooling (StoP) Project by Sassano M, Seyyedsalehi  MS, […], Boffetta P. 

 

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11016516/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on cohort studies/significantly, viamin C and cancer right here. 

Objectives:
While clinical studies indicate that dietary protein may benefit glucose homeostasis in type 2 diabetes (T2D), the impact of dietary protein, including whether the protein is of animal or plant origin, on the risk of type 2 diabetes is uncertain. Therefore, an update of the meta-analysis has been conducted. 

Is there an associations between total, animal and plant protein dietary intakes and the risk of type 2 diabetes?

 

Study design:
This review article included 16 prospective cohort studies, involving 615,125 participants and 52,342 type 2 diabetes cases. Of which 11 studies reported data on intake of both animal and plant protein. 

 

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found dietary intakes of total protein were significantly associated with an increased risk of 14% for type 2 diabetes [pooled effect size = 1.14, 95% CI = 1.04 to 1.24].

The investigators found every increase of 20g dietary intakes of total protein were significantly associated with an increased risk of 3% for type 2 diabetes.

The investigators found dietary intakes of animal protein were significantly associated with an increased risk of 18% for type 2 diabetes [pooled effect size = 1.18, 95% CI = 1.09 to 1.27].

The investigators found every increase of 20g dietary intakes of animal protein were significantly associated with an increased risk of 7% for type 2 diabetes.

The investigators found, in contrast, there was no association between dietary intake of plant protein and type 2 diabetes risk [pooled effect size = 0.98, 95% CI = 0.89 to 1.08].

The investigators found every replacement of 20 grams animal by plant protein was 

significantly associated with a reduced risk of 20% for type 2 diabetes [pooled effect size = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.76 to 0.84].

The investigators concluded that long-term consumption of animal, but not plant, protein is associated with a dose-dependent increase in the risk of type 2 diabetes, with the implication that replacement of animal with plant protein intake may lower the risk of type 2 diabetes.  

Original title: 
Association between total, animal, and plant protein intake and type 2 diabetes risk in adults: A systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies by Ardakani AF, Anjom-Shoae J, […], Horowitz M. 

Link: 
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39032197/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on protein and diabetes right here.

 

Objectives:
The association between soy product consumption and cancer risk varies among studies. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Do higher soy product consumption reduce cancer risk?

Study design:
This review article included 17 cohort studies and 35 case-control studies with a total of 861,372 participants and 44,932 cases (persons with cancer). 

Regarding quality assessment, the case-control studies achieved an average score of 6.7. The mean score of the cohort study was 7.2, which satisfied the criterion of high quality. 
All analyses adjusted for age and most studies adjusted for smoking status (n = 38), drinking status (n = 29), total energy intake (n = 27), BMI (n = 26) and education level (n = 26). 

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found in pooled analysis of cohort studies and case-control studies that higher consumption of total soy products significantly reduced risk of cancer with 31% [RR = 0.69, 95% CI = 0.60 to 0.80, I2 = 82.7%, p < 0.001]. 
However, this reduced risk was not significant in cohort studies (RR = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.80 to 1.01].

The investigators found higher tofu consumption significantly reduced cancer risk in both men and women.

The investigators found higher consumption of total soy products significantly reduced risk of cancer amond women with 24% [RR = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.65 to 0.89].

The investigators found in subgroup analysis that higher consumption of total soy products was significantly associated with a reduced risk for gastrointestinal cancer [RR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.61 to 0.89], prostate cancer [RR = 0.47, 95% CI = 0.31 to 0.71], lung cancer [RR = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.52 to 0.86], upper aerodigestive tract cancer [RR = 0.33, 95% CI = 0.22 to 0.49] and multiple myeloma [RR = 0.10, 95% CI = 0.01 to 0.97], but not in bladder or liver cancer.

The investigators found in pooled analysis of cohort studies and case-control studies that higher consumption of tofu significantly reduced risk of cancer with 22% [RR = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.70 to 0.86, I2 = 47.9%, p = 0.004]. 
However, this reduced risk was not significant in cohort studies [RR = 0.89, 95% CI = 0.78 to 1.01, p = 0.186].

The investigators found in pooled analysis of cohort studies and case-control studies that higher consumption of soymilk significantly reduced risk of cancer with 25% [RR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.60 to 0.86, I2 = 47.9%, p = 0.004]. 
However, this reduced risk was not significant in cohort studies [RR = 1.10, 95% CI = 0.76 to 1.58].

The investigators found a 54g per day increment of total soy products significantly reduced cancer risk by 11%, a 61g per day increment of tofu significantly reduced cancer risk by 12%, and a 23g per day increment of soymilk significantly reduced cancer risk by 28%, while none of the other soy products were associated with cancer risk. 

The investigators concluded that daily consumption of 54g total soy products, 61g tofu or 23g soymilk is associated with a lower cancer risk. More prospective cohort studies are still needed to confirm the causal relationship between soy product consumption and cancer risk.

Original title: 
Soy Product Consumption and the Risk of Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies by Wang C, Ding K, […], Hong H. 

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11013307/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on cohort studies/significantly, soy and cancer right here. 

Objectives:
Previous cohort studies have indicated that consumption of total and animal proteins are related to fracture risk; however, results were inconclusive. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Does a high dietary intake of protein reduce risk of fractures?

Study design:
This review article included 20 cohort studies with serious to moderate risk of bias involving 780,322 individuals. 

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found a non-statistically significant relation between intake of animal proteins and dairy products and all fracture risk. 

The investigators found, however, a significantly 43% decreased incidence of fracture per 100 g/day total protein dietary intake [RR = 0.57, 95% CI = 0.36 to 0.93]. 

The investigators found, however, a significantly 5% decreased incidence of fracture per 15 g/day fish protein dietary intake [RR = 0.95, 95% CI = 0.91 to 0.99]. 

The investigators found every 100 g/day total and animal protein dietary intake and every 15 g/day fish dietary intake were significantly linked to 48%, 50% and 5% lower hip fracture risk. 

The investigators found greater dietary animal protein intake might reduce risk of hip but not fracture at any site. 

The investigators concluded greater total protein (per 100 g/day) and fish (per 15 g/day) dietary intake may reduce risk of any or hip fracture. May reduce because the cohort studies had serious to moderate risk of bias.

Original title: 
Association between total and animal proteins with risk of fracture: A systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of cohort studies by Zeraattalab-Motlagh S, Mortazavi AS, […], Mohammadi H.

 

Link: 
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37855886/ 

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on proteins and elderly right here. 

100 grams of protein consumption per day corresponds to a diet with 20 En% protein. A diet with 20 En% protein mainly consists of products with 20 En% protein. Find here which products in the supermarket contain 20 En% protein.

20 En% protein means that the number of grams of protein contributes 20% to the total calorie content of the product in question.

Calculate here whether your daily diet contains 20 En% protein. This tab is only visible after gratis inlog. 

Objectives:
Hypertension (HTN) is regarded as a serious public health issue throughout the world. High blood pressure (BP) may be improved by carotenoid supplementation; however, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) provide conflicting evidence. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Do carotenoid supplements reduce blood pressure?

Study design:
This review article included 19 RCTs involving 1,151 participants.
Evidence for all systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure and heart rate values was high quality.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found carotenoid supplementation significantly reduced the systolic blood pressure (SBP) [WMD = -2.492 mmHg, 95% CI = -4.52 to -0.47, p = 0.016] and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) [MD = -1.60 mmHg, 95% CI = -2.73 to -0.47, p = 0.005]. 

The investigators found greater effects were observed in Asian participants, those aged >50 years, nonhealthy participants and participants with a baseline systolic blood pressure ≥130 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure ≥80 mmHg and at carotenoid dose >10 mg. 

The investigators found dose-response analysis showed that carotenoid supplementation decreased systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure levels at doses of, respectively, 0-25 and 0-20 mg/d. 

The investigators concluded daily 10-25 mg carotenoid supplementation decrease blood pressure, especially in nonhealthy study participants with high blood presurre baseline levels.

Original title: 
Effect of carotenoid supplementation on blood pressure in adults: a GRADE-assessed systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials by Behzadi M, Akbarzadeh M, […], Bideshki MV. 

Link:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38219250/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on RCT’s/sensitivity analysis, carotenoids and cardiovascular diseases right here.

Heart patients are advised to choose low fat, low salt and fiber rich products. These products can be found here. 

Patients with a high blood pressure are advised to choose low salt products. These products can be found here. 

Coenzyme Q10 supplements improve endothelial function 

Objectives:
Coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10) has gained attention as a potential therapeutic agent for improving endothelial function. Several randomized clinical trials (RCTs) have investigated CoQ10 supplementation's effect on endothelial function. However, these studies have yielded conflicting results. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Do coenzyme  Q10 supplements improve endothelial function?

Study design:
This review article included 12 RCTs comprising 489 subjects.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found significant increases in Flow Mediated Dilation (FMD) after CoQ10 supplementation [WMD = 1.45, 95% CI = 0.55 to 2.36, p < 0.02], but there was no increase in Vascular cell adhesion protein (VCAM) and Intercellular adhesion molecule (ICAM) following Q10 supplementation. 

The investigators found the sensitivity analysis showed that the effect size was robust in FMD and VCAM. 

The investigators found in meta-regression, changes in FMD percent were significantly associated with the dose of supplementation [slope = 0.01, 95% CI = 0.004 to 0.03, p = 0.006].

The investigators concluded coenzyme Q10 supplementation has a positive effect on Flow Mediated Dilation (FMD) in a dose-dependent manner.  

Original title: 
Effect of Coenzyme Q10 Supplementation on Vascular Endothelial Function: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials by Daei S, Ildarabadi A, […], Mohamadi-Sartang M. 

Link:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38630421/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on RCT’s/sensitivity analysis, coenzyme Q10 and cardiovascular diseases right here. 

Endothelial function can be assessed non-invasively using the flow-mediated dilation (FMD) technique. Flow-mediated dilation (FMD) refers to dilation (widening) of an artery when blood flow increases in that artery.

Heart patients are recommended to choose high-fiber, low-fat and low-salt products.

High-fiber, low-fat and low-salt products are products with minimum 1.5 grams of fiber per 100 kcal, maximum 30 En% fat and maximum 0.2 grams salt per 100 kcal. 
Find here which products are suitable for heart patients.

Calculate here whether your daily diet meets the requirements for heart patients.

Calculate here whether your diet for the past six months meets the requirements for heart patients.

Objectives:
Carotenoids appear to have anticancer effects. Prospective evidence for the relation between serum carotenoids and breast cancer is controversial. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Do higher carotenoids levels (likes, α-carotene, β-carotene, β-cryptoxanthin, lycopene, zeaxanthin and lutein) reduce breast cancer risk among women?

Study design:
This review article included 17 nested case-control studies and 1 cohort study, published between 1984 and 2016 with a total of 20,188 participants. 
Median follow-up ranged from 8 months to 21 years during which 7,608 breast cancer cases were reported. 
All studies assessed circulating carotenoids using high-performance liquid chromatography. The majority of studies carried out on circulating carotenoids and the risk of breast cancer were adjusted for the following variables: BMI (n = 9), dietary variables (n = 8), age (n = 9), alcohol (n = 6), age at menarche (n = 6) and age at first birth (n = 8). 
According to the quality assessment, except for 2 studies, other publications had high quality. 

There was no publication bias. 

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found that the highest levels of total carotenoids compared to the lowest were significantly related to a 24% lower risk of breast cancer [relative risk (RR) = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.62 to 0.93, I2 = 45.6%, p = 0.075]. 
According to the sensitivity analysis, no study affected the overall RR. 

The investigators found according to linear dose-response analysis, the risk of breast cancer decreased by 2% for every 10 μg/dL of total carotenoids [RR = 0.98, 95% CI = 0.97 to 0.99]. A steady drop in the risk of breast cancer was observed for total carotenoid concentrations <1200 μg/dL followed by a plateau. The level of evidence was graded as low.

The investigators found that the highest levels of α-carotene compared to the lowest were significantly related to a 23% lower risk of breast cancer [relative risk (RR) = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.68 to 0.87, I2 = 0.0%, p = 0.48]. 
According to the sensitivity analysis, no study affected the overall RR. 

The investigators found according to linear dose-response analysis, the risk of breast cancer decreased by 22% for every 10 μg/dL of α-carotene [RR = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.66 to 0.93]. 
No evidence for nonlinear association was found. The level of evidence was graded as low. 

The investigators found that the highest levels of β-carotene compared to the lowest were significantly related to a 20% lower risk of breast cancer [relative risk (RR) = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.65 to 0.98, I2 = 56.5%, p = 0.004]. 
According to the sensitivity analysis, no study affected the overall RR. 

The investigators found according to linear dose-response analysis, the risk of breast cancer decreased by 4% for every 10 μg/dL of β-carotene [RR = 0.96, 95% CI = 0.93 to 0.99]. No evidence for nonlinear association was found. The level of evidence was graded as low. 

The investigators found that the highest levels of β-cryptoxanthin compared to the lowest were significantly related to a 15% lower risk of breast cancer [relative risk (RR) = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.74 to 0.96, I2 = 0.0%, p = 0.80]. 
According to the sensitivity analysis, no study affected the overall RR. 

The investigators found according to linear dose-response analysis, the risk of breast cancer decreased by 10% for every 10 μg/dL of β-cryptoxanthin [RR = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.82 to 0.99]. 

The investigators found that the highest levels of lycopene compared to the lowest were significantly related to a 14% lower risk of breast cancer [relative risk (RR) = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.76 to 0.98, I2 = 0.0%, p = 0.46]. 
According to the sensitivity analysis, no study affected the overall RR. 

The investigators found that the highest levels of lutein compared to the lowest were significantly related to a 30% lower risk of breast cancer [relative risk (RR) = 0.70, 95% CI = 0.52 to 0.93, I2 = 17.1%, p = 0.30]. 
According to the sensitivity analysis, no study affected the overall RR. 

The investigators concluded that higher levels of carotenoids, α-carotene, β-carotene, β-cryptoxanthin, lycopene and lutein are related to a decreased risk of breast cancer. Additionally, each 10 μg/dL of total carotenoids, α-carotene, β-carotene and β-cryptoxanthin reduce breast cancer risk with 2%, 22%, 4% and 10%, respectively. 

Original title: 
The Association between Circulating Carotenoids and Risk of Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Studies by Dehnavi MK, Ebrahimpour-Koujan S, […], Azadbakht L.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10694674/ 

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on cohort studies/significantly, carotenoids and breast cancer right here. 

Objectives:
Even though many studies have examined the possible effect of low-fat diet on breast cancer survival, the relationship remains unclear. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Does low-fat diet reduce risk of recurrence of breast cancer?

Study design:
This review article included 2 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 1 large multi-center prospective cohort study with 9,966 breast cancer patients.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found post-diagnostic low-fat diet significantly reduced risk of recurrence of breast cancer by 23% [HR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.63 to 0.94, p = 0.009] and all cause mortality of breast cancer by 17% [HR = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.69 to 1.00, p = 0.05].

The investigators concluded post-diagnostic low-fat diet reduces risk of recurrence of breast cancer. However, more trials of the relationship between low-fat diet and all-cause mortality of breast cancer are still needed.

Original title:
Effect of low-fat diet on breast cancer survival: a meta-analysis by Xing MY, Xu SZ and Shen P.

Link:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24606431/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on fat consumption and breast cancer right here.

A low-fat diet is a diet with maximum 30 En% fat and maximum 7 En% saturated fat.  
30 En% fat means that the amounts of fat contribute 30% to the total calories (kcal) of the diet.
If the diet contains 2000 kcal, 66.7 grams of fat contribute 30% to this 2000 kcal.
1 gram of fat gives 9 kcal. Thus, 66.7 grams of fat provide 600 kcal and 600 kcal is 30% of 2000 kcal.

The most easy way to follow a diet a diet with maximum 30 En% fat and maximum 7 En% saturated fat is to choose only meals/products with maximum 30 En% fat and maximum 7 En% saturated fat. Check here which products contain maximum 30 En% fat and maximum 7 En% saturated fat.

However, the most practical way to follow a diet with maximum 30 En% fat and maximum 7 En% saturated fat is, all meals/products that you eat on a daily basis should contain on average maximum 30 En% fat and maximum 7 En% saturated fat.

To do this, use the 7-points nutritional profile app to see whether your daily diet contains maximum 30 En% fat and maximum 7 En% saturated fat.

Objectives:
Although exercise can improve insulin sensitivity, no adequate synthesis exists of exercise intervention studies with regard to their effect on insulin sensitivity. Therefore, this review article (meta-analysis) has beeen conducted.

Does exercise improve insuline sensitivity?

Study design:
This review article included data found across 2509 subjects (115 samples, 78 reports).
The median of mean age was 43 years.
The median of mean preintervention fasting insulin was 8 mU/L.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found the overall mean effect size for 2-group postintervention comparisons was 0.38 [95% CI = 0.25-0.51, I2 = 0%] and for 2-group pre-post comparisons was 0.43 [95% CI = 0.30-0.56, I2 = 52%].

The investigators found higher mean insulin sensitivity for treatment than control subjects.

The investigators found the postintervention mean of 0.38 was consistent with treatment subjects ending studies with a mean fasting insulin of 6.8 mU/L if control participants’ mean fasting insulin were 7.9 mU/L.
Exploratory moderator analyses did not document different insulin sensitivity effect sizes across intervention characteristics or sample attributes.

The investigators concluded exercise is a valuable primary care and community health strategy for healthy adults to improve insulin sensitivity and lower the risk for diabetes conferred by insulin resistance.

Original title:
Insulin Sensitivity Following Exercise Interventions: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Outcomes Among Healthy Adults by Conn VS, Koopman RJ, […], Hafdahl AR.

Link:
http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/2150131913520328

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more studies/information on physical activity and diabetes right here.

Objectives:
Evidence shows cruciferous vegetables exhibit chemoprotective properties, commonly attributed to their rich source of isothiocyanates. However, epidemiological data examining the association between cruciferous vegetable intake and colorectal neoplasms have been inconclusive. Therefore, this review article (meta-analysis) has been conducted.

Does cruciferous vegetable intake decrease colon cancer risk?

Study design:
This review article included 33 articles.
Subgroup analysis for individual cruciferae types (n = 8 studies) and GST polymorphism (n = 8 studies) were performed. Pooled adjusted odds ratios (ORs) comparing highest and lowest categories of dietary pattern scores were calculated.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found when comparing highest with lowest categorie, cruciferous vegetable intake significantly reduced risk of colon cancer with 16% [OR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.72-0.98, p value heterogeneity 0.001].

The investigators found when comparing highest with lowest categorie, broccoli intake significantly reduced risk of colorectal neoplasms with 20% [OR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.65-0.99, p value heterogeneity = 0.02].

The investigators found stratification by GST genotype showed that the GSTT1 null genotype confered a reduction in colorectal neoplasms risk of 22% [OR = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.64-0.95, p value heterogeneity = 0.32].

The investigators concluded this meta-analysis provides support to the hypothesis that cruciferous vegetable intake protects against cancer of the colon. This meta-analysis also demonstrates the significance of gene-diet interactions and the importance of assessing individual cruciferous vegetables.

Original title:
Cruciferous vegetables and risk of colorectal neoplasms: a systematic review and meta-analysis by Tse G and Eslick GD.

Link:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24341734

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more studies/information on colon cancer and cruciferous vegetable intake right here.

Objectives:
Does physical activity reduce gastric cancer risk?

Study design:
This review article included 7 cohort studies (with mean reported follow-up ranging from 6 to 18.8 years) and 9 case control studies reporting 11,111 cases of gastric cancer among 1,606,760 patients.

There was no evidence of publication bias, both quantitatively [Begg and Mazumdar rank correlation test, p = 0.62] and qualitatively, on visual inspection of the funnel plot.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found the risk of gastric cancer was 21% [OR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.71-0.87, I2 = 55%]  lower among the most physically active people as compared with the least physically active people, after adjustment for important confounders, including age, obesity, and other risk factors for gastric cancer (smoking, alcohol, dietary patterns and socioeconomic status).
This protective effect was seen for gastric cancers in the cardia [OR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.63-1.00, 4 studies] and distal stomach [OR = 0.63, 95% CI = 0.52-0.76, 5 studies].

The investigators found increasing physical activity was associated with a reduced risk of gastric cancer in both men [OR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.75-0.99, 10 studies] and women [OR = 0.72, 95% CI = 0.55-0.94, 3 studies].

The investigators found in 12 studies that increased recreational physical activity showed an 18% reduction in gastric cancer risk [OR = 0.82, 95% CI = 0.72-0.94].

The investigators found the effect size was significantly smaller in high-quality studies [OR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.75-0.99, 6 studies] as compared with low-quality studies [OR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.69-0.81, 10 studies]. The results were consistent across sex, study quality, study design and geographic location.

The investigators concluded physical activity - especially recreational physical activity - is associated with reduced risk of gastric cancer. Lifestyle interventions focusing on increasing physical activity may decrease the global burden of gastric cancer, in addition to a myriad of other health benefits with being physically active, which include cardiovascular, metabolic and psychologic wellbeing.

Original title:
Physical Activity Is Associated with Reduced Risk of Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis by Singh S, Varayil JE, […], Iyer PG.

Link:
http://cancerprevention.aacrjournals.org/content/7/1/12.abstract

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more studies/information on physical activity and cancer right here.

Objectives:
Previous meta-analyses identified an inverse association of coffee consumption with the risk of type 2 diabetes. However, an updated meta-analysis is needed because new studies comparing the trends of association for caffeinated and decaffeinated coffee have since been published. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Does coffee intake reduce type 2 diabetes risk in a dose-response manner?

Study design:
This review article included 28 prospective cohort studies with 1109272 study participants and 45335 cases of type 2 diabetes. The follow-up duration ranged from 10 months to 20 years.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found for compared with no or rare coffee consumption, a significant reduced risk of type 2 diabetes of:
8% [RR = 0.92, 95% CI = 0.90-0.94] for 1 cup/day;
15% [RR= 0.85, 95% CI = 0.82-0.88] for 2 cups/day;
21% [RR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.75-0.83] for 3 cups/day;
25% [RR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.71-0.80] for 4 cups/day;
29% [RR = 0.71, 95% CI = 0.65-0.76] for 5 cups/day and;
33% [RR = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.61-0.74] for 6 cups/day.

The investigators found a significant decreased risk of type 2 diabetes of 9% [RR = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.89-0.94] for an increasement of 1 cup/day caffeinated coffee and 6% [RR = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.91-0.98] for an increasement of 1 cup/day decaffeinated coffee [p for difference = 0.17].

The investigators concluded coffee consumption is inversely associated with the risk of type 2 diabetes in a dose-response manner. Both caffeinated and decaffeinated coffee is associated with reduced diabetes risk.

Original title:
Caffeinated and decaffeinated coffee consumption and risk of type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and a dose-response meta-analysis by Ding M, Bhupathiraju SN, […], Hu FB.

Link:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24459154

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more studies/information on coffee consumption and diabetes right here.
 

Objectives:
The prevalence of obesity and diabetes is increasing among children, adolescents and adults. Although estimates of the efficacy of exercise training on fasting insulin and insulin resistance have been provided for adults, similar estimates have not been provided for youth. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Study design:
This review article included 24 trials.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found a small to moderate effect for exercise training on fasting insulin and improving insulin resistance in youth [Hedges’ d effect size = 0.48, 95% CI = 0.22-0.74, p 0.001 and 0.31, 95% CI = 0.06-0.56, p 0.05, respectively].

The investigators concluded there is evidence to support the use of exercise training in the prevention and treatment of type 2 diabetes in youth.

Original title:
Exercise and Insulin Resistance in Youth: A Meta-Analysis by Fedewa MV, Gist NH, […], Dishman RK.

Link:
http://www.pediatricsdigest.mobi/content/133/1/e163.abstract

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information/studies on diabetes and sport nutrition right here.

Objectives:
The association of red meat consumption with the risk of stomach cancer has been reported by many studies, with inconclusive results. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Does a high red meat consumption increase stomach cancer risk?

Study design:
This review article included a total of 18 studies (cohort and case-control studies) involving 1,228,327 subjects.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found for the highest versus lowest categories of red meat intake a significant increased risk of 37% for gastric cancer [pooled RR = 1.37, 95% CI = 1.18-1.59, I2 = 67.6%, p 0.001].

The investigators found in population-based case-control studies, a significant increased risk of 58% for gastric cancer [pooled RR = 1.58, 95% CI = 1.22-2.06, I2 = 73.0%, p 0.001].

The investigators found in hospital-based case-control studies, a significant increased risk of 63% for gastric cancer [pooled RR = 1.63, 95% CI = 1.38-1.92, I2 = 19.1%, p = 0.284].

The investigators found, however, no association among cohort studies [RR = 1.00, 95% CI = 0.83-1.20, I2 = 33.9%, p = 0.158].

The investigators found the significant association was also presented in the subgroup analysis by geographic area (Asia, Europe), publication year (≥2000), sample size (1,000, ≥1,000) and quality score (7 stars, ≥7 stars).

The investigators found in dose-response analysis that every 100 g/day increment in red meat intake significant increased gastric cancer risk with 17% [RR = 1.17, 95% CI = 1.05-1.32].

The investigators found in linear regression model that the risk of gastric cancer increased with increasing level of red meat consumption.

The investigators concluded that a increased intake of red meat might be a risk factor for stomach cancer. Might be because the risk was not significant among cohort studies. Therefore, further larger prospective cohort studies are warranted to verify this association.

Original title:
Red meat consumption and stomach cancer risk: a meta-analysis by Song P, Lu M, […], Zhao Q.

Link:
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00432-014-1637-z

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more studies/information on meat intake and cancer right here.
 

Objectives:
The association between meat consumption and the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is still inconclusive. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Does meat consumption increase risk of hepatocellular carcinoma?

Study design:
This review article included 7 cohort studies and 10 case-control studies.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found for the highest vs. lowest consumption levels a non-significant increased risk for hepatocellular carcinoma of 10% [RR = 1.10, 95% CI = 0.85-1.42] for red meat, a non-significant increased risk of 1% [RR = 1.01, 95% CI = 0.79-1.28] for processed meat and a non-significant decreased risk of 3% [RR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.85-1.11] for total meat. Non-significant means, there is no association with a 95% confidence.

The investigators found for the highest vs. lowest consumption levels a significant decreased risk for hepatocellular carcinoma of 31% [RR = 0.69, 95% CI = 0.58-0.81] for white meat and a significant decreased risk of 22% [RR = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.67-0.90] for fish. The results remained quite stable after stratification by the confounding factors.
Significant means, there is an association with a 95% confidence.

The investigators concluded a high level of white meat or fish consumption reduces the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma, while intake of red meat, processed meat or total meat is not associated with hepatocellular carcinoma risk. These results suggest that dietary intervention may be a promising approach for prevention of hepatocellular carcinoma, which still need to be confirmed by further well-designed prospective studies and experimental research.

Original title:
Systematic review with meta-analysis: meat consumption and the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma by Luo J, Yang Y, [...], Zhu Y.

Link:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24588342

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more studies/information on fish consumption, meat consumption and cancer right here.

A review article of cohort studies or case-control studies will answer the following question:
"Should I change my diet?".

Objectives:
Is there an association between meat intake and risk of esophageal cancer?

Study design:
This review article included 7 cohort studies and 28 case-control studies.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found for the highest versus lowest total meat consumption categories a non-significant increased risk of 19% [95% CI = 0.98-1.46] for esophageal cancer.

The investigators found for the highest versus lowest red meat consumption categories a significant increased risk of 55% [95% CI = 1.22-1.96] for esophageal cancer.

The investigators found for the highest versus lowest processed meat consumption categories a significant increased risk of 33% [95% CI = 1.04-1.69] for esophageal cancer.

The investigators found for the highest versus lowest white meat consumption categories a significant decreased risk of 28% [95% CI = 0.60-0.86] for esophageal cancer.

The investigators found for the highest versus lowest poultry consumption categories a significant decreased risk of 17% [95% CI = 0.72-0.96] for esophageal cancer.

The investigators found for the highest versus lowest fish consumption categories a non-significant decreased risk of 5% [95% CI = 0.76-1.19] for esophageal cancer.

The investigators found when stratified by histological subtype, positive associations among esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and red meat, white meat and poultry and esophageal adenocarcinoma with total meat and processed meat.

The investigators concluded red meat and processed meat consumption increase risk of esophageal cancer, while white meat and poultry decrease risk of esophageal cancer. Fish consumption is not associated with incidence of esophageal cancer.

Original title:
Meat consumption is associated with esophageal cancer risk in a meat- and cancer-histological-type dependent manner by Zhu HC, Yang X, […], Sun XC.

Link:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24395380

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more studies/information on meat consumption and cancer right here.
 

Objectives:
Previous observational studies regarding the existence of an association between folate intake and the risk of breast cancer have been inconsistent. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Does a higher dietary folate intake reduce breast cancer risk?

Study design:
This review article included 14 prospective cohort studies that reported data on 677,858 individuals.
The participant follow-up period ranged 4.7-17.4 years and the number of individuals per study ranged 11,699-88,818.
There was no publication bias.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found no association between dietary folate intake and breast cancer risk for highest versus lowest category  [RR =  0.97, 95% CI = 0.90-1.05, p  = 0.451, I2 =  57.5%, p = 0.004].

The investigators found dose-response meta-analysis findings showed no association between the risk of breast cancer and a 100 µg/day increase in dietary folate intake [RR = 0.99, 95% CI = 0.98-1.01, p = 0.361, I2 = 66.2%, p 0.001].

The investigators found evidence of a nonlinear relationship between dietary folate intake and the risk of breast cancer.

A daily dietary folate intake of 200-320 µg was associated with a reduced risk of breast cancer. However, daily folate intake levels >400 µg was associated with a increased risk of breast cancer.

The investigators found overall folate intake level was associated with a reduced breast cancer risk of 36% if the patients had a daily alcohol intake >10 g [RR for highest versus lowest category = 0.64, 95% CI = 0.43-0.97].

The investigators concluded there are no effects of increased dietary folate intake on the incidence of breast cancer. But, a daily dietary folate intake of 200-320 µg was associated with a reduced risk of breast cancer. However, daily folate intake levels >400 µg was associated with a increased risk of breast cancer. Future studies should focus on specific populations in order to analyze primary breast cancer prevention.

Original title:
Folate Intake and the Risk of Breast Cancer: A Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Studies by Zhang YF, Shi WW, […], Zhou YH.

Link:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4059748/

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more studies/information on folate intake and breast cancer right here.
 

Objectives:
Increasing evidence suggests that the Mediterranean diet can reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease. Olive oil is the hallmark of this dietary pattern. Therefore, this review article has been conducted.

Does olive oil consumption reduce risk of cardiovascular disease?

Study design:
This review article included case-control, prospective cohort studies and a randomised controlled trial investigating the specific association between olive oil consumption and the risk of cardiovascular disease (101,460 participants) or stroke (38,673 participants). The results of all observational studies were adjusted for total energy intake.

Evidence of heterogeneity was apparent for cardiovascular disease, but not for stroke. Both the Egger test (p = 0.06) and the funnel plot suggested small-study effects.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found in case-controle studies a non-significant reduced risk of 27% [relative risk = 0.73, 95% CI = 0.44-1.21] for cardiovascular disease for a 25g increase in olive oil consumption.

The investigators found in cohort studies a non-significant reduced risk of 4% [relative risk = 0.96, 95% CI = 0.78-1.18] for cardiovascular disease for a 25g increase in olive oil consumption.

The investigators found in cohort studies olive oil consumption significantly reduced risk of stroke with 26% [relative risk = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.60-0.92].

The investigators found random-effects model showed a significant reduced risk of 18% [RR = 0.82, 95% CI = 0.70, 0.96] for combining all cardiovascular events (CHD and stroke).

The investigators concluded available studies support an inverse association of olive oil consumption with stroke and with stroke and cardiovascular disease combined. This finding is in agreement with the recent successful results of the PREDIMED randomised controlled trial.

Original title:
Olive oil consumption and risk of CHD and/or stroke: a meta-analysis of case-control, cohort and intervention studies by Martínez-González MA, Dominguez LJ and Delgado-Rodríguez M.

Link:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24775425

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more studies/information on cardiovascular disease right here.

Objectives:
What is the impact of antioxidants (N-acetylcysteine (NAC), polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) and vitamins) on incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) and duration of length of hospital stay?

Study design:
This review article included 23 RCTs that reported outcomes of 4278 patients undergoing cardiac surgery.
A total of 10 RCTs with 1,026 patients (513 cases were allocated to the NAC and 513 cases to the control group, with a mean age of 63.2 years and 76.8% being males), 8 RCTs with 2,687 patients (with a mean age of 64.17 years and 77.6% being males), and 5 RCTs with 565 patients (with a mean age of 65.17 years and 73.6% being males) investigated the effect of NAC, PUFA and antioxidant vitamins on POAF, respectively.

There was no publication bias.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found pooled effects estimates on postoperative atrial fibrillation showed a significant reduction after:
NAC [OR = 0.56, 95% CI = 0.40-0.77, p 0.001, I2 = 15%, p = 0.3];
PUFA [OR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.71-0.99, p = 0.03] and;
Vitamin C treatment [OR = 0.50, 95% CI = 0.27-0.91, p = 0.02, I2 = 50%].

The investigators found hospital length of stay was not significant reduced after NAC therapy [SMD = 0.082, 95% CI = -0.09 to 0.25, p = 0.3, I2 = 0.0%, p = 0.7], but could be significant decreased with PUFA [SMD = -0.185, 95% CI = -0.35 to -0.018, p = 0.03, I2 = 11%, p = 0.3] and vitamin C [SMD = -0.325, 95% CI = -0.50 to -0.14, p 0.01, I2 = 60.4%, p = 0.056].
Significant because the p-values were less than the p-value of 0.05.

The investigators concluded perioperative antioxidant supplementations with N-acetylcysteine, polyunsaturated fatty acids and vitamin C prevent atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery. Moreover, polyunsaturated fatty acids and vitamin C are capable to reduce hospital stay, whereas N-acetylcysteine lacks this capacity.

Original title:
Antioxidant supplementations for prevention of atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery: an updated comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of 23 randomized controlled trials by Ali-Hassan-Sayegha S, Mirhosseinia SJ, […], Liakopoulose OJ.

Link:
http://icvts.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2014/02/19/icvts.ivu020.long

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more studies on cardiovascular diseases, antioxidants, NAC, PUFA, vitamin C and p-value of 0.05/95% CI right here. 

Objectives:
Does niacine supplementation reduce blood lipids levels in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus?

Study design:
This review article included randomized controlled trials.

The meta-analysis showed the absence of publication bias and any dose-response relations between niacin and effect size.

There was a significant heterogeneity for the impact of niacin on LDL cholesterol and fasting plasma glucose.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found niacin supplementation significantly increased HDL cholesterol with 0.27 mmol/L [95% CI = 0.24 to 0.30, p 0.001] in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

The investigators found niacin supplementation significantly reduced LDL cholesterol with 0.250 mmol/L [95% CI = -0.47 to -0.03, p 0.05] in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

The investigators found niacin supplementation significantly reduced triglycerides with 0.39 mmol/L [95% CI = -0.43 to -0.34, p 0.001] in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

The investigators found niacin supplementation significantly increased fasting plasma glucose with 0.085 mmol/L [95% CI = 0.029 to 0.141, p 0.05] compared with controls in patients with long term treatment.

The investigators concluded niacin alone or in combination improves lipid abnormalities in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, but requires monitoring of glucose in long term treatment.

Original title:
Effect of niacin on lipids and glucose in patients with type 2 diabetes: A meta-analysis of randomized, controlled clinical trials by Ding Y, Li Y and Wen A.

Link:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25306426

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information on niacin (vitamin B3) and diabetes.

Objectives:
Observational studies suggest an association between dietary fiber intake and risk of type 2 diabetes, but the results are inconclusive. Therefore, this review article (meta-analysis) has been conducted.

Does dietary fiber intake reduce risk of type 2 diabetes?

Study design:
This review article included 17 prospective cohort studies of dietary fiber intake and risk of type 2 diabetes involving 19,033 cases and 488,293 participants.

Results and conclusions:
The investigators found total dietary fiber intake significantly reduced risk of type 2 diabetes with 19% [combined RR = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.73-0.90].

The investigators found dietary cereal fiber intake significantly reduced risk of type 2 diabetes with 23% [combined RR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.69-0.85].

The investigators found dietary fruit fiber intake significantly reduced risk of type 2 diabetes with 6% [combined RR = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.88-0.99].

The investigators found dietary insoluble fiber intake significantly reduced risk of type 2 diabetes with 25% [combined RR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.63-0.89].

The investigators found a nonlinear relationship of total dietary fiber intake with risk of type 2 diabetes [p for nonlinearity 0.01].

The investigators found dietary fiber intake of 15g per day non-significantly reduced risk of type 2 diabetes with 2% [combined RR = 0.98, 95% CI = 0.90-1.06].

The investigators found dietary fiber intake of 20g per day non-significantly reduced risk of type 2 diabetes with 3% [combined RR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.87-1.07].

The investigators found dietary fiber intake of 25g per day significantly reduced risk of type 2 diabetes with 11% [combined RR = 0.89, 95% CI = 0.80-0.99].

The investigators found dietary fiber intake of 30g per day significantly reduced risk of type 2 diabetes with 24% [combined RR = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.65-0.88].

The investigators found dietary fiber intake of 35g per day significantly reduced risk of type 2 diabetes with 34% [combined RR = 0.66, 95% CI = 0.53-0.82].

The investigators found that the risk of type 2 diabetes decreased by 6% [combined RR = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.93-0.96] for 2 g/day increment in cereal fiber intake.

The investigators concluded that the intakes of dietary fiber, at least 25g total dietary fiber intake per day reduce risk of type 2 diabetes.

Original title:
Dietary fiber intake and risk of type 2 diabetes: a dose–response analysis of prospective studies by Yao B, Fang H, […], Zhao Y.

Link:
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10654-013-9876-x

Additional information of El Mondo:
Find more information on fiber and type 2 diabetes right here.